Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 49, Issue 3, pp 398–410 | Cite as

The Results of the “Positive Action for Today’s Health” (PATH) Trial for Increasing Walking and Physical Activity in Underserved African-American Communities

  • Dawn K. Wilson
  • M. Lee Van Horn
  • E. Rebekah Siceloff
  • Kassandra A. Alia
  • Sara M. St. George
  • Hannah G. Lawman
  • Nevelyn N. Trumpeter
  • Sandra M. Coulon
  • Sarah F. Griffin
  • Abraham Wandersman
  • Brent Egan
  • Natalie Colabianchi
  • Melinda Forthofer
  • Barney Gadson
Original Article

Abstract

Background

The “Positive Action for Today’s Health” (PATH) trial tested an environmental intervention to increase walking in underserved communities.

Methods

Three matched communities were randomized to a police-patrolled walking plus social marketing, a police-patrolled walking-only, or a no-walking intervention. The 24-month intervention addressed safety and access for physical activity (PA) and utilized social marketing to enhance environmental supports for PA. African-Americans (N = 434; 62 % females; aged 51 ± 16 years) provided accelerometry and psychosocial measures at baseline and 12, 18, and 24 months. Walking attendance and trail use were obtained over 24 months.

Results

There were no significant differences across communities over 24 months for moderate-to-vigorous PA. Walking attendance in the social marketing community showed an increase from 40 to 400 walkers per month at 9 months and sustained ~200 walkers per month through 24 months. No change in attendance was observed in the walking-only community.

Conclusions

Findings support integrating social marketing strategies to increase walking in underserved African-Americans (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01025726).

Keywords

Physical activity Walking interventions African-Americans Perceptions of safety and access 

Supplementary material

12160_2014_9664_MOESM1_ESM.docx (61 kb)
ESM (DOCX 60.5 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, et al. Physical activity and public health: Updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007; 39: 1423-1434.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brock DW, Thomas O, Cowan CD, Allison DB, Gaesser GA, Hunter GR. Association between insufficiently physically active and the prevalence of obesity in the United States. J Phys Act Health. 2009; 6: 1-5.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dunn AL, Marcus BH, Kampert JB, et al. Comparison of lifestyle and structured interventions to increase physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness: A randomized trial. JAMA. 1999; 281: 327-334.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, et al. Physical activity and public health A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA. 1995; 273: 402-407.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jones DA, Ainsworth BA, J.B. C, et al.: Moderate leisure time physical activity: Who is meeting the public health recommendations? A national cross-sectional study. Arch Family Med. 1998, 7:285289.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    King AC, Blair SN, Bild DE, et al. Determinants of physical activity and interventions in adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992; 24: S221-236.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marcus BH, King TK, Clark MM, Pinto BM, Bock BC. Theories and techniques for promoting physical activity behaviours. Sports Med. 1996; 22: 321-331.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Young DR, King AC. Exercise Adherence: Determinants of physical activity and applications of health behavior change theories. Med Exerc Nutr Health. 1995; 4: 335-348.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sallis JF, Owen N. Physical Activity and Behavioral Medicine. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumanyika SK, Whitt-Glover MC, Gary TL, et al. Expanding the obesity research paradigm to reach African American communities. Prev Chron Dis. 2007; 4: A112.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Booth SL, Sallis JF, Ritenbaugh C, et al. Environmental and societal factors affect food choice and physical activity: Rationale, influences, and leverage points. Nutr Rev. 2001; 59: S21-39. discussion S57-65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988; 15: 351-377.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jancey JM, Clarke A, Howat PA, et al. A Physical Activity Program to Mobilize Older People: A Practical and Sustainable Approach. Gerontologist. 2008; 48: 251-257.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kinney AM, Hutton L, Carlson B, et al. Isanti county active living: Measuring change in perception and behavior. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 43: S392-S394.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krieger J, Rabkin J, Sharify D, Song L. High Point Walking for Health: Creating Built and Social Environments That Support Walking in a Public Housing Community. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99: S593-S599.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zenk SN, Wilbur J, Wang E, et al. Neighborhood environment and adherence to a walking intervention in African American women. Health Educ Behav. 2009; 36: 167-181.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brownson RC, Smith CA, Pratt M, et al. Preventing cardiovascular disease through community-based risk reduction: The Bootheel Heart Health Project. Am J Public Health. 1996; 86: 206-213.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fisher KJ, Fuzhong L. A Community-Based Walking Trial to Improve Neighborhood Quality of Life in Older Adults: A Multilevel Analysis. Ann Behav Med. 2004; 28: 186-194.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    King AC, Marcus B, Ahn D, et al. Identifying subgroups that succeed or fail with three levels of physical activity intervention: The Activity Counseling Trial. Health Psychol. 2006; 25: 336-347.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Andreasen A. Marketing Social Change: Changing Behavior to Promote Health, Social Development, and the Environment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1995.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gordon R, McDermott L, Stead M, Angus K. The effectiveness of social marketing interventions for health improvement: What’s the evidence? Publ Health. 2006; 120: 1133-1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Beaudoin CE, Fernandez C, Wall JL, Farley TA. Promoting healthy eating and physical activity short-term effects of a mass media campaign. Am J Prev Med. 2007; 32: 217-223.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Van Duyn MAS, McCrae T, Wingrove BK, et al. Adapting Evidence-Based Strategies to Increase Physical Activity Among African Americans, Hispanics, Hmong, and Native Hawaiians: A Social Marketing Approach. Prev Chron Dis. 2007; 4: A102.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wilson DK, Trumpeter NN, St George SM, et al. An overview of the “Positive Action for Today's Health” (PATH) trial for increasing walking in low income, ethnic minority communities. Contemp Clin Trials. 2010; 31: 624-633.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Coulon SM, Wilson DK, Griffin S, et al. Formative Process Evaluation for Implementing a Social Marketing Intervention to Increase Walking Among African Americans in the Positive Action for Today’s Health Trial. Am J Public Health. 2012; 102: 2315-2321.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Langer EJ, Rodin J. The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: A field experiment in an institutional setting. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1976; 34: 191-198.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kotler P. Marketing for Non-profit Organizations. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ; 1975.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Alcalay R, Bell RA. Promoting Nutrition and Physical Activity Through Social Marketing: Current Practices and Recommendations. Center for Advanced Studies in Nutrition and Social Marketing. Davis, CA: University of California; 2000.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wilson DK, St George SM, Trumpeter NN, et al. Qualitative developmental research among low income African American adults to inform a social marketing campaign for walking. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013; 10: 33.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Welk GJ, Schaben JA, Morrow JR Jr. Reliability of accelerometry-based activity monitors: A generalizability study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36: 1637-1645.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Trumpeter NN, Lawman HG, Wilson DK, et al. Accelerometry cut points for physical activity in underserved African Americans. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012; 9: 73.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Evenson KR, Terry JW Jr. Assessment of differing definitions of accelerometer nonwear time. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2009; 80: 355-362.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Meyers DC, Wilson DK, Kugler KA, et al. Assessing urban walking trail use and changes in the trail environment using systematic observational protocols. Health Place. 2012; 18: 991-999.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    McKenzie TL, Cohen DA: System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC) Description and Procedures Manual. 2007Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    McKenzie TL, Cohen DA, Sehgal A, Williamson S, Golinelli D. System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC): Reliability and Feasibility Measures. J Phys Act Health. 2006; 3(Suppl 1): S208-S222.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cohen D, Sehgal A, Williamson S, et al. Impact of a new bicycle path on physical activity. Prev Med. 2008; 46: 80-81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schafer JL. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. London: Chapman & Hall; 1997.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Taljaard M, Donner A, Klar N. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials. Biom J. 2008; 50: 329-345.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Catellier DJ, Hannan PJ, Murray DM, et al. Imputation of missing data when measuring physical activity by accelerometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005; 37: S555-S562.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Enders CK. Analyzing longitudinal data with missing values. Rehab Psychol. 2011; 56: 267-288.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    van Buuren S, Boshuizen HC, Knook DL. Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in survival analysis. Stat Med. 1999; 18: 681-694.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. MICE: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. J Stat Softw. 2011; 45: 1-67.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Team RCD. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2008.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Siceloff R, Coulon S, Wilson DK. Physical activity as a mediator linking neighborhood environmental supports and obesity in African Americans in the PATH trial. Health Psychol. 2014; 33: 481-489.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Stokols D. Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. Am J Health Promot. 1996; 10: 282-298.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Ecological Approach. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Co; 1999.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T. Theorising interventions as events in systems. Am J Community Psychol. 2009; 43: 267-276.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wilson DK, Ellerbe C, Lawson A, et al. Imputational modeling of spatial context and social environmental predictors of walking in the in an underserved community in the PATH trial. Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2012; 4: 15-23.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Reichardt CS. A typology of Strategies for Ruling out Threats to Validity. In: Bickman L, ed. Research Design: Donald Campbell’s Legacy. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2000.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dawn K. Wilson
    • 1
  • M. Lee Van Horn
    • 1
  • E. Rebekah Siceloff
    • 1
  • Kassandra A. Alia
    • 1
  • Sara M. St. George
    • 1
  • Hannah G. Lawman
    • 1
  • Nevelyn N. Trumpeter
    • 1
  • Sandra M. Coulon
    • 1
  • Sarah F. Griffin
    • 2
  • Abraham Wandersman
    • 1
  • Brent Egan
    • 3
  • Natalie Colabianchi
    • 4
  • Melinda Forthofer
    • 5
  • Barney Gadson
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Heath, Education, and Human DevelopmentClemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  3. 3.Department of MedicineUniversity of South Carolina School of Medicine-Greenville, Care Coordination InstituteGreenvilleUSA
  4. 4.Institute for Social Research, School of Public Health (Epidemiology)University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  5. 5.Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public HealthUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  6. 6.Newton Family Life CenterSumterUSA

Personalised recommendations