Advertisement

Determination of Valifenalate in Grape, Vegetables, and Soil Using Ultrahigh Performance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry and Exploration of Its Degradation Behavior in Grape Field

  • Runan Li
  • Zenglong Chen
  • Yan Tao
  • Xinglu Pan
  • Duoduo Jiang
  • Fengshou Dong
  • Jun Xu
  • Xingang Liu
  • Xiaohu Wu
  • Yongquan Zheng
Article

Abstract

A novel, sensitive, and rapid analytical method for analyzing valifenalate residue in grape, vegetables (tomato, lettuce, eggplant, potato), and soil was established and validated using a modified quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) method by ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). The determination of the analyte was achieved within 4 min for per injection using electrospray ionization (ESI) operated in positive ion mode, and the retention time was 1.92 min. The developed method exhibited good linearity (R2 ≥ 0.9941) and the limit of quantitation (LOQ) was 0.5 μg/kg for analyte in selected matrices. The mean recoveries in six matrices ranged from 74.5 to 106.6% with intra-day relative standard deviation (RSD) of 0.7–12.3% and inter-day RSD of 3.2–12.2% at four spiking levels (0.5, 10, 100, 500 μg/kg) in recovery assays. The proposed method was applied to explore the dissipation rates of valifenalate in grapes and soil under field conditions, and the half-lives of analyte in grape and soil were 15.5 ± 1.4 and 3.8 ± 0.1 days, respectively. The study indicated that the method was effective and reliable for detection of valifenalate residues and the dissipation data can provide reference towards safety application for the analyte.

Keywords

Valifenalate Residues Degradation rate Ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0200204).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The article is an original research which has neither been published previously nor submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration.

Conflict of Interest

Runan Li declares that he has no conflict of interest. Zenglong Chen declares that he has no conflict of interest. Yan Tao declares that he has no conflict of interest. Xinglu Pan declares that he has no conflict of interest. Duoduo Jiang declares that he has no conflict of interest. Fengshou Dong declares that he has no conflict of interest. Jun Xu declares that he has no conflict of interest. Xingang Liu declares that he has no conflict of interest. Xiaohu Wu declares that he has no conflict of interest. Yongquan Zheng declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The article does not contain any studies with human participants or animal subjects.

Informed Consent

All the authors named in a manuscript are entitled to the authorship and have approved the final version of the submitted manuscript.

References

  1. Avuthu MR, Rao TN, Reddy BV, Murthy S, Revathi P (2016) Determination of toxic pesticide residues in crops. Sch J Agric Vet Sci 3:358–369Google Scholar
  2. Bruzzoniti MC, Checchini L, Carlo RMD, Orlandini S, Rivoira L, Bubba MD (2014) QuEChERS sample preparation for the determination of pesticides and other organic residues in environmental matrices: a critical review. Anal Bioanal Chem 406:4089–4116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cappiello A, Famiglini G, Palma P, Pierini E, Termopoli V, Trufelli H (2008) Overcoming matrix effects in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 80:9343–9348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Capriotti AL, Cavaliere C, Giansanti P, Gubbiotti R, Samperi R, Laganà A (2010) Recent developments in matrix solid-phase dispersion extraction. J Chromatogr A 1217:2521–2532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen Z, Dong F, Pan X, Xu J, Liu X, Wu X, Zheng Y (2016) Influence of uptake pathways on the stereoselective dissipation of chiral neonicotinoid sulfoxaflor in greenhouse vegetables. J Agric Food Chem 64:2655–2660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Churchwell MI, Twaddle NC, Meeker LR, Doerge DR (2005) Improving LC-MS sensitivity through increases in chromatographic performance: comparisons of UPLC-ES/MS/MS to HPLC-ES/MS/MS. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci 825:134–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. EU - Pesticides database (2014) Regulation Pesticides EU-MRLs regulation (EC) No. 396/2005: http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/eu-pesticides-database/public/?event=pesticide.residue. CurrentMRL&language=EN
  8. European Commission (2002) Implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of resultsGoogle Scholar
  9. European Commission (2017) Guidance document on analytical quality control and validation procedures for pesticide residues analysis in food and feedGoogle Scholar
  10. González-Álvarez M, González-Barreiro C, Cancho-Grande B, Simal-Gándara J (2012) Impact of phytosanitary treatments with fungicides (cyazofamid, famoxadone, mandipropamid and valifenalate) on aroma compounds of Godello white wines. Food Chem 131:826–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gonzálezrodríguez RM, Canchogrande B, Simalgándara J (2011) Decay of fungicide residues during vinification of white grapes harvested after the application of some new active substances against downy mildew. Food Chem 125:549–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Han Y, Song L, Zou N, Chen R, Qin Y, Pan C (2016) Multi-residue determination of 171 pesticides in cowpea using modified QuEChERS method with multi-walled carbon nanotubes as reversed-dispersive solid-phase extraction materials. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci 1031:99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hou X, Lei S, Qiu S, Guo L, Yi S, Liu W (2014) A multi-residue method for the determination of pesticides in tea using multi-walled carbon nanotubes as a dispersive solid phase extraction absorbent. Food Chem 153:121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hu M, Liu X, Dong F, Xu J, Li S, Xu H, Zheng Y (2015) Determination of ametoctradin residue in fruits and vegetables by modified quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe method using ultra-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Food Chem 175:395–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kamoun S (2003) Molecular genetics of pathogenic oomycetes. Eukaryot Cell 2:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kamoun S (2006) A catalogue of the effector secretome of plant pathogenic oomycetes. Annu Rev Phytopathol 44:41–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Koesukwiwat U, Lehotay SJ, Miao S, Leepipatpiboon N (2010) High throughput analysis of 150 pesticides in fruits and vegetables using QuEChERS and low-pressure gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1217:6692–6703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Konatu FRB, Breitkreitz MC (2017) Revisiting quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe parameters for sample preparation in pesticide residue analysis of lettuce by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1482:11–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kovalczuk T, Lacina O, Jech M, Poustka J, Hajslová J (2008) Novel approach to fast determination of multiple pesticide residues using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Food Addit Contam 25:444–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kruve A, Künnapas A, Herodes K, Leito I (2008) Matrix effects in pesticide multi-residue analysis by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1187:58–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kwon H, Lehotay SJ, Geisasteggiante L (2012) Variability of matrix effects in liquid and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of pesticide residues after QuEChERS sample preparation of different food crops. J Chromatogr A 1270:235–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li M, Liu X, Dong F, Xu J, Kong Z, Li Y, Zheng Y (2013) Simultaneous determination of cyflumetofen and its main metabolite residues in samples of plant and animal origin using multi-walled carbon nanotubes in dispersive solid-phase extraction and ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrome. J Chromatogr A 1300:95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu X, Wang X, Xu J, Dong F, Song W, Zheng Y (2011) Determination of tebuconazole, trifloxystrobin and its metabolite in fruit and vegetables by a Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged and Safe (QuEChERS) method using gas chromatography with a nitrogen-phosphorus detector and ion trap mass spectrometry. Biomed Chromatogr 25:1081–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ma J, Jiang L, Wu G, Xia Y, Lu W, Li J, Chen L (2016) Determination of six sulfonylurea herbicides in environmental water samples by magnetic solid-phase extraction using multi-walled carbon nanotubes as adsorbents coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1466:12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marsilii E, Cacciola SO, Salamone A, Scarito G, Raudino F, Pane A, San Lio GMD (2009) Efficacy of valifenalate against Phytophthora spp. of ornamental plants. Protezione Delle Colture 2:108–109Google Scholar
  26. Pesticide Properties Database (2018) International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC): http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/iupac/Reports/1659.htm
  27. Rao TN, Apparao K, Reddy EGS, Prasad BG, Murthy SNVS (2015) Determination of valifenalate fungicide residues in tomato fruit. Der Chemica Sinica 6:34–38Google Scholar
  28. Rubert J, Soler C, Mañes J (2010) Optimization of Matrix Solid-Phase Dispersion method for simultaneous extraction of aflatoxins and OTA in cereals and its application to commercial samples. Talanta 82:567–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sadowskarociek A, Surma M, Cieślik E (2018) Determination of PAHs in cocoa samples using D-SPE with different sorbents. J Microbiol Biotechnol Food Sci 4:135–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Salamone A, Raudino F, Cacciola SO, San Lio GM di (2014) Efficacy of the fungicide valifenalate against crown rot of rose caused by Phytophthora citrophthora. Modern fungicides and antifungal compounds. VII. Proceedings of the 17th International Reinhardsbrunn Symposium, April 21-25, 2013, Friedrichroda, Germany. Deutsche Phytomedizinische Gesellschaft e.V. Verlag, Braunschweig, Germany, 55–60Google Scholar
  31. Takach E, O'Shea T, Liu H (2014) High-throughput quantitation of amino acids in rat and mouse biological matrices using stable isotope labeling and UPLC-MS/MS analysis. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci 964:180–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tian F, Liu X, Wu Y, Xu J, Dong F, Wu X, Zheng Y (2016) Simultaneous determination of penflufen and one metabolite in vegetables and cereals using a modified quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe method and liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Food Chem 213:410–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ulrich G, Helge S (2008) Fungicide modes of action and resistance in downy mildews. Eur J Plant Pathol 122:157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilkowska AM, Biziuk M (2010) Rapid method for the determination of organochlorine pesticides and PCBs in fish muscle samples by microwave-assisted extraction and analysis of extracts by GC-ECD. J AOAC Int 93:1987–1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Wilson ID, Nicholson JK, Castroperez J, Granger JH, Johnson KA, Smith BW, Plumb RS (2005) High resolution "ultra performance" liquid chromatography coupled to oa-TOF mass spectrometry as a tool for differential metabolic pathway profiling in functional genomic studies. J Proteome Res 4:591–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wu X, Xu J, Dong F, Liu X, Li Y, Zheng Y (2014) Simultaneous determination of oxathiapiprolin and two metabolites in fruits, vegetables and cereal using a modified quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe method and liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1329:30–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xu X, Liu Z, Li X, Liu S, Zi X (2011) Abstract 4629: ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC)-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) method for analysis and pharmacokinetic study of flavokawain A, a novel chalcone from the kava plant, in mice. Cancer Res 71:4629–4629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yang X, Luo J, Li S, Liu C (2016) Evaluation of nine pesticide residues in three minor tropical fruits from southern China. Food Control 60:677–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yu P, Jia C, Zhao E, Chen L, He H, Jing J, He M (2017) Determination of oxathiapiprolin concentration and dissipation in grapes and soil by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Sci Food Agric 97:3294–3299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhan XP, Ma L, Huang LQ, Chen JB, Zhao L (2017) The optimization and establishment of QuEChERS-UPLC–MS/MS method for simultaneously detecting various kinds of pesticides residues in fruits and vegetables. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci 1060:281–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang Y, Qiao H, Chen C, Wang Z, Xia X (2016) Determination of nitrofurans metabolites residues in aquatic products by ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Food Chem 192:612–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhao P, Wang L, Jiang Y, Zhang F, Pan C (2012) Dispersive cleanup of acetonitrile extracts of tea samples by mixed multiwalled carbon nanotubes, primary secondary amine, and graphitized carbon black sorbents. J Agric Food Chem 60:4026–4033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zheng HB, Ding J, Zheng SJ, Yu QW, Yuan BF, Feng YQ (2015) Magnetic “one-step” quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe method for the fast determination of pesticide residues in freshly squeezed juice. J Chromatogr A 1398:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant ProtectionChinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents, Institute of ZoologyChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations