Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 363–372

Impact of Genetic Causal Information on Medical Students’ Clinical Encounters with an Obese Virtual Patient: Health Promotion and Social Stigma

Original Article

Abstract

Background

Health care providers will increasingly encounter information about the genetics of obesity as genetics research progresses.

Purpose

This study explores whether information about the genetics of obesity reduces medical student stigmatization of obese patients, and how it affects rates of health behavior-related referral.

Methods

One hundred and ten third and fourth year medical students were randomly assigned to read about genetic or behavioral mechanisms of obesity, or a control topic. Students interacted with an obese virtual patient in a virtual clinic and completed a battery of measures.

Results

Rates of most health behavior screening recommendations (weight loss, exercise, and diet consultations) were lower among participants exposed to genetic causal information than control. The genetic causal information group exhibited less negative stereotyping of the patient than control, F(1,105) = 5.00, p = 0.028, but did not differ in anticipated patient adherence, F(1,105) = 3.18, p = 0.077.

Conclusions

Information highlighting genetic contributions to obesity may lead to both positive and negative outcomes. Communication about the genetics of obesity should discuss the multi-factorial and non-deterministic nature of genetic risk.

Keywords

Obesity Genetics Stigma Provider attitudes Health behavior Virtual reality 

References

  1. 1.
    Maes HHM, Neale MC, Eaves LJ: Genetic and environmental factors in relative body weight and human adiposity. Behavior Genetics. 1997, 27:325–351.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bouchard C: Gene-environment interactions in the etiology of obesity: Defining the fundamentals. Obesity. 2008, 16:S5-S10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Agurs-Collins T, Khoury MJ, Simon-Morton D, et al.: Public health genomics: Translating obesity genomics research into population health benefits. Obesity. 2008, 16:S85–S94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marti A, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Martinez JA: Interaction between genes and lifestyle factors on obesity. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 2008, 67:1–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Collins FS: Has the revolution arrived?. Nature. 2010, 464:674-675.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guttmacher AE, Porteous ME, McInerney JD: Educating health-care professionals about genetics and genomics. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2007, 8:151-157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Foster GD, Wadden TA, Makris AP, et al.: Primary care physicians’ attitudes about obesity and its treatment. Obesity Research. 2003, 11:1168-1177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ogden J, Bandara I, Cohen H, et al.: General practicioners’ and patients’ models of obesity: Whose problem is it?. Patient Education and Counseling. 2001, 44:227-233.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Must A, Spadano J, Coakley EH, et al.: The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999, 282:1523-1529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Scott JG, Cohen D, DiCiccio-Bloom B, et al.: Speaking of weight: How patients and primary care clinicians initiate weight loss counseling. Preventive Medicine. 2004, 38:819-827.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thande NK, Hurstak EE, Sciacca RE, Giardina E-GV: Management of obesity: A challenge for medical training and practice. Obesity. 2009, 17:107-113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tham M, Young D: The role of the general practitioner in weight management in primary care - a cross sectional study in General Practice. BMC Family Practice. 2008, 9.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Simkin-Silverman LR, Gleason KA, King WC, et al.: Predictors of weight control advice in primary care practices: Patient health and psychosocial characteristics. Preventive Medicine. 2005, 40:71-82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jay M, Kalet A, Ark T, et al.: Physicians’ attitudes about obesity and their associations with competency and specialty: A cross-sectional study. BMC Health Services Research. 2009, 9.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Visser F, Hiddink G, Koelen M, et al.: Longitudinal changes in GPs’ task perceptions, self-efficacy, barriers, and practices of nutrition education and treatment of overweight. Family Practice. 2008, 25:i105-i111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Block JP, DeSalvo KB, Fisher WP: Are physicians equipped to address the obesity epidemic? Knowledge and attitudes of internal medicine residents. Preventive Medicine. 2003, 36:669-675.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hayden MJ, Dixon JB, Piterman L, O'Brien PE: Physician attitudes, beliefs, and barriers toward the management and treatment of adult obesity: A literature review. Australian Journal of Primary Health. 2008, 14:9-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leventhal H, Benyamini Y, Brownlee S: Illness representations: Theoretical foundations. Perceptions of health and illness. Amsterdam: Harwood, 1997, 1-18.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ogden J, Flanagan Z: Beliefs about the causes and solutions to obesity: A comparison of GPs and lay people. Patient Education and Counseling. 2008, 71:72-78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grant RW, Hivert M, Pandiscio JC, et al.: The clinical application of genetic testing in type 2 diabetes: A patient and physician survey. Diabetologia. 2009, 52:2299-2305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Puhl RM, Heuer CA: The stigma of obesity: A review and update. Obesity. 2009, 17:941-964.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Harvey EL, Hill AJ: Health professionals’ views of overweight people and smoking. International Journal of Obesity. 2001, 25:1253-1261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Price JH, Desmond SM, Krol RA, Snyder FF, O’Connell JK: Family practice physicians’ beliefs, attitudes, and practices regarding obesity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1987, 3:339-345.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Beach MC, Roter DL, Wang NY, Duggan PS, Cooper LA: Are physicians’ attitudes of respect accurately perceived by patients and associated with more positive communication behaviors?. Patient Education and Counseling. 2006, 62:347-354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Street Jr. RL, Gordon H, Haidet P: Physicians’ communication and perceptions of patients: Is it how they look, how they talk, or is it just the doctor?. Social Science and Medicine. 2007, 64:586-598.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Persky S, Eccleston CP: Medical student bias and care recommendations for an obese versus non-obese virtual patient. International Journal of Obesity. In press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Amy NK, Aalborg A, Lyons P, Keranen L: Barriers to routine gynecological cancer screening for White and African-American obese women. International Journal of Obesity. 2006, 30:147-155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Puhl RM, Brownell KD: Psychosocial origins of obesity stigma: Toward changing a powerful and pervasive bias. Obesity Reviews. 2003, 4:213-227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Weiner B, Perry RP, Magnusson J: An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1988, 55:738-748.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Crandall CS: Prejudice against fat people: Ideology and self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994, 66:882-894.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Daníelsdóttir S, O’Brien KS, Ciao A: Anti-fat prejudice reduction: A review of published studies. Obesity Facts. 2010, 3:47-58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ross KM, Shivy VA, Mazzeo SE: Ambiguity and judgments of obese individuals: No news could be bad news. Eating Behaviors. 2009, 10:152-156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Teachman BA, Gapinski KD, Brownell KD, Jeyaram S: Demonstrations of implicit anti-fat bias: The impact of providing causal information and evoking sympathy. Health Psychology. 2003, 22:68-78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wiese HJC, Wilson JF, Jones RA, Neises M: Obesity stigma reduction in medical students. International Journal of Obesity. 1992, 16:859-868.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    O’Brien KS, Puhl RM, Latner JD, Mir AS, Hunter JA: Reducing anti-fat prejudice in preservice health students: A randomized trial. Obesity. In Press.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Loomis JM, Blascovich JJ, Beall AC: Immersive virtual environments as a basic research tool in psychology. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers. 1999, 31:557-564.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Blascovich J, Loomis J, Beall A, et al.: Immersive virtual environment technology as a research tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry. 2002, 13:103-125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Persky S, McBride CM: Immersive virtual environment technology: a promising tool for future social and behavioral genomics research and practice Health Communication. 2009, 24:677 - 682PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    McCall C, Blascovich J: How, when, and why to use digital experimental virtual environments to study social behavior. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2009, 3:744-758.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mast MS, Hall JA, Roter DL: Caring and dominance affect participants’ perceptions and behaviors during a virtual medical visit. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2008, 23:53-527.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mast MS, Hall JA, Roter DL: Disentangling physician sex and physician communication style: Their effects on patient satisfaction in a virtual medical visit. Patient Education and Counseling. 2007, 68:16-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Deladisma AM, Cohen M, Stevens A, et al.: Do medical students respond empathetically to a virtual patient? The American Journal of Surgery. 2007, 193:756-760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Raij AB, Johnsen K, Dickerson RF, et al.: Comparing interpersonal interactions with a virtual human to those with a real human. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 2007, 13:1-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Johnsen K, Raij A, Stevens A, Lind DS, Lok B: The validity of a virtual human experience for interpersonal skills education. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 2007:1049 - 1058Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Coulehan J, Williams PC: Vanquishing virtue: The impact of medical education. Academic Medicine. 2001, 76:598-605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hebl MR, Xu J: Weighing the care: Physicians’ reactions to the size of a patient. International Journal of Obesity. 2001, 25:1246-1252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Puhl RM, Schwartz MB, Brownell KD: Impact of perceived consensus on stereotypes about obese people: A new approach for reducing bias. Health Psychology. 2005, 24:517-525.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Aiken LS, West SG: Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Friedman JM: Modern science versus the stigma of obesity. Nature Medicine. 2004, 10:563-569.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Weinsier RL, Hunter GR, Heini AF, Goran MI, Sell SM: The etiology of obesity: Relative contribution of metabolic factors, diet, and physical activity. The American Journal of Medicine. 1998, 105:145-150.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Martinez JA: Body-weight regulation: Causes of obesity. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 2000, 59:337-345.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ernst E, Canter PH: A systematic review of systematic reviews of spinal manipulation. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2006, 99:192-196.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Nappi G, Perrotta A, Rossa P, Sandrini G: Chronic daily headache. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. 2008, 8:361-384.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine (outside the USA) 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research InstituteBethesdaUSA
  2. 2.Syracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations