Advertisement

Food Analytical Methods

, Volume 11, Issue 9, pp 2396–2406 | Cite as

Detection of Transgenic Atlantic and Coho Salmon by Real-time PCR

  • Frédéric Debode
  • Eric Janssen
  • Aline Marien
  • Robert H. Devlin
  • Kathrin Lieske
  • Joachim Mankertz
  • Gilbert Berben
Article
  • 206 Downloads

Abstract

Genetic modifications (GM) have been applied to salmon to generate fast-growing strains for potential use in aquaculture. In November 2015, the first transgenic salmon (AquAdvantage® Atlantic salmon) was accepted for commercialization in the USA under defined conditions. The presence of GM food products in the marketplace stimulates the need for detection methods to allow screening for the presence of genetic modifications in seafood products. This paper first shows that it is possible to obtain amplifiable DNA from raw and processed products containing salmon. Detection methods by real-time PCR are proposed in this work. An endogenous gene target was designed to detect salmonid species DNA in samples. In addition, detection methods using real-time PCR were developed for two GM salmon possessing growth hormone transgenes: the AquAdvantage® Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) developed by AquaBounty for commercial purposes, and the coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) developed for research purposes by Fisheries and Oceans Canada. The methods are able to detect at least 20 copies of the target. It was found however that one of the construct-specific methods for the AquAdvantage® salmon detection did not work on AquAdvantage® genomic DNA even though it works on the sequence published in GenBank. The other assay however was found to reliably detect AquAdvantage® transgenic sequences in genomic DNA.

Keywords

Salmon Transgenic Detection AquAdvantage Real-time PCR 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was conducted within a Belgian research project (Convention RF 11/6242 UGMMONITOR) financed by the Belgian Federal Public Service for Public Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment. We also thank Cécile Ancion, Denis Roulez, and Gaëlle Antoine from the GMO team of CRA-W.

Compliance with Ethic Requirements

Conflict of Interest

Frédéric Debode declares that he has no conflict of interest. Eric Janssen declares that he has no conflict of interest. Aline Marien declares that she has no conflict of interest. Robert H. Devlin declares that he has no conflict of interest. Kathrin Lieske declares that she has no conflict of interest. Joachim Mankertz declares that he has no conflict of interest. Gilbert Berben declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain studies with human or animal subjects. Samples used are food samples.

Supplementary material

12161_2018_1214_MOESM1_ESM.docx (298 kb)
Figure S1 Placement of the primers and probes for salmon detection on the sequence of different salmonid species available in the NCBI database (Accession numbers of the sequences are given after the name). A. target proposed by Li et al. 2013 B. Target proposed in this study C. Target proposed by Ben Hafsa et al. 2016. (DOCX 298 kb)

References

  1. AFNOR XP V03-020-2 (2008). Produits alimentaires. Détection et quantification des organismes végétaux génétiquement modifies et produits dérivés. Partie 2: méthodes basées sur la réaction de polymérisation en chaîne. Norme expérimentaleGoogle Scholar
  2. AquaBounty Technologies, Inc, 2010, An Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) bearing a single copy of the stably integrated α-form of the opAFP-GHc2 gene construct at the α- locus in the EO-1α line, Environmental Assessment for AquAdvantage® Salmon. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/VeterinaryMedicineAdvisoryCommittee/UCM224760.pdf (last consulted on 18 June 2016)
  3. Asche F (2008) Farming the sea. Mar Resour Econ 23:527–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ben Hafsa A, Nabi N, Zellama MS, Said K, Chaouachi M (2016) A new specific reference gene based on growth hormone gene (GH1) used for detection and relative quantification of Aquadvantage® GM salmon (Salmo salar L.) in food products. Food Chem 190:1040–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Broeders S, Huber I, Grohmann L, Berben G, Taverniers I, Mazzara M, Roosens N, Morisset D (2014) Guidelines for validation of qualitative real-time PCR methods. Trends Food Sci Technol 37:115–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brophy B, Smolenski G, Wheeler T, Wells D, L'Huillier P, Laible G (2003) Cloned transgenic cattle produce milk with higher levels of β-casein and κ-casein. Nat Biotechnol 21:157–162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Burns M, Corbisier P, Wiseman G, Valdivia H, McDonald P, Bowler P, Ohara K, Schimmel H, Charels D, Damant A, Harris N (2006) Comparison of plasmid and genomic DNA calibrants for the quantification of genetically modified ingredients. Eur Food Res Technol 224:249–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castro C, Amorim M, Moreira F, Pereira F (2017) A method to assemble DNA fragments mimicking junctions of transgenic elements: application to the AquAdvantage salmon. Food Control 82:179–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chandelier A, Planchon V, Oger R (2010) Determination of cycle cut off in real-time PCR for the detection of regulated plant pathogens. EPPO Bull 40:52–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cowx IG, Bolland JD, Nunn AD, Kerins G, Stein J, Blackburn J, Hart A, Henry C, Britton J, Capp G, Peeler E (2010) Defining environmental risk assessment criteria for genetically-modified fishes to be placed on the EU market. EFSA Support Publication 7Google Scholar
  11. Debode F, Janssen E, Berben G (2007) Physical degradation of genomic DNA of soybean flours does not impair relative quantification of its transgenic content. Eur Food Res Technol 226:273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Debode F, Marien A, Janssen E, Bragard C, Berben G (2017) The influence of amplicon length on real-time PCR results. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 21:3–11Google Scholar
  13. Devlin RH, Yesaki TY, Biagi CA, Donaldson EM, Swanson P, Chan WK (1994) Extraordinary salmon growth. Nature 371:209–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Devlin RH, Yesaki TY, Donaldson EM, Du SJ, Hew CL (1995) Production of germline transgenic Pacific salmonids with dramatically increased growth performance. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 52:1376–1384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Devlin RH, Biagi CA, Yesaki TY (2004) Growth, viability and genetic characteristics of GH transgenic coho salmon strains. Aquaculture 236:607–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Devlin RH, Sakhrani D, Tymchuk WE, Rise ML, Goh B (2009) Domestication and growth hormone transgenesis cause similar changes in gene expression in coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:3047–3052CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Devlin RH, Sundström LF, Leggatt RA (2015) Assessing ecological and evolutionary consequences of growth-accelerated genetically engineered fishes. BioScience 65:685–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Du SJ, Gong Z, Fletcher GL, Shears MA, King MJ, Idler DR, Hew CL (1992) Growth enhancement in transgenic Atlantic salmon by the use of an “all fish” chimeric growth hormone gene construct. Nat Biotechnol 10:176–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. FAO (2014) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Rome, 223pp. ISBN 978-92-5-108275-1Google Scholar
  20. FDA (2015) AquAdvantage® salmon approval letter and appendix. http://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/GeneticEngineering/GeneticallyEngineeredAnimals/ucm466214.htm (last consulted on 22 June 2016)
  21. Fitzpatrick JL, Akbarashandiz H, Sakhrani D, Biagi CA, Pitcher TE, Devlin RH (2011) Cultured growth hormone transgenic salmon are reproductively out-competed by wild-reared salmon in semi-natural mating arenas. Aquaculture 312:185–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Forsberg CW, Phillips JP, Golovan SP, Fan MZ, Meidinger RG, Ajakaiye A, Hilborn D, Hacker RR (2003) The enviropig physiology, performance, and contribution to nutrient management advances in a regulated environment: the leading edge of change in the pork industry. J Anim Sci 81:E68–E77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Garikipati DK, Gahr SA, Rodgers BD (2006) Identification, characterization, and quantitative expression analysis of rainbow trout myostatin-1a and myostatin-1b genes. J Endocrinol 190:879–888CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hardie DC, Hebert PD (2004) Genome-size evolution in fishes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:1636–1646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hinegardner R, Rosen DE (1972) Cellular DNA content and the evolution of teleostean fishes. Am Nat 106:621–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ISO 21571 (2005) Foodstuffs. Methods of analysis for the detection of genetically modified organisms and derived products. Nucleic acid extraction. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson OW, Utter FM, Rabinovitch PS (1987) Interspecies differences in salmonid cellular DNA identified by flow cytometry. Copeia 1987:1001–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kind A, Schnieke A (2008) Animal pharming, two decades on. Transgenic Res 17:1025–1033CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lai L, Kang JX, Li R, Wang J, Witt WT, Yong HY, Hao Y, Wax DM, Murphy CN, Rieke A, Samuel M, Linville ML, Korte SW, Evans RW, Starzl TE, Prather RS, Daï Y (2006) Generation of cloned transgenic pigs rich in omega-3 fatty acids. Nat Biotechnol 24:435–436CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Li X, Li J, Zhang S, He Y, Pan L (2013) Novel real-time PCR method based on growth hormone gene for identification of Salmonidae ingredient in food. J Agric Food Chem 61:5170–5177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lievens A, Petrillo M, Querci M, Patak A (2015) Genetically modified animals: options and issues for traceability and enforcement. Trends Food Sci Technol 44:159–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Luo Y, Lin L, Bolund L, Jensen TG, Sørensen CB (2012) Genetically modified pigs for biomedical research. J Inherit Metab Dis 35:695–713CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lyall J, Irvine RM, Sherman A, McKinley TJ, Núñez A, Purdie A, Outtrim L, Brown I, Rolleston-Smith G, Sang H, Tiley L (2011) Suppression of avian influenza transmission in genetically modified chickens. Science 331:223–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Masri S, Rast H, Ripley T, James D, Green M, Jia X, Devlin RH (2002) Detection of genetically modified coho salmon using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. J Agric Food Chem 50:3161–3164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. McLeod C, Grice J, Campbell H, Herleth T (2006) Super salmon: the industrialisation of fish farming and the drive towards GM technologies in salmon production. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/37927
  36. Menozzi D, Mora C, Merigo A (2013) Genetically modified salmon for dinner? Transgenic salmon marketing scenarios. AgBioforum 15:276–293Google Scholar
  37. Mori T, Devlin RH (1999) Transgene and host growth hormone gene expression in pituitary and nonpituitary tissues of normal and growth hormone transgenic salmon. Mol Cell Endocrinol 149:129–139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Niemann H, Kues WA (2007) Transgenic farm animals: an update. Reprod Fertil Dev 19:762–770CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ohno S, Muramoto J, Klein J, Atkin NB (1969) Diploid-tetraploid relationship in clupeoid and salmonoid fish. Chromosomes Today 2:139–147Google Scholar
  40. Phillips JP, Golovan SP, Meidinger RG, Forsberg CW (2006) Transgenic enhancement of nutrient cycling: moving toward an environmentally sustainable animal agriculture. In Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 13–18 August, 2006. Instituto Prociência, pp 19–02Google Scholar
  41. Richt JA, Kasinathan P, Hamir N, Castilla J, Sathiyaseelan T, Vargas F, Sathiyaseelan J, Wu H, Matsushita H, Koster J, Kato S, Ishida I, Soto C, Robl J, Kuroiwa Y (2007) Production of cattle lacking prion protein. Nat Biotechnol 25:132–138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring HarborGoogle Scholar
  43. Uh M, Khattra J, Devlin RH (2006) Transgene constructs in coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) are repeated in a head-to-tail fashion and can be integrated adjacent to horizontally-transmitted parasite DNA. Transgenic Res 15:711–727CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Vinogradov AE (1998) Genome size and GC-percent in vertebrates as determined by flow cytometry: the triangular relationship. Cytometry 31:100–109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang Y, Hu W, Wu G, Sun Y, Chen S, Zhang F, Zhu Z, Feng J, Zhang X (2001) Genetic analysis of “all-fish” growth hormone gene transferred carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) and its F1 generation. Chin Sci Bull 46:a1–a4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Whyte JJ, Prather RS (2011) Genetic modifications of pigs for medicine and agriculture. Mol Reprod Dev 78(10–11):879–891CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Wu X, Ouyang H, Duan B, Pang D, Zhang L, Yuan T, Xue L, Ni D, Cheng L, Dong S, Wei Z, Li L, Yu M, Sun QY, Chen DY, Lai L, Dai Y, Li GP (2012) Production of cloned transgenic cow expressing omega-3 fatty acids. Transgenic Res 21:537–543CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Yaskowiak ES, Shears MA, Agarwal-Mawal A, Fletcher GL (2006) Characterization and multi-generational stability of the growth hormone transgene (EO-1α) responsible for enhanced growth rates in Atlantic salmon. Transgenic Res 15:465–480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frédéric Debode
    • 1
  • Eric Janssen
    • 1
  • Aline Marien
    • 1
  • Robert H. Devlin
    • 2
  • Kathrin Lieske
    • 3
  • Joachim Mankertz
    • 3
  • Gilbert Berben
    • 1
  1. 1.Unit Traceability and Authentication, Department Valorisation of Agricultural ProductsWalloon Agricultural Research Center (CRA-W)GemblouxBelgium
  2. 2.Fisheries and Oceans CanadaWest VancouverCanada
  3. 3.Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL)BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations