Advertisement

BioEnergy Research

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 43–54 | Cite as

Warm-Season Grass Monocultures and Mixtures for Sustainable Bioenergy Feedstock Production in the Midwest, USA

  • Moon-Sub Lee
  • Rob Mitchell
  • Emily Heaton
  • Colleen Zumpf
  • D. K. LeeEmail author
Original Research
  • 184 Downloads

Abstract

Biomass yield and adaptability to a broad range of environments are important characteristics of dedicated energy crops for sustainable bioenergy feedstock production. In addition to yield potential, the role of species diversity on ecosystem services is also growing in importance as we seek to develop sustainable feedstock production systems. The objective of this study was to compare the biomass yield potential of the commercially available germplasm of native warm-season grasses in monocultures and in blends (mixture of different cultivars of the same species) or mixtures of different species across an environmental gradient (temperature and precipitation) in the Midwest, USA. Warm-season grasses including switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.), big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman), indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans [L.] Nash), sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula [Michx.] Torr.) and Miscanthus × giganteus (Greef and Deu.) were planted in 2009. Biomass was annually harvested from 2010 through 2015 for Urbana, IL and Mead, NE but only in 2010 and 2011 for Ames, IA. The effect of species in monocultures and mixtures (or blends) on biomass yields was significant for all locations. In monocultures, the annual biomass yields averaged over a 6-year period were 11.12 Mg ha−1 and 10.98 Mg ha−1 at Urbana and Mead, respectively, while the annual biomass yield averaged over a 2-year period was 7.99 Mg ha−1 at Ames, IA. Also, the annual biomass yields averaged across the different mixtures and blends at each location were 10.25 Mg ha−1, 9.88 Mg ha−1, and 7.64 Mg ha−1 at Urbana, Mead, and Ames, respectively. At all locations, M. × giganteus and ‘Kanlow N1’ produced the highest biomass yield in monocultures while mixtures containing switchgrass and big bluestem had the greatest mixture yield. The results from this multi-environment study suggest mixtures of different species provided no yield advantage over monocultures for bioenergy feedstocks in Illinois and Nebraska and both systems consistently produced biomass as long as April–July precipitation was near or above the average precipitation (300 mm) of the regions.

Keywords

Bioenergy crop Warm-season grasses Monoculture Mixture Precipitation 

Supplementary material

12155_2018_9947_MOESM1_ESM.docx (180 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 179 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Boe A, Springer T, Lee DK, Rayburn AL, Gonzalez-Hernandez J (2013) Underutilized grasses. In: Malay CS et al. (eds) Bioenergy feedstocks: breeding and genetics. Wiley, New York, pp173–205Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bouton JH (2010) Future developments and uses. In: Boller B et al. (eds), Fodder Crops and Amenity Grasses. Springer, New York, pp. 201–209Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coblentz WK, Turner JE, Scarbrough DA, Lesmeister KE, Johnson ZB, Kellogg DW, Coffey KP, McBeth LJ, Weyers JS (2000) Storage characteristics and nutritive value changes in bermudagrass hay as affected by moisture content and density of rectangular bales. Crop Sci 40:1375–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Danalatos NG, Archontoulis SV, Mitsios I (2007) Potential growth and biomass productivity of Miscanthus× giganteus as affected by plant density and N-fertilization in Central Greece. Biomass Bioenergy 31:145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elmqvist T, Folke C, Nyström M, Peterson G, Bengtsson J, Walker B, Norberg J (2003) Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Front Ecol Environ 1:488–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    FAO (1997) Report of the study on CGIAR research priorities for marginal lands. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; FAO web. http://www.fao.org/Wairdocs/TAC/X5784E/x5784e02.htm. Accessed 3 March 1997
  7. 7.
    Gonzalez-Hernandez JL, Sarath G, Stein JM, Owens V, Gedye K, Boe A (2009) A multiple species approach to biomass production from native herbaceous perennial feedstocks. In: In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant, vol 5, pp 267–281Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heaton EA, Long SP, Voigt TB, Jones MB, Clifton-Brown J (2004) Miscanthus for renewable energy generation: European Union experience and projections for Illinois. Mitig Adapt Strat Gl 9:433–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hong CO, Owens VN, Lee DK, Boe A (2012) Switchgrass, big bluestem, and indiangrass monocultures and their two-and three-way mixtures for bioenergy in the Northern Great Plains. Bioenergy Res 6:229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) (2007) Pub L 2008(110–140):121Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jones PG, Thornton PK (2003) The potential impacts of climate change on maize production in Africa and Latin America in 2055. Glob Environ Chang 13:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kardol P, Campany CE, Souza L, Norby RJ, Weltzin JF, Classen AT (2010) Climate change effects on plant biomass alter dominance patterns and community evenness in an experimental old-field ecosystem. Glob Chang Biol 16:2676–2687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Langholtz MH, Stokes BJ, Eaton LM (2016) 2016 Billion-ton report: advancing domestic resources for a thriving bioeconomy, volume 1: economic availability of feedstock. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, managed by UT-Battelle, LLC for the US Department of Energy.2016:1–411Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee DK, Boe A (2005) Biomass production of switchgrass in central South Dakota. Crop Sci 45:2583–2590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee MS, Wycislo A, Guo J, Lee DK, Voigt T (2017) Nitrogen fertilization effects on biomass production and yield components of Miscanthus × giganteus. Front Plant Sci 8:544Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lin BB (2011) Resilience in agriculture through crop diversification: adaptive management for environmental change. BioScience 61:183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Martin AR, Moomaw RS, Vogel KP (1982) Warm-season grass establishment with atrazine. Agron J 74:916–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McMillan C (1959) The role of ecotypic variation in the distribution of the central grassland of North America. Ecol Monogr 29:285–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mitchell CE, Tilman D, Groth JV (2002) Effects of grassland plant species diversity, abundance, and composition on foliar fungal disease. Ecology 83:1713–1726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mitchell RB, Masters RA, Waller SS, Moore KJ, Young LJ (1996) Tallgrass prairie vegetation response to spring burning dates, fertilizer, and atrazine. J Range Manage 1:131–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mitchell R, Owens V, Gutterson N, Richard E, Barney J (2011) Herbaceous perennials: placement, benefits and incorporation challenges in diversified landscapes. ARS USDA SubmissionsGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mitchell R, Vogel KP, Sarath G (2008) Managing and enhancing switchgrass as a bioenergy feedstock. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 2:530–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mitchell RB, Vogel KP (2004) Indiangrass. p. 937-953. In: L.E. Moser et al. (eds.), Warm-season (C4) grasses. ASA/CSSA/SSSA Special Publ. 45, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mitchell RB, Schmer MR, Anderson WF, Jin V, Balkcom KS, Kiniry J, Coffin A, White P (2016) Dedicated energy crops and crop residues for bioenergy feedstocks in the central and eastern USA. Bioenergy Res 9:384–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moser LE, Burson BL, Sollenberger LE (2004) Warm-season (C4) grass overview. In: Moser LE et al.(eds) Warm-season (C4) Grass, ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, pp 1–14Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mulkey VR, Owens VN, Lee DK (2008) Management of warm-season grass mixtures for biomass production in South Dakota USA. Bioresour Technol 99:609–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Parrish DJ, Fike JH (2009) Selecting, establishing, and managing switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) for biofuels. In: Jonathan RM (ed) Biofuels: methods and protocols. Humana Press Inc, New York, pp 27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Paruelo JM, Lauenroth WK, Burke IC, Sala OE (1999) Grassland precipitation-use efficiency varies across a resource gradient. Ecosystems 2:64–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Perrin R, Vogel K, Schmer M, Mitchell R (2008) Farm-scale production cost of switchgrass for biomass. Bioenergy Res 1:91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Picasso VD, Brummer EC, Liebman M, Dixon PM, Wilsey BJ (2008) Crop species diversity affects productivity and weed suppression in perennial polycultures under two management strategies. Crop Sci 48:331–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pyter, R. E. Heaton. F. Dohleman, T. Voigt, S. Long. 2009. Agronomic experiences with Miscanthus x giganteus in Illinois, USA. Biofuels. Methods in molecular biology (methods and protocols), vol 581. Humana Press, Totowa, NJGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Richter GM, Riche AB, Dailey AG, Gezan SA, Powlson DS (2008) Is UK biofuel supply from Miscanthus water-limited? Soil Use Manage 24:235–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Porter PA, Mitchell RB, Moore KJ (2015) Reducing hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico: reimagining a more resilient agricultural landscape in the Mississippi River watershed. J Soil Water Conserv 70:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Quinn LD, Straker KC, Guo J, Kim S, Thapa S, Kling G, Lee DK, Voigt TB (2015) Stress-tolerant feedstocks for sustainable bioenergy production on marginal land. Bioenergy Res 8:1081–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Russelle MP, Morey RV, Baker JM, Porter PM, and Jung HG (2007) Comment on “Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass”. Science 316:1567Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sanderson MA, Adler PR, Boateng AA, Casler MD, Sarath G (2006) Switchgrass as a biofuels feedstock in the USA. Can J Plant Sci 86:1315–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schmer MR, Vogel KP, Mitchell RB, Perrin RK (2008) Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:464–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shiflet TN, Dietz HE (1974) Relationship between precipitation and annual rangeland herbage production in southeastern Kansas. J Range Manag 1:272–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sosa A, Acuna M, McDonnell K, Devlin G (2015) Managing the moisture content of wood biomass for the optimisation of Ireland's transport supply strategy to bioenergy markets and competing industries. Energy 86:354–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Springer TL, Aiken GE, McNew RW (2001) Combining ability of binary mixtures of native, warm-season grasses and legumes. Crop Sci 41:818–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tahir MH, Casler MD, Moore KJ, Brummer EC (2011) Biomass yield and quality of reed canarygrass under five harvest management systems for bioenergy production. BioEnergy Res 4:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tengö M, Belfrage K (2004) Local management practices for dealing with change and uncertainty: a cross-scale comparison of cases in Sweden and Tanzania. Ecol Soc 9:4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tilman D, Hill J, Lehman C (2006) Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass. Science 314:1598–1600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Vogel KP, Hopkins AA, Moore KJ, Johnson KD, Carlson IT (1996) Registration of ‘Shawnee’ switchgrass. Crop Sci 36:1713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Vogel KP, Masters RA (2001) Frequency grid: a simple tool for measuring grassland establishment. J Range Manag 1:653–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Vogel KP, Mitchell RB, Casler M, Sarath G (2014a) Registration of ‘liberty’ switchgrass. J Plant Regist 8:242–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vogel KP, Mitchell RB, Klopfenstein TJ, Anderson BE (2006a) Registration of ‘Bonanza’ big bluestem. Crop Sci 46:2313–2314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Vogel KP, Mitchell RB, Klopfenstein TJ, Anderson BE (2006b) Registration of ‘Goldmine’ big bluestem. Crop Sci 46:2314–2315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Vogel KP, Mitchell RB, Gorz HJ, Haskins FA, Newell LC, Klopfenstein TJ, Erickson G, Anderson BE (2010) Registration of ‘Warrior’, ‘Scout’, and ‘Chief’ Indiangrass. J Plant Regist 4:115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Vogel KP, Sarah G, Saathoff AJ, Mitchell RB (2011) Switchgrass. In: Halford NG, Karp A (eds) Energy crop. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, pp 314–380Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Vogel KP, Mitchell RB, Casler MD, Sarath G (2014b) Registration of ‘Liberty’ switchgrass. J Plant Registrations 8:242–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wang DA, Lebauer DS, Dietze MC (2010) A quantitative review comparing the yield of switchgrass in monocultures and mixtures in relation to climate and management factors. GCB Bioenergy 2:16–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Weaver JE, Fitzpatrick TJ (1935) The prairie. Ecol Monogr 4:109–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Yachi S, Loreau M (1999) Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:1463–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Zhu Y, Chen H, Fan J, Wang Y (2000) Genetic diversity and disease control in rice. Nature 406:718–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Moon-Sub Lee
    • 1
  • Rob Mitchell
    • 2
  • Emily Heaton
    • 3
  • Colleen Zumpf
    • 1
  • D. K. Lee
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Crop SciencesUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.USDA/ARS Wheat, Sorghum and Forage Research Unit, 251 Filley HallUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA
  3. 3.Department of AgronomyIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations