Catalytic Conversion of Biomass for Aromatics Over HZSM-5 Modified by Dawson-Type Phosphotungstic Acid
- 15 Downloads
Abstract
The multi-functional zeolites modified with different phosphotungstic acid (PW) ratios were prepared and characterized. Thermogravimetric tests coupled with kinetics analysis were performed to evaluate catalytic pyrolysis behavior of biomass; The presence of HZSM-5 inhibited the product diffusion, causing a slight delay of pyrolysis; The PW modification made the reaction more complex; reaction order increased from 1.96 to 2.12. The activation energy decreased from 53.32 to 31.15 kJ/mol with the increase of PW. Then, fixed-bed catalytic experiments were further conducted to investigate aromatics production; 10%PW modification gave the appropriate acidic distribution and pore structure, resulting in oxygen being more likely to be removed in the form of COx. Although the organic yield was only 10.73%, HHV reached 38.01 MJ/kg. The organic phase catalyzed by 10%PW/HZSM-5 exhibited higher aromatization degree, and the structures of benzene ring were mainly single-rings. The oxygenates (especially for phenols from 16.88% to undetected) reduced obviously with increasing PW loading, and the 10%PW modification gave the highest content (peak area, %) of desirable mono-aromatic hydrocarbons (52.29%). The GC/MS analysis results were basically consistent with the 1H/13C NMRs. Besides, the 10%PW/HZSM-5 had the highest catalytic stability and the spent catalyst could recover high activity after regeneration. Therefore, catalytic pyrolysis of biomass using Dawson-structured PW-modified HZSM-5 is a promising approach for production of light aromatic hydrocarbons.
Keywords
Rapeseed shell Catalytic pyrolysis HZSM-5 Phosphotungstic acid AromaticsAbbreviations
- PW
Phosphotungstic acid
- TGA
Thermogravimetric analysis
- FT/IR
Fourier-transform infrared
- GC/MS
Gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy
- XRD
X-ray diffraction
- BET
Brunner-Emmet-Teller
- BJH
Barrett-Joyner-Halenda
- NH3-TPD
NH3 temperature programmed desorption
- TCD
Thermal conductivity detector
- Py-IR
Pyridine infrared
- TG
Thermogravimetric
- DTG
Differential thermogravimetric
- GC
Gas chromatography
- NIST
National Institute of Standards and Technology
- NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
- NOE
Nuclear Overhauser effect
- HHV
Higher heating value
- MAH
Monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
- PAH
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
- LAH
Light aliphatic hydrocarbon
- (H/C)eff
Effective hydrogen to carbon ratio
- BTEX
Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene
- RP
Relative proton
- RC
Relative carbon
Symbols
- n
Reaction order
- E
Activation energy, kJ/mol
- A
Frequency factor, s−1
- B
Brønsted
- L
Lewis
- R2
Square of correlation coefficient
Introduction
So far, a large proportion (more than 80%) of energy consumption around the world comes from petroleum-derived fuels, so the environmental issues are serious such as global warming due to the emission of greenhouse gases or acid rain by releasing harmful gases (e.g., NOx and SO2). Biomass, as a promising alternative energy source, is the only renewable carbon-based source, CO2 neutral, and cost effective. Among the many forms of biomass, lignocellulosic biomass is an attractive feedstock attributed to its abundance, low cost, and non-competitiveness with the food chain. Pyrolysis, as a thermo-chemical conversion route, can be easy to handle and utilize biomass source in the absence of oxygen and produce high yield of bio-oil [1]. Nevertheless, the pyrolysis bio-oil is a complex mixture of various oxygenates derived from the decomposition of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin and a typical bio-oil composed of hundreds of different compounds [1, 2] whose molecular weight ranges from 18 to 5000 g/mol or more [3], thus limiting the application of bio-oil. Catalytic pyrolysis, which integrates catalysis with lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis, is the most promising method to improve the bio-oil quality [4]. In this regard, HZSM-5 zeolite is seen to be an efficient catalyst for degradation of biomass; however, oxygenates converted on the acid sites of HZSM-5 by cracking, oligomerization, cyclization, and dehydrogenation are easy to form coke to cover active sites, or even block the pore channels due to excessive acidity and diffusion stop, further resulting in the severe deterioration of the catalytic efficiency or deactivation of coke deposition [5].
Hence, it is necessary to adjust the acidity distribution (including acid intensity and type) and the adsorption properties (including pore volume, pore size, etc.) of original HZSM-5 to adapt to the catalytic pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. So far, many researchers have carried out a lot of chemical modification researches on HZSM-5, involving metallic elements such as Zn, Ni, Co, Sn, Mo, Pd, Pt, Ce, Mg, Al, Fe, Cu, Ag, and Na etc. and non-metallic elements such as P and B. The modification of these elements is conducive to the reasonable deployment of the acidity and adsorption of catalyst, the improvement of the diffusion and escape performance of products, the improvement of the selectivity of the target compounds, and the enhancement of the structural stability of catalyst. For example, P modification can increase the Lewis acid sites, promote the migration of hydrogen atom, and facilitate the generation of aromatic hydrocarbon, and P modification can enhance the stability of catalyst framework [6]. The modification of Zn, Co, Ni, and Sn is beneficial to change part of B acid sites into L acid sites and improve the aromatization performance under the condition of keeping the total acid sites unchanged [6]. The modification of Mo, Pd, Pt, and Ce can also increase the proportion of L acid sites and then improve the aromatization performance [7, 8]. The modification of Na, Mg, Al, and B decreases the amount of total acid and weak acid sites, increases the amount of medium-strength acid sites, changes little in strong acid sites, and enhances the selectivity to olefins [9, 10]. The modification of Fe, Cu, and Ag can improve the cracking and deoxidization ability of the catalyst, improve the selectivity of aromatic hydrocarbon or olefin, and enhance the catalyst stability [11, 12]. In addition, HZSM-5 has also been studied on the composite modification of some elements, most of which are the physical superposition modification of two different elements. The results showed that catalytic performance has been improved to varying degrees, and the law of modification is basically similar. However, there are few studies on the modification of HZSM-5 with multi-element and multi-functional crystal compounds, but there is no report on the application of this kind of modified HZSM-5 in biomass conversion. The PW is a kind of multi-functional material with excellent properties, which not only has the structural characteristics of complexes and metal oxides but also has acidity and catalytic activity. It has the advantages of high catalytic activity and good selectivity and is widely used in various catalytic reaction systems and Dawson-structured PW (H6P2W18O62) showed a better catalytic activity than Keggin-structured PW (H3PW12O40) in many catalytic reactions [13, 14]. In 1953, B. Dawson firstly investigated the structure of K6[α-P2W18O62]14H2O and determined the Dawson-structured model [15]. Saturated Dawson-structured anions are a common type of heteropoly metal oxygen clusters. They can be seen as derivatives of two three-vacancy Keggin-structured anions. Their general formula [X2M18O62]6−(X = PV, SiV, GeV, AsV; M = Mo, W) has D3h symmetry, and 18 coordination atoms are divided into two groups: six atoms are located in the polar position and 12 atoms are in the equator position. Dawson-structured anions can be used as excellent electron acceptors to introduce the organic groups with unpaired electrons into polyanion skeletons to react, which may be conducive to the adsorption and catalysis of organic functional groups. Zeng et al. [16] tried to modify Y-zeolite by PW and determined the catalytic activity of olefins removal from aromatics, and the results showed that the catalytic activity (especially for alkylation) of Dawson-structured PW was higher than that of Kiggen-structured PW.
Moreover, a good understanding of catalytic pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass should be comprehensively evaluated in terms of two aspects of thermogravimetric kinetics and reaction pyrolysis. Currently, some publications only reported the catalytic pyrolysis kinetics of lignocellulosic biomass [17, 18]; simultaneously, other studies about catalytic pyrolysis had focused on the operating parameters, biomass compositions, or catalyst types or product selectivity [19, 20], and the online conjoint analysis technologies, such as TGA-FT/IR [21], Py-GC/MS [22], are often adopted. However, these studies have defects in the study of the final composition and yield of bio-oil, which are of great value to analyze and evaluate the practicability and economy of the conversion process. Therefore, the HZSM-5 modified by Dawson-structured PW was prepared and employed as the catalyst. The first focus herein was to investigate the characteristics and kinetics of the catalytic pyrolysis of rapeseed shell. Thermal behavior of biomass pyrolysis using HZSM-5 with different PW loadings (0%, 5%, 10%, and 20%) and different heating rates (10 °C/min, 20 °C/min, and 40 °C/min) was determined by TGA. In addition, the kinetics evaluation was further conducted based on TGA data, and Kissinger [23] and Coats-Redfern [24] methods are specifically applied for n, E, and A determinations because the combination of the two methods could make the calculation be both efficient and accurate [25]. Then, the second objective was to evaluate the yields, properties, and compositions of products during catalytic pyrolysis of rapeseed shell over modified HZSM-5 via a fixed-bed reactor. Specifically, given that the reactor was simple in structure and efficient in operation, in situ upgrading method was applied in this study. To date, lots of studies had been conducted over various aspects of in situ upgrading that covered reaction factors, feedstock composition, catalyst modification, and so on and achieved some beneficial effects [26, 27]. Hu et al. [27] compared ex situ and in situ catalytic pyrolysis of biomass over HZSM-5 in a two-stage fluidized-bed/fixed-bed combination reactor and the results showed that ex situ method gave a similar carbon yield of aromatics + olefins with in situ method. In addition, to maintain consistency with TGA analysis, in situ upgrading method was necessarily used in fix-bed experiments. Overall, the aim was to provide new insight on the implementation possibility and experimental basis of catalytic pyrolysis of rapeseed shell to produce bio-fuels with high added value.
Materials and Methods
Materials
Biomass
Results of proximate, ultimate, and compositional analysis and calorific value of biomass together with related methods
Analysis | Item | Standard method | Value | Basis |
---|---|---|---|---|
Proximate | Moisture | ASTM E1756-08. Standard Test Method for Determination of Total Solids in Biomass | 5.68wt.% | Received |
Volatile matter | ASTM E872-82. Standard Test Method for Volatile Matter in the Analysis of Particulate Wood Fuels | 75.77wt.% | ||
Ash | ASTM E1755-01. Standard Test Method for Ash in Biomass | 2.45wt.% | ||
Fixed carbon | Calculated by difference | 16.10wt.% | ||
Ultimate | C | ASTM E777. Standard Test Method for Carbon and Hydrogen in the Analysis Sample of Refuse-Derived Fuel | 46.17wt.% | Dry |
H | 6.08wt.% | |||
N | ASTM E778-15. Standard Test Method for Nitrogen in Refuse-Derived Fuel Analysis Samples | 0.23wt.% | ||
O | Calculated by difference | 47.52wt.% | ||
Compositional | Cellulose | NREL/TP-510-42618. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Crocker D, Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass | 49.81wt.% | Dry |
Hemicellulose | 21.79wt.% | |||
Lignin | 25.10wt.% | |||
Others | 3.30wt.% | |||
Calorific value | ASTM E711-87. Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of Refuse-Derived Fuel by the Bomb Calorimeter | 18.18MJ/kg | Dry |
Catalyst
The modified catalyst was prepared by testing dipping method. The HZSM-5 powder (particle size of 5.0 μm) was calcined at 550 °C for 2 h to remove possible template agent and some moisture, and then immersed in a certain amount of phosphotungstic acid solution. Stirred at 80 °C for 4 h, and transferred to a drying oven and dried at 110 °C for 4h, and then roasted at 550 °C for 2h. Finally, the modified catalyst was obtained and three kinds of catalysts with different loads were prepared, including 5%PW/HZSM-5, 10%PW/HZSM-5, and 20%PW/HZSM-5.
Thermogravimetric Kinetics
Experiments
The TGA of rapeseed shell without and with catalysts was conducted in a thermo-gravimetric analyzer (Mettler Toledo TGA 1, Swiss). High-purity N2 (99.999%) was used as carrier gas at a flow rate of 50 mL/min. The samples of biomass, catalyst, and biomass mixed with catalyst were placed in Al2O3 crucibles and pyrolyzed by duplicate at the heating rates of 10 °C/min, 20 °C/min, and 40 °C/min. In order to compare the catalytic performance of different catalysts, the same heating rate of 20 °C/min was adopted. Blank runs at the respective heating rates were performed, and the results were used to subtract from the sample runs to remove any instrument artifact. During the experiments, TG and DTG curves were recorded synchronously.
Kinetic Analysis
where m0 is the initial mass of biomass [mg], m is the actual mass [mg], and mz is the final mass [mg].
Then, the initial and final stages of biomass pyrolysis were removed since the mechanism of both stages is different from the pyrolysis. And the derivative conversion data, which should be used and analyzed in the kinetic calculation, was obtained from the numerical differentiation of the conversion data (dα/dT). It should be noted that the derivative conversion data usually contains data noises, and consequently, it tends to numerically unstable. Hence, to reduce the impact of data noises on the further analyses, a smoothing operation is needed. Before the calculation of E and A, the n should be given according to the Kissinger method. For a case of nth order reaction, n could be calculated by Kissinger index of shape equation (\( n=1.26\sqrt{s} \)) [23]. The shape index s is defined as the absolute value of the ratio of the slope of tangents to the curve at inflection points on the derivative conversion data.
when T is temperature [K], R is constant [8.314 × 10−3 kJ·(K mol)−1], and the heating rate β is a constant. 2RT/E is far less than 1 for biomass pyrolysis, and \( -\mathit{\ln}\left[\frac{AR}{\beta E}\left(1-\frac{2 RT}{E}\right)\right] \) can be regarded as a constant. Hence, interpolating \( -\ln \left[\frac{-\ln \left(1-x\right)}{T^2}\right] \) to \( \frac{1}{T} \) when n = 1, and interpolating \( -\ln \left[\frac{1-{\left(1-x\right)}^{1-n}}{T^2\left(1-n\right)}\right] \) to \( \frac{1}{T} \) when n ≠ 1. The least square method was employed to make linear fitting of the data. After the correct n was determined through the Kissinger method, a straight with high linear correlation can be obtained, whose gradient is E/R and intercept is \( -\mathit{\ln}\left[\frac{AR}{\beta E}\left(1-\frac{2 RT}{E}\right)\right] \). Finally, the values of E and A can be calculated.
Reaction Chemistry
Experiments
The experimental system for catalytic pyrolysis of biomass
Then, the obtained liquid products were weighed, extracted, and separated, and the organic phase was obtained. The dichloromethane (CH2Cl2) reagent was used to for extraction and separation. The organic products were detected and analyzed by FT/IR, GC/MS, and 1H/13C NMR, while the gas products were analyzed by GC. During the experiments, ground reactants were prepared by evenly mixing the biomass and catalysts with a biomass to catalyst ratio of 5 which was the intermediate value based on above literatures [26, 27] and tested in the pre-experiments. Besides, the reaction temperature of 500 °C, heating rate of 20 °C/min and system pressure of 5 kPa were employed, which was proven to be better in previous studies [28, 29]. The organic phases obtained by using 0%PW/HZSM-5, 5%PW/HZSM-5, 10%PW/HZSM-5, and 20%PW/HZSM-5 were respectively labeled as OP-I, OP-II, OP-III, and OP-IV. After the experiments, the spent catalysts were separated to subject to the TGA analysis. In addition, the spent catalyst with the optimal performance was regenerated through 700 °C high-temperature roasting (12 h) and the regenerated catalyst was subjected to the BET analysis to evaluate the activity recovery.
Gaseous Product Analysis
The gas products were analyzed by GC (Agilent 7890A, USA) with carrier gas of high purity argon (Ar), gas flow rate of 45 mL/min, injection volume of 20 mL, column temperature of 55 °C, TCD detector of 60 °C, and bridge current of 60 mA. The main gas products of CO, CO2, CH4, and H2 were determined respectively.
Organic Phase Analysis
The chemical functional groups of organic phases were characterized by FT/IR (Thermo Nicolet iS5, Swiss). A certain amount of potassium bromide (KBr) was taken and pressed to obtain the tablet, and about 0.1 mL of organic phase was added to the tablet. Then, the tablet was measured, and the wavenumber scan range was 4000–400 cm−1 with a resolution of 0.1 cm−1.
The molecular compositions of organic phases were detected by GC/MS (Thermo Trace DSQ II, USA). Conditions: Carrier gas of high purity helium (He), gas flow rate of 1 mL/min, temperature at injection port of 250 °C, sample injection volume of 1 μL. Ion source temperature of 230 °C, MS transfer line temperature of 250 °C, ionization mode of EI, ionization energy of 70 eV, mass scan range of 30–500 m/z, and scan time of 1 s. The column temperature was maintained at 30 °C for 2 min, then increased to 100 °C at 15 °C/min and then to 250 °C at 10 °C/min and kept 250 °C for 3 min. Solvent (CH2Cl2) delay time was 3 min. The identification of the peaks in the chromatogram was based on the comparison with the standard spectra of compounds in the NIST library. The contents of the products were also calculated, which corresponded to the respective relative peak area among all of the detected peaks.
Furthermore, the chemical compositions of organic phases were characterized and confirmed by NMR (Bruker 600M, Germany), a 5-mm tube was used, 80 mg of sample was taken and dissolved in 300 μl deuterium acetone reagent, and testing temperature was 298 °C. The 1H spectrum: Scanning width was 6000 Hz, sampling points were 66,000, scanning times were 16, and delay time was 1.0 s. The 13C spectrum conditions: Scan width 36,000 Hz, sampling points were 66,000, scanning times were 512, delay time was 2.0 s, and using reverse-gated de-duplication method to eliminate NOE effect. A semi-quantitative analysis was made to compare the distribution of aliphatic hydrogen/carbon and aromatic hydrogen/carbon in different bio-oils based on the same amount of solvent (CH2Cl2).
Spent and Regenerated Catalyst Evaluation
The TGA was also used to determine the coke deposited on the spent catalysts. The air was used as the carrier gas, flow rate was 50 mL/min, and heat rate was 10 °C/min from 40 to 800 °C. The TG and DTG curves were recorded synchronously. In addition, the BET analysis was carried out for the regenerated catalyst and the conditions were also the same as above.
Results and Discussion
Modified Catalyst Characterizations
Specific surface area and pore volume of catalysts
Sample | Specific surface area/m2 g−1 | Pore volume/cm3 g−1 | Mean pore radius/μm | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total | Micropore | |||
0%PW/HZSM-5 | 66.031 | 0.107 | 0.025 | 0.324 |
5%PW/HZSM-5 | 71.503 | 0.112 | 0.030 | 0.314 |
10%PW/HZSM-5 | 148.936 | 0.189 | 0.064 | 0.254 |
20%PW/HZSM-5 | 245.733 | 0.220 | 0.117 | 0.179 |
Py-IR semi-quantitative results of catalysts
Sample | B acid/μmol g−1 | L acid/μmol g−1 | B + L/μmol g−1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
L1450 | L1616 | |||
0%PW/HZSM-5 | 20.4 | 193.0 | 279.2 | 62.6 |
5%PW/HZSM-5 | 92.8 | 17.4 | 168.0 | 103.3 |
10%PW/HZSM-5 | 118.1 | 10.5 | 134.7 | 121.4 |
20%PW/HZSM-5 | 113.6 | 8.3 | 115.1 | 122.0 |
Thermogravimetric Kinetics
Thermogravimetric Analysis
The TG and DTG curves of rapeseed shell pyrolysis without catalyst (a, b), with catalyst at different heating rates (c, d), and with different catalysts at same heating rate (e, f)
The TG and DTG curves of rapeseed shell pyrolysis with catalyst (0%PW/HZSM-5) are shown in Fig. 2c, d. They show that when 0%PW/HZSM-5 was added to in the catalytic pyrolysis of biomass, the effect of heating rate on catalytic conversion process was similar with the pyrolysis process. The difference is that the addition of zeolite catalyst can reduce the pyrolysis temperature of biomass and the temperature corresponding to the maximum weight-loss rate. HZSM-5 is a typical acidic zeolite catalyst with special pore structure and acid distribution. Hence, there are two aspects of the influence of zeolite catalysts on biomass pyrolysis: The strong acidity of the catalyst can easily decompose the compounds in biomass and advance the pyrolysis conversion process [36], and the larger specific surface area of zeolite has stronger adsorption on pyrolysis products, and the special pore structure has shape-selective catalysis on pyrolysis products, these two factors can slow down the release of products [37]. After adding 0%PW/HZSM-5 zeolite alone, the effect of acidity on the pyrolysis process was more obvious, and the TG and DTG curves shifted to the side of low temperature. Simultaneously, the strong acidity catalysis accelerated the conversion process and caused the maximum weight-loss rate to increase further. When PW-modified zeolites with different loadings were added to the conversion process, the specific TG and DTG curves are shown in Fig. 2e, f. With the increase of PW loading, the acidity distribution of zeolite was adjusted (mainly reflected in the distribution of B acid and L acid). This adjustment could not be simply evaluated as the increase or decrease of acidity but played a role in increasing or decreasing the selectivity of a certain reaction. At this time, the effect of catalyst acidity on biomass pyrolysis characteristics should be much smaller than that of specific surface area and pore structure. PW modification increased the specific surface area of zeolite from 66.031 to 245.733 m2/g and the pore volume from 0.107 to 0.220 cm3/g (in which the micropore volume increased from 0.025 to 0.117 cm3/g). This obvious change enhanced the absorption and catalysis of pyrolysis products and decreased the volatilization and precipitation rate of products. Therefore, the conversion process was slightly delayed compared with 0%PW/HZSM-5 catalysis, and the TG and DTG curves shifted back to the high-temperature side to some extent. At the same time, the maximum weight-loss rate was reduced due to the inhibition of product diffusion.
Kinetics
Results of calculated kinetics parameters for different conversion methods
Methods | Interval/°C | Fitting equation | R2 | Number | E(kJ mol−1) | A/s−1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pyrolysis | 10°C/min | 309–433 | y = 6485.12x + 4.49 | 0.9910 | 1.96 | 53.92 | 8.72 × 104 |
20°C/min | 272–397 | y = 6413.59x + 3.56 | 0.9985 | 1.97 | 53.32 | 2.18 × 105 | |
40°C/min | 243–353 | y = 6061.98x + 3.57 | 0.9895 | 1.97 | 50.40 | 2.04 × 105 | |
Catalysis: 0%PW/HZSM-5 | 10°C/min | 240–360 | y = 4237.16x + 6.97 | 0.9936 | 2.06 | 35.23 | 4.79 × 103 |
20°C/min | 195–330 | y = 4650.36x + 5.30 | 0.9886 | 2.05 | 38.66 | 2.78 × 104 | |
40°C/min | 188–308 | y = 4741.64x + 4.56 | 0.9905 | 2.02 | 39.42 | 5.93 × 104 | |
Catalysis: 20 °C/min | 5%PW/HZSM-5 | 212–340 | y = 4610.71x + 4.58 | 0.9856 | 2.09 | 38.33 | 5.68 × 104 |
10%PW/HZSM-5 | 225–355 | y = 4156.25x + 5.81 | 0.9964 | 2.06 | 34.56 | 1.50 × 104 | |
20%PW/HZSM-5 | 260–374 | y = 3746.59x + 8.45 | 0.9899 | 2.12 | 31.15 | 9.61 × 102 |
Reaction Chemistry
Product Distribution
The main composition of gas and the yield, elemental composition, and calculated HHV of organic phase
Catalysis | Gas composition/% | Organic phase | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H2 | CH4 | CO | CO2 | Othera | Yield/% | C/% | H/% | Oa/% | HHV/MJ kg−1 | |
0%PW/HZSM-5 | 1.80 | 12.22 | 29.43 | 40.10 | 16.45 | 18.18 | 73.56 | 8.89 | 17.55 | 34.34 |
5%PW/HZSM-5 | 1.55 | 8.89 | 35.91 | 39.46 | 14.19 | 13.10 | 76.51 | 9.06 | 14.43 | 35.89 |
10%PW/HZSM-5 | 2.16 | 6.50 | 42.12 | 39.08 | 10.14 | 10.73 | 80.01 | 9.48 | 10.51 | 38.01 |
20%PW/HZSM-5 | 1.92 | 7.01 | 40.59 | 37.87 | 12.61 | 11.83 | 79.42 | 9.32 | 11.26 | 37.54 |
FT/IR Analysis
The FT/IR technique was employed to investigate the chemical structure of the obtained organic phases. The FT/IR spectrums of the organic phases and the identified band positions, functional group absorbance type, and corresponding chemical species are summarized in Supplementary Material. The functional groups of each oil phase were similar, but there are still some differences. The first broad band around 3380 cm−1 corresponded to the O–H stretching vibration mainly caused by phenolic and alcoholic functional groups, and another band indicating O–H bending vibration was all detected in obtained organic phases, which further showed the inevitable existence of alcohols. Differently, when PW was introduced, the intensity of the band decreased slightly, whose change rule was more consistent with the change of oxygen content, indicating that the hydroxyl functional groups also showed the law of decreasing first and then increasing. Then, the bands between 2864 and 2850cm−1 caused by the stretching vibration of the saturated alkyl hydrogen C–H bonds, simultaneously, accompanied by the bending vibration (bands between 1470 and 1350cm−1), indicating that there are many –CH3 functional groups in all organic phases. In addition, an absorption band around 3056 cm−1 was examined in OP-III, which was caused by =C–H stretching, indicating that the alkenyl functional group had a more existence. Thirdly, an obvious band around 1700 cm−1 was caused by C=O stretching vibration, which showed the existence of carbonyl groups from ketones or carboxylic acids, so the stability of organic phase needed further improvement. Fourthly, the vibration absorption bands within the range of 1600–1500cm−1 were caused by the skeleton structure of aromatic C=C bonds; meanwhile, the absorption bands located within the range of 870–625cm−1 was caused by the bending vibration of aromatic =C–H hydrogen bonds, and interestingly, the C=C and =C–H bond types of benzene rings in OP-II, III were relatively few, but the band intensities were significantly enhanced (especially for OP-III), indicating that the benzene ring structures in organic phases may be different, which was mainly reflected in the monocyclic or polycyclic structure. It can be inferred that there are more aromatic compounds with monocyclic structure in OP-III. Last point, the absorption bands between 1300 and 1000cm−1 were mainly caused by the stretching vibration of C–O bond in the alkyl aryl ethers, alcohols, esters, or aliphatic ethers, and generally, the C–O bond stretching vibration of bio-oil after catalytic upgrading is mainly caused by methoxy.
GC/MS Analysis
Then, organic phases were analyzed by GC/MS technique, and more than 75% of hydrocarbons were detected in all organic phases, so hydrocarbons were the main products, and aromatic hydrocarbons were the main components of hydrocarbon products, which became the most important factor affecting the physicochemical properties of organic phase. Therefore, the detected aromatic hydrocarbons were summarized in Supplementary Material. Generally, aromatic hydrocarbons can be classified as MAH and PAH, in order to better analyze the hydrocarbon composition of organic phase. MAH is further divided into MAH-I (contains only one benzene ring without any other ring structure) and MAH-II (contains one benzene ring with one or more hydrogenated benzene ring) in this study, from the perspective of fuel grade and environmental protection; MAH-II and PAH should belong to undesirable products. The change of catalyst made the selection of products inconsistent, but some products belonged to similar compounds, and there are 14 kinds of MAH-I compounds, five kinds of MAH-II compounds and 14 kinds of PAH compounds in all detected aromatics. Vinyl-benzene as a typical high content (6.52%) of MAH-I was only obtained in OP-III, which verified the FT/IR results of =C–H stretching peak around 3056 cm−1, and from this point, the quantitative analysis of organic phase chemical constituents using GC/MS technique compromised with the FT/IR qualitative results. The critical diameter (width), maximum diameter (length), and kinetic diameter of the oxygenates, olefins, and aromatics were reported in literature [47], and it was found that benzene, toluene, naphthalene, indene, ethylbenzene, and p-xylene are sufficiently small to diffuse into the zeolite micro-pores, while the larger aromatic products are most likely formed in the particle gaps.
The hydrocarbon compound distribution in the organic phases
The BTEX distribution in the organic phases
The main oxygenated compound distribution in the organic phases
The oxygen atom distribution in the organic phases
1H/13C NMR Analysis
The NMR spectra of organic phases: a1H NMR spectra and b13C NMR spectra
Spent and Regenerated Catalyst Analysis
The TG and DTG curves of the spent catalysts
To evaluate the regeneration performance of the catalysts, the optimal catalyst 10%PW/HZSM-5 was subjected to the BET analysis after roasting regeneration. The specific surface area and pore volume of the fresh catalyst were 148.936 m2/g and 0.220 cm3/g, and those of the regenerated catalyst were 145.241 m2/g and 0.214 cm3/g. The properties recovered 97.52% and 97.27%, which showed that the catalyst had high regeneration activity, and it could be continuously regenerated and reused.
Conclusion
The thermogravimetric behavior, kinetic analysis, and reaction pyrolysis of rapeseed shell without and with Dawson-structured PW-modified HZSM-5 was investigated. The modified PW delayed the weightlessness behavior, thermogravimetric curves slightly shifted back to the high-temperature side, and the maximum weight-loss rate was reduced. Additionally, the reaction order, activation energy, and frequency factor for rapeseed shell conversion without and with PW/HZSM-5 were determined by combining the Kissinger and Coats-Redfern methods. The introduction of zeolite and PW increased the reaction complexity and hence the reaction order was increased slightly (from 1.96–1.97 to 2.06–2.12), while the activation energy decreased from 50.40–53.92 to 31.15–38.33 kJ/mol, and the frequency factor decrease indicated that the rate of reaction was also significantly reduced.
Furthermore, the reaction pyrolysis of rapeseed shell with PW/HZSM-5 was evaluated in a fixed-bed reactor with respect to organic phase yield, deoxygenation ability, and selectivity towards hydrocarbons. The suitable loading for PW was 10% and the modified catalyst formulation with the higher surface area, pore volume, and more reasonable acidity distribution, which yielded the least organic phase (10.73%), although the oxygen content and calorific value reached the optimum levels of 10.51% and 38.01 MJ/kg respectively. With increasing PW, more oxygen was removed in the forms of COx and the structures of benzene ring tended to single rings. The 10%PW/HZSM-5 catalysis gave the highest content of desired MAH-I (52.29%) and the lowest content of undesired PAH (12.32%); simultaneously, the selectivity to BTEX compounds was improved. The cracking and alkylation of the appropriate amount of PW-supported HZSM-5 contributed to the significant reduction of oxygenate compounds, which was further confirmed by 1H/13C NMR analysis. Besides, the 10%PW/HZSM-5 had the lowest coke content and it could recover high activity after regeneration, so the catalyst could be used repeatedly. Overall, this study provided a promising technological path for efficient utilization of rapeseed shell on a laboratory scale and laid the theoretical foundation and experimental basis for large-scale conversion research.
Notes
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Analysis and Testing Center of Yancheng Institute of Technology for the technical support.
Funding information
This work is currently supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51806186) and the Scientific Research Project for the Introduction Talent of Yancheng Institute of Technology (XJ201708).
Supplementary material
References
- 1.Kan T, Strezov V, Evans TJ (2016) Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis: a review of product properties and effects of pyrolysis parameters. Renew Sust Energ Rev 57:1126–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Elliott D, Beckman D, Bridgwater A, Diebold J, Gevert S, Solantausta Y (1991) Developments in direct thermochemical liquefaction of biomass: 1983-1990. Energy Fuel 5:399–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Lu Q, Li WZ, Zhu XF (2009) Overview of fuel properties of biomass fast pyrolysis oils. Energy Convers Manag 50:1376–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Ro DH, Kim YM, Lee IG, Jae JH, Jung SC, Kim SC, Park YK (2018) Bench scale catalytic fast pyrolysis of empty fruit bunches over low cost catalysts and HZSM-5 using a fixed bed reactor. J Clean Prod 176:298–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Fan Y, Cai Y, Li X, Yin H, Xia J (2017) Coking characteristics and deactivation mechanism of the HZSM-5 zeolite employed in the upgrading of biomass-derived vapors. J Ind Eng Chem 46:139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Zheng Y, Yang X, Wang F, Liu C, Zheng Z, Gu J (2015) Research progress of aromatic production from catalytic pyrolysis of biomass. Chem Ind For Prod 35(5):149–158Google Scholar
- 7.Kim JW, Park SH, Jung J, Jeon JK, Ko CH, Jeong KE, Park YK (2013) Catalytic pyrolysis of mandarin residue from the mandarin juice processing industry. Bioresour Technol 136:431–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Momayez F, Darian JT, Sendesi SMT (2015) Synthesis of zirconium and cerium over HZSM-5 catalysts for light olefins production from naphtha. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 112:135–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Dai G, Wang S, Zou Q, Huang S (2018) Improvement of aromatics production from catalytic pyrolysis of cellulose over metal-modified hierarchical HZSM-5. Fuel Process Technol 179:319–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Frence R, Czernik S (2010) Catalytic pyrolysis of biomass for biofuels production. Fuel Process Technol 91(1):25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Yang M, Shao J, Yang Z, Yang H, Wang X, Wu Z, Chen H (2019) Conversion of lignin into light olefins and aromatics over Fe/ZSM-5 catalytic fast pyrolysis: significance of Fe contents and temperature. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 137:259–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Kubo K, Iida H, Namba S, Igarashi A (2015) Comparison of steaming stability of Cu-ZSM-5 with those of Ag-ZSM-5, P/H-ZSM-5, and H-ZSM-5 zeolites as naphtha cracking catalysts to produce light olefin at high temperatures. Appl Catal A-Gen 489:272–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Cao X, Li S, Zhou D, Lei Y, Zhan C (2015) Preparation, characterization of AlH3P2W18O62˙nH2O and its catalytic performance in synthesis of adipic acid. Chem Ind Eng Prog 34:1014–1018Google Scholar
- 14.Ma T, Ding J, Shao R, Xu W, Yun Z (2017) Dehydration of glycerol to acrolein over Wells–Dawson and Keggin type phosphotungstic acids supported on MCM-41 catalysts. Chem Eng J 316:797–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Dawson B (1953) The structure of the 9(18)-heteropoly anion in potassium 9(18)-tungstophosphate, K6(P2W18O62)˙14H2O. Acta Cryst 6:113–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Zeng Y, Yu H, Shi L (2008) Surface acidity and catalytic activity of Y-zeolite catalysts. J East China Univ Sci Technol 34:635–640Google Scholar
- 17.Balasundram V, Ibrahim N, Kasmani RM, Hamid MKA, Isha R, Hasbullah H, Ali RR (2017) Thermogravimetric catalytic pyrolysis and kinetic studies of coconut copra and rice husk for possible maximum production of pyrolysis oil. J Clean Prod 167:218–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Loy ACM, Yusup S, Chin BLF, Gan DKW, Shahbaz M, Acda MN, Unrean P, Rianawati ER (2018) Comparative study of in-situ catalytic pyrolysis of rice husk for syngas production: kinetics modelling and product gas analysis. J Clean Prod 197:1231–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Shen DK, Jin W, Hu J, Xiao R, Luo KH (2015) An overview on fast pyrolysis of the main constituents in lignocellulosic biomass to valued-added chemicals: structures, pathways and interactions. Renew Sust Energ Rev 51:761–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Galadima A, Muraza O (2015) In situ fast pyrolysis of biomass with zeolite catalysts for bioaromatics/gasoline production: a review. Energy Convers Manag 105:338–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Li B, Lv W, Zhang Q, Wang T, Ma L (2014) Pyrolysis and catalytic pyrolysis of industrial lignins by TG-FTIR: kinetics and products. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 108:295–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Lu Q, Guo HQ, Zhou MX, Cui MS, Dong CQ, Yang YP (2018) Selective preparation of monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from catalytic cracking of biomass fast pyrolysis vapors over Mo2N/HZSM-5 catalyst. Fuel Process Technol 173:134–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Kissinager HE (1957) Reaction kinetics in differential thermal analysis. Anal Chem 29:1702–1706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Coats AW, Redfern JP (1964) Kinetic parameters from thermogravimetric data. Nature 201:68–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Fan Y, Cai Y, Li X, Jiao L, Xia J, Deng X (2017) Effects of the cellulose, xylan and lignin constituents on biomass pyrolysis characteristics and bio-oil composition using the simplex lattice mixture design method. Energy Convers Manag 138:106–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Zhang Y, Chen P, Lou H (2016) In situ catalytic conversion of biomass fast pyrolysis vapors on HZSM-5. J Energy Chem 25:427–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Hu C, Xiao R, Zhang H (2017) Ex-situ catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass over HZSM-5 in a two-stage fluidized-bed/fixed-bed combination reactor. Bioresour Technol 243:1133–1140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Fan Y, Cai Y, Li X, Yin H, Yu N, Zhang R, Zhao W (2014) Rape straw as a source of bio-oil via vacuum pyrolysis: optimization of bio-oil yield using orthogonal design method and characterization of bio-oil. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 106:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Fan Y, Cai Y, Li X, Yu N, Yin H (2014) Catalytic upgrading of pyrolytic vapors from the vacuum pyrolysis of rape straw over nanocrystalline HZSM-5 zeolite in a two-stage fixed-bed reactor. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 108:185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Akshay W (1996) One-step synthesis and characterization of niobia-phosphate aerogels. Catal Today 28:41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Emeis CA (1993) Determination of integrated molar extinction coefficients for infrared absorption bands of pyridine adsorbed on solid acid catalysts. J Catal 141:347–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Liu X, Li X, She L, Yuan S, Qin H (1988) Aromatization of hydrocarbons over zinc-modified ZSM-5 zeolite I. Formation and characterization for the active sites. Acta Petrol Sin (Petrol Proc Sec) 4:36–43Google Scholar
- 33.Wu Y, Ye X, Yang X, Wang X, Chu W, Hu Y (1996) Heterogenization of heteropolyacids: a general discussion on the preparation of supported acids catalysts. Ind Eng Chem Res 58:2546–2560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Veronika S, Josef P, Gernot S (1997) Effects of particle size, heating rate and pressure on measurement of pyrolysis kinetics by thermogravimetric analysis. Fuel 76:1277–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Maschio G, Koufopanos C, Lucchesi A (1992) Pyrolysis, a promising route for biomass utilization. Bioresour Techol 43:219–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Castano P, Gutierrez A, Villanueva I, Pawelec B, Bilbao J, Arandes AM (2009) Effect of the support acidity on the aromatic ring-opening of pyrolysis gasoline over Pt/HZSM-5 catalysts. Catal Today 143:115–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Losch P, Pinar AB, Willinger MG, Soukup K, Chavan S, Vincent B, Pale P, Louis B (2017) H-ZSM-5 zeolite model crystals: structure-diffusion-activity relationship in methanol-to-olefins catalysis. J Catal 345:11–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Li X, Shu X, Li G, Zhang L, Zhang L, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Jia Y (2010) Study on the pyrolysis and kinetics of three agro-forestry biomass. Renew Energy Resour 28:63–70Google Scholar
- 39.Wu W, Mei Y, Le Z, Liu R, Cai J (2014) Effective activation energies of lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis. Energy Fuel 28:3916–3923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Belyi VA, Udoratina EV, Kuchin AV (2015) Kinetics of the thermocatalytic conversion of lignocelluloses. Kinet Catal 56:663–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Lu C, Song W, Lin W (2009) Kinetics of biomass catalysis pyrolysis. Biotechnol Adv 27:583–587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.Sun Z, Xu B, Rony AH, Toan S, Chen S, Gasem KAM, Adidharma H, Fan M, Xiang W (2017) Thermogravimetric and kinetics investigation of pine wood pyrolysis catalyzed with alkali-treated CaO/ZSM-5. Energy Convers Manag 146:182–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Stefanidis DD, Kalogiannis KG, Iliopoulou EF, Lappas AA, Pilavachi PA (2011) In-situ upgrading of biomass pyrolysis vapors: catalyst screening on a fixed bed reactor. Bioresour Technol 102:8261–8267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Cai Y, Fan Y, Li X, Chen L, Wang J (2016) Preparation of refined bio-oil by catalytic transformation of vapors derived from vacuum pyrolysis of rape straw over modified HZSM-5. Energy 102:95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Zhang H, Xiao R, Huang H, Xiao G (2009) Comparison of non-catalytic and catalytic fast pyrolysis of corncob in a fluidized bed reactor. Bioresour Technol 100:1428–1434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.Channiwala S, Parikh P (2002) A unified correlation for estimating HHV of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels. Fuel 81:1051–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.Jae J, Tompsett GA, Foster AJ, Hammond KD, Auerbach SM, Lobo RF, Huber GW (2011) Investigation into the shape selectivity of zeolite catalysts for biomass conversion, catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass with mesoporous ZSM-5 zeolites prepared by desilication with NaOH solutions. J Catal 279:257–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.Kelkar S, Saffron CM, Li Z, Kim SS, Pinnavaia TJ, Miller DJ, Kriegel R (2014) Aromatics from biomass pyrolysis vapour using a bifunctional mesoporous catalyst. Green Chem 16:803–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 49.Asadieraghi M, Daud WMAW (2015) In-situ catalytic upgrading of biomass pyrolysis vapor: using a cascade system of various catalysts in a multi-zone fixed bed reactor. Energy Convers Manag 101:151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 50.Biswas B, Singh R, Kumar J, Singh R, Gupta P, Krishna BB, Bhaskar T (2018) Pyrolysis behavior of rice straw under carbon dioxide for production of bio-oil. Renew Energy 129:686–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 51.Xu ZX, Liu P, Xu GS, Liu Q, He ZX, Wang Q (2017) Bio-fuel oil characteristic from catalytic cracking of hydrogenated palm oil. Energy 133:666–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 52.Valle B, Castano P, Olazar M, Bilbao J, Gayubo AG (2012) Deactivating species in the transformation of crude bio-oil with methanol into hydrocarbons on a HZSM-5 catalyst. J Catal 285:304–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 53.Lin BC, Wang J, Huang QX, Ali M, Chi Y (2017) Aromatic recovery from distillate oil of oily sludge through catalytic pyrolysis over Zn modified HZSM-5 zeolites. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 128:291–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar