Individual Differences in Diurnal Preference and Time-of-Exercise Interact to Predict Exercise Frequency
Diurnal preference (and chronotype more generally) has been implicated in exercise behavior, but this relation has not been examined using objective exercise measurements nor have potential psychosocial mediators been examined. Furthermore, time-of-day often moderates diurnal preference’s influence on outcomes, and it is unknown whether time-of-exercise may influence the relation between chronotype and exercise frequency.
The current study examined whether individual differences in diurnal preference (“morningness-eveningness”) predict unique variance in exercise frequency and if commonly studied psychosocial variables mediate this relation (i.e., behavioral intentions, internal exercise control, external exercise control, and conscientiousness). Moreover, the study sought to test whether individuals’ typical time-of-exercise moderated the impact of diurnal preference on exercise frequency.
One hundred twelve healthy adults (mean age = 25.4; SD = 11.6 years) completed baseline demographics and then wore Fitbit Zips® for 4 weeks to objectively measure exercise frequency and typical time-of-exercise. At the end of the study, participants also self-reported recent exercise.
Diurnal preference predicted both self-reported exercise and Fitbit-recorded exercise frequency. When evaluating mediators, only conscientiousness emerged as a partial mediator of the relation between diurnal preference and self-reported exercise. In addition, time-of-exercise moderated diurnal preference’s relation to both self-reported exercise and Fitbit-recorded exercise frequency such that diurnal preference predicted higher exercise frequency when exercise occurred at a time that was congruent with one’s diurnal preference.
Based on these findings, diurnal preference is valuable, above and beyond other psychological constructs, in predicting exercise frequency and represents an important variable to incorporate into interventions seeking to increase exercise.
KeywordsDiurnal preference Chronotype Morningness Exercise Physical activity
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Authors’ Statement of Conflict of Interest and Adherence to Ethical Standards Authors Hisler, Phillips and Krizan declare that they have no conflict of interest. All procedures, including the informed consent process, were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000.
This research was approved by an institutional review board and involved human participants who provided informed consent to participate in the research.
- 1.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Physical activity guidelines for Americans. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 2008.Google Scholar
- 2.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010: understanding and improving health. Washington, DC: U.S. Government printing office; 2000.Google Scholar
- 3.Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York (NY): Psychology Press; 2010Google Scholar
- 4.Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hal; 1986.Google Scholar
- 7.Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis, NLD. Youth attitudes. In: Smith AL, Biddle SJH, eds. Youth physical activity and sedentary behavior: challenges and solutions. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2008: 167–192.Google Scholar
- 8.Roberts BW, Kuncel NR, Shiner R, Caspi A, Goldberg LR. The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perpect Psyhcol Sci. 2007; 2(4): 313–345.Google Scholar
- 11.Van Dongen HP, Dinges DF. Circadian rhythms in fatigue, alertness, and performance. Prin Pract Sleep Med. 2000; 20:391–9.Google Scholar
- 15.Wang L, Chartrand TL. Morningness–eveningness and risk taking. J Psychol Interdicip Appl. 2015; 149(4): 394–411.Google Scholar
- 22.Lipnevich AA, Credé M, Hahn E, Spinath FM, Roberts RD, Preckel F. How distinctive are morningness and eveningness from the Big Five-Factors of personality? A meta-analytic investigation. J Pers and Soc Psychol. In press.Google Scholar
- 34.Ajzen, I. Theory of Planned Behavior Questionnaire. Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Available at www.midss.org. 2013. Accessibility verified September, 28, 2016.
- 36.Jekauc D, Völkle M, Wagner MO, Mess F, Reiner M, Renner B. Prediction of attendance at fitness center: A comparison between the theory of planned behavior, the social cognitive theory, and the physical activity maintenance theory. Front Psychol. 2015; 121(6): 1–10.Google Scholar
- 40.Costa PT, McCrae RR. The revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PIR). In: Boyle GJ, Matthews G, Saklosfke DH, eds. The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment. London: SAGE; 2008: 179–198.Google Scholar
- 42.Mammen G, Gardiner S, Senthinathan A, McClemont L, Stone M, Faulkner G. (2012). Is this bit fit? Measuring the quality of the Fitbit step-counter. Health Fit J of Can, 5(4); 30–39.Google Scholar
- 46.IBM Corp. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2013.Google Scholar
- 47.Hayes AF. PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. www.afhayes.com. Published 2012.