Improvement of Biomethane Production from Sewage Sludge in Co-digestion with Glycerol and Waste Frying Oil, Using a Design of Experiments
- 113 Downloads
A central composite design circumscribed method was used to define the experimental conditions that improve the methane production rate (kCH4, liters of methane per kilogram of VS of waste added and per day) and the cumulative methane production (cMP, liters of methane per kilogram of VS of waste added) of the co-digestion of sewage sludge (SS) with crude glycerol (cGly) and waste frying oil (WFO). Three factors were selected, i.e., SS concentration, global co-substrate concentration, and mass fraction of cGly (xcGly) in a mixture of cGly and WFO (in chemical oxygen demand, COD). SS digestion without co-substrate reached a cMP of (294 ± 6) L·kg−1 and a kCH4 of (64 ± 1) L·kg−1·d−1, at standard temperature and pressure conditions and expressed relatively to the initial volatile solids. After statistical analysis, SS and co-substrate concentrations of 4.6 g·L−1 and 8.8 g·L−1 (in COD), respectively, with xcGly of 0.8, were defined to simultaneously boost cMP (91 % more) and kCH4 (3-fold increase). Application of these conditions would yield 214 MWh more in electricity per 1000 m3 of SS digested.
KeywordsAnaerobic co-digestion Sewage sludge Crude glycerol Waste frying oil Design of experiments
This study was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) under the scope of Project RECI/BBB-EBI/0179/2012 (FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-027462), the strategic funding of UID/BIO/04469/2013 unit and COMPETE 2020 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006684), and BioTecNorte operation (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000004) funded by European Regional Development Fund under the scope of Norte2020—Programa Operacional Regional do Norte. The authors also acknowledge the financial support of the FCT (ESF) through the grant given to J.V. Oliveira (SFRH/BD/111911/2015). Research of A.J. Cavaleiro was supported by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013)/ERC Grant Agreement No. 323009.
- 1.European Commission (2016) Eurostat. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/. Accessed 20 May 2016
- 2.Tchobanoglous G, Burton FL, Stensel HD, Metcalf & Eddy (2003) Wastewater engineering, treatment and reuse, 4th, inter ed. McGraw-Hill Education, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 3.Ramakrishna DM, Viraraghavan T (2005) Strategies for sludge minimization in activated sludge process - a review. Fresenius Environ Bull 14:2–12Google Scholar
- 6.ALTENER Program NTB - NETT Phase IV (2000) Agriculture and Food Development Authority, waste oils and fats as biodiesel feedstocks: an assessment of their potential in the EUGoogle Scholar
- 21.APHA, AWWA, WPCF (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 17th ed. Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
- 25.Montgomery DC (2009) Design and analysis of experiments, 7th edn. John Wiley, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
- 26.NIST/SEMATECH (2013) 5. Process improvement. http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/. Accessed 5 Sep 2016