A Behavior Change Model for Internet Interventions

  • Lee M. Ritterband
  • Frances P. Thorndike
  • Daniel J. Cox
  • Boris P. Kovatchev
  • Linda A. Gonder-Frederick
Original Article

Abstract

Background

The Internet has become a major component to health care and has important implications for the future of the health care system. One of the most notable aspects of the Web is its ability to provide efficient, interactive, and tailored content to the user. Given the wide reach and extensive capabilities of the Internet, researchers in behavioral medicine have been using it to develop and deliver interactive and comprehensive treatment programs with the ultimate goal of impacting patient behavior and reducing unwanted symptoms. To date, however, many of these interventions have not been grounded in theory or developed from behavior change models, and no overarching model to explain behavior change in Internet interventions has yet been published.

Purpose

The purpose of this article is to propose a model to help guide future Internet intervention development and predict and explain behavior changes and symptom improvement produced by Internet interventions.

Results

The model purports that effective Internet interventions produce (and maintain) behavior change and symptom improvement via nine nonlinear steps: the user, influenced by environmental factors, affects website use and adherence, which is influenced by support and website characteristics. Website use leads to behavior change and symptom improvement through various mechanisms of change. The improvements are sustained via treatment maintenance.

Conclusion

By grounding Internet intervention research within a scientific framework, developers can plan feasible, informed, and testable Internet interventions, and this form of treatment will become more firmly established.

Keywords

Internet interventions eHealth Online treatment Behavior change Behavior change model Scientific framework 

References

  1. 1.
    Murray E, Burns J, See TS, Lai R, Nazareth I. Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005; (4): CD004274.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wantland D, Portillo C, Holzemer W, Laughter R, McGhee E. The effectiveness of web-based vs. non-web-based interventions: A meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes. J Med Internet Res. 2004; 6: e40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Review of randomised controlled trials of Internet interventions for mental health disorders and related conditions. Clin Psychol. 2006; 10: 16-29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marks IM, Cavanagh K, Gega L. Hands-On Help: Computer-Aided Psychotherapy. New York: Psychology; 2007.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stinson J, Wilson R, Gill N, Yamada J, Holt J. A systematic review of Internet-based self-management interventions for youth with health conditions. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009; 34: 495-510.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ritterband LM, GonderFrederick LA, Cox DJ, Clifton AD, West RW, Borowitz SM. Internet interventions: In review, in use, and into the future. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2003; 34: 527-534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barak A, Proudfoot JG, Klein B. Defining Internet-supported therapeutic interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2009. doi:10.1007/s12160-009-9130-7.
  8. 8.
    Celio AA, Winzelberg AJ, Wilfley DE, et al. Reducing risk factors for eating disorders: Comparison of an Internet- and a classroom-delivered psychoeducational program. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000; 68: 650-657.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tate DF, Finkelstein EA, Khavjou O, Gustafson A. Cost effectiveness of Internet interventions: Review and recommendations. Ann Behav Med. 2009. doi:10.1007/s12160-009-9131-6.
  10. 10.
    Barak A, Hen L, Boniel-Nissim M, Shapira N. A comprehensive review and a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of Internet-based psychotherapeutic interventions. J Technol Hum Serv. 2008; 26: 109-160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Glanz K, Lewis F, Rimer B. Linking theory, research, and practice. In: Glanz K, Lewis F, Rimer B, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1997: 19-35.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rosenstock IM. Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Educ Monogr. 1974; 2: 328-335.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. The transtheoretical approach. In: Norcross JC, Goldfried MR, eds. Handbook of Psychotherapy Integration. New York: Basic Books; 1992: 300-334.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lefebvre RC, Rochlin L. Social marketing. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer B, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1997: 384-402.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miller NE, Dollard J. Social Learning and Imitation. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1941.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Matarazzo JD, Weiss SM, Herd JA, Miller NE, Weiss SM, eds. Behavioral Health: A Handbook of Health Enhancement and Disease Prevention. New York: Wiley; 1984.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Casmir FL, ed. Building communication theories: A socio/cultural approach. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1994.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fisher JD, Fisher WA. The information-motivation-behavioral skills model. In: DiClemente R, Crosby R, Kegler M, eds. Emerging Theories in Health Promotion Practice and Research. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey Bass; 2002: 40-70.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nielson J. Designing Web Usability. Indianapolis: New Riders; 2000.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Magee JC, Ritterband LM, Thorndike FP, Cox DJ, Borowitz SM. Exploring the relationship between parental worry about their child’s health and usage of an Internet intervention for pediatric encopresis. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009; 34: 530-538.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tercyak KP, Abraham AA, Graham AL, Wilson LD, Walker LR. Association of multiple behavioral risk factors with adolescents’ willingness to engage in eHealth promotion. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009; 34: 457-469.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Glasgow RE, Eakin EG. Issues in diabetes self-management. In: Shumaker SA, Schron EB, Ockene JK, McBee WL, eds. The Handbook of Health Behavior Change. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 1998: 435.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Biener L, Abrams DB, Follick MJ, Dean L. A comparative evaluation of a restrictive smoking policy in a general hospital. Am J Public Health. 1989; 79: 192-195.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ritterband LM, Cox DJ, Gordon T, et al. The inclusion of audio, graphics, and interactivity in an internet intervention for pediatric encopresis. Child Health Care. 2006; 35: 47-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Danaher BG, Boles SM, Akers L, Gordon JS, Severson HH. Defining participant exposure measures in web-based health behavior change programs. J Med Internet Res. 2006; 8: e15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hurling R, Fairley BW, Dias MB. Internet-based exercise intervention systems: Are more interactive designs better? Psychol Health. 2006; 21: 757-772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cox DJ, Tisdelle DA, Culbert JP. Increasing adherence to behavioral homework assignments. J Behav Med. 1988; 11: 519-522.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ritterband LM, Borowitz SM, Cox DJ, et al. Using the Internet to provide information prescriptions. Pediatrics. 2005; 116: e643-e647.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hurling R, Catt M, De Boni M, et al. Using Internet and mobile phone technology to deliver an automated physical activity program: Randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2007; 9: e7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Patrick K, Raab F, Adams MA, et al. A text message-based intervention for weight loss: Randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2009; 11: e1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Greist JH, Marks IM, Baer L, et al. Behavior therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder guided by a computer or by a clinician compared with relaxation as a control. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002; 63: 138-145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wright J, Wright A, Albano AM, et al. Computer-assisted cognitive therapy for depression: Maintaining efficacy while reducing therapist time. Am J Psychiatry. 2005; 162: 1158-1164.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tate DF, Jackvony EH, Wing RR. A randomized trial comparing human e-mail counseling, computer-automated tailored counseling, and no counseling in an Internet weight loss program. Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166: 1620-1625.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web: A systematic review. JAMA. 2002; 287: 2691-2700.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. Motivational factors in consumer response to advertisements. In: Geen RG, Beatty WW, Arkin RM, eds. Human Motivation. New York: Allyn and Bacon; 1984: 418-454.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Beck RC. Motivation: Theories and Principles. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1990.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    US Department of Commerce. A Nation Online: How Americans are Expanding their Use of the Internet. US Department of Commerce. Washington: Government Printing Office; 2002.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Faison EW. Advertising: A Behavioral Approach for Managers. New York: Wiley; 1980.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ritterband LM, Thorndike FP, Gonder-Frederick L, et al. Efficacy of an Internet-based behavioral intervention for adults with insomnia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009; 66: 692-698.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Brug J, Oenema A, Campbell M. Past, present, and future of computer-tailored nutrition education. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003; 77: 1028S-1034S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Oenema A, Tan F, Brug J. Short-term efficacy of a web-based computer-tailored nutrition intervention: Main effects and mediators. Ann Behav Med. 2005; 29: 54-63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Farrer L. Adherence in Internet interventions for anxiety and depression. J Med Internet Res. 2009; 11: e13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2002: Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Lifestyle. Geneva: WHO; 2002.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Clark DO. Issues of adherence, penetration, and measurement in physical activity effectiveness studies. Med Care. 2001; 39: 409-412.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Christensen H, Mackinnon A. The law of attrition revisited. J Med Internet Res. 2006; 8: e20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res. 2005; 7: e11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Spek V, Cuijpers P, Nyklicek I, Riper H, Keyzer J, Pop V. Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety: A meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2007; 37: 319-328.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Andersson G, Lundström P, Ström L. Internet-based treatment of headache: Does telephone contact add anything? Headache. 2003; 43: 353-361.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Klein B, Austin D, Pier C, et al. Internet-based treatment for panic disorder: Does frequency of therapist contact make a difference? Cogn Behav Ther. 2009; 38: 100-113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Korten AE, Brittliffe K, Groves C. A comparison of changes in anxiety and depression symptoms of spontaneous users and trial participants of a cognitive behavior therapy website. J Med Internet Res. 2004; 6: e46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kazdin AE. Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007; 3: 1-27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Marks I, Cavanagh K. Computer-aided psychological treatments: Evolving issues. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2009; 5: 121-141.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ford DE, Kamerow DB. Epidemiologic study of sleep disturbances and psychiatric disorders, an opportunity for prevention? JAMA. 1989; 262: 1479-1484.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mellinger GD, Balter MB, Uhlenhuth EH. Insomnia and its treatment. Prevalence and correlates. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985; 42: 225-232.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ohayon MM. Epidemiology of insomnia: What we know and what we still need to learn. Sleep Med Rev. 2002; 6: 97-111.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Simon GE, VonKorff M. Prevalence, burden, and treatment of insomnia in primary care. Am J Psychiatry. 1997; 154: 1417-1423.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Perlis ML, Smith MT, Cacialli DO, Nowakowski S, Orff H. On the comparability of pharmacotherapy and behavior therapy for chronic insomnia. Commentary and implications. J Psychosom Res. 2003; 54: 51-59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1986.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Marlatt GA, George WH. Relapse prevention and the maintenance of optimal health. In: Shumaker SA, Schron EB, Ockene JK, McBee WL, eds. The Handbook of Health Behavior Change. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2004: 33-58.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lee M. Ritterband
    • 1
  • Frances P. Thorndike
    • 1
  • Daniel J. Cox
    • 2
  • Boris P. Kovatchev
    • 3
  • Linda A. Gonder-Frederick
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, Behavioral Health and TechnologyUniversity of Virginia Health SystemCharlottesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, Center for Behavioral Medicine ResearchUniversity of Virginia Health SystemCharlottesvilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, Diabetes TechnologyUniversity of Virginia Health SystemCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations