Baseline Characteristics and Generalizability of Participants in an Internet Smoking Cessation Randomized Trial
- 199 Downloads
The potential for sampling bias in Internet smoking cessation studies is widely recognized. However, few studies have explicitly addressed the issue of sample representativeness in the context of an Internet smoking cessation treatment trial.
The purpose of the present study is to examine the generalizability of participants enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of an Internet smoking cessation intervention using weighted data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS).
A total of 5290 new users on a smoking cessation website enrolled in the trial between March 2012 and January 2015. Descriptive statistics summarized baseline characteristics of screened and enrolled participants, and multivariate analysis examined predictors of enrollment. Generalizability analyses compared demographic and smoking characteristics of trial participants to current smokers in the 2012–2014 waves of NHIS (n = 19,043) and to an NHIS subgroup based on Internet use and cessation behavior (n = 3664). Effect sizes were obtained to evaluate the magnitude of differences across variables.
Predictors of study enrollment were age, gender, race, education, and motivation to quit. Compared to NHIS smokers, trial participants were more likely to be female, college educated, and daily smokers and to have made a quit attempt in the past year (all effect sizes 0.25–0.60). In comparisons with the NHIS subgroup, differences in gender and education were attenuated, while differences in daily smoking and smoking rate were amplified.
Few differences emerged between Internet trial participants and nationally representative samples of smokers, and all were in expected directions. This study highlights the importance of assessing generalizability in a focused and specific manner.
KeywordsSmoking cessation Internet Research design
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This study was supported by funding from the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (#5R01CA155489). The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01544153).
Conflict of Interest
Sarah Cha, Raymond S. Niaura, and Amanda L. Graham are employees of Truth Initiative, a non-profit public health foundation that runs BecomeAnEX.org, an online tobacco cessation intervention.
- 1.US Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of smoking—50 years of progress: A report of the surgeon general. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2014.Google Scholar
- 3.Institute of Medicine. Ending the tobacco problem: A blueprint for the nation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007.Google Scholar
- 4.Fiore MC, Jaén CR, Baker TB, et al. Tobacco use and dependence guideline panel. Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. Clinical practice guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service; 2008.Google Scholar
- 9.Pew Internet & American Life Project. Internet use over time. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/internet-use/internet-use-over-time/. Published 2015. Accessed May 15, 2015.
- 10.Pew Internet & American Life Project. Internet user demographics. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/internet-use/latest-stats/. Published 2015. Accessed May 15, 2015.
- 11.Pew Internet & American Life Project. Health fact sheet. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheets/health-fact-sheet/. Published 2015. Accessed May 15, 2015.
- 12.Fox S. Online Health Search. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media/Files/Reports/2006/PIP_Online_Health_2006.pdf.pdf. Published October 29, 2006. Accessed August 19, 2013.
- 46.McCausland KL, Curry LE, Mushro A, Carothers S, Xiao H, Vallone DM. Promoting a web-based smoking cessation intervention: Implications for practice. Cases Publ Health Commun Mark. 2011; 5 Proc: 3–26.Google Scholar
- 47.National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Interview Survey, 2007. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/quest_data_related_1997_forward.htm. Published 2007. Accessed March 23, 2009.
- 48.Hampton KN, Goulet LS, Rainie L, Purcell K. Social networking sites and our lives. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media/Files/Reports/2011/PIP%20-%20Social%20networking%20sites%20and%20our%20lives.pdf . Published June 16, 2011. Accessed September 7, 2012.
- 51.Center for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health Interview Survey, 2015. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/nhis_questionnaires.htm. Published 2015. Accessed June 23, 2015.
- 52.National Center for Health Statistics. Survey Description, National Health Interview Survey, 2012. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/quest_data_related_1997_forward.htm. Published 2013. Accessed August 25, 2015.
- 53.National Center for Health Statistics. Survey Description, National Health Interview Survey, 2013. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/quest_data_related_1997_forward.htm. Published 2014. Accessed August 25, 2015.
- 54.National Center for Health Statistics. Survey Description, National Health Interview Survey, 2014. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/quest_data_related_1997_forward.htm. Published 2015. Accessed August 25, 2015.
- 55.Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988: 179-213.Google Scholar
- 56.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 2015.
- 58.Lumley T. Analysis of complex survey samples: Survey 3.30 package manual. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survey/survey.pdf. Published 2014. Accessed December 22, 2014.
- 59.Fox S. Health topics. http://www.pewinternet.org/2011/02/01/health-topics-2/. Published February 1, 2011. Accessed July 25, 2012.