Advertisement

Logistics Research

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 231–243 | Cite as

Value-creating relationships: focusing on the human level

  • Alexander Bode
  • Katja MüllerEmail author
Original Paper
  • 360 Downloads

Abstract

Enhancing a firm’s value creation is one of today’s most discussed topics in management practice and science. Many approaches start by enhancing value creation while looking at operations and/or logistics of a firm, for example, a lean production. Furthermore, there is an increasing trend for cooperation. Close business-partner relationships are necessary while facing the challenges of changing business environments, inherent complexity, and dynamics of markets. We suggest that while the trade-off between competition and cooperation has to be decided on an organizational level, the individual level is crucial for value creation and success within cooperative forms of business. According to the call for micro-foundation, we will show how value creation can be improved within business-partner relationships by looking at the social behavior of individuals and human-level approaches. Accordingly, the overarching question in this paper is: Which models can be used for improving business-partner relationships aiming at an increasing value creation within cooperation. Answering this question, we consider people-oriented management approaches as a basis for the emphasis of the human level within cooperation, arguing that social exchange theory can complement the existing resource-based and relational view. As a result, we develop a micro-foundation framework including humans and their individual assets, exchange resources, and characteristics of the relationships as impact factors for value-creating relationships. Based on this literature-based investigation, we derive implications for further research and management practice.

Keywords

Business-partner relationships Value creation Micro-foundation Social exchange theory People orientation Resource-based and relational view 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewer for his/her valuable comments.

References

  1. 1.
    Taylor FW (1999) What is scientific management? In: Matteson MT, Ivancevich JM (eds) Management and behavior classics, 7th edn. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston, pp 12–15Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Knowles WH (1958) Human relations in industry: research and concepts. Calif Manag Rev 1:87–105. ISSN:00081256Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rappapord A (2006) 10 ways to create shareholder value. Harv Bus Rev 84: 66–77. ISSN:00178012Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liker JK (2004) The Toyota way: 14 management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Priem RL (2007) A consumer perspective on value creation. Acad Manag Rev 32:219–235. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2007.23464055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boddewyn JJ, Brewer TL (1994) International-business political behavior: new theoretical directions. Acad Manag Rev 19:119–148. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1994.9410122010Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bridoux F, Coeurderoy R, Durand R (2011) Heterogeneous motives and the collective creation of value. Acad Manag Rev 366:711–730. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2011.65554704Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Felin T, Foss NJ (2005) Strategic organization: a field in search of micro-foundations. Strateg Organ 3:441–455. doi: 10.1177/1476127005055796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coff R, Kryscynski D (2011) Invited editorial: drilling for micro-foundations of human capital-based competitive advantages. J Manag 37:429–1443. doi: 10.1177/0149206310397772Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Foss NJ (2011) Why micro-foundations for resource-based theory are needed and what they may look like. J Manag 37:1413–1428. doi: 10.1177/0149206310390218Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Felin T, Foss NJ, Heimeriks KH, Madsen TL (2012) Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: individuals, processes, and structure. J Manag Stud 49:1351–1374. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01052.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hammervoll T, Toften K (2010) Value-creation initiatives in buyer-seller relationships. Eur Bus Rev 22:539–555. doi: 10.1108/09555341011068930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cropanzano R, Mitchell MS (2005) Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review. J Manag 31:874–900. doi: 10.1177/0149206305279602Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Muthusamy SK, White MA (2005) Learning and knowledge transfer in strategic alliances: a social exchange view. Organ Stud 26:415–441. doi: 10.1177/0170840605050874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Felin T, Foss NJ, Heimeriks KH, Madsen TL (2012) Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: individuals, processes, and structure. J Manag Stud 49:1366. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01052.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 5:171–180. ISSN:01432095Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17:99–120. ISSN:01492063Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang HC, He J, Mahoney JT (2009) Firm-specific knowledge resources and competitive advantage: the roles of economic- and relationship-based employee governance mechanisms. Strateg Manag J 30:1265–1285. doi: 10.1002/smj.787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D (1994) Die zweite Revolution in der Autoindustrie: Konsequenzen aus der weltweiten Studie des Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Campus Verlag, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liker JK (2004) The Toyota way: 14 management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 6Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hines P, Holweg M, Rich N (2004) Learning to evolve: a review of contemporary lean thinking. Ind J Prod Manag 24:994–1011. doi: 10.1108/01443570410558049Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jayaraman V, Luo Y (2007) Creating competitive advantages through new value creation: a reverse logistics perspective. Acad Manag Perspect 21:56–73. doi: 10.5465/AMP.2007.25356512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hammervoll T (2009) Value creation in supply chain relationships: a critique of governance value analysis. Eur J Manag 43:630–639. doi: 10.1108/03090560910946963Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cui L, Hertz S (2011) Networks and capabilities as characteristics of logistics firms. Ind Mark Manag 40:1004–1011. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Christopher M (2005) Logistics and supply chain management: creating value-adding networks. Pearson Education Limited, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ghosh M, John G (1999) Governance value analysis and marketing strategy. J Mark 63:131–145. ISSN:00222429Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Staats BR, Upton DM (2011) Lean knowledge work. Harv Bus Rev Oct:100–110, p 97. ISSN:00178012Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Spear BR, Bowen DM (1999) Decoding the dna of the Toyota production system. Harv Bus Rev Sep–Oct: 96–106. ISSN:00178012Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pfeiffer W, Weiß E (1994) Lean management: Grundlagen der Führung und Organisation lernender Unternehmen. Erich Schmidt Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hines P, Holweg M, Rich N (2004) Learning to evolve: a review of contemporary lean thinking. Ind J Prod Manag 24(994–1011):997. doi: 10.1108/01443570410558049Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hines P, Silvi R, Bartolini M (2002) Demand chain management: an integrative approach in automotive retailing. J Manag 20:707–728. ISSN:02726963Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Newbert SL (2008) Value, rareness, competitive advantage and performance: a conceptual-level empirical investigation of the resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 29:745–768. doi: 10.1002/smj.686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Peteraf MA, Barney JB (2003) Unraveling the resource-based tangle. Manag Decis Econ 24:309–323. doi: 10.002/mde.1126Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Holweg M, Pil FK (2001) Successful build-to-order strategies: start with the customer. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 43:74–83. ISSN:15329194Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tan CK (2001) A framework of supply chain management literature. Eur J Purch Supply Manag 7:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Smith KG, Caroll SJ, Ashford SJ (1995) Intra- and interorganizational cooperation: toward a research agenda. Acad Manag Rev 35:7–23. doi: 10.2307/256726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bradach JL, Eccles RG (1989) Price, authority, and trust: from ideal types to plural forms. Annu Rev Soc 15:97–118. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.15.080189.000525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23(660–679):662. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1998.1255632Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Huemer L (2006) Supply management: value creation, coordination and positioning in supply relationships. Long Range Plan 39(133–153):134. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2006.04.005MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23:660–679. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1998.1255632Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Amasaka K, Sakai H (2010) Evolution of TPS fundamentals using new JIT strategy: proposal and validity of advanced TPS at Toyota. J Adv Manuf Syst 9:85–99. doi: 10.1142/S0219686710001831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lee BH, Ho HJ (2007) The mutation of the Toyota production system: adapting the TPS at hyundai motor company. Int J Prod Res 45:3665–3679. doi: 10.1080/00207540701223493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sakakibara S, Flynn BB, Schroeder RC, Morris WT (1997) The impact of just-in-time manufacturing and its infrastructure on manufacturing performance. Manag Sci 43:1246–1257. ISSN:00251909Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sugimori Y, Kusunoki K, Cho F, Uchikawa S (1977) Toyota production system and Kanban system materialization of just-in-time and respect-for-human system. Int J Prod Res 77:553–564. ISSN:00207543Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sugimori Y, Kusunoki K, Cho F, Uchikawa S (1977) Toyota production system and Kanban system materialization of just-in-time and respect-for-human system. Int J Prod Res 77:553–564, p 553. ISSN:00207543Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Imai M (1986) Kaizen (ky’zen): the key to Japan’s competitive success. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Reiß M (1993) Die Rolle der Personalführung im Lean Management. Vom Erfüllungsgehilfen zum Schrittmacher einer Management-Revolution. Z. für Personalforschung 7:171–194Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Thun JH, Drüke M, Grübner A (2010) Empowering Kanban through TPS-principles—an empirical analysis of the Toyota production system. Int J Prod Res 48:7089–7106. doi: 10.1080/00207540903436695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lander E, Liker JK (2007) The Toyota production system and art: making highly customized and creative products the Toyota way. Int J Prod Res 45:3681–3698. doi: 10.1080/00207540701223519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    New SJ (2007) Celebrating the enigma: the continuing puzzle of the Toyota production system. Int J Prod Res 45:3545–3554. doi: 10.1080/00207540701223386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Liker JK (2004) The Toyota Way: 14 management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 13Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Van de Ven AH (1976) On the nature, formation, and maintenance of relations among organizations. Acad Manag Rev October: 24–36, p 25. ISSN:03637425Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Borys B, Jemison DB (1989) Hybrid arrangements as strategic alliances: theoretical issues in organizational combinations. Acad Manag Rev 14:234–249. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1989.4282106Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Emerson RM (1976) Social exchange theory. Annu Rev Soc 2:335–362. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Frenzen J, Nakamoto K (1993) Structure, cooperation, and the flow of market information. J Consum Res 20:360–375. ISSN:00935301Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Burns T (1973) A structural theory of social exchange. Acta Sociol 16(188–208):188. doi: 10.1177/000169937301600303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Thibaut JW, Kelley HH (1986) The social psychology of groups. Transaction Books, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35:128–152. ISSN:00018392Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Nonaka I (2007) The knowledge-creating company. Harv Bus Rev 85:162–171. ISSN:00178012Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Eisenberger R, Cotterell N, Marvel J (1987) Reciprocation ideology. J Pers Soc Psychol 53:743–750. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Witt AL (1992) Exchange ideology as a moderator of the relationships between importance of participation in decision making and job attitude. Hum Relat 45:73–85. ISSN:00187267Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Crosby LA, Evans KA, Cowles D (1990) Relationship quality in services selling: an interpersonal influence perspective. J Mark 54:68–81. ISSN:00222429Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Gefen D, Ridings CM (2002) Implementation team responsiveness and user evaluation of customer relationship management: a quasi-experimental design study of social exchange theory. J Manag Inf Syst 19:47–69. ISSN:07421222Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Dose JJ (1997) Work values: an integrative framework and illustrative application to organizational socialization. J Occup Organ Psychol 70:219–240. ISSN:09631798Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Nystrom PC (1986) Comparing beliefs of line and technostructure managers. Acad Manag J 29:812–819. doi: 10.2307/255947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sidani Y, Jamali D (2010) The Egyptian worker: work beliefs and attitudes. J Bus Ethics 92:433–450. doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0166-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Bateman TS, Crant JM (1993) The proactive component of organizational behavior: a measure and correlates. J Organ Behav 14:103–118. ISSN:08943796Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Chan D (2006) Interactive effects of situational judgment effectiveness and proactive personality on work perceptions and work outcomes. J Appl Psychol 91:475–481. ISSN:00219010Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Crant JM (1995) The proactive personality scale and objective job performance among real estate agents. J Appl Psychol 80:532–537. ISSN:00219010Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Erdogan B, Bauer TN (2005) Enhancing career benefits of employee proactive personality: the role of fit with jobs and organizations. Pers Psychol 58:859–891. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00772.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Seibert SE, Crant JM, Krainer ML (1999) Proactive personality and career success. J Appl Psychol 84:16–427. ISSN:00219010Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Seibert SE, Kraimer ML, Crant JM (2001) What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success. Pers Psychol 54:845–874. ISSN:00219010Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Zhang Z, Wang M, Shi J (2012) Leader-follower congruence in proactive personality and work outcomes: the mediating role of leader-member exchange. Acad Manag J 55:111–130. doi: 10.5465/amj.2009.0865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Foa UG, Foa EB (1974) Societal structures of the mind. Charles C Thomas, SpringfieldGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Foa UG, Foa EB (1974) Societal structures of the mind. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, p 37Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Grant RM, Baden-Fuller C (2004) A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. J Manag Stud 4:61–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00421.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Palmatier RW (2008) Interfirm relational drivers of customer value. J Mark 72:76–89. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.72.4.76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Lawler EJ, Yoon J (1996) Commitment in exchange relations: test of a theory of relational cohesion. Am Sociol Rev 61:89–108, 90. ISSN:00031224Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Kanter RM (1968) Commitment and social organization: a study of commitment mechanisms in utopian communities. Am Sociol Rev 33:499–517. ISSN:00031224Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Marsden PV, Campbell KE (1984) Measuring tie strength. Soc Forces 63:482–501. ISSN:00377732Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Granovetter MS (1973): The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78:1360–1830. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2776392
  82. 82.
    Dyer J, Nobeoka K (2000) Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case. Strateg Manag J 21:345–367, 349. ISSN:01432095Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Nobeoka K, Dyer JF, Madhok A (2002) The influence of customer scope on supplier learning and performance on Japanese Automobile Industry. J Int Bus Stud 33:717–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    IBM Global Services (2009) The smarter supply chain of the future: global chief supply chain officer study. http://www-148.ibm.com/tela/servlet/Asset/297861/CSCO%20Study%2010_21_09.PDF. Accessed 26 Oct 2012
  85. 85.
    Pritchard D, MacPherson A (2004) Industrial subsidies and the politics of world trade: the case of Boeing 7e7. Ind Geogr 1:57–73Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    McLeish KN, Oxoby RJ (2011) Social interactions and the salience of social identity. J Econ Psychol 32:172–178. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2010.11.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Mael F, Ashforth BE (1992) Alumni and their alma mater: a partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. J Organ Behav 13:103–123. ISSN:08943796Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technische Universität DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations