Advertisement

Food Analytical Methods

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 176–185 | Cite as

Determination and In Vitro Bioaccessibility Evaluation of Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn in Chia (Salvia hispanica L.) Seeds by ICP OES

  • Filipe B. Santana
  • Laís A. Souza
  • Wellington C. Carvalho
  • Maria Graças A. Korn
  • Daniele C. M. B. SantosEmail author
Article
  • 99 Downloads

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the total content and estimate the bioaccessible fraction of Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn in chia seeds (Salvia hispanica L.) by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP OES). For the evaluation of the total content, a method of acid digestion was developed, using a complete factorial design 23, in a digester block with reflux system using cold finger, and the variables chosen were as follows: volume of nitric acid, sulfuric acid, and hydrogen peroxide. Optimization provided the best conditions considering 5.0 mL of HNO3 65% m m−1, 0.5 mL of H2SO4 98% m m−1, and 3.0 mL of H2O2 30% m m−1. The detection limits, in μg g−1, were 0.18 (Cu), 0.22 (Fe), 0.28 (Mn), and 0.37 (Zn). The analyte addition and recovery test were applied to evaluate the accuracy and recovery percentage values ranging from 84 to 114% were obtained, which is considered adequate for quantitative analysis. Precision was expressed as relative standard deviation (% RSD). It was less than or equal to 7.6% (n = 10) for all analytes. The procedure was applied to 10 samples of chia seed commercialized in Salvador (Brazil). The following concentration ranges, in μg g−1, were found: Cu (12–24.2), Fe (53.2–108), Mn (29.8–84.2), and Zn (45.8–77.4). Bioaccessibility was assessed using an in vitro method that takes into account the entire gastrointestinal tract. The following bioaccessible fractions were obtained in percent: Cu (3.6–14), Fe (5.2–5.5), Mn (5.8–29.1), and Zn (< 0.7 μg g−1). The procedure was validated through a mass balance (bioaccessible content + residual fraction compared with the total content), which presented percentages of recovery ranging from 82 to 156%. This new information provides a starting point for more complex evaluations from the nutritional point of view, including the establishment of a recommended daily dietary intake for this frequently consumed seed.

Keywords

Chia Total content Inorganic constituents Bioaccessibility ICP OES 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia (FAPESB), providing scholarship, financial support, and infrastructure. This study also was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Santana declares that she has no conflict of interest. Souza declares that he has no conflict of interest. Carvalho declares that he has no conflict of interest. Korn declares that he has no conflict of interest. Santos declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Not applicable for this study.

References

  1. Agudelo MAH, Miró M, Arruda MAZ (2017) In vitro oral bioavailability and the total content of Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn from transgenic mice (through cps EPSPS 4 gene) and transgenic precursor seeds / soybean successor. Food Chem 225:125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali NM, Yeap SK, Ho WY, Beh BK, Tan SW, Tan SG (2012) The promising future of chia, Salvia hispanica L. Biomed Res Int 2012:9Google Scholar
  3. Amaral CD, Amais RS, Fialho LL, Schiavo D, Nogueira ARA, Nóbrega JA (2015) Determination of carbon in digested samples and amino acids by inductively coupled plasma tandem mass spectrometry. Microchem J 122:29–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbosa JTP, Santos CMM, Korn M, Peralva VN, Nóbrega JA, Flores EMM, Korn MGA (2014) Microwave assisted diluted acid digestion for trace elements analysis of edible soybean products. Food Chem 175:212–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benevides CMJ, Souza MV, Souza RDB, Lopes MV (2011) Fatores antinutricionais em alimentos: revisão. Segur Aliment Nutr 18(2):67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolaños D, Marchevsky EJ, Camiña JM (2016) Elemental analysis of amaranth, chia, sesame, linen, and quinoa seeds by ICP-OES: assessment of classification by chemometrics. Food Anal Methods 9(2):477–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Braga ADA, Barleta VCN (2017) Alimento funcional: uma nova abordagem terapêutica das dislipidemias como prevenção da doença aterosclerótica. Cadernos unifoa 2:100–120Google Scholar
  8. Brazil (2005) ANVISA – brazilian agency for sanitary surveillance, resolution # 269/2005. Technical regulation on recommended daily ingestion of protein, vitamins and minerals. Disponível em: http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/documents/33880/2568070/RDC_269_2005.pdf/36ef25bc-80d4-465a-ac85-340587a7b850. Accessed 09 Octuber 2018
  9. BRAZIL (2018) Serviço Brasileiro de Apoio às Micro e Pequenas Empresas. Disponível em: http://www.sebraemercados.com.br/alimentos-funcionais-e-tendencia-no-brasil/ accessed 25 September 2018
  10. Brito ALB, Oliveira AF, Nogueira ARA, Pessoa AG, Pontes LF (2017) Determination of inorganic constituents and physicochemical characterization of functional flour samples. Microchem J 132:112–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coelho MS, Salas-Mellado MLM (2015) Effects of substituting chia (Salvia hispanica L.) flour or seeds for wheat flour on the quality of the bread. LWT Food Sci Technol 60(2):729–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Costa VC, Babos DV, Aquino FWB, Virgílio A, Amorim FAC, Pereira-Filho ER (2018) Direct determination of Ca, K and Mg in cassava flour samples by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). Food Anal Methods 11:1886–1896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cozzolino SMF (2007) Biodisponibilidade de nutrientes, first edn. Manole, BarueriGoogle Scholar
  14. Derringer G, Suich RJ (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12:214–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ding Y, Lin HW, Lin YL, Yang DJ, Yu YS, Chen JW, Wang SY, Chen YC (2018) Nutritional composition in the chia seed and its processing properties on restructured ham-like products. J Food Drug Anal 26(1):124–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fennema OR, Parkin K, Damodaran S (eds) (2008) Fennema’s food chemistry, fourth edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernandes KG, Moraes MD, Neto JAG, Nóbrega JA, Oliveira PV (2003) Padronização interna em espectrometria de absorção atômica. Química Nova 26:249–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferreira TRB (2013) Caracterização nutricional e funcional da farinha de chia (Salvia hispanica) e sua aplicação no desenvolvimento de pães. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências). Universidade de São PauloGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferreira SL, Silva LO, Santana FA, Junior MM, Matos GD, Santos WN (2013) A review of reflux systems using cold finger for sample preparation in the determination of volatile elements. Microchem J 106:307–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferreira SL, Junior MSS, Felix CSA, Silva DLF, Santos AS, Neto JHS, Souza CT, Junior RAC, Souza AS (2019) Multivariate optimization techniques in food analysis–a review. Food Chem 273(3–8):3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gouveia ST, Silva FV, Costa LM, Nogueira ARA, Nóbrega JA (2001) Determination of residual carbon by inductively-coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry with axial and radial view configurations. Anal Chim Acta 445:269–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO 5725-1 (1998) Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results–part 1: general principles and definitions. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  23. Korn MGA, Morte ESB, Santos DCMB, Castro JT, Barbosa JTP, Teixeira AP, Fernandes AP, Welz B, Santos WPC, Santos EBGN, Korn (2008) Sample preparation for the determination of metals in food samples using spectroanalytical methods – a review. Appl Spectrosc Rev 43:67–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Korn MGA, Santos DCMB, Guida MAB, Barbosa IS, Passos MLC, Saraiva MLMFS, Lima JLFC (2010) Evaluation of digestion procedures for simultaneous determination of Ca, P, Mg, K and Na in biodiesel by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry. J Braz Chem Soc 21(12):2278–2284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krug FJ, Rocha FRP (2016) Métodos de preparo de amostras para análise elementar. EditSBQ – Sociedade Brasileira de Química, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  26. Magnusson B (2014) The fitness for purpose of analytical methods: a laboratory guide to method validation and related topics,2nd edition. Eurachem GuideGoogle Scholar
  27. Maulvault AL, Machado R, Afonso C, Lourenço HM, Nunes ML, Coelho I, Langerholc T, Marques A (2011) Bioaccessibility of Hg, Cd and As in cooked black scabbard fish and edible crab. Food Chem Toxicol 49(11):2808–2815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mermet JM, Poussel E (1995) ICP emission spectrometers: analytical figures of merit. Appl Spectrosc 49:12–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Momen AA, Zachariadis GA, Anthemidis AN, Stratism JA (2006) Investigation of four digestion procedures for multi-element determination of toxic and nutrient elements in legumes by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 565:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moraes FP, Colla LM (2006) Alimentos funcionais e nutracêuticos: definições, legislação e benefícios à saúde. Rev Eletr Farm 3:109–122Google Scholar
  31. Nóbrega JA, Pirola C, Fialho LL, Rota G, de Campos Jordão CEKMA, Pollo F (2012) Microwave-assisted digestion of organic samples: how simple can it become? Talanta. 98:272–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nosratpour M, Jafari SM (2018) Bioavailability of minerals (Ca, Mg, Zn, K, Mn, Se) in food products. Reference Module In Food Science. Encyclopedia of Food Chemistry: 148–154Google Scholar
  33. Oomen AG, Hack A, Minekus M, Zeijdner E, Cornelis C, Schoeters G, Verstraete W, Wiele TV, Wragg J, Rompelberg CJM, Sips AJAM, Wijnen JHV (2002) Comparison of five in vitro digestion models to study the bioaccessibility of soil contaminants. Environ Sci Technol 36:3326–3334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oomen AG, Rompelberg CJM, Bruil MA, Dobbe CJG, Pereboom DPKH, Sips AJAM (2003) Development of an in vitro digestion model for estimating the bioaccessibility of soil contaminant. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 44:281–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Picinin CTR (2014) Caracterização química, ação antioxidante e influência do consumo de grão de chia (Salvia hispanica L.) nos níveis glicêmicos. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências de Alimentos). Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência de alimentos. Universidade Federal de LavrasGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosende M, Magalhães LM, Segundo MA, MIRO M (2014) Assessing oral bioaccessibility of trace elements in soils under worst-case scenarios by automated in-line dynamic extraction as a front end to inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 842:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ruby MV, Schoof R, Brattin W, GoldadePost G, Harnois M, Edwards D (1999) Advances in evaluating the oral bioavailability of inorganics in soil for use in human health risk assessment. Environ Sci Technol 33:3697–3705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Souza LA, Souza TL, Santana FB, Araujo RGO, Teixeira LS, Santos DCMB, Korn MGA (2018a) Determination and in vitro bioaccessibility evaluation of Ca, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, P and Zn in linseed and sesame. Microchem J 137:8–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Souza LA, Rosende M, Korn MGA, Miró M (2018b) Flow-through dynamic microextraction system for automatic in vitro assessment of chyme bioaccessibility in food commodities. Anal Chim Acta 1026:51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stringheta PC, de Oliveira TT, Gomes RC, Amaral MDPH, Carvalho AF, Vilela MAP (2007) Políticas de saúde e alegações de propriedades funcionais e de saúde para alimentos no Brasil. Rev Bras Cienc Farm 43(2):181–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tognon AL (2012) Quantificação e avaliação da bioacessibilidade in vitro de micro e macroelementos em frutas, hortaliças e cereais. Dissertação (Mestrado em Química) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Química, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão PretoGoogle Scholar
  42. Versantvoort CH, Oomen AG, Van de Kamp E, Rompelberg CJ, Sips AJ (2005) Applicability of an in vitro digestion model in assessing the bioaccessibility of mycotoxins from food. Food Chem Toxicol 43(1):31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zettel V, Hitzmann B (2018) Applications of chia (Salvia hispanica L.) in food products. Trends Food Sci Technol 80:43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Química Analítica, Instituto de QuímicaUniversidade Federal da BahiaSalvadorBrazil
  2. 2.INCT de Energia e Ambiente - Universidade Federal da BahiaInstituto de QuímicaSalvadorBrazil

Personalised recommendations