Dimethyl Ether Production from Sugarcane Vinasse: Modeling and Simulation for a Techno-economic Assessment

  • Gabriela de França LopesEmail author
  • Lucas Bonfim-Rocha
  • Luiz Mario de Matos Jorge
  • Paulo Roberto Paraíso


Industrialization and energy demand increase are highlighted as consequences of world population growth for decades. Thereby, aiming to contribute to sustainable processes capable of mitigating the effects resulting from this process, biofuels have been intensively researched, produced and used in recent years. Among the possibilities, dimethyl ether (DME) stands out with great prospects replacing liquefied petroleum gas and diesel due to its potential as clean fuel. This work aims to conjoin the production of DME, a biofuel with great prospects for technical performance, safety, and economy, with a favorable destination for vinasse, the most worrying residue of ethanol production, due to its high polluting potential and large production volume in several countries. A rigorous and robust simulation of direct synthesis of DME from vinasse-derived syngas is performed using Aspen Hysys and its supplements, evaluating the technical and economic aspects of its production in ethanol distilleries. Results of the proposed scenario point that the process is technically feasible, reaching a purity of 99.9%, respecting the minimum required by standard norms. In addition, the designed process achieved yields of 1 kg of DME for each 1.6 kg of syngas. The simulated process presented a total capital cost of 47.1 millions of dollars, operating costs of 14.1 millions of dollars per year, and utilities cost of 11.2 millions of dollars per year. Considering energy cogeneration, an economy of 9.2% was reached, resulting in a production cost of simulated stage of 98.36 US$/tonne of DME and, considering a complete scenario, an accumulated cost of 233.48 US$/tonne of DME. It demonstrates an economic competitiveness for the DME price and ensures a considerable profit margin for the process. Consequently, the investigated DME production scenario emerges as a promising diesel substitute in a realistic scenario.

Graphical Abstract



Vinasse Biogas Syngas Industrial scale Renewable processes Dimethyl ether 



capital annualized costs (US$/year)


capital costs (US$)


capital recovery factor


dimethyl ether


interest rate


International Energy Agency


internal rate of return


income tax

LP steam generation

low-pressure steam generation

MP steam generation

medium-pressure steam generation


non-random two liquid model – Redlick-Kwog


operating costs (US$/year)


pressure (kPa)


mass flow of dimethyl ether produced per year (tonnes/year)


synthesis gas


plant lifetime (year)


temperature (K)


total annualized cost (US$/year)


United Nations Conference on Trade and Development


United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs


mass fraction


Funding information

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from CAPES (Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education).


  1. 1.
    United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2017) World population prospects: the 2017 revision. Accessed 22 August 2018
  2. 2.
    International Energy Agency (2017) World energy outlook 2017. Accessed 2 August 2018
  3. 3.
    Statista (2018) Primary energy consumption worldwide from 2005 to 2017, by fuel type (in million tons oil equivalent). Accessed 22 September 2018
  4. 4.
    Moradi GR, Parvizian F (2011) An expert model for estimation of the performance of direct dimethyl ether synthesis from synthesis gas. Can J Chem Eng 89:1266–1273. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guo M, Song W, Buhain J (2015) Bioenergy and biofuels: history, status, and perspective. Renew Sust Energ Rev 42:712–725. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pascall A, Adams TA (2013) Semicontinuous separation of dimethyl ether (DME) produced from biomass. Can J Chem Eng 91:1001–1021. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2009) The biofuels market: current situation and alternative scenarios. Geneva and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moradi GR, Ahmadpour J, Yaripour F, Wang J (2011) Equilibrium calculations for direct synthesis of dimethyl ether from syngas. Can J Chem Eng 89:108–115. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen WH, Hsu CL, Wang XD (2016) Thermodynamic approach and comparison of two-step and single step DME (dimethyl ether) syntheses with carbon dioxide utilization. Energy 109:326–340. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Azizi Z, Rezaeimanesh M, Tohidian T, Rahimpour MR (2014) Dimethyl ether: a review of technologies and production challenges. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 82:150–172. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bakhtyari A, Rahimpour MR (2018) Methanol to dimethyl ether. In: Basile A, Dalena F (eds) Methanol, 1st edn. Elsevier, Cambridge, pp 281–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boundy B, Diegel S, Wright L, Davis SC (2011) Biomass energy data book, 4th edn. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TennesseeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Global Petrol Prices (2018) Diesel prices. Accessed 20 August 2018
  15. 15.
    Global Petrol Prices (2019) Gasoline prices. Accessed 16 Oct 2019
  16. 16.
    Global Safety Management (2015). Safety data sheet: methanol, lab grade, 4L. Accessed [16 Oct 2019]
  17. 17.
    GPC Química (2011) Ficha de Informações de Segurança de Protuto Químico - FISPQ: Metanol (In portuguese). Accessed 16 Oct 2019
  18. 18.
    Holly Frontier (2017) Safety data sheet: gasoline (all grades). HollyFrontier Refining & Marketing LLC, Dallas Accessed 16 Oct 2019Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kapus P, Ofner H (1995) Development of fuel injection equipment and combustion system for DI diesels operated on dimethyl ether. SAE Techn Pap 950062:18Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Methanol Institute (2019) Methanol price and supply/demand. Accessed 16 October 2018
  21. 21.
    Park SH, Lee CS (2014) Applicability of dimethyl ether (DME) in a compression ignition engine as an alternative fuel. Energy Convers Manag 86:848–863. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Petrobras Distribuidora (2018) Ficha de Informações de Segurança de Produto Químico - FISPQ: Óleo Diesel B S500 (In portuguese). Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Seddon D (2011) Methanol and dimethyl ether (DME) production from synthesis gas. In: Khan MR (ed) Advances in clean hydrocarbon fuel processing: science and technology, 1st edn. Woodhead Publishing Limited, pp 363–386Google Scholar
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
    Delparish A, Avci AK (2016) Intensified catalytic reactors for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis and for reforming of renewable fuels to hydrogen and synthesis gas. Fuel Process Technol 151:72–100. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yousefi A, Eslamloueyan R, Kazerooni NM (2017) Optimal conditions in direct dimethyl ether synthesis from syngas utilizing a dual-type fluidized bed reactor. Energy 125:275–286. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kurzina IA, Reshetnikov SI, Karakchieva NI, Kurina LN (2017) Direct synthesis of dimethyl ether from synthesis gas: experimental study and mathematical modeling. Chem Eng J 329:135–141. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bhatia SC (2014) Biodiesel. In: Advanced renewable energy systems. Woodhead Publishing India, Nova York, pp 573–626. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Farsi M, Sani AH, Riasatian P (2016) Modeling and operability of DME production from syngas in a dual membrane reactor. Chem Eng Res Des 112:190–198. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Luu MT, Milani D, Wake M, Abbas A (2016) Analysis of di-methyl ether production routes: process performance evaluations at various syngas compositions. Chem Eng Sci 149:143–155. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Leonzio G (2018) State of art and perspectives about the production of methanol, dimethyl ether and syngas by carbon dioxide hydrogenation. J CO2 Util 27:326–354. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Leme RM, Seabra JEA (2017) Technical-economic assessment of different biogas upgrading routes from vinasse anaerobic digestion in the Brazilian bioethanol industry. Energy 119:754–766. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    de Souza Dias MO, Maciel Filho R, Mantelatto PE et al (2015) Sugarcane processing for ethanol and sugar in Brazil. Environ Dev 15:35–51. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Parsaee M, Kiani MKD, Karimi K (2019) A review of biogas production from sugarcane vinasse. Biomass Bioenergy 122:117–125. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fuess LT, Araújo Júnior MM, Garcia ML, Zaiat M (2017) Designing full-scale biodigestion plants for thetreatment of vinasse in sugarcane biorefineries: how phase separation and alkalinization impactbiogas and electricity production costs? Chem Eng Res Des 119:209–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fuess LT, Garcia ML, Zaiat M, Fuess LT (2018) Seasonal characterization of sugarcane vinasse: assessing environmental impacts from fertirrigation and the bioenergy recovery potential through biodigestion. Sci Total Environ 634:29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Molina FB, Salina FH, Palacios-Bereche R, Ensinas AV (2018) Supercritical water gasification route for methane production from sugarcane vinasse. In: 31st International Conference on efficiency, cost, optimization, simulation and environmental impact of energy systems ECOS. p 1–13Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nogueira CEC, Souza SNM, Micuanski VC, Azevedo RL (2015) Exploring possibilities of energy insertion from vinasse biogas in the energy matrix of Parana State, Brazil. Renew Sust Energ Rev 48:300–305. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pinto LS, Neto DP, Domingues EG (2018) Investment risk analysis of electricity generation from vinasse biodigestion in the free contracting environment. In: IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe. p 1–6Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Salomon KR, Lora EES (2009) Estimate of the electric energy generating potential for different sources of biogas in Brazil. Biomass Bioenergy 33:1101–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Clausen RL, Elmegaard B, Houbak N (2010) Techno economic analysis of a low CO2 emission dimethyl ether (DME) plant based on gasification of torrefied biomass. Energy 35:4831–4842. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Inayat A, Ghenai C, Naqvi M, Ammar M, Ayoub M, Hussin MNB (2017) Parametric study for production of dimethyl ether (DME) as a fuel from palm wastes. Energy Procedia 105:1242–1249. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ju F, Chen H, Ding X, Yang H, Wang X, Zhang S, Dai Z (2009) Process simulation of single-step dimethyl ether production via biomass gasification. Biotechnol Adv 27:599–605. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Nakyai T, Saebea D (2019) Exergoeconomic comparison of syngas production from biomass, coal, and natural gas for dimethyl ether synthesis in single-step and two-step processes. J Clean Prod 241:118334. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Parvez AM, Wu T, Li S, Miles N, Mujtaba IM (2018) Bio-DME production based on conventional and CO2-enhanced gasification of biomass: a comparative study on exergy and environmental impacts. Biomass Bioenergy 110:105–113. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Espana-Gamboa EI, Mijangos-Cortés JO, Hernández-Zárate G, Maldonado JAD, Alzate-Gaviria LM (2012) Methane production by treating vinasses from hydrous ethanol using a modified UASB reactor. Biotechnol Biofuels 82:1–9Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Fuess LT, Garcia ML (2014) Implications of stillage land disposal: a critical review on the impacts of fertigation. J Environ Manag 145:210–229. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Salomon K, Lora EES, Rocha MH, Olmo OA (2011) Cost calculations for biogas from vinasse biodigestion and its energy utilization. Sugar Ind 136:217–223Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Labriet M, Simbolotti G, Tosato G (2013) Biogas and bio-syngas production. In: Energy Technology Systems Analysis Program (ETSAP) technology brief P11: International Energy Agency (IEA). Accessed 22 September 2019
  50. 50.
    Moraes BS, Zaiat M, Bonomi A (2015) Anaerobic digestion of vinasse from sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil : challenges and perspectives. Renew Sust Energy Rev 44:888–903. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Chen X, Jiang J, Li K, Tian S, Yan F (2017) Energy-efficient biogas reforming process to produce syngas: the enhanced methane conversion by O2. Appl Energy 185:687–697. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Salomon KR (2007) Technical-economic and environmental assessment of the use of biogas from vinasse biodigestion in technologies for electricity generation. Dissertation. Federal University of ItajubáGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    International DME Association (2019) About DME. Accessed 25 March 2018
  54. 54.
    Gopaul SG, Dutta A (2015) Dry reforming of multiple biogas types for syngas production simulated using Aspen Plus: the use of partial oxidation and hydrogen combustion to achieve thermo-neutrality. Int J Hydrog Energy. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Silva RO, Yoshi HCMH, Rocha LB, Lima OCM, Jiménez L, Jorge LMM (2017) Synthesis of a new route for methanol production by syngas arising from sugarcane vinasse. Comput Aided Chem Eng 40:811–816. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Al-Lagtah N, Al-Habsi S, Onaizi SA (2015) Optimization and performance improvement of Lekhwair natural gas sweetening plant using Aspen Hysys. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 26:367–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Alnili F, Barifcani A (2018) Simulation study of sweetening and dehydration of natural gas stream using MEG solution. Can J Chem Eng 96:2000–2006. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Gangadharan P, Kanchi KC, Lou HH (2012) Chemical Engineering Research and Design Evaluation of the economic and environmental impact of combining dry reforming with steam reforming of methane. Chem Eng Res Des 90:1956–1968. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Matzen M, Demirel Y (2016) Methanol and dimethyl ether from renewable hydrogen and carbon dioxide: alternative fuels production and life-cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 139:1068–1077. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Luyben WL (2011) Compressor heuristics for conceptual process design. Ind Eng Chem Res 50:13984–13989. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Abu-Dahrieh J, Rooney D, Goguet A, Saih Y (2012) Activity and deactivation studies for direct dimethyl ether synthesis using CuO-ZnO-Al2O3 with NH(4)ZSM-5, HZSM-5 or gamma-Al2O3. Chem Eng J 203:201–211. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Falco M, Capocelli M, Centi G (2016) Dimethyl ether production from CO2 rich feedstocks in a one-step process: thermodynamic evaluation and reactor simulation. Chem Eng J 294:400–409. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Aguayo T, Eren J, Mier D, Arandes JM, Olazar M, Bilbao J (2007) Kinetic modeling of dimethyl ether synthesis in a single step on a CuO−ZnO−Al2O3/γ-Al2O3 catalyst. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:5522–5530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Stolov MA, Zaitseva KV, Varfolomeev MA, Acree WE (2017) Thermochimica Acta enthalpies of solution and enthalpies of solvation of organic solutes in ethylene glycol at 298.15 K: prediction and analysis of intermolecular interaction contributions. Thermochim Acta 648:91–99. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Urut GO, Bayramin D, Alp S (2017) Synthesis and spectral properties of new ethylene glycol bridged oxazol-5-ones: high stokes’ shift fluorophores sensitive to solvent polarity. J Mol Liq 247:109–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
  67. 67.
    Spath P, Aden A, Eggeman T, Ringer M, Wallace B, Jechura J (2005) Biomass to hydrogen production detailed design and economics utilizing the Battelle Columbus Laboratory indirectly - heated gasifier. GoldenGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Turton R, Bailie RC, Whiting WB, Shaeiwitz JA, Battacharyya D (2012) Analysis, synthesis, and design of chemical processes, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Silva RO, Torres CM, Bonfim-Rocha L, Lima OCM, Coutu A, Jiménez L, Jorge LMM (2018) Multi-objective optimization of an industrial ethanol distillation system for vinasse reduction – a case study. J Clean Prod 183:956–963. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Plastic Insight (2018) Mono-ethylene glycol (MEG): production, Market, Price and its Properties. Accessed 5 June 2018
  71. 71.
    Hofsetz K, Silva MA (2012) Brazilian sugarcane bagasse: energy and non-energy consumption. Biomass Bioenergy 46:564–573. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Arshad M, Ahmed S (2016) Cogeneration through bagasse : a renewable strategy to meet the future energy needs. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:732–737. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Bonfim-Rocha L, Gimenes ML, Faria SHB, Silva RO, Jiménez L (2018) Multi-objective design of a new sustainable scenario for bio-methanol production in Brazil. J Clean Prod 187:1043–1056. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Bollon F (2011) DME standardization , regulation and safety recommendations. In: 7th Asian DME Conference. International DME Association, Niigata p 1–27Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Dantas GA, Legey LFL, Mazzone A (2013) Energy from sugarcane bagasse in Brazil: an assessment of the productivity and cost of different technological routes. Renew Sust Energ Rev 21:356–364. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Brazilian Central Bank (2017) Interest rate history. Accessed 20 August 2018
  77. 77.
    Ballinger SE, Adams TA II (2017) Space-constrained purification of dimethyl ether through process intensification using semicontinuous dividing wall columns. Comput Chem Eng 105:197–211. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Exchange-Rates (2019) Conversão de Dólares Americanos (USD) para Reais Brasileiros (BRL) - Taxas de Câmbio. Accessed 5 February 2019
  79. 79.
    Petrobrás (2019) Composição de Preços do Diesel - Petrobras (In portuguese). Accessed 5 February 2019

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringState University of MaringaMaringaBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Chemical EngineeringTechnological Federal University of ParanáLondrinaBrazil

Personalised recommendations