Time to Make a Change: Assessing LDL-C Accurately in the Era of Modern Pharmacotherapeutics and Precision Medicine
Purpose of Review
The Friedewald equation for estimation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was published in 1972 as an alternative to direct assessment by preparative ultracentrifugation. In this equation, very low-density lipoprotein is estimated by dividing triglycerides by a fixed factor (5 in mg/dL or 2.2 in mmol/L) and subtracting this term from non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C). This method was derived in fasting samples from a small cohort of patients with primarily genetic dyslipidemias followed at the NIH. The method served well as the global standard for LDL-C estimation for decades, but is not well suited to modern clinical practice because it tends to underestimate LDL-C at low LDL-C and high triglyceride levels. The concern is that underestimation could lead to undertreatment in high-risk patients.
Derived from big data and now validated around the world, a novel LDL-C equation created at Johns Hopkins replaces the fixed factor seen in the classic equation with a patient-specific variable based on triglyceride and non-HDL-C levels.
Given its superior accuracy in fasting and non-fasting populations alike, the novel equation is now the preferred method for LDL-C estimation and is being incorporated by leading clinical laboratories.
KeywordsCardiovascular prevention Dyslipidemia Lipid metabolism Friedewald equation Novel low-density lipoprotein equation Precision medicine
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
Very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
Intermediate-density lipoprotein cholesterol
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol
Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9
National Cholesterol Education Program
10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
American College of Cardiology
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists
Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial
Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research with PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects with Elevated Risk
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
SSM and SRJ have patent applications pending on the novel equation for LDL-C estimation. In addition, SSM reports personal fees for serving on scientific advisory boards for Amgen, Sanofi/Regeneron, Quest Diagnostics, and Akcea Therapeutics, as well as grants/research support from the PJ Schafer Cardiovascular Research Fund, the David and June Trone Family Foundation, American Heart Association, Aetna Foundation, Maryland Innovation Initiative, Nokia, Google, Apple, and iHealth.
Authors VP, RQ, ME, RV, and VS have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance
- 4.Neaton JD, Blackburn H, Jacobs D, Kuller L, Lee DJ, Sherwin R, et al. Serum cholesterol level and mortality findings for men screened in the multiple risk factor intervention trial. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152(7):1490–500. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.152.7.1490.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Wiviott SD, Cannon CP, Morrow DA, Ray KK, Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E, et al. Can low-density lipoprotein be too low? The safety and efficacy of achieving very low low-density lipoprotein with intensive statin therapy: a PROVE IT-TIMI 22 substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(8):1411–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.064.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25):2889–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Zulewski H, Ninnis R, Miserez AR, Baumstark MW, Keller U. VLDL and IDL apolipoprotein B-100 kinetics in familial hypercholesterolemia due to impaired LDL receptor function or to defective apolipoprotein B-100. J Lipid Res. 1998;39(2):380–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9150(95)96509-q.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Kissebah AH, Alfarsi S, Adams PW. Integrated regulation of very low density lipoprotein triglyceride and apolipoprotein-B kinetics in man: normolipemic subjects, familial hypertriglyceridemia and familial combined hyperlipidemia. Metab Clin Exp. 1981;30(9):856–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-0495(81)90064-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Murphy SA, Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, White JA, Lokhnygina Y, et al. Reduction in total cardiovascular events with ezetimibe/simvastatin post-acute coronary syndrome the IMPROVE-IT trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(4):353–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.077.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Nordestgaard BG, Langsted A, Mora S, Kolovou G, Baum H, Bruckert E, et al. Fasting is not routinely required for determination of a lipid profile: clinical and laboratory implications including flagging at desirable concentration cut-points-a joint consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society and European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(25):1944–58. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2016.258897.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 34.van Deventer HE, Miller WG, Myers GL, Sakurabayashi I, Bachmann LM, Caudill SP, et al. Non-HDL cholesterol shows improved accuracy for cardiovascular risk score classification compared to direct or calculated LDL cholesterol in a dyslipidemic population. Clin Chem. 2011;57:490–501. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2010.154773.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 40.Tremblay AJ, Morrissette H, Gagné JM, Bergeron J, Gagné C, Couture P. Validation of the Friedewald formula for the determination of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol compared with beta-quantification in a large population. Clin Biochem. 2004;37(9):785–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.03.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 42.DeLong DM, DeLong ER, Wood PD, Lippel K, Rifkind BM. A comparison of methods for the estimation of plasma low- and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: the lipid research clinics prevalence study. JAMA. 1986;256(17):2372–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1986.03380170088024.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 46.Hattori Y, Suzuki M, Tsushima M, Yoshida M, Tokunaga Y, Wang Y, et al. Development of approximate formula for LDL-chol, LDL-apo B and LDL-chol/LDL-apo B as indices of hyperapobetalipoproteinemia and small dense LDL. Atherosclerosis. 1998;138(2):289–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9150(98)00034-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 51.Osegbe I, Ugonabo M, Chukwuka C, Meka I, Nwosu N. Comparison of calculated versus directly-measured low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol: an evaluation of ten formulas for an HIV-positive population in sub-Saharan Africa. J Lab Physicians. 2017;9(2):111–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2727.199632.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 55.Choi H, Shim JS, Lee MH, Yoon YM, Choi DP, Kim HC. Comparison of formulas for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in general population and high-risk patients with cardiovascular disease. Korean Circ J. 2016;46(5):688–98. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2016.46.5.688.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 58.•• Martin SS, Blaha MJ, Elshazly MB, et al. Comparison of a novel method vs the Friedewald equation for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels from the standard lipid profile. JAMA. 2013;310:2061–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.280532. Initial study to propose the Martin LDL-C equation, which is currently being incorporated globally as the new standard of LDL-C estimation. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 60.Lee J, Jang S, Son H. Validation of the Martin method for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in Korean adults: findings from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2011. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0148147. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148147.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 61.Mehta R, Reyes-rodríguez E, Yaxmehen Bello-chavolla O, et al. Performance of LDL-C calculated with Martin's formula compared to the Friedewald equation in familial combined hyperlipidemia. Atherosclerosis. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.06.868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 63.Bachorik P. Measurement of low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol. In: Rifai N, Warnick G, Dominiczak M, editors. Handbook of lipoprotein testing, 2nd ed. Washington D.C: AACC Press; 2000. p. 245.Google Scholar
- 64.Miller WG, Myers GL, Sakurabayashi I, Bachmann LM, Caudill SP, Dziekonski A, et al. Seven direct methods for measuring HDL and LDL cholesterol compared with ultracentrifugation reference measurement procedures. Clin Chem. 2010;56:977–86. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2009.142810.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 65.Whelton SP, Meeusen JW, Donatp LJ, et al. Evaluating the atherogenic burden of individuals with a Friedewald-estimated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol < 70 mg/dL compared with a novel low-density lipoprotein estimation method. J Clin Lipidol. 2017;11(4):1065–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2017.05.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 67.Sathiyakumar V, Park J, Quispe R, Elshazly MB, Michos ED, Banach M, et al. Impact of novel LDL-C assessment on the utility of secondary non-HDL-C and ApoB targets in selected worldwide dyslipidemia guidelines. Circulation. 2018;138:244–54. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.117.032463.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar