Poor Decision Making Among Older Adults Is Related to Elevated Levels of Neuroticism
- 605 Downloads
A well-studied index of reasoning and decision making is the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). The IGT possesses many features important to medical decision making, such as weighing risks and benefits, dealing with unknown outcomes, and making decisions under uncertainty.
There exists a great deal of individual variability on the IGT, particularly among older adults, and the present study examines the role of personality in IGT performance. We explored which of the five-factor model of personality traits were predictive of decision-making performance, after controlling for relevant demographic variables.
One hundred and fifty-two healthy cognitively intact adults (aged 26–85) were individually administered the IGT and the NEO Five-Factory Inventory.
In the older adults, but not the younger, higher NEO neuroticism was associated with poorer IGT performance.
Our findings are discussed in the context of how stress may impact cognitive performance and cause dysfunction of neural systems in the brain important for decision making.
KeywordsNeuroticism Decision making Aging Frontal lobe Personality Stress
Preparation of this article was supported by a National Institute on Aging Career Development Award to Natalie L. Denburg (K01 AG022033), by fellowship funding from the Iowa Scottish Rite Masonic Foundation, and by an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Centers for Education and Research on Therapeutics cooperative agreement #5 U18 HSO16094.
- 1.Karlamangla A, Tinetti M, Guralnik J, Studenski S, Wetle T, Reuben D. Comorbidity in older adults: Nosology of impairment, diseases, and conditions. J Gerontol Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007; 62: 296–300.Google Scholar
- 2.Yancik R, Ershler W, Satariano W, Hazzard W, Cohen HJ, Ferrucci L. Report of the national institute on aging task force on comorbidity. J Gerontol Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007; 62: 275–280.Google Scholar
- 5.Moscovitch M, Winocur G. The neuropsychology of memory and aging. In: Craik FIM, Salthouse TA, eds. The Handbook of Aging and Cognition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1992: 315–372.Google Scholar
- 6.Robbins TW, James M, Owen AM, et al. A study of performance on tests from the CANTAB battery sensitive to frontal lobe dysfunction in a large sample of normal volunteers: Implications for theories of executive functioning and cognitive aging. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1998; 4: 474–490.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Leventhal EA, Leventhal H, Schaefer P, Easterling D. Conservation of energy, uncertainty reduction, and swift utilization of medical care among the elderly. J Gerontol Psychol Sci. 1993; 48: 78–86.Google Scholar
- 22.Bechara A. Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) Professional Manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2007.Google Scholar
- 31.Casillas A. Personality and neuropsychological correlates of impulsivity (Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa). Diss Abstr Int. 2005; 66: 4476.Google Scholar
- 32.Weller JA. The role of affect in decisions under varying levels of uncertainty: Converging evidence from neurological and temperament perspectives. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa; 2007.Google Scholar
- 33.Digman JM. Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annu Rev Psychol. 1990; 41: 417–440.Google Scholar
- 35.McCrae RR, Costa PT. Personality in Adulthood. New York: Guilford; 1990.Google Scholar
- 37.Tellegen A. Structures of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-report. In: Tuma AH, Maser JD, eds. Anxiety and the Anxiety Disorders. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1985: 681–706.Google Scholar
- 38.Eysenck HJ, Eysenck SBG. Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service; 1975.Google Scholar
- 41.Costa P, McCrae R. Revised NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1992.Google Scholar
- 43.Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Beck Depression Inventory Manual. 2nd ed. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1996.Google Scholar
- 45.Tranel D. Theories of clinical neuropsychology and brain–behavior relationships: Luria and beyond. In: Morgan JE, Ricker JH, eds. Textbook of Clinical Neuropsychology. New York: Taylor and Francis; 2007: 27–39.Google Scholar
- 47.Wilkinson GS. Wide Range Achievement Test-3. Wilmington: Jastak; 1993.Google Scholar
- 48.Wechsler DA. Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. New York: Psychological Corporation; 1999.Google Scholar
- 49.Wechsler DA. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III. New York: Psychological Corporation; 1997.Google Scholar
- 51.Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1988.Google Scholar
- 53.Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple Regression Test and Interpreting Interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1991.Google Scholar
- 71.Wolf OT, Convit A, de Leon MJ, Caraos C, Qadri SF. Basal hypothalamo–pituitary–adrenal axis activity and corticotrophin feedback in young and older men: Relationships to magnetic resonance imaging-derived hippocampus and cingulate gyrus volumes. Neuroendocrinology. 2002; 75: 241–249.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 72.Damasio AR. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam; 1994.Google Scholar
- 75.Clark LA. Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality: Manual for Administration, Scoring, and Interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1993.Google Scholar
- 76.John OP, Srivastava S. The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In: Pervin LA, John OP, eds. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford; 1999: 102–138.Google Scholar