What Types of Evidence are Most Needed to Advance Behavioral Medicine?
This editorial presents a perspective on the types of evidence most needed to advance behavioral medicine given the current status of the field.
The paper argues that the types of evidence most needed at present are evidence that is contextual, practical, and robust.
Each of the above issues is discussed with attention to characteristics of interventions; representativeness at the multiple levels of setting, clinical staff, and participants; and research design and measures. Arguments are made from philosophy of science, status of the literature, and future directions perspectives.
The current dominant paradigm of reductionistic studies focused predominantly on internal validity using highly homogenous patients and academic settings is not and will not produce the desired translation to real-world practice and policy. Instead, broader “practical” clinical and behavioral trials are needed that address the influence of the context in which programs are conducted, that include outcomes important to decision makers and communities, and that focus on moderating, mediating, and economic issues.
To create programs that will be disseminable, a greater focus is needed on external validity and transparency of reporting. We need to realize that the world is complex and embrace and study this complexity to produce further progress. Such an approach can produce evidence that is both rigorous and relevant.
KeywordsResearch methods Design Dissemination Translation Effectiveness RCT
- 1.Kuhn TS. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1962.Google Scholar
- 2.Biglan A. Changing Cultural Practices: A Contextualist Framework for Intervention Research. Reno, NV: Context Press; 1995.Google Scholar
- 3.Thomas P. Integrating Primary Health Care. Oxford, England: Radcliffe Publishing; 2006.Google Scholar
- 4.Gharajedaghi J. Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity. 2nd ed. Boston: Elsevier; 2006.Google Scholar
- 5.McNulty T, Ferlie E. Reengineering Health Care: The Complexities of Organizational Transformation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2002.Google Scholar
- 6.Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and Quasi-experimental Design for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 2002.Google Scholar
- 12.Paul GL. Behavior modification research: Design and tactics. In Franks CM, ed. Behavior Therapy: Appraisal and Status. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1969: 29–62.Google Scholar
- 15.Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 3rd ed. London: Erlbaum; 2003.Google Scholar
- 18.Goodman A. Storytelling as best practice: How stories strengthen your organization, engage your audience, and advance your mission. Andy Goodman; 2003.Google Scholar
- 19.Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Glasgow RE. Childhood obesity prevention: Reviewing the translation potential of intervention evidence. Am J Prev Med. 2008; in press.Google Scholar
- 29.Rotheram-Borus MJ, Flannery D, Duan N. Interventions that are CURRES: Cost-effective, useful, realistic, robust, evolving, and sustainable. In Rehmschmidt H, et al, eds., Facilitating Pathways: Care, Treatment, and Prevention in Child and Adolescent Health. New York: Springer; 2004; 235–244.Google Scholar
- 30.Goodman RM, McLeroy KR, Steckler A, Hoyle R. Development of level of institutionalization scales for health promotion programs. Health Ed Q. 1993; 20: 161–178.Google Scholar
- 34.Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003.Google Scholar
- 36.Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1997.Google Scholar
- 37.Green LW, Ottosen JM. From efficacy to effectiveness to community and back: Evidence-based practice vs. practice-based evidence. Proceedings from conference: From Clinical Trials to Community: The Science of Translating Diabetes and Obesity Research. National Institutes of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2004.Google Scholar
- 43.Estabrooks PA, Glasgow RE. Dissemination, knowledge exchange, or knowledge integration: Explaining the gap between medical office-based physical activity intervention research and practice. Am J Pub Health. 2005; 31(4 Suppl): S45–S56.Google Scholar
- 45.Curry L, Shield R, Wetle T, eds. Improving Aging and Public Health Research: Qualitative and Mixed Methods. Washington, DC: Public Health Association; 2006.Google Scholar