Challenges and future perspectives for the life cycle of manufacturing networks in the mass customisation era
Manufacturers and service providers are called to design, plan, and operate globalised manufacturing networks, addressing to challenges of increasing complexity in all aspects of product and production life cycle. These factors, caused primarily by the increasing demand for product variety and shortened life cycles, generate a number of issues related to the life cycle of manufacturing systems and networks. Focusing on the aspects that affect manufacturing network performance, this work reviews the exiting literature around the design, planning, and control of manufacturing networks in the era of mass customisation and personalisation. The considered life cycle aspects include supplier selection, initial manufacturing network design, supply chain coordination, complexity, logistics management, inventory and capacity planning and management, lot sizing, enterprise resource planning, customer relationship management, and supply chain control. Based on this review and in correlation with the view of the manufacturing networks and facilities of the future, directions for the development of methods and tools to satisfy product–service customisation and personalisation are promoted.
KeywordsManufacturing systems and networks Design Planning Mass customisation
Mass production (MP) has been the established manufacturing paradigm for nearly a century. MP initially answered to the need of the continuously increasing population around the globe, with a gradual improvement in its living standards, especially in the developed world, for goods and commodities. However, since the 1980s and with the beginning of the new millennium, a saturation of the market towards mass produced products is observed. In 2006, Chryssolouris states that: “It is increasingly evident that the era of MP is being replaced by the era of market niches. The key to creating products that can meet the demands of a diversified customer base, is a short development cycle yielding low cost and high quality goods in sufficient quantity to meet demand” . Currently, the need for increased product variety is intensifying, and customers in many market segments request truly unique products, tailored to their individual taste. Companies are striving to offer product variety while trying to produce more with less  (i.e. maximise their output while minimising the use of materials and environmental footprint), while the landscape that they must operate in, inflicted by the economic recession, has become more complex and dynamic than ever.
In the mass customisation (MC) paradigm, the establishment of which is still an ongoing process, instead of treating customers merely as product buyers, a producer must consider them as integrated entities in the product design and development cycle. In this customer-driven environment that is shifting towards online purchases and market globalisation, the underlying manufacturing systems and chains are heavily affected. Owing to its multidisciplinary nature, the manufacturing domain in general lacks of unified solution approaches . The management of the co-evolution of product, process and production on a strategic and operational level is a huge challenge. Market globalisation broadens the target audience of a product, while at the same time it constitutes supply strategies and logistics’ more difficult to manage. Adding to that, the Internet, one of the primary enablers of globalisation, allowed online customisation and purchasing, leading to new disruptive purchasing models. In their turn, these models affected long-established businesses that could not form an online presence fast and succumbed to the competition. Moreover, the economic recession highlighted the need for quick adaptation to demand; companies that could not adapt to the new requirements suffered economic losses and their viability was challenged. Simultaneously, the decreasing product costs and the increase in purchasing power in developing countries generated new markets and destabilised demand. Finally, the emergence of new materials, new forms of production, and key enabling technologies constitute new diversified product features and processes feasible, as well as they allow the interconnection between ICT systems, humans, and engineering/manufacturing phases.
It becomes apparent that manufacturers and service providers are presented with numerous external and internal drivers and challenges  that have a visible impact on the smooth operation of the entire value-adding network down to each individual manufacturing facility . A root cause for these problems is that while the MC paradigm proposes a set of practices and solutions for tackling these issues, its practical implementation is still considered as work in progress in terms of effectiveness of coordination and collaboration between stakeholders, design and planning of networks and facilities, and execution and control efficiency . An enabling solution for realising a cost-effective implementation of MC is to properly configure easily adaptable manufacturing networks, which are capable to handle the complexity and disturbances that modern production requirements inflict . Support systems for the design, planning, and control with inherent robustness are necessary in order for companies to withstand the antagonism through sustainable practices. Technology-based business approaches comprise a major enabler for the realisation of robust manufacturing systems and networks that offer high value-added, user-oriented products and services. These qualities are critical for companies in order to master variety and maintain their viability . Significant work has been conducted on this field, yet a focused review of the literature regarding the influence of MC practices on different aspects of the manufacturing network life cycle is missing. In particular, the lack of dedicated reviews on the challenging issues of design, planning, and operation of manufacturing networks in the framework of MC forms the motivation for conducting this work .
Towards bridging this gap in academic approaches, this work reviews the existing literature related to the basic aspects of a manufacturing network from its design, planning, and control life cycle perspectives within the general MC landscape, targeting to the understanding of the current situation and identification of future developments. For the scope of the paper, areas of supplier selection, initial manufacturing network design, supply chain coordination, complexity, logistics management, inventory and capacity planning and management, lot sizing, enterprise resource planning (ERP), customer relationship management (CRM), and supply chain control are reviewed. The purpose is to establish an overview of the current status of academic research and pinpoint the challenges that have yet to be addressed by academic work. Departing from that, major drivers and enabling technologies are identified, as well as concepts that can lead to a more sustainable implementation of MC are proposed.
The above figure also visualises the increase of interest on these topics by the scientific community, and the establishment of MC as a distinct field of research. The trend resembles a typical hype cycle. In the beginning, the abstract concept of MC is born from the realisation that product variety is increasing. Then, key enabling technologies, such as the rise of the Internet, web-based collaboration means, and flexible manufacturing systems act as a trigger in the spread of MC, quickly reaching a peak during late 1990s and early 2000s. Until then, most studies are concerned with management and strategic issues of MC, failing to address critical MC implementation issues. Afterwards, researchers realised that a series of sub-problems ought to be tackled first, leading to research indirectly associated with MC (e.g. investigation of product family modelling techniques). Nevertheless, MC is here to stay, therefore, research interest on complete MC solutions starts appearing after 2005 and continues up to the current date.
The rest of the paper is structured as follows. Section 2 presents the evolution of manufacturing paradigms and discusses the recent shift towards customer-centred manufacturing. Section 3 performs a literature review on major topics related to the life cycle of manufacturing networks, together with the latest advances in ICT for supporting the design, planning, and control of manufacturing networks. Section 4 summarises the challenges that need to be addressed, aided by a generic view of the manufacturing landscape of the near future. Finally, Sect. 5 concludes the paper.
2 Evolution of manufacturing and current challenges
2.1 Evolution of manufacturing paradigms
A research conducted in the UK related to automotive products revealed that 61 % of the customers wanted their vehicle to be delivered within 14 days , whereas consumers from North America responded that they could wait no longer than 3 weeks for their car, even if it is custom built . Such studies point out the importance of responsiveness and pro-activeness for manufacturers in product and production design.
During the last 15 years, the number of online purchases has increased and recent surveys show that 89 % of the buyers prefer shopping online to in-store shopping . Web-based and e-commerce systems have been implemented and have proved to be very effective in capturing the pulse of the market . These web-based toolkits aim at providing a set of user-friendly design tools that allow trial-and-error experimentation processes and deliver immediate simulated feedback on the outcome of design ideas. Once a satisfactory design is found, the product specifications can be transferred into the firm’s production system and the custom product is subsequently produced and delivered to the customer . Still online 2D and 3D configurators do not solve practical issues such as the assembly process of these unique variants. Although proposed approaches include e-assembly systems for collaborative assembly representation  and web-based collaboration systems , the research in this area needs to be expanded in order to provide tools for assembly representation and product variant customisation. An additional constraint is that globalised design and manufacturing often require the variants for local markets to be generated by regional design teams, which use different assembly software and source parts from different supply bases . The incorporation of the customers’ unique tastes in the product design phase is a fairly new approach to the established ways of achieving product variety and entails significant reorganisation, reconfiguration, and adaptation efforts for the company’s production system. Variety is normally realised at different stages of a product life cycle. It can be realised during design, assembly, at the stage of sales and distribution, and through adjustments at the usage phase. Moreover, variety can be realised during the fabrication process, e.g. through rapid prototyping .
It should finally be noted that naturally, even if the trends dictate a shift towards personalised product requirements, it should always be considered that forms of production such as MP cannot be abandoned for commodities and general-purpose products, raw materials, and equipment. After all, paradigms are shaped to serve specific market and economical situations.
Globalisation in manufacturing activities, apart from its apparent advantages, introduces a set of challenges. On the one hand, a globalised market offers opportunities for expanding the sphere of influence of a company, by widening its customer base and production capacity. Information and communication technologies (ICT) and the Internet have played a significant role to that . On the other hand, regional particularities greatly complicate the transportation logistics and the identification of optimum product volume procurement, among other. Indicatively, the difficulty in forecasting product demand was highlighted as early as in 1986 by the following observation from Intel laboratories: when investigating the match between actual call off and the actual forecast, they estimated that supply and demand were in equilibrium for only 35 min in the period between 1976 and 1986 [30, 31]. Enterprises started locating their main production facilities in countries with favourable legislation and low cost of human labour ; thus, the management of the supply chain became extremely complex, owing primarily to the fact that a great number of business partners have to mutually cooperate in order to carry out a project, while being driven by opportunistic behaviours. Thus, manufacturing networks need to properly coordinate, collaborate, and communicate in order to survive .
On a manufacturing facility level, the impact of supply chain uncertainties and market fluctuations is also considerable. The design and engineering analysis of a complex manufacturing system is a devious task, and the operation of the systems becomes even harder when flexibility and reconfigurability parameters must be incorporated . The process is iterative and can be separated into smaller tasks of manageable complexity. Resource requirements, resource layout, material flow, and capacity planning are some of these tasks , which even after decomposition and relaxation remain challenging . In particular, in the context of production for MC businesses, issues such as task-sequence-dependent inter-task times between product families are usually ignored, leading to inexact, and in many cases non-feasible, planning and scheduling. Even rebalancing strategies for serial lines with no other interdependencies is challenging, leaving ample room for improvement in order for the inconsistencies between process planning and line balancing to be minimised .
From a technological perspective, the increased penetration of ICT in all aspects of product and production life cycles enables a ubiquitous environment for the acquisition, processing, and distribution of information, which is especially beneficial for a globalised paradigm. With the introduction of concepts like cyber physical systems (CPS) and Internet of things (IoT) in manufacturing , new horizons are presented for improving awareness, diagnosis, prognosis, and control. Also, the relatively new paradigm of agent-based computation provides great potential for realising desirable characteristics in production, such as autonomy, responsiveness, distributiveness, and openness .
3 Manufacturing networks life cycle and mass customisation
3.1 Supplier selection
The supplier selection problem becomes even more complicated in the era of MC since a certain level of adaptability and robustness is necessary when operating within a volatile and rapidly changing environment. The most commonly used criteria in supplier selection studies include quality and performance . However, when having to deal with unpredictability and fluctuating demand, which are common in MC, additional factors need to be considered such as management compatibility, transparency of operations, strategic direction, reliability, and agility . While trying to adhere to eco-friendliness directives, frameworks like the one proposed in  incorporate environmental footprint criteria to green supply chain design. Moreover, several other criteria may be relevant according to the design and planning objectives of a niche supply chain, which could be identified using data mining methods .
The Internet and web-based platforms are used in recent years in order to counterbalance uncertainty, monitor altering parameters (e.g. weather in supply routes), and proactively adapt to changes . Moreover, several proposed supplier selection models incorporate the relative importance of the supplier selection factors depending on the types of targeted MC implementation, e.g. for the component-sharing modularity type of MC, the requirements for selecting suppliers would not be the same as the component-sweeping modularity implementation type . Like in the case of a stable low variety production, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is commonly used as a means to solve the multi-criteria decision-making problem of supplier selection. Incorporating uncertain information about the real world, essentially extending the Dempster–Shafer theory, the authors in  propose the D-AHP method for solving the supplier selection problem. The suggested D numbers preference relation encapsulates the advantages of fuzziness and handles possible incomplete and imprecise information, which is common in human-driven systems such as supply chains. Similarly, a combined analytic hierarchy process—quality function deployment (AHP–QFD) framework is described by  that handles uncertain information, selects suppliers, and allocates orders to them. A multi-criteria decision-making method to support the identification of business-to-business (B2B) collaboration schemes, especially for supplier selection is proposed in .
3.2 Supply chain coordination
The literature on organisational knowledge creation points out that “coordination” plays an important role in combining knowledge from stakeholders , while it also mediates the relationship between product modularity and MC . A report on coordination mechanisms for supply chains was compiled in .
The need for adaptation to the new MC requirements has led to the definition of a novel framework for autonomous logistics processes. The concept of autonomous control “describes processes of decentralised decision-making in heterarchical structures, and it presumes interacting elements in non-deterministic systems, and possess the capability and possibility to render decisions independently ”. However, regardless the topology, the alignment of the objectives of the different collaborating organisations in order to successfully carry out projects, optimise system performance, and achieve mutual profits is indispensable . While an action plan suffices for the coordination of a centralised supply chain, it is inadequate with a decentralised one  since entities tend to exhibit opportunistic behaviour. Nevertheless, in terms of overall network performance, decentralised topologies have shown great benefits for serving the mass customisation paradigm [6, 7].
3.3 Initial manufacturing network configuration
Still, the accuracy of planning ahead in longer horizons is restricted. The incorporation of unpredictable parameters in the configuration through a projection of the possible setting of the network in the future may lead to unsafe results.
3.4 Inventory management/capacity planning/lot sizing
Inventories are used by most companies as a buffer between supply chain stages to handle uncertainty and volatile demand. Prior to the 1990s, where the main supply chain phases, namely procurement, production, and distribution, were regarded in isolation, companies maintained buffers of large inventories due to the lack of regulatory mechanisms and feedback . The basis for manufacturing and inventory planning was relatively safe forecasts. However, in the era of customisation the basis is actual orders and the pursuit is minimisation of inventories. These requirements constitute inventory management and capacity planning functions very important for a profitable MC implementation.
In particular, in just-in-time (JIT) environments, MC impacts the amount of inventory that needs to be carried by firms that supply many part variants to a JIT assembly line. In addition, the supply of parts is performed either on constant order cycles or more commonly under non-constant cycles . The goal chasing heuristic, pioneered within the Toyota production system, seeks to minimise the variance between the actual number of units of a part required by the assembly line and the average demand rate on a product-unit-by-product-unit basis, while applying penalties for observed shortages or overages . Of course, information sharing and partner coordination systems are a prerequisite for JIT procurements. For instance, DELL, which achieved a highly coordinated supply chain to respond to MC, communicated its inventory levels and replenishment needs on an hourly basis with its key suppliers and required from the latter to locate their facilities within a 15-min distance from DELL facilities . Another consideration during inventory management is the type of postponement applied in a company. Studies have shown that postponement structures allow firms to meet the increased customisation demands with lower inventory levels in the case of time postponement (make-to-order), or with shorter lead times in the case of form postponement . Also, an assemble-to-order process, a variation of form postponement, does not hold inventory of the finished product, while in form postponement, finished goods inventory for each distinct product at the product’s respective point of customisation is kept . An indicative example is given in the case of Hewlett Packard, where using form postponement, the company achieved the postponement of the final assembly of their DeskJet printers to their local distribution centres .
3.5 Logistics management
Moreover, the management of logistics is a process inherently based on communication and collaboration. Developments of either function-specific or all-in-one ICT solutions targeted on logistics are analysed in [6, 82]. Tools for warehouse and transportation management, ERP, supply chain management (SCM), and information sharing are reported under the umbrella of e-logistics. The concept of virtual logistics is also proposed for separating the physical and digital aspects of logistics operations , having Internet as an enabling means to handle ownership and control of resources.
3.6 Supply chain control
The information transferred from one supply chain tier to the next in the form of orders is often distorted, a phenomenon known as the bullwhip effect. In particular, when customer demand is volatile such as the case is in MP, the bullwhip effect misguides upstream members of the supply chain in their inventory and production decisions . Nevertheless, the performance of the supply chain is highly sensitive to the control laws used for its operation. The application of the wrong control policy may have as a result the amplification of variance instead on its minimisation. Dynamic modelling approaches have been proposed to manage supply chains, accounting for the flow of information and material, to capture the system dynamics . Multi-agent approaches for modelling supply chain dynamics are proposed in . Software components known as agents represent supply chain entities (supplier, dealers, etc.), their constituent control elements (e.g. inventory policy), and their interaction protocols (e.g. message types). The agent framework utilises a library of supply chain modelling components that have derived after analysis of several diversified supply chains. For instance, a novel oscillator analogy in presented in  for modelling the manufacturing systems dynamics. The proposed analogy considers a single degree of freedom mass vibrator and a production system, where the oscillation model has as input forces, while the manufacturing system has demand as excitation. The purpose is to use this simple oscillator analogy to predict demand fluctuations and take actions towards alignment.
Another necessity in supply chain control is the traceability of goods. Traceability methods, essential for perishable products and high-value shipments, exploit the radio frequency identification (RFID) technology during the last years [88, 89]. A traceability system that traces lots and activities is proposed by Bechini et al. . The study examines the problem from a communication perspective, stressing the need to use neutral file formats and protocols such as XML (extended markup language) and SOAP (simple object access protocol) in such applications. The emerging technology of IoT can provide ubiquitous traceability solutions. Combining data collection methods based on wireless sensor network (WSN) with the IoT principles, the method proposed in  can support the traceability of goods in the food industry. In a similar concept, the role of an IoT infrastructure for order fulfilment in a collaborative warehousing environment is examined in . The IoT infrastructure is based on RFID, ambient intelligence, and multi-agent system, and it integrates a bottom-up approach with decision support mechanisms such as self-organisation and negotiation protocols between agents based on a cooperation concept.
Supply chains formed for servicing customisation are more complex as structures and less predictable in their dynamic behaviour than stable traditional supply chains. Recent complexity studies deal with the emerging aspects of increasing complexity of manufacturing activities and the dynamic nature of supply chains . The importance of managing the complexity in supply chains is evident, as recent studies depict that lower manufacturing network complexity is associated with reduced costs and overall network performance [38, 94]. A complete and comprehensive review of complexity in engineering design and manufacturing is presented in [95, 96, 97].
3.7 Simulation and ICT support systems for manufacturing networks life cycle
3.8 Simulation for manufacturing network design
Literature on ICT-based systems for improving manufacturing networks is abundant and highlights the need for increased penetration of ICT systems in design, planning, and operation phases. A simulation-based method to model and optimise supply chain operations by taking into consideration their end-of-life operations is used to evaluate the capability of OEMs to achieve quantitative performance targets defined by environmental impacts and life cycle costs . A discrete event simulation model of a capacitated supply chain is developed and a procedure to dynamically adjust the replenishment parameters based on re-optimisation during different parts of the seasonal demand cycle is explained . A model is implemented in the form of Internet-enabled software framework, offering a set of characteristics, including virtual organisation, scheduling, and monitoring, in order to support cooperation and flexible planning and monitoring across extended manufacturing enterprise . Furthermore, the evaluation of the performance of automotive manufacturing networks under highly diversified product demand is succeeded through discrete event simulation models in  with the use of multiple conflicting user-defined criteria such as lead time, final product cost, flexibility, annual production volume, and environmental impact due to product transportation. Finally, the application of the mesoscopic simulation approach to a real-world supply chain example is illustrated utilising the MesoSim simulation software [104, 105].
Existing simulation-based approaches do not tackle the numerous issues of manufacturing network design in a holistic integrated manner. The results of individual modules used for tackling network design sub-problems often contradict each other because they refer to not directly related manufacturing information and context (e.g. long-term strategic scheduling vs. short-term operational scheduling), while harmonising the context among these modules is challenging. This shortcoming hinders the applicability of tools to real manufacturing systems as it reduces the trustworthiness of results to the eyes of the planner among other reasons.
3.9 Enterprise resource planning
An ERP system is a suite of integrated software applications used to manage transactions through company-wide business processes, by using a common database, standard procedures, and data sharing between and within functional areas . Such ICT systems entail major investments and involve extensive efforts and organisational changes in companies that decide to employ them. ERP systems are becoming more and more prevalent throughout the international business world. Nowadays, in most production distribution companies, ERP systems are used to support production and distribution activities and they are designed to integrate and partially automate financial, resource management, commercial, after-sale, manufacturing, and other business functions into one system around a database .
A trend, especially in the mid-market, is to provide specific ERP modules as services. Such need generates the challenge for ERP system providers to offer mobile-capable ERP solutions. Another issue is the reporting and data analysis, which grows with the information needs of users. Research in big data analytics and business intelligence (BI) should become more tightly integrated with research and applications of ERP.
3.10 Customer relationship management
In Internet-based retailing, which is the preferred business model followed in MC, customer information management is a necessity. In particular, exploiting consumer data, such as purchase history, purchasing habits, and regional purchasing patterns, are the cornerstone of success for any company active in MC. In business-to-business and business-to-customer, CRM suites are thus indispensable. According to Strauss and Frost , CRM involves, as a first step, research to gain insight so as to identify potential and current customers. In a second step, customer information is used to differentiate the customer base according to specific criteria. Finally, the third step involves customised offerings for those customers that are identified as “superior” from the previous phase, enabling thus, the targeted offering of customised products. During the first step of identification of customers, market research and consumer behaviour models are used. In a second phase, for establishing differentiation techniques, data mining and KPIs assessment are used. Finally, for fine-tuning customisation options, information such as price, variants, promotions, and regions are examined .
As Internet becomes ubiquitous in business, CRM has been acknowledged as an enabler for better customisation since it offers management of the new market model less disruptively. Internet-enabled CRM tools also bring the customer closer to the enterprise and allow highly responsive customer-centred systems without significant increase in costs . e-CRM implementations have been assessed in the study . Noticeably, most major CRM suite vendors have started providing cloud-based services, a business model that suits SMEs that cannot afford huge ICT investments. Based on the balanced scorecard method, the study in  assessed e-CRM performance using 42 criteria in a number of companies. The results show that a successful CRM implementation is associated with tangible outcomes, such as improvements in financial indicators, customer value, brand image, and innovation. Finally, the latest generation of CRM tools, referred to as social CRM, exploit social networking technology to harness information about customer insights and engagement.
3.11 Cloud computing and manufacturing
A comprehensive definition of cloud computing is provided by the National Institute of Standards and Technology: “a model for enabling ubiquitous, convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources (e.g. networks, servers, storage, applications, and services) that can be rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort or service provider interaction” . Several applications have been reported in recent years where a cloud infrastructure is used to host and expose services related to manufacturing, such as: machine availability monitoring , collaborative and adaptive process planning , online tool-path programming based on real-time machine monitoring , manufacturing collaboration and data integration based on the STEP standard , and collaborative design .
Benefits and drawbacks of cloud technology for manufacturing
Increased mobility that allows decentralised and distributed SCM
Lack of standardisation and protocols create hesitation in adoption of Cloud solutions
Ubiquitous access to information context empowering decision-making
Security and lack of awareness on security issues, especially in SMEs, that are part of supply chains/clusters
Device and location independent offering context-sensitive visualisation of crucial data relevant to the mfg. network
Privacy issues generate legal concerns, identity management, access control, and regulatory compliance
Hidden complexity permits the diffusion of ICT solutions even to traditional, averted by disruptive solutions, sectors
Dependence on the cloud provider (provider stops providing services, absence of contracts/regulation)
Virtualised and scalable on-demand computational resources (problems of varied computational complexity)
Loss of control over data (assuring smaller companies that their data are not visible by anyone in the supply chain, but the owner is challenging)
Low cost for SMEs that cannot afford huge ICT investments and lack the know-how to maintain them
4 Challenges for future manufacturing
MC provides a set of enabling concepts and methods for providing the customer with products they desire and for organising production resources and networks to realise these products. However, on a practical strategic, tactical, and operational level, the tools for the realisation of MC are under development and refinement and a number of issues related to the design of manufacturing networks and their management are still not tackled in a holistic integrated manner. Several particular challenges need to be addressed as described below. Possible solutions are also proposed in the context of supporting a more efficient implementation of MC and personalisation.
4.1 Challenges for the manufacturing network life cycle
Regarding supplier selection, existing frameworks that handle both selection of suppliers, order allocation, and capacity planning are rare in the literature. Therefore, inconsistencies between the design phase and the actual implementation of the supply chain are a common issue. The problem most commonly treated jointly with supplier selection is the order allocation problem, as reported in the works of [123, 124, 125] among other. Moreover, several studies point out the difficulties of coordination between large networks of stakeholders. Potential solutions in novel approaches to tackling the issues generated in supply chain coordination for the procurement of customised products are proposed, such as in , where organisation flatness is proposed as a mediator for enhancing MC capability. Flatness in cross-plant and cross-functional organisation alleviate the need to decisions to pass through multiple layers of executives, simplifying coordination and information sharing . Among the several challenges for configuring robust manufacturing networks to satisfy MC are the need for frameworks that handle the entire order fulfilment life cycle (from product design to delivery), methods to allow easy modelling and experimentation of what-if scenarios and deeper examination of the impact of product variety on the performance of manufacturing networks. On the field of SCM, identifying the benefits of collaboration is still a big challenge for many. The definition of variables, such as the optimum number of partners, investment in collaboration, and duration of partnership, are some of the barriers of healthy collaborative arrangements that should be surpassed . Available solutions for lot sizing are following traditional approaches and are not able to address the increasing complexity of problems arising in the modern manufacturing network landscape. The economic order quantity (EOQ), established for more than 100 years, still forms the basis of recent lot sizing practices. In setups of complex and changeable products, the problem of lot sizing becomes extremely complex. Nevertheless, the optimality of inventory and capacity planning is often neglected due to increased complexity of the supply chain problems which comes with higher priority. For instance, in multi-agent manufacturing systems, each agent resolves inventory issues in its domain partition level, without clear global optimisation overview . Furthermore, the broader role of logistics capabilities in achieving supply chain agility has not been addressed from a holistic conceptual perspective . Therefore, an open research question is the relationship between logistics capabilities and supply chain agility. Regarding ERP suites, apart from their apparent benefits, the reported successful implementations of ERP systems are limited when considering implementation costs and disruptions caused in production . One reason for the low success rates in ERP implementations is attributed to the organisation changes needed for the industry that disrupt normal flow of business. Another reason is that production planning, a core function handled by currently deployed closed-loop MRPII (manufacturing resource planning) and ERP suites, is performed through the fundamental MRP (material requirements planning) logic [1, 131]. This leads to the generation of low-detail shop-floor schedules, assuming infinite production capacity and constant time components, thus leading to inflated lead times . Challenges on the technological level of ERP systems include delivery of software as a service, mobile technology, tightly integrated business intelligence, and big data analytics [133, 134]. Challenges in the field of product data management (PDM) are related to the efficiency of these systems with regard to studying factors that affect the accessibility of product data, for instance, the nature of data in different timeframes of a development, the relationship between the maturity of the data, and the probability of them being modified . The deployment and tight integration of product life cycle management (PLM) tools must also be considered since they bring an abundance of benefits against current manufacturing challenges. Yet these benefits are still not appreciated by many industrial sectors, mainly due to the following reasons: (1) they are complex as a concept and understanding their practical application is difficult, (2) they lack a holistic approach regarding the product life cycle and its underlying production life cycle and processes, and (3) the gap between research and industrial implementation is discouraging . Concerning CRM, although data rich markets can exploit the feedback of consumers through social networks to identify user polarity towards a product–service, improve its design, and refine a product service system (PSS) offering, only few initiatives have tapped that potential.
Further challenges that are related indirectly to the previous aspects are discussed hereafter. Concerning individual disparate software modules, it is often observed that they contradict each other because they refer to not directly related manufacturing information and context. The harmonisation, both on an input/output level and to the actual contents of information, is often a mistreated issue that hinders the applicability of tools to real-life manufacturing systems. Limitations of current computer-aided design (CAD) tools include: the complexity of menu items or commands, restricted active and interactive assistance during design, and inadequate human–computer interface design (focused on functionality) . To fulfil the needs of modern manufacturing processes, computer-aided process planning should be responsive and adaptive to the alterations in the production capacity and functionality. Nowadays, conventional computer-aided process planning (CAPP) systems are incapable of adjusting to dynamic operations, and a process plan, created in advance, is found improper or unusable to specific resources . Highlighted challenges for life cycle assessment (LCA) are modularisation and standardisation of environmental profiles for machine tools, as well as modelling of “hidden flows” and their incorporation in value stream mapping tools [139, 140]. Regarding knowledge management and modelling, reusable agent-oriented knowledge management frameworks, including the description of agent roles, interaction forms, and knowledge description, are missing . Moreover, ontologies used for knowledge representation have practical limitations. In case an ontology is abstract, its applicability and problem-solving potential may be diminished. On the other hand, in the case of very specific ontologies, reasoning and knowledge inference capacities are constrained . Furthermore, in the turbulent manufacturing environment, a key issue of modern manufacturing execution systems is that they cannot plan ahead of time. This phenomenon is named decision myopia and causes undoubtedly significant malfunctions in manufacturing . In the field of layout design and material simulation, some commercial software can represent decoupling data from 3D model and export them in XML or HTML format. While this is an export of properties, it cannot fully solve the interoperability and extensibility issues since the interoperability depends on how the different software and users define contents of data models . Concerning material flow simulation, it can be very time-consuming to build and verify large models with standard commercial-off-the-shelf software. Efficient simulation model generation will allow the user to simplify and accelerate the process of producing correct and credible simulation models . Finally, while the steady decline in computational cost renders the use of simulation very cost-efficient in terms of hardware requirements, commercial simulation software has not kept up with hardware improvements.
4.2 Solutions for addressing the challenges in the future manufacturing landscape
New technologies and emerging needs render traditional SCM and manufacturing network design models obsolete. To support manufacturing network design, planning, and control, a framework that integrates, harmonises, processes, and synchronises the different steps and product-related information is needed. The framework will be capable of supporting the decision-making procedure on all organisation levels in an integrated way, ranging from the overall management of the manufacturing network, down to the shop-floor scheduling fuelled by big data analytics, intuitive visualisation means, smart user interfaces, and IoT. An alignment and coordination between supply chain logistics and master production schedules with low-level shop-floor schedules is necessary for short-term horizons. The framework needs not be restricted on a particular manufacturing domain; since it is conceived by addressing universal industrial needs, its applicability to contemporary systems is domain-independent. The constituents of the framework are described hereafter.
The system will be supported by automated model-based decision-making methods that will identify optimum (or near-optimum) solutions to the sub-problems identified above, such as for the problem of the configuration of manufacturing networks capable of serving personalised product–services. The method must consider the capabilities of the manufacturing network elements (suppliers of different tiers, machining plants, assembly plants, etc.) and will indicate solutions to the warehouse sizing problem, to the manufacturing plant allocation, and to the transportation logistics. The decision support framework requires interfacing with discrete event simulation models of manufacturing networks and assessment of multiple conflicting and user-defined performance indicators.
The joint handling of order allocation, supplier selection, and capacity planning is necessary to alleviate inconsistencies between the supply chain design and implementation phases under a flatness concept. The incorporation of the entire order fulfilment life cycle is additionally envisioned, enhanced with methods that allow easy modelling and experimentation on what-if scenarios. The relationship between logistics capabilities and supply chain agility can also be revealed through this holistic view of the constituents of the supply chain.
Regarding SCM, collaboration concepts based on cloud computing and cloud manufacturing are a game changer. Through the sharing of both ICT as well as manufacturing resources, SMEs can unleash their innovation potential and thus compete more easily in the global market.
Further to that, the measurement and management of the manufacturing network complexity should be considered as a core strategic decision together with classical objectives of cost, time, and quality. Handling a variety of market excitations and demand fluctuations is the standard practice even today in many sectors, while this trend is only bound to intensify. In parallel, a risk assessment engine should correlate complexity results and leverage them into tangible risk indicators. Complexity can then be efficiently channelled through the designed network in the less risky and unpredictable manner.
To address the increasing complexity of problems arising in the modern manufacturing network landscape, the lot sizing and material planning need to be tightly incorporated to the production planning system. The consideration of capacitated production constraints is needed in order to reflect realistic system attributes. A shared and distributed cloud-based inventory record will contain information related to MRP and ERP variables (e.g. projected on-hand quantities, scheduled order releases and receipts, changes due to stock receipts, stock withdrawals, wastes and scrap, corrections imposed by cycle counting, as well as static data that describe each item uniquely). This record should be pervasive and contain dataset groups relevant to intra-departmental variables, as well as datasets visible only to suppliers and relevant stakeholders, in order to increase the transparency of operations.
The mistreated issues of deployment and tight integration of PLM, ERP, and CRM tools must also be tackled through interfacing of legacy software systems and databases for seamless data exchange and collaboration. Software as a service PLM, ERP, and CRM solutions available to be purchased per module will be the ideal ownership model since it allows greater degree of customisation of solutions, more focused ICT deployment efforts, and reduced acquisition costs. CAD/CAM, PDM, and MPM (manufacturing process management) systems and databases will be interfaced and interact with digital mock-ups of the factory and product–services solutions as well for synchronising the physical with the digital worlds. In addition, the knowledge capturing and exploitation is pivotal in the proposed framework. Product, process, and production information is acquired from production steps and is modelled and formalised in order to be exploited by a knowledge reuse mechanism that utilises semantic reasoning. This mechanism is comprised of an ontological model that is queried by the knowledge inference engine and allows the retrieval of knowledge and its utilisation in design and planning phases. The developments should also mediate the deeper examination of the impact of product variety on the performance of manufacturing networks.
In parallel, there is an urgent need of standardisation and harmonisation of data representation for manufacturing information, for example: the product information (BoM, engineering-BoM and manufacturing-BoM ), the manufacturing processes (bill of processes—BoP) including the manufacturing facilities layout, the associated relations (bill of relations—BoR), and related services (Bill of Services—BoS) should be pursued through a shared data model. Moreover, the product complexity needs to be assessed based on functional product specifications using, for instance, design structure matrices (DSM) , which incorporate components (BoM), the required manufacturing and assembly processes (BoP) including sequences/plans, relationships (BoR), and the accompanying services (BoS). The complexity of the product in relation to the manufacturing network and service activities (impact on delivery time and cost, and effect on the overall reliability) will be quantified and will be incorporated in the decision-making process.
Last but not least, it should be noted that the components of the proposed framework must be offered following a software as a service delivery method and not as a rigid all-around platform. The framework should act as a cloud-based hub of different solutions, offering web-based accessibility through a central “cockpit” and visualisation of results through common browser technology and handheld devices (tablets, smartphones, etc.).
The ability to customise a product/service is offered to consumers for many years now, while truly unique products will be requested in the near future by users around the globe  using the Internet as a means of integration in the design process. In addition, the shortening of life cycles and time to market, increased outsourcing, manufacturing at dispersed sites, and the diverse cooperation in networks increase the complexity of production . Agility, reconfigurability, and synchronisation from process up to supply chain levels are necessary in order for companies to respond effectively to the ever-changing market needs . Driven by the ever-increasing need to reduce cost and delivery times, OEMs are called to efficiently overcome these issues by designing and operating sustainable and efficient manufacturing networks.
This work reviewed the existing literature related to the basic aspects of a manufacturing network life cycle within the MC landscape. The focus was to study existing practices and highlight the gaps in the current approaches related to these aspects of manufacturing network design, planning, and operation. Afterwards, the identification of future directions of academic and industrial research is proposed. Departing from that, major drivers and enabling technologies are identified and concepts that can lead to a more sustainable implementation of MC are proposed.
Summing up, the theoretical foundations of MC have been laid for many years now . Still, there is an apparent gap between the theoretical and the actual application of MC, and bridging this gap is a challenging task that needs to be addressed. A safe conclusion reached is that the complexity generated in manufacturing activities due to the exploding product variety requires a systematic approach to be considered during the design, planning, and operating of the entire manufacturing system . All in all, piecemeal digitalisation of manufacturing network is not a viable option; revisiting of the entire supply and manufacturing network life cycle is essential for sustainability. The pursuit for a smoother, more efficient, more rewarding, and eco-friendly manufacturing is ongoing.
- 1.Chryssolouris G (2006) Manufacturing systems: theory and practice, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 5.Chryssolouris G, Papakostas N (2014) Dynamic Manufacturing Networks in a Globalised Economy. In: 8th International conference on digital enterprise technology—DET 2014. Keynote Presentation, 25–28 Mar 2014, Stuttgart, ISBN: 9783839606971Google Scholar
- 10.Gunasekaran A, Ngai EWT (2012) The future of operations management: an outlook and analysis. Int J of Prod Econ 135(2):687–701Google Scholar
- 11.Mourtzis D, Doukas M (2014) The evolution of manufacturing systems: From craftsmanship to the era of customisation. In Modrak V, Semanco P, (eds) Design and management of lean production systems. IGI Global, ISBN13: 9781466650398, http://www.igi-global.com/book/handbook-research-design-management-lean/84172/
- 12.Chandler AD (1990) Scale and scope. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 13.Hounshell A (1984) From the American system to mass production, 1800–1932: the development of manufacturing technology in the United States. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
- 14.Piller FT, Möslein KM (2002) From economies of scale towards economies of customer interaction: value creation in mass customisation based electronic commerce. In: 15th Bled electronic commerce conference, TU München, pp 214–228Google Scholar
- 17.Koren Y (2009) The global manufacturing revolution, 2nd edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
- 22.Elias S (2002) New car buyer behaviour. 3DayCar Research Report. Cardiff Business SchoolGoogle Scholar
- 23.Knight K (2007) Survey: 89 % of consumers prefer online shopping. Bizreport. http://www.bizreport.com/2007/12/survey_89_of_consumers_prefer_online_shopping.html
- 29.Warren NA (2005) Internet and globalisation. In: Gangopadhyay P, Chatterji M (eds) Economics of globalisation. Ashgate, USAGoogle Scholar
- 30.Oliver J, Houlihan JB (1986) Logistics management—the present and the future. In: Proceedings of 1986 BPICS conference, p 91–99Google Scholar
- 36.Chui M, Loffler M, Roberts R (2010) The internet of things. McKinsey Quarterly, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 43.Ellram LM (1990) The supplier selection decision in strategic partnerships. J Purch Mater Manag 26(4):8–14Google Scholar
- 54.Kanda AA, Deshmukh SG (2008) Supply chain coordination: perspectives, empirical studies and research directions. Int J Prod Econ 15(2):316–335Google Scholar
- 56.Chase RB (1998) Production and operations management: manufacturing and services. Irwin McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 72.Monden Y (1983) Toyota production system: a practical approach to production management. Industrial Engineering and Management Press, ISBN: 978-0898060348Google Scholar
- 74.Zinn W, Bowersox DJ (1988) Planning physical distribution with the principle of postponement. J Bus Logist 9(2):117–136Google Scholar
- 78.Pagh JD, Cooper MC (1998) Supply chain postponements and speculation strategies: how to choose the right strategy. J Bus Logist 19(2):13–33Google Scholar
- 98.Maropoulos P (1994) Digital enterprise technology–defining perspectives and research priorities. Int J Comput Int Manag 16(7–8):467–478Google Scholar
- 99.Manufuture (2004) A vision for 2020, report of the high-level group, Nov 2004. http://www.manufuture.org/documents/manufuture_vision_en%5B1%5D.pdf
- 100.Bughin J, Chui M, Manyika CJ (2010) Big data, and smart assets: ten tech-enabled business trends to watch. McKinsey Quarterly, McKinsey Global Institute, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 103.Grewal CS, Enns ST, Rogers P (2010) Dynamic adjustment of replenishment parameters using optimum-seeking simulation. In: Simulation conference (WSC), proceedings of the 2010 winter conference, pp 1797–1808Google Scholar
- 104.Umeda S, Zhang F (2010) A simulation modelling framework for supply chain system analysis. In: Simulation conference (WSC), proceedings of the 2010 winter conference, pp 2011–2022Google Scholar
- 108.Strauss J, Frost R (2001) E-marketing, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
- 113.Mell P, Grance T (2009) Perspectives on cloud computing and standards. Information Technology Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), GaithersburgGoogle Scholar
- 114.Mourtzis D, Doukas M, Vlachou K, Xanthopoulos N (2014) Machine availability monitoring for adaptive holistic scheduling: A conceptual framework for mass customisation. In: 8th International conference on digital enterprise technology—DET 2014. 25–28 Mar, Stuttgart, ISBN: 9783839606971Google Scholar
- 115.CAPP-4-SMEs. Collaborative and adaptive process planning for sustainable manufacturing environments—CAPP4SMEs. EC Funded Project, 7th Frammework Programme. Grant Agreement No.: 314024Google Scholar
- 116.Tapoglou N, Mehnen J, Doukas M, Mourtzis D (2014) Optimal tool-path programming based on real-time machine monitoring using IEC 61499 function blocks: a case study for face milling. In: 8th ASME 2014 international manufacturing science and engineering conference, 9–13 June 2014, Detroit, MichiganGoogle Scholar
- 118.Wu D, Thames JL, Rosen DW, Schaefer D (2012) Towards a cloud-based design and manufacturing paradigm: looking backward, looking forward. In: 32nd Computers and information in engineering conference ASME proceedings, Chicago, Illinois, 12–15, Aug, pp 315–328Google Scholar
- 119.Lewis G (2010) Basics about cloud computing. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
- 120.Technavio Insights (2014) Global cloud security software market. http://www.trendmicro.com/cloud-content/us/pdfs/business/reports/rpt_technavio-global-security-software-market.pdf
- 121.MindCommerce (2014) Cloud security 2014: companies and solutions, July 2014. http://www.mindcommerce.com/cloud_security_2014_companies_and_solutions.php
- 130.Panorama Consulting (2014) ERP Report. Denver, Colorado: A Panorama Consulting Solutions Research ReportGoogle Scholar
- 132.Plossl GW (2011) Orlicky’s material requirements planning, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 133.Su CJ (2009) Effective mobile assets management system using RFID and ERP technology. In: WRI international conference on communications and mobile computing, pp 147–151Google Scholar
- 134.Schabel S (2009) ERP—mobile computing. Thesis, Wien: Universität, WienGoogle Scholar
- 141.Dignum V (2006) An Overview of Agents in Knowledge Management. In: Umeda M (ed) Proceedings of INAP-05. Springer, pp 175–189Google Scholar
- 146.Xu HC, Xu XF, HE T (2007) Research on transformation engineering BOM into manufacturing BOM based on BOP. Appl Mech Mater 10–12:99–103Google Scholar
- 147.Eppinger SD, Browning TR (2012) Design structure matrix methods and applications. ISBN: 9780262017527Google Scholar
- 149.Simchi-Levi D (2010) Operation rules. MIT Press Ltd, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 150.Pine BJ (1992) Mass customisation: the new frontier in business competition. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.