Molecular Identification of Four Genetically Modified Maize (Bt11, Bt176, Mon810 and T25) by Duplex Quantitative Real-Time PCR
- 277 Downloads
- 4 Citations
Abstract
In response to the increasing number of genetically modified (GM) events released on the market, control laboratories explore various strategies to simplify and reduce the number of tests needed to characterise the content in genetically modified organism (GMO) of a given sample. Lastly, multiplexing is considered as one of the possible ways to decrease the time and cost of analysis. Here, we report the development of four duplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests for the identification and the quantification of four maize transformation events from which commercial lines have been authorised in Europe namely, Bt11 and Bt176 (Syngenta, DE, USA), Mon810 MaisGard™ (Monsanto, MO, USA) and T25 Liberty Link™ (Bayer CropScience, Monheim, Germany). The duplex PCR tests combine a maize-specific PCR test hybridising in the Adh1 locus with an event-specific detection system designed on a junction fragment for each of these four GM maize. Real-time PCR tests, suitable to comply with the European regulation, were designed by using Taqman® chemistry.
Keywords
Maize GMO Event-specific Quantification Duplex QRT-PCRNotes
Conflict of Interest
All the authors have no financial relationship with the organisation that sponsored the research. The Conflict of Interest statements must list each author separately by name:
Dr. Maher Chaouachi declares that he has no conflict of interest. Mr. Mohamed Salem Zellama declares that he has no conflict of interest. Ms. Nesrine Nabi declares that he has no conflict of interest. Mr. Ahmed Ben Hafsa declares that he has no conflict of interest. Pr. Khaled Said declares that he has no conflict of interest. This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.
References
- Ananiev EV, Phillips RL, Rines HW (1998) A knob-associated tandem repeat in maize capable of forming fold-back DNA segments: are chromosome knobs megatransposons? Proc Natl Acad Sci 95:10785–10790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Arumuganathan K, Earle ED (1991) Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Mol Biol Rep 9:208–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chaouachi M, Alaya A, Ali IB, Hafsa AB, Nabi N, Bérard A, Romaniuk M, Skhiri F, Saïd K (2013) Development of real-time PCR method for the detection and the quantification of a new endogenous reference gene in sugar beet "Beta vulgaris L.": GMO application. Plant Cell Rep 32:117–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chaouachi M, Chupeau G, Berard A, McKhann H, Romaniuk M, Giancola S, Laval V, Bertheau Y, Brunel D (2008) A high-throughput multiplex method adapted for GMO detection. J Agric Food Chem 56:11596–11606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Collonnier C, Schattner A, Berthier G, Boyer F, Coué-Philippe G, De Beuckeler M, de Loose M, Windels P, Bertheau Y (2005) Characterization and event specific-detection by quantitative real time PCR of T25 maize insert. J AOAC Int 88:536–546Google Scholar
- Dong W, Yang L, Shen K, Kim B, Kleter GA, Marvin HJ, Guo R, Liang W, Zhang D (2008) GMDD: a database of GMO detection methods. BMC Bioinforma 9:260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- European Commission Regulations N° (1829/2003) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed. Off J Eur Union 2003a L268:1–23Google Scholar
- Fernandez S, Charles-Delobel C, Geldreich A, Berthier G, Boyer F, Collonnier C, Coué-Philippe G, Diolez A, Duplan MN, Kebdani N, Romaniuk M, Feinberg M, Bertheau Y (2005) Quantification of the 35S promoter in DNA extracts from genetically modified organisms using real-time polymerase chain reaction and specificity assessment on various genetically modified organisms, part I: operating procedure. J AOAC Int 88:547–557Google Scholar
- Forte VT, Di Pinto A, Martino C, Tantillo GM, Grasso G, Schena FP (2005) A general multiplex-PCR assay for the general detection of genetically modified soya and maize. Food Control 16:535–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Germini A, Zanetti A, Salati C, Rossi S, Forré S, Schmid S, Marchelli R, Fogher C (2004) Development of a seven-target multiplex PCR for the simultaneous detection of transgenic soybean and maize in feeds and foods. J Agric Food Chem 52:3275–3280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Guo JL, Yang L, Chen L, Morisset D, Li X, Pan L, Zhang D (2011) MPIC: a high-throughput analytical method for multiple DNA targets. Anal Chem 83:1579–1586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hamels ST, Glouden K, Gillard M, Debode F, Foti N, Sneyers M, Nuez TE, Pla M, Berben G, Moens W, Bertheau Y, Audéon C, Van den Eede G, Remacle J (2009) A PCR-microarray method for the screening of genetically modified organisms. Eur Food Res Technol 228:531–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Heide BR, Heir E, Holck A (2007) Detection of eight GMO maize events by qualitative, multiplex PCR and fluorescence capillary gel electrophoresis. Eur Food Res Technol 227:527–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Henegariu O, Heerema NA, Dlouhy SR, Vance GH, Vogt PH (1997) Multiplex PCR: critical parameters and step-by-step protocol. Biotechniques 23:504–511Google Scholar
- Hernandez M, Duplan M-N, Berthier G, Vaitilingom M, Hauser W, Freyer R, Pla M, Bertheau Y (2004) Development and comparison of four real-time polymerase chain reaction systems for specific detection and quantification of Zea mays L. J AgricFood Chem 52:4632–4637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hernandez M, Pla M, Esteve T, Prat S, Puigdomènech P, Ferrando A (2003a) A specific real-time quantitative PCR detection system for event MON810 in maize YieldGard based on the 3′-transgene integration sequence. Transgenic Res 12:179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hernandez M, Rodriguez-Lazaro D, Esteve T, Prat S, Pla M (2003b) Development of melting temperature-based SYBR Green I polymerase chain reaction methods for multiplex genetically modified organism detection. Anal Biochem 323:164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hernandez M, Rodriguez-Lazaro D, Zhang D, Esteve T, Pla M, Prat S (2005) Interlaboratory transfer of a PCR multiplex method for simultaneous detection of four genetically modified maize lines: Bt11, MON810, T25, and GA21. J Agric Food Chem 53:3333–3337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Holck A, Vaïtilingom M, Didierjean L, Rudi K (2002) 5′-Nuclease PCR for quantitative event-specific detection of the genetically modified Mon810 MaisGard maize. Eur Food Res Technol 214:449–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- ISO 5725 (1994) Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results—part 2: basic method for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility of a standard measurement method. http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/ISOOnline.openerpage
- ISO 5725 (1998) Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results—part 1: general principles and definitions. International Standard Organization, http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/ISOOnline.openerpage
- Mano J, Harada M, Takabatake R, Furui S, Kitta K, Nakamura K, Akiyama H, Teshima R, Noritake H, Hatano S, Futo S, Minegishi Y, Iizuka T (2012) Comprehensive GMO detection using real-time PCR array: single-laboratory validation. J AOAC Int 95:508–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Matsuoka T, Kawashima Y, Akiyama H, Miura H, Goda Y, Kusakabe Y, Isshiki K, Toyoda M, Hino A (2000) A method of detecting recombinant DNAs from four lines of genetically modified maize. J Food Hyg Social Japan 41:137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Matsuoka T, Kuribara H, Takubo K, Akiyama H, Miura H, Goda Y, Kusakabe Y, Isshiki K, Toyoda M, Hino A (2002) Detection of recombinant DNA segments introduced to genetically modified maize (Zea mays). J Agric Food Chem 50:2100–2109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nadal A, Esteve T, Pla M (2009) Multiplex polymerase chain reaction-capillary gel electrophoresis: a promising tool for GMO screening-assay for simultaneous detection of five genetically modified cotton events and species. J AOAC Int 92:765–772Google Scholar
- Pansiot J, Chaouachi M, Cavellini L, Romaniuk M, Ayadi M, Bertheau Y, Laval V (2011) Development of two screening duplex PCR assays for genetically modified organism quantification using multiplex real-time PCR master mixes. Eur Food Res Technol 232:327–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rizzi A, Agosti F, Daffonchio D, Sorlini C (2001) Detection of genetically modified Bt-maize in cooked food products by PCR. Ital J of Food Sci 3:265–273Google Scholar
- Ronning S, Vaïtilingom M, Berdal K, Holst-Jensen A (2003) Event specific real-time quantitative PCR for genetically modified Bt11 maize (Zea mays). Eur Food Res Technol 216:347–354Google Scholar
- Sylvia R, Broeders M, Sigrid C, De Keersmaecker J, Roosens NHC (2012) How to deal with the upcoming challenges in GMO detection in food and feed. J Biomed Biotechnol. doi: 10.1155/2012/402418 Google Scholar
- Takabatake R, Onishi M, Koiwa T, Futo S, Minegishi Y, Akiyama H, Teshima R, Kurashima T, Mano J, Furui S, Kitta K (2013) Development and interlaboratory validation of quantitative polymerase chain reaction method for screening analysis of genetically modified soybeans. Biol Pharm Bull 36:131–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tengel C, Schüβler P, Setzke E, Balles J, Sprenger-Hauβels M (2001) PCR-based detection of genetically modified soybean and maize in raw and highly processed foodstuffs. Biotechniques 31:426–429Google Scholar
- Yang L, Pan A, Zhang K, Guo J, Yin C, Chen J, Huang C, Zhang D (2005) Identification and quantification of three genetically modified insect resistant cotton lines using conventional and TaqMan real-time polymerase chain reaction methods. J Agric Food Chem 53:6222–6229CrossRefGoogle Scholar