Thin-layer Chromatographic Method for Quantification of Sulfonamides in Chicken Meat
- 7 Downloads
The sulfonamides are a widely used group of antimicrobials in veterinary practice especially in developing countries due to their broad spectrum of activity, availability, and low cost. The objective of this study was to establish a thin-layer chromatographic (TLC) method to detect residues of commonly used sulfonamides in Sri Lanka in chicken. The TLC method separated sulfadiazine (SDZ), sulfadoxine (SD), sulfamethazine (SMZ), sulfathiazole (STZ), and sulfaquinoxaline (SQ) on silica gel plates using chloroform: n_butanol (90:10). Sulfonamides densitometric measurements were conducted by derivatising with fluorescamine and scanning the separated bands at 366 nm. The quantity of the sulfonamide in samples was calculated using a standard calibration curve obtained by plotting values of peak area against sulfonamide concentrations at 200, 150, 100, 50, 30, and 25 ng/g. The mean percentage recoveries were 80–120% while the intra-day and inter-day precision was 3–22% and 6–42% respectively. The SD had the highest limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) values of 60 and 100 ng/g respectively. The LOD of all the other analytes were 40 ng/g, and STZ had the lowest LOQ values of 50 ng/g. A reliable, inexpensive, simple, liquid-liquid extraction method for the rapid analysis of five sulfonamides at maximum residue limit (MRL) in chicken using TLC was developed.
KeywordsThin-layer chromatography Sulfonamides Residues Food safety
JMKJK Premarathne conducted the experiments, conceived the article, searched the literature, and prepared the manuscript as a part of her MPhil program. DA Satharasinghe conducted experiments and analyzed data. ARC Gunasena assisted in experiments. AW designed the experiment and supervised the work. DMS Munasinghe and P Abeynayake were responsible for supervising the project and editing the article in their role as MPhil supervisors for Premarathne.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
All authors declare that he/she has no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Begum RM (2008) Food sanitation and hygiene. A text book of foods, nutrition and dietetics, 3rd edn. Sterling Publishers Pvt Ltd., New Delhi. Chapter 24, pp 151–155Google Scholar
- Bergwerff AA (2005) Rapid assays to detection of veterinary drug residues. In: Van Amerongen A, Barug D, Lauwaars MW (eds) Rapid methods: for biological and chemical contaminants in food and feed, 1st edn. Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp 258–290Google Scholar
- Fried B, Sherma J (1996) Thin-layer chromatography, 4th edn. CRC Press Marcel Dekker, Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Giguère S, Presscott JF, Baggot JD et al (2006) Antimicrobial therapy in veterinary medicine, 4th edn. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, IowaGoogle Scholar
- Jork H, Funk W, Fischer W et al (1990) Chemical methods of detection. Thin layer chromatography reagents and detection methods. VCH Publishers, Germany. Chapter 1, pp 55–118Google Scholar
- Kothalawala KACHA, Wijewantha P, Udugama K (2011) Market analysis of poultry meat: supply and demand. XIth Annual Scientific Sessions, 23rd July 2011. Abs. World’s Poultry Science Book, pp 31–33Google Scholar
- Ministry of Livestock and Rural Community Development (2011) Livestock master plan—a strategy for livestock development for self–sufficiency, Sri LankaGoogle Scholar
- Thomas MH, Soroka KE, Thomas SH (1983) Quantitative thin layer chromatographic multi-sulfonamide screening procedure. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 66:881–883Google Scholar
- Veterinary Drug Control Authority (VDCA) (2012) Department of Animal Production and Health, PeradeniyaGoogle Scholar
- Xia L, Liu L, Lv X, Qu F, Li G, You J (2017) Towards the determination of sulfonamides in meat samples: a magnetic and mesoporous metal-organic framework as an efficient sorbent for magnetic solid phase extraction combined with high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1500:24–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar