Advertisement

Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports

, Volume 7, Issue 6, pp 409–410 | Cite as

Smoking in Women—an Underestimated Relationship?

  • Rachel HuxleyEmail author
Invited Commentary
  • 91 Downloads

Historically in medicine, chronic disease risk factors—including smoking—have been regarded as exerting the same influence on risk of disease in women as in men. This assumption was largely predicated on the fact that most of the early cohort studies were comprised solely of men and the findings were necessarily extrapolated to women for want of sex-specific data [1]. However, with the subsequent initiation and maturation of large prospective studies of only women or of mixed populations, this assumption has been increasingly put to the test and found wanting [2, 3].

Just as there are subtle age differences in the relationships between certain risk factors with risk of disease, so too are there marked and clinically meaningful sex differences—often marked—in the strength of the association between some risk factors with chronic disease. A now classic example is diabetes, which confers a much stronger relative hazard for fatal coronary heart disease (CHD) in women than in men, which is...

Keywords

Smoking Women Chronic disease 

Notes

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Rachel Huxley declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Editorial. Taking sex into account in medicine. Lancet. 2011;378:1826.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huxley R, Barzi F, Woodward M. Excess risk of fatal coronary heart disease associated with diabetes in men and women: meta-analysis of 37 prospective cohort studies. BMJ. 2006;332:73–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huxley RR, Woodward M. Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for coronary heart disease in women compared with men: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Lancet. 2011;378:1297–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peters SA, Huxley RR, Woodward M. Smoking as a risk factor for stroke in women compared with men: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 81 cohorts, including 3,980,359 individuals and 42,401 strokes. Stroke. 2013.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huxley RR, Yatsuya H, Lutsey PL, Woodward M, Alonso A, Folsom AR. Impact of age at smoking initiation, dosage, and time since quitting on cardiovascular disease in African Americans and Whites: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;175:816–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barzi F, Huxley R, Jamrozik K, Lam TH, Ueshima H, Gu D, et al. Association of smoking and smoking cessation with major causes of mortality in the Asia Pacific Region: The Asia Pacific cohort studies collaboration. Tob Control. 2008;17:166–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pirie K, Peto R, Reeves GK, et al. The 21st century hazards of smoking and benefits of stopping: a prospective study of one million women in the UK. Lancet. 2013;381:133–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Woodward M, Moohan M, Tunstall-Pedoe H. Self-reported smoking, cigarette yields and inhalation biochemistry related to the incidence of coronary heart disease: Results from the Scottish heart health study. J Epidemiol Biostat. 1999;4:285–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brand JS, Chan MF, Dowsett M, Folkerd E, Wareham NJ, Luben RN, et al. Cigarette smoking and endogenous sex hormones in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:3184–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaleta D, Usidame B, Polańska K. Tobacco advertisements targeted on women: Creating an awareness among women. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2011;19:73–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Population HealthUniversity of QueenslandHerstonAustralia

Personalised recommendations