Advertisement

Food Analytical Methods

, Volume 9, Issue 8, pp 2321–2334 | Cite as

Optimization of Extraction Parameters of Phenolic Antioxidants from Leaves of Capparis spinosa Using Response Surface Methodology

  • Mohammad Fattahi
  • Rahimeh Rahimi
Article

Abstract

Optimization of antioxidant assay (2,2-dipheynl-1-picrylhydrazy (DPPH) scavenging assay), total phenol content (TPC), and total flavonoid content (TFC) from leaves of Capparis spinosa were investigated using response surface methodology (RSM). The conditions investigated were ethanol concentration (20–80 %, ethanol/water, v/v), extraction temperature (30–65 °C), and solvent to material ratio 20:50 (v/w). A rotatable Box–Behnken design (BBD) consisting of 15 experimental runs with three replicates at the center point were applied by second-order polynomial models. The results of RSM showed that the highest extraction efficiency was obtained in 49 % ethanol, 51.8 °C, and 50 (v/w) ratio of solvent to material. Under optimum conditions, the corresponding values for TPC, TFC, and antioxidant assay were 27.44 (mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE) g−1 dry weight (DW)), 26.07 (mg quercetin g−1 DW), and 85.74 (DPPHsc%), respectively. Comparison of predicted and observed data through the chi-square (X 2) values demonstrated that RSM models was useful for predicting of responses. In addition, the higher R 2 values (R 2 > 0.998) showed that models could efficiently predict the yield of responses.

Keywords

RSM Total phenol content Total flavonoid Antioxidant assay Optimization 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work was performed in the Department of Horticulture of Urmia University.

Funding

This study was funded by Urmia University.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Mohammad Fattahi declares that he has no conflict of interest. Rahimeh Rahimi declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Publication has been approved by all individual participants.

References

  1. Bimakr M, Rahman RA, Taip FS, Adzahan NM, Sarker MZI, Ganjloo A (2012) Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of crude oil from winter melon (Benincasa hispida) seed using response surface methodology and evaluation of its antioxidant activity, total phenolic content and fatty acid composition. Molecules 17:11748–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonina F, Puglia C, Ventura D, Aquino R, Tortora S, Sacchi A, Saija A, Tomaino A, Pellegrino M, de Capariis P (2002) In vitro antioxidant and in vivo photoprotective effects of a lyophilized extract of Capparis spinosa L. buds. J Cosmet Sci 53:321–36Google Scholar
  3. Box GE, Wilson K (1951) On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J R Stat Soc Series B (Methodological) 13:1–45Google Scholar
  4. Chiou A, Karathanos VT, Mylona A, Salta FN, Preventi F, Andrikopoulos NK (2007) Currants (Vitis vinifera L.) content of simple phenolics and antioxidant activity. Food Chem 102:516–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Escribano-Bailón M, Santos-Buelga C (2003) Polyphenol extraction from foods. In: Santos-Buelga C, Williamson G (eds) Methods in polyphenol analysis. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  6. Fattahi M, Nazeri V, Torras-Claveria L, Sefidkon F, Cusido RM, Zamani Z, Palazon J (2013) Identification and quantification of leaf surface flavonoids in wild-growing populations of Dracocephalum kotschyi by LC–DAD–ESI-MS. Food Chem 141:139–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ignat I, Volf I, Popa VI (2011) A critical review of methods for characterisation of polyphenolic compounds in fruits and vegetables. Food Chem 126:1821–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ilaiyaraja N, Likhith K, Babu GS, Khanum F (2015) Optimisation of extraction of bioactive compounds from Feronia limonia (wood apple) fruit using response surface methodology (RSM). Food Chem 173:348–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Khanfar MA, Sabri SS, Abu Zarga MH, Zeller K-P (2003) The chemical constituents of Capparis spinosa of Jordanian origin. Nat Prod Res 17:9–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Khiari Z, Makris DP, Kefalas P (2009) An investigation on the recovery of antioxidant phenolics from onion solid wastes employing water/ethanol-based solvent systems. Food Bioprocess Tech 2:337–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lanfer-Marquez UM, Barros RMC, Sinnecker P (2005) Antioxidant activity of chlorophylls and their derivatives. Food Res Int 38:885–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liyana-Pathirana C, Shahidi F (2005) Optimization of extraction of phenolic compounds from wheat using response surface methodology. Food Chem 93:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Martins S, Mussatto SI, Martínez-Avila G, Montañez-Saenz J, Aguilar CN, Teixeira JA (2011) Bioactive phenolic compounds: production and extraction by solid-state fermentation. A review Biotech Adv 29:365–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mašković PZ, Diamanto LD, Cvetanović A, Radojković M, Spasojević MB, Zengin G (2015) Optimization of the extraction process of antioxidants from orange using response surface methodology. Food Anal Method. 1-8Google Scholar
  15. Meziant L, Benchikh Y, Louaileche H (2014) Deployment of response surface methodology to optimize recovery of dark fresh fig (Ficus carica L., var. Azenjar) total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity. Food Chem 162:277–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Myers WR, Montgomery DC (2003) Response surface methodology. Encycl Biopharm Stat 1:858–69Google Scholar
  17. Nakajima J-i, Tanaka I, Seo S, Yamazaki M, Saito K (2004) LC/PDA/ESI-MS profiling and radical scavenging activity of anthocyanins in various berries. Biomed Res Int 2004:241–7Google Scholar
  18. Panico A, Cardile V, Garufi F, Puglia C, Bonina F, Ronsisvalle G (2005) Protective effect of Capparis spinosa on chondrocytes. Life Sci 77:2479–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pinho C, Melo A, Mansilha C, Ferreira IM (2010) Optimization of conditions for anthocyanin hydrolysis from red wine using response surface methodology (RSM). J Agr Food Chem 59:50–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Prakash O, Talat M, Hasan S, Pandey RK (2008) Factorial design for the optimization of enzymatic detection of cadmium in aqueous solution using immobilized urease from vegetable waste. Bioresource Technol 99:7565–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Prommuak C, De-Eknamkul W, Shotipruk A (2008) Extraction of flavonoids and carotenoids from Thai silk waste and antioxidant activity of extracts. Sep Purif Technol 62:444–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Puértolas E, Saldana G, Álvarez I, Raso J (2011) Experimental design approach for the evaluation of anthocyanin content of rose wines obtained by pulsed electric fields. Influence of temperature and time of maceration. Food Chem 126:1482–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Quanhong L, Caili F (2005) Application of response surface methodology for extraction optimization of germinant pumpkin seeds protein. Food Chem 92:701–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Radojkovića M, Zekovića Z, Jokićb S, Vidovića S (2012) Determination of optimal extraction parameters of mulberry leaves using response surface methodology (RSM). Rom Biotech Lett 17:7295–308Google Scholar
  25. Robards K, Prenzler PD, Tucker G, Swatsitang P, Glover W (1999) Phenolic compounds and their role in oxidative processes in fruits. Food Chem 66:401–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rodrigo M, Lazaro M, Alvarruiz A, Giner V (1992) Composition of capers (Capparis spinosa): influence of cultivar, size and harvest date. J Food Sci 57:1152–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sharaf M, El-Ansari M, Saleh N (2000) Quercetin triglycoside from Capparis spinosa. Fitoterapia 71:46–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shi J, Yu J, Pohorly J, Young JC, Bryan M, Wu Y (2003) Optimization of the extraction of polyphenols from grape seed meal by aqueous ethanol solution. J Food Agric Environ 1:42–7Google Scholar
  29. Shin Y, Liu RH, Nock JF, Holliday D, Watkins CB (2007) Temperature and relative humidity effects on quality, total ascorbic acid, phenolics and flavonoid concentrations, and antioxidant activity of strawberry. Postharvest Biol Tec 45:349–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Silva EM, Rogez H, Larondelle Y (2007) Optimization of extraction of phenolics from Inga edulis leaves using response surface methodology. Sep Purif Technol 55:381–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Slinkard K, Singleton VL (1977) Total phenol analysis: automation and comparison with manual methods. Am J Enol Viticult 28:49–55Google Scholar
  32. Tabaraki R, Heidarizadi E, Benvidi A (2012) Optimization of ultrasonic-assisted extraction of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peel antioxidants by response surface methodology. Sep Purif Technol 98:16–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tlili N, Khaldi A, Triki S, Munné-Bosch S (2010) Phenolic compounds and vitamin antioxidants of caper (Capparis spinosa). Plant Food Hum Nutr 65:260–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang X, Wu Y, Chen G, Yue W, Liang Q, Wu Q (2013) Optimisation of ultrasound assisted extraction of phenolic compounds from Sparganii rhizome with response surface methodology. Ultrason Sonochem 20:846–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wei Z-F, Wang X-Q, Peng X, Wang W, Zhao C-J, Zu Y-G, Fu Y-J (2015) Fast and green extraction and separation of main bioactive flavonoids from Radix Scutellariae. Ind Crop Prod 63:175–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhu C, Liu X (2013) Optimization of extraction process of crude polysaccharides from pomegranate peel by response surface methodology. Carbohyd Polym 92:1197–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Horticulture, Faculty of AgricultureUrmia UniversityUrmiaIran

Personalised recommendations