Advertisement

Food Analytical Methods

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 258–270 | Cite as

Central Composite Design-Desirability Function Approach for Optimum Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Daidzein and Genistein from Soybean and Their Antimycotoxigenic Potential

  • Bibiana da SilvaEmail author
  • Larine Kupski
  • Eliana Badiale-Furlong
Article
  • 70 Downloads

Abstract

Soybean isoflavones have been underestimated about their possible antifungal or antimycotoxigenic potential. In the present investigation, chemometric approaches were used such as the fractioned experimental design, the central composite rotatable design, and the Derringer’s desirability function to optimize a method to extract the isoflavones daidzein and genistein by ultrasound-assisted extraction. The optimized method was validated and applied to ten soybeans. The possible antimycotoxigenic abilities of isoflavones were evaluated by the inhibition of hydrolytic and oxidative enzymes. The multivariate procedures were efficient to determine the optimal extraction conditions, using daidzein and genistein concentration as responses. The best conditions were extraction time, 30 min; frequency, 55 kHz (36 kJ mL−1); hydrolysis time, 20 min; and hydrolysis temperature, 168 °C. The method was validated according to Eurachem guidelines and considered reproducible. The daidzein concentration was higher than genistein in soybeans. Low concentrations of aglycones were capable to inhibit fungal α-amylase (0.1 μg mL−1), highlighting genistein. Daidzein and genistein were able to inhibit oxidative processes in two strands, inhibition of oxidative enzyme and free radical propagation. These properties indicate that these isoflavones are able to contribute to avoid stress situations that could promote fungal contamination and manifestation of their mycotoxigenic potential.

Keywords

Derringer’s desirability function Fractioned experimental design Isoflavones Fungal α-amylase Peroxidase Principal components analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, Brazil) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brazil). The authors would like to thank Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa, Brazil) for providing conventional soybean sample.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Bibiana da Silva declares that she has no conflict of interest. Larine Kupski declares that she has no conflict of interest. Eliana Badiale-Furlong declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Consent for Publication

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

12161_2018_1357_MOESM1_ESM.docx (32 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 32 kb)
12161_2018_1357_MOESM2_ESM.docx (14 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 14 kb)
12161_2018_1357_MOESM3_ESM.docx (54 kb)
ESM 3 (DOCX 53 kb)

References

  1. Andrade JC, Mandarino JMG, Kurozawa LE, Ida EI (2016) The effect of thermal treatment of whole soybean flour on the conversion of isoflavones and inactivation of trypsin inhibitors. Food Chem 194:1095–1101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.08.115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhat R, Reddy KRN (2017) Challenges and issues concerning mycotoxins contamination in oil seeds and their edible oils: updates from last decade. Food Chem 215:425–437.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.07.161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C (1995) Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT Food Sci Technol 28:25–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bremner DH, Burgess AE, Chand R (2011) The chemistry of ultrasonic degradation of organic compounds. Curr Org Chem 15:168–177.  https://doi.org/10.2174/138527211793979862 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Budryn G, Gałązka-Czarnecka I, Brzozowska E, Grzelczyk J, Mostowski R, Żyżelewicz D, Cerón-Carrasco JP, Pérez-Sánchez H (2018) Evaluation of estrogenic activity of red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) sprouts cultivated under different conditions by content of isoflavones, calorimetric study and molecular modelling. Food Chem 245:324–336.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.10.100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chemat F, Rombaut N, Meullemiestre A, Turk M, Perino S, Fabiano-Tixier AS, Abert-Vian M (2017a) Review of green food processing techniques. Preservation, transformation, and extraction. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 41:357–377.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2017.04.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chemat F, Rombaut N, Sicaire AG, Meullemiestre A, Fabiano-Tixier AS, Abert-Vian M (2017b) Ultrasound assisted extraction of food and natural products. Mechanisms, techniques, combinations, protocols and applications. A review. Ultrason Sonochem 34:540–560.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.06.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiang W, Shih C, Chu Y (2001) Optimization of acid hydrolysis conditions for total isofavones analysis in soybean hypocotyls by using RSM. Food Chem 72:499–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cochran BYWG (1941) The distribution of the largest of a set of estimated variances as a fraction of their total. Ann Eugenics 11:47–52.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1941.tb02271.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cordisco E, Haidar CN, Coscueta ER, Nerli BB, Malpiedi LP (2016) Integrated extraction and purification of soy isoflavones by using aqueous micellar systems. Food Chem 213:514–520.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Lima FS, Kurozawa LE, Ida EI (2014) The effects of soybean soaking on grain properties and isoflavones loss. LWT Food Sci Technol 59:1274–1282.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.04.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Derringer G, Suich R (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12(4):214–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Devaiah SP, Shetty HS (2009) Purification of an infection-related acidic peroxidase from pearl millet seedlings. Pestic Biochem Physiol 94:119–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2009.04.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Devi MKA, Gondi M, Sakthivelu G, Giridhar P, Rajasekaran T, Ravishankar GA (2009) Functional attributes of soybean seeds and products, with reference to isoflavone content and antioxidant activity. Food Chem 114:771–776.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.10.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Durbin J, Watson GS (1971) Biometrika trust testing for serial correlation in least squares regression. Biometrika 38:159–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eurachem (2014) Eurachem guide: the fitness for purpose of analytical nethods—a laboratory guide to method validation and related topics. (retrieved form) https://www.eurachem.org/images/stories/Guides/pdf/MV_guide_2nd_ed_EN.pdf
  17. Fernandez-Lopez A, Lamothe V, Delample M, Denayrolles M, Bennetau-Pelissero C (2016) Removing isoflavones from modern soyfood: why and how? Food Chem 210:286–294.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.04.126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Funke I, Melzig MF (2005) Effect of different phenolic compounds on α-amylase activity: screening by microplate-reader based kinetic assay. Pharmazie 60:796–797Google Scholar
  19. Garda-Buffon J, Baraj E, Badiale-Furlong E (2010) Effect of Deoxynivalenol and T-2 toxin in malt amylase activity. Braz Arch Biol Technol 53:505–511.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132010000300002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grubbs FE (1969) Procedures for detecting outlying observations in samples. Technometrics 11(1):1.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1266761 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heidtmann-Bemvenuti R, Tralamazza SM, Ferreira CFJ et al (2016) Effect of natural compounds on fusarium graminearum complex. J Sci Food Agric 96:3998–4008.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7591 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hsiao YH, Hsieh JF (2018) The conversion and deglycosylation of isoflavones and anthocyanins in black soymilk process. Food Chem 261:8–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.03.152 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jin M, Chung I, Kim H, Yhung M (2015) High resolution LC – ESI-TOF-mass spectrometry method for fast separation , identification , and quantification of 12 isoflavones in soybeans and soybean products. Food Chem 176:254–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.12.073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klejdus B, Mikelová R, Adam V, Zehnálek J, Vacek J, Kizek R, Kubáň V (2004) Liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometric determination of genistin and daidzin in soybean food samples after accelerated solvent extraction with modified content of extraction cell. Anal Chim Acta 517:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2004.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krämer RP, Hindorf H, Jha HC, Kallage J, Zilliken F (1984) Antifungal activity of soybean and chickpea isoflavones and their reduced derivatives. Phytochemistry 23:2203–2205.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)80520-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee JH, Choung M (2011) Determination of optimal acid hydrolysis time of soybean isoflavones using drying oven and microwave assisted methods. Food Chem 129:577–582.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.04.069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee CH, Yang L, Xu JZ et al (2005) Relative antioxidant activity of soybean isoflavones and their glycosides. Food Chem 90:735–741.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.04.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee MJ, Chung IM, Kim H, Jung MY (2015) High resolution LC-ESI-TOF-mass spectrometry method for fast separation, identification, and quantification of 12 isoflavones in soybeans and soybean products. Food Chem 176:254–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.12.073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu Y-T, Chen Y-H, Uramaru N, Lin AH, Yang HT, Lii CK, Yao HT (2016) Soy isoflavones reduce acetaminophen-induced liver injury by inhibiting cytochrome P-450-mediated bioactivation and glutathione depletion and increasing urinary drug excretion in rats. J Funct Foods 26:135–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2016.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275Google Scholar
  31. Margină D, Ilie M, Grădinaru D, Androutsopoulos VP, Kouretas D, Tsatsakis AM (2015) Natural products-friends or foes? Toxicol Lett 236:154–167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2015.05.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meullemiestre A, Breil C, Abert-Vian M, Chemat F (2016) Microwave, ultrasound, thermal treatments, and bead milling as intensification techniques for extraction of lipids from oleaginous Yarrowia lipolytica yeast for a biojetfuel application. Bioresour Technol 211:190–199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moras B, Stéphane R, Gérard V, Pierre-Yves P (2017) Pressurized water extraction of isoflavones by experimental design from soybean flour and soybean protein isolate. Food Chem 214:9–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.07.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Naim M, Gestetner B, Zilkah S, Birk Y, Bondi A (1974) Soybean Isoflavones: characterization, determination, and antifungal activity. J Agric Food Chem 22:806–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nemitz MC, Teixeira HF, Von PGL (2015) A new approach for the purification of soybean acid extract: simultaneous production of an isoflavone aglycone-rich fraction and a furfural derivative-rich by-product. Ind Crop Prod 67:414–421.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.01.074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Oliveira MD, Dors GC, Souza-Soares LA, Badiale-Furlong E (2007) Atividade antioxidante e antifúngica de extratos vegetais. Alim Nutr 18:267–275Google Scholar
  37. Pagnussatt FA, Meza SLR, Garda-Buffon J, Badiale-Furlong E (2012) Procedure to determine enzyme inhibitors activity in cereal seeds. J Agric Sci 4:85–92.  https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v4n12p85 Google Scholar
  38. Pagnussatt FA, De Lima VR, Dora CL et al (2016) Assessment of the encapsulation effect of phenolic compounds from Spirulina sp. LEB-18 on their antifusarium activities. Food Chem 211:616–623.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.05.098 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pananun T, Montalbo-lomboy M, Noomhorm A et al (2012) LWT—food science and technology high-power ultrasonication-assisted extraction of soybean iso fl avones and effect of toasting. LWT Food Sci Technol 47:199–207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2011.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Quideau S, Deffieux D, Douat-Casassus C, Pouységu L (2011) Plant polyphenols: chemical properties, biological activities, and synthesis. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:586–621.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201000044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rodrigues MI, Iemma AF (2009) Planejamento de experimentos e Otimização de processos, 2a. Cárita, CampinasGoogle Scholar
  42. Rostagno M, Palma M, Barroso C (2003) Ultrasound-assisted extraction of soy isoflavones. J Chromatogr A 1012:119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rostagno MA, Palma M, Barroso CG (2007) Microwave assisted extraction of soy isoflavones. Anal Chim Acta 588:274–282.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2007.02.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rostagno MA, Villares A, Guillamón E, García-Lafuente A, Martínez JA (2009) Sample preparation for the analysis of isoflavones from soybeans and soy foods. J Chromatogr A 1216:2–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.11.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schmidt CG, Gonçalves LM, Prietto L, Hackbart HS, Furlong EB (2014) Antioxidant activity and enzyme inhibition of phenolic acids from fermented rice bran with fungus Rizhopus oryzae. Food Chem 146:371–377.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.09.101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shao S, Duncan AM, Yang R, Marcone MF, Rajcan I, Tsao R (2011) Systematic evaluation of pre-HPLC sample processing methods on total and individual isoflavones in soybeans and soy products. FRIN 44:2425–2434.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2010.12.041 Google Scholar
  47. Shim YS, Yoon WJ, Hwang JB, Park HJ, Seo D, Ha J (2015) Rapid method for the determination of 14 isoflavones in food using UHPLC coupled to photo diode array detection. Food Chem 187:391–397.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.04.077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sicaire AG, Vian MA, Fine F, Carré P, Tostain S, Chemat F (2016) Ultrasound induced green solvent extraction of oil from oleaginous seeds. Ultrason Sonochem 31:319–329.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.01.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Souza MM, Rocha M, Oliveira MS, Badiale-Furlong E (2012) Evaluation of antifungal and antimicotoxin activities of phenolic extracts from rice bran. Rev Inst Adolfo Lutz 71:437–441Google Scholar
  50. Stossel P (1986) Aflatoxin contamination in soybeans: role of proteinase inhibitors, zinc availability, and seed coat integrity. Appl Environ Microbiol 52:68–72Google Scholar
  51. Tan Y, Chang SKC, Zhang Y (2017) Comparison of alpha-amylase, alpha-glucosidase and lipase inhibitory activity of the phenolic substances in two black legumes of different genera. Food Chem 214:259–268.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.06.100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Xu Z, Wu Q, Godber JS (2002) Stabilities of daidzin, glycitin, genistin, and generation of derivatives during heating. J Agric Food Chem 50:7402–7406.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf025626i CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratório de Micotoxinas e Ciência de Alimentos, Escola de Química e Alimentos (EQA), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia e Ciência de AlimentosUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG)Rio GrandeBrazil

Personalised recommendations