Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 139–152 | Cite as

The SHED-IT Community Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Internet- and Paper-Based Weight Loss Programs Tailored for Overweight and Obese Men

  • Philip J. Morgan
  • Robin Callister
  • Clare E. Collins
  • Ronald C. Plotnikoff
  • Myles D. Young
  • Nina Berry
  • Patrick McElduff
  • Tracy Burrows
  • Elroy Aguiar
  • Kristen L. Saunders
Original Article



There is limited evidence for effective obesity treatment programs that engage men.


This study evaluated the efficacy of two gender-tailored weight loss interventions for men, which required no face-to-face contact.


This was a three-arm, randomized controlled trial: (1) Resources (n = 54), gender-tailored weight loss materials (DVD, handbooks, pedometer, tape measure); (2) Online (n = 53), Resources materials plus study website and e-feedback; and (3) Wait-list control (n = 52). The interventions lasted 3 months and were grounded in Social Cognitive Theory.


At 6 months, significantly greater weight loss was observed for the Online (−4.7 kg; 95 % CI −6.1, −3.2) and Resources (−3.7 kg; 95 % CI −4.9, −2.5) groups compared to the control (−0.5 kg; 95 % CI −1.4, 0.4). Additionally, both intervention groups significantly improved body mass index, percent body fat, waist circumference, blood pressure, physical activity, quality of life, alcohol risk, and portion size, compared to controls.


Men achieved significant weight loss after receiving novel, minimal-contact, gender-tailored programs, which were designed for widespread dissemination.


Weight loss Men Obesity Online Treatment 


  1. 1.
    Finucane MM, Stevens GA, Cowan MJ, et al. National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: Systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9.1 million participants. Lancet. 2011;377:557-567.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wirth A, Steinmetz B. Gender differences in changes in subcutaneous and intra-abdominal fat during weight reduction: An ultrasound study. Obes Res. 1998;6:393-399.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Australian Bureau of Statistics: Overweight and obesity in adults in Australia: A snapshot, 20072008. Canberra, 2011.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pagoto SL, Schneider KL, Oleski JL, et al. Male Inclusion in Randomized Controlled Trials of Lifestyle Weight Loss Interventions. Obesity. 2012;20:1234-1239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gray CM, Anderson AS, Clarke AM, et al. Addressing male obesity: An evaluation of a group-based weight management intervention for Scottish men. J Mens Health. 2009;6:70-81.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sabinsky MS, Toft U, Raben A, Holm L. Overweight men’s motivations and perceived barriers towards weight loss. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007;61:526-531.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Egger G. Intervening in men's nutrition: Lessons from the GutBuster men's 'waist loss' program. Aust J Nutr Diet. 2000;57:46-49.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morgan PJ, Warren JM, Lubans DR, Collins CE, Callister R. Engaging men in weight loss: Experiences of men who participated in the male only SHED-IT pilot study. Obes Res Clin Prac. 2011;5:e239-e248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Young MD, Morgan PJ, Plotnikoff RC, Callister R, Collins CE. Effectiveness of male-only weight loss and weight loss maintenance interventions: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2012;13:393-408.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Egger G, Bolton A, O'Neill M, Freeman D. Effectiveness of an abdominal obesity reduction programme in men: The GutBuster 'waist loss' programme. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1996;20:227-231.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Collins CE, Morgan PJ, Warren JM, Lubans DR, Callister R. Men participating in a weight-loss intervention are able to implement key dietary messages, but not those relating to vegetables or alcohol: The Self-Help, Exercise and Diet using Internet Technology (SHED-IT) study. Public Health Nutr. 2011;14:168-175.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lubans D, Morgan P, Collins C, Warren J, Callister R. Exploring the mechanisms of weight loss in the SHED-IT intervention for overweight men: A mediation analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:76.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morgan PJ, Lubans DR, Collins CE, Warren JM, Callister R. The SHED-IT Randomized Controlled Trial: Evaluation of an Internet-based Weight Loss Program for Men. Obesity. 2009;17:2025-2032.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morgan PJ, Lubans DR, Collins CE, Warren JM, Callister R. 12-Month Outcomes and Process Evaluation of the SHED-IT RCT: An Internet-Based Weight Loss Program Targeting Men. Obesity. 2011;19:142-151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Morgan PJ, Collins CE, Plotnikoff RC, et al. The SHED-IT community trial study protocol: A randomised controlled trial of weight loss programs for overweight and obese men. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:701.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Norton K. Sports Medicine Australia pre-exercise screening system. Sports Medicine Australia (SMA), 2005.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morgan PJ, Lubans DR, Callister R, et al. The 'Healthy Dads, Healthy Kids' randomized controlled trial: Efficacy of a healthy lifestyle program for overweight fathers and their children. Int J Obes. 2011;35:436-447.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gough B, Conner MT. Barriers to healthy eating amongst men: A qualitative analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:387-395.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kiefer I, Rathemanner T, Kunze M. Eating and dieting differences in men and women. J Mens Health Gend. 2005;2:194-201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lewis S, Thomas SL, Hyde J, Castle DJ, Komesaroff PA. A qualitative investigation of obese men's experiences with their weight. Am J Health Behav. 2011;35:458-469.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Smith JA, Braunack-Mayer AJ, Wittert GA, Warin MJ. Qualities men value when communicating with general practitioners: Implications for primary care settings. Med J Aust. 2008;189:618-621.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Coates J. Men talk. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Australian Bureau of Statistics: Socio-economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) Australia- 2006: Postal Areas, Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage No. ABS catalogue 2033.0.55.001. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2008.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    World Health Organization (WHO): Waist circumference and waist-hip ratio: Report of a WHO expert consultation. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 8–11 December 2008.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gibson AL, Holmes JC, Desautels RL, Edmonds LB, Nuudi L. Ability of new octapolar bioimpedance spectroscopy analyzers to predict 4-component-model percentage body fat in Hispanic, black, and white adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87:332-338.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Le Masurier GC, Lee SM, Tudor-Locke C. Motion sensor accuracy under controlled and free-living conditions. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:905-910.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Steeves JA, Silcott NA, Bassett DR, Thompson DL, Fitzhugh EC. Evaluation of the Omron HJ-720ITC Pedometer under Free-Living Conditions. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:1791-1797.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marshall AL, Miller YD, Burton NW, Brown WJ. Measuring total and domain-specific sitting: A study of reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42:1094-1102.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Watson J, Collins C, Sibbritt D, Dibley M, Garg M. Reproducibility and comparative validity of a food frequency questionnaire for Australian children and adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Giles GG, Ireland PD. Dietary Questionnaire for Epidemiological Studies (Version 2). Melbourne: The Cancer Council Victoria; 1996.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption–II. Addiction. 1993;88:791-804.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Allen JP, Litten RZ, Fertig JB, Babor T. A review of research on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1997;21:613-619.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ware J Jr. Kosinski M, Keller SD: A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220-233.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: The Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep. 1991;14:540-545.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fayers P, King M. The baseline characteristics did not differ significantly. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:1047-1048.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    White IR, Horton NJ, Carpenter J, Pocock SJ. Strategy for intention to treat analysis in randomised trials with missing outcome data. Br Med J. 2011;342:d40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Br Med J. 2010;340:c869.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Neve M, Morgan P, Collins C. Weight change in a commercial web-based weight loss program and its association with website use: Cohort study. J Med Int Res. 2011;13:e83.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes with Lifestyle Intervention or Metformin. N Eng J Med. 2002;346:393-403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Patrick K, Calfas KJ, Norman GJ, et al. Outcomes of a 12-month web-based intervention for overweight and obese men. Ann Behav Med. 2011;42:391-401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tanaka M, Adachi Y, Adachi K, Sato C. Effects of a non-face-to-face behavioral weight-control program among Japanese overweight males: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Med. 2010;17:17-24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Leslie WS, Lean MEJ, Baillie HM, Hankey C. Weight management: A comparison of existing dietary approaches in a work-site setting. Int J Obes. 2002;26:1469-1475.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Ross R. Body mass index, waist circumference, and health risk: Evidence in support of current National Institutes of Health guidelines. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:2074-2079.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Neve M, Morgan PJ, Jones PR, Collins CE. Effectiveness of web-based interventions in achieving weight loss and weight loss maintenance in overweight and obese adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2010;11:306-321.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Norman GJ, Zabinski MF, Adams MA, et al. A Review of eHealth Interventions for Physical Activity and Dietary Behavior Change. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33:336-345.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Donnelly JE, Blair SN, Jakicic JM, et al. American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. Appropriate physical activity intervention strategies for weight loss and prevention of weight regain for adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:459-471.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    George ES, Kolt GS, Duncan MJ, et al. A Review of the Effectiveness of Physical Activity Interventions for Adult Males. Sports Med. 2012;42:281-300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Barker R, Cooke B. Diet, obesity and being overweight: A qualitative research study. Health Educ J. 1992;51:117-121.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Jackson M, Ball K, Crawford D. Beliefs about the causes of weight change in the Australian population. Int J Obes. 2001;25:1512-1516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Australian Bureau of Statistics: Alcohol Consumption in Australia: A Snapshot, 200405 No. 4832.0.55.001. Canberra, 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip J. Morgan
    • 1
  • Robin Callister
    • 2
  • Clare E. Collins
    • 3
  • Ronald C. Plotnikoff
    • 1
  • Myles D. Young
    • 1
  • Nina Berry
    • 1
  • Patrick McElduff
    • 4
  • Tracy Burrows
    • 3
  • Elroy Aguiar
    • 2
  • Kristen L. Saunders
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Education, Priority Research Centre in Physical Activity and NutritionUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
  2. 2.School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, Priority Research Centre in Physical Activity and NutritionUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
  3. 3.School of Health Sciences, Priority Research Centre in Physical Activity and NutritionUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
  4. 4.School of Medicine and Public HealthUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia

Personalised recommendations