Advertisement

Anatomical single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

  • Michael R. Carmont
  • Sven Scheffler
  • Tim Spalding
  • Jeremy Brown
  • Paul M. Sutton
Article

Abstract

We present a review of the literature looking at the anatomy of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament, the biomechanical aspects of ACL reconstruction, review the outcomes of single and double bundle ACL reconstruction and present the current techniques for anatomic single bundle reconstruction.

Keywords

Anatomical Single bundle Cruciate Reconstruction ACL 

Notes

Disclosure

M.R. Carmont: none; S. Scheffler: consultant to Smith & Nephew, Payment by Smith & Nephew for surgical courses; T. Spalding: consultant to Smith & Nephew, Payment by Smith & Nephew for lectures on Anatomic ACL reconstruction; J. Brown: none; P.M. Sutton: none.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.
    Renstron P, Lunqvist A, Arndt E, et al. Non contact injuries in female athlete: an International Olympic Committee current concepts statement. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42:394–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Griffin LY, Albohm MJ, Arndt EA, et al. Understanding and preventing non-contact ACL injuries. A review of the Hunt Valley II meeting January 2005. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1512–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oiestad BE, Holm I, Aune AK, et al. Knee function and prevalence of knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate reconstructions: a prospective study with 10–15 year follow up. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:2201–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lohmander LS, Englund PM, Dahl LL, Roos EM. The long-term consequences of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries: osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med. 2007;16:323–9.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Amis A, Jakob H. Anterior cruciate ligament graft positioning tensioning and twisting. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998;6:S2–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zavras TD, Race A, Bull AM, Amis AA. A comparative study of “isometric” points for anterior cruciate ligament graft attachment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthosc. 2001;9:28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mott HW. Semitendinosus anatomic reconstruction for cruciate ligament insufficiency. Clin Orth Relat Res. 1983;172:90–2.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zaricznyj B. Reconstruction of the ACL of the knee using a doubled tendon graft. Clin Orth Relat Res. 1987;220:162–75.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Salmon L, Russell V, Musgrave T, Pinczewski L, Refshauge K. Incidence and risk factors for graft rupture and contralateral rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:948–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Edwards A, Bull AM, Amis AA. The attachments of the anteromedial and posterolateral fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament. Part 1: tibial attachment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:1414–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Edwards A, Bull AM, Amis AA. The attachments of the anteromedial and posterolateral fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament. Part 2: femoral attachment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:29–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tsukada H, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Fukuda A, Toh S. Anatomical analysis of the anterior cruciate ligament femoral and tibial footprints. J Orthop Sci. 2008;13:122–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ferretti M, Ekdahl M, Shen W, Fu FH. Osseous landmarks of the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:1218–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hutchinson MR, Ash SA. Residents Ridge: Assessing the cortical thickness of the lateral wall and roof of the intercondylar notch. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:931–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kopf S, Musahl V, Tashman S, et al. A systematic review of the femoral origin and tibial insertion morphology of the ACL. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17:213–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Farrow LD, Chen MR, Cooperman DR, Victoroff BN, Goodfellow DB. Morphology of the femoral intercondylar notch. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2150–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kopf S, Forsythe B, Wong AK, et al. Non-anatomic tunnel position in traditional transtibial single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction evaluated by three dimensional computer tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1427–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Steiner M. Anatomic single bundle ACL reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2009;17:247–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Van Eck CF, Martins CA, Vyas SM, et al. Femoral intercondylar notch shape and dimensions in ACL injured patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:1257–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Purnell ML, Larson AI, Clancy W. Anterior cruciate ligament insertions on the tibia and femur and their relationships to critical bony landmarks using high resolution volume rendering computed tomography. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:2083–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Odensten M, GIllqvist J. A modified technique for ACL surgery using a new drill guide for isomatrc positioning of the ACL. Clin Orth Relat Res. 1986;213:154–8.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mochizuki T, Muneta T, Nagase T, Shirasawa S, Akitw K, Sekiya I. Cadaveric knee observation study for describing anatomic femoral tunnel placement for two bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(4):356–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Siebold R, Ellert T, Metz S, Metz J. Femoral insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry and arthroscopic orientation models for double bundle bone tunnel placement-a cadaver study. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:585–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zantop T, Wellmann M, Fu FH, Petersen W. Tunnel positioning of anteromedial and posterolateral bundles in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anatomic and radiographic findings. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:65–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hutchinson MR, Bae TS. Reproducibility of anatomical tibial landmarks for ACL reconstructions. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:777–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Purnell ML, Larson AI. Mini-incision patellar tendon harvest and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using critical bony landmarks. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2009;17:234–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Siebold R, Ellert T, Metz S, Metz J. Tibial insertions of anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: Morphometry, arthroscopy landmarks and orientation a model for bone tunnel placement. Arthoscopy. 2008;24:154–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Colombet P, Robinson J, Christel P, et al. Morphology of anterior cruciate ligament attachments for anatomic reconstruction: a cadaveric dissection and radiographic study. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:984–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    • Ziegler CG, Pietrini SD, Westerhaus BD et al. Arthroscopically pertinent landmarks for tunnel positioning in single bundle and double bundle reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 2011, In press. This paper provides accurate arthroscopic measurements to locate the tibial tunnel. The tibial ACL attachment center was 7.5 mm medial to the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus, 13.0 mm anterior to the retroeminence ridge and 10.5 mm posterior to the ACL ridge. Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dargel J, Gotter M, Mader K, et al. Biomechanics of the anterior cruciate ligament and implications for surgical reconstruction. Strat Traum Limb Recon. 2007;2:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yamamoto Y, Hsu WH, Woo SL, et al. Knee stability and graft function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of a lateral and an anatomical femoral tunnel placement. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:1825–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lubowitz JH, Bernardini BJ, Ried 3rd JB. Current concepts review: comprehensive physical examination for instability of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:577–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mae T, Shino K, Miyama T. Single versus two femoral socket ACL reconstruction technique. Biomechanical analysis using a robotic simulator. Arthroscopy. 2001;17:708–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Radford WJ, Amis A. Biomechanics of a double prosthetic ligament in the ACL deficient knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72:1038–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A, et al. Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:660–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Markolf KL, Park S, Jackson SR, McAllister DR. Anterior-posterior and rotatory stability of single and double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:107–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Musahl V, Bedi A, Citak M et al. Effect of angle bundle and double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions on pivot shift kinematics in anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus deficient knees. Am J Sports Med 2010, In press.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kondo E, Yasuda K, Azuma H, Tanabe Y, Yagi T. Prospective clinical comparisons of anatomic double bundle versus single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in 328 consecutive procedures. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1675–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ho JY, Gardiner A, Shah V, Steiner ME. Equal kinematics between central anatomic single bundle and double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:464–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Voos JE, Musahl V, Maak TG, Wickiewicz TL, Pearle AD. Comparison of tunnel positions in single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using computer navigation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:1282–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jarvela T. Double bundle versus single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:500–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Meredick RB, Vance KJ, Appleby D, Lubowitz JH. Outoome of single bundle versus double bundle reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1414–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Muneta T, Koga H, Mochizuki T. A prospective randomized study of 4 strand semitendonosus anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing single bundle and double bundle techniques. Arthroscopy. 2008;23:618–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Park JK, Sang EK, Sean JK. Comparison of intra-operative stability in ACL reconstruction based on femoral tunnel postions. Orthopaedics. 2010;33:94–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Siebold R, Dehler C, Ellert T. A prospective randomized comparison of double bundle versus single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:137–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Streich NA, Freidrich K, Gotterbarm T, Schmitt H. Reconstruction of the ACL with a semitendinosus tendon graft: a prospective randomized single blinded comparison of double bundle versus single bundle technique in male athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:232–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H. Clinical evaluation of anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:240–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Van Eck CF, Schreiber VM, Mejia HA, et al. “Anatomic” anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of surgical techniques and reporting of surgical data. Arthroscopy. 2010;26:S2–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zantop T, Diermann N, Schumacher T, et al. Anatomical and non-anatomical double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: importance of femoral tunnel location on knee kinematics. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:678–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Piasecki DP, Bach BR Jr, Espinoza Oras AA, Verma NN. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Can anatomic femoral placement be achieved with transtibial technique? Am J Sports Med 2011, In press.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Aglietti P, Giron F, Cuomo P, Losco M, Mondenelli N. Single and double incision double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Ortho Rel Res. 2007;454:108–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Aglietti P, Giron F, Losco M, et al. Comparison between single and double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:25–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Lewis PB, Parameswaran AD, Rue JP, Bach Jr BR. Systematic review of single bundle ACL recosntructionoutcomes: a baseline assessment for consideration of double bundle techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:2028–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rue JP, Lewis PB, Parameswaran AD, Bach Jr BR. Single bundle ACL reconstruction: techniques, overview and comprehensive review results. J Bone Joint Surg. 2008;90 Suppl 4:67–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Araki D, Kuroda R, Kubo S et al. A prospective randomised study of anatomical angle bundle versus double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system. Int Orthop 2010, In press.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Zaffagnini S, Bruni D, Marcheggiani Muccioloi GM, et al. Single bundle patellar tendon versus non-anatomical double bundle hamstrings ACL reconstruction: a prospective randmoised study at 8 year follow up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010, In press.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Izawa T, Okazaki K, Tashiro Y. Comparison of rotatory stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between single and double bundle techniques. Am J Sports Med 2011, In press.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Snow M, Stanish WD. Double bundle ACL reconstruction: how big is the learning curve? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:1195–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Paxton ES, Kymes SM, Brophy RH. Cost effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2010;32:2417–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Loh JC, Fukuda Y, Tsuda E. Knee stability and graft function following Anteriro cruciate ligament reconstruction between 11 o’clock and 10 o’clock femoral tunnel placement: 2002 Richard O’Connor Award Paper. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:297–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Steiner ME, Murray MM, Rodeo SA. Strategies to improve anterior cruciate ligament healing and graft placement. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:176–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Karlsson J. Anatomy is the key. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Fu FH, Jordan SS. The lateral intercondylar ridge: a key to anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2103–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Zantop T, Kuso S, Petersen W, Musahl V, Fu FH. Current techniques in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:938–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kaseta MK, DeFrate LE, Charnock BL, Sullivan RT, Garrett Jr WE. Reconstruction techniques affect femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction. Clin Orth Relat Res. 2008;466:1467–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    • Bird J, Carmont MR, Smith N, Brown C, Thompson P, Spalding T. Validation of a new technique to determine femoral mid-bundle tunnel position in Anterior Cruciate Llgament reconstruction using 3D Computer Tomography analysis. Arthroscopy 2011, In press. This paper describes the mid-condylar measuring technique. With the knee flexed to 90 degrees the centre of the femoral ACL insertion is found at the mid point of the lateral femoral condyle. When the femoral tunnel position obtained by this method was compared to that of a low tunnel obtained using AM portal drilling, the mean position for the center of the femoral tunnel was 0.9 mm from the theoretical optimal center position, compared to 5 mm from the mean position of the traditional tunnels. Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Bernard M, Hertel P. Intraoperative and postoperative insertion control of anterior cruciate ligament-plasty. A radiologic measuring method (quadrant method). Unfallchirurg. 1996;99:332–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Lee BI, Kwon SW, Kim JB, Choi HS, Min KD. Comparison of clinical results according to amount of preserved remnant in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadrupled hamstring graft. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:560–8.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Pinczewski LA, Salmon LJ, Jackson WK, et al. Radiological landmarks for the placement of the tunnels in single bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:172–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Silva A, Sampaio R, Pinto E. Placement of femoral tunnel between the AM and PL bundles using a transtibial technique in single bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:1245–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Staubli HU, Rauschning W. Tibial attachment area of the anterior cruciate ligament in the extended knee position anatomy and cryosections in vitro complemented by magnetic resonance arthrography in vivo. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 1994;2:138–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Basdekis G, Christel P, Anne F. Validation of the position of the femoral tunnels in anatomic double bundle ACL reconstruction with 3D CT scan. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17:1089–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Forsythe B, Kopf S, Wong AK, et al. The location of femoral and tibial tunnels in anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction analyzed by three dimensional computed tomography models. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1418–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Kasten P, Szczodry M, Irrgang J, et al. What is the role of intra-operative fluoroscopic measurements to determine tibial tunnel placement in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:1169–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Harner CD, Honkamp NJ, Ranawat AS. Anteromedial portal technique for creating the anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:113–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Lubowitz JH. Anteromedial technique for the anterior cruciate ligament femoral socket: pitfalls and solutions. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:95–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Silver AG, Kaar SG, Grisell MK, Reagan JM, Farrow LD. Comparison between rigid and flexible systems for drilling the femoral tunnel through an anteromedial portal in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2010;26:790–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Kopf S, Pombo MW, Shen W, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH. The ability of 3 different approaches to restore the anatomic AM bundle femoral insertion site during anatomic ACL reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2011;27:200–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Steiner ME. Independent drilling of tibial and femoral tunnels in ACL reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2009;22:171–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Heming JF, Rand J, Steiner ME. Anatomical limitations of transtibial drilling in ACL reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:1708–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Strauss EJ, Barker JU, McGill K et al. Can anatomic femoral tunnel placement be achieved using a transtibial technique for hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2011, In press.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Dargel J, Schmidt-Wiethoff R, Fischer S, et al. Femoral bone tunnel placement using the transtibial tunnel or the anteromedial portal in ACL reconstruction: a radiographic evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17:220–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Bedi A, Altchek DW. The “footprint” anterior cruciate ligament technique: an anatomic approach to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:1128–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Van Eck CF, Lesniak BP, Schrieber VM, Fu FH. Anatomic single and double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction flowchart. Arthroscopy. 2010;26:258–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    • Siebold R. The concept of the complete footprint restoration with guidelines for single and double bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011, In press. The concept of complete footprint restoration is the likely progression for the future of anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael R. Carmont
    • 1
    • 3
  • Sven Scheffler
    • 2
  • Tim Spalding
    • 3
  • Jeremy Brown
    • 1
  • Paul M. Sutton
    • 1
  1. 1.The Northern General HospitalSheffield University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustSheffieldUK
  2. 2.Centre for Musculoskeletal SurgeryCharite UniversitatsmedizinBerlinGermany
  3. 3.The University Hospitals of Coventry & Warwickshire NHS TrustCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations