Advertisement

BioEnergy Research

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 317–328 | Cite as

Improved Feedstock Option or Invasive Risk? Comparing Establishment and Productivity of Fertile Miscanthus × giganteus to Miscanthus sinensis

  • Catherine L. Bonin
  • Evans Mutegi
  • Allison A. Snow
  • Maria Miriti
  • Hsiaochi Chang
  • Emily A. HeatonEmail author
Article

Abstract

The perennial grass genus Miscanthus has great promise as biomass feedstock, but there are concerns about potential invasion outside production fields. While the sterile hybrid Miscanthus × giganteus is currently one of the leading feedstock options due to its low invasive potential, fertile varieties are being developed to reduce establishment costs, and their invasive risks need to be further assessed. We performed seed addition experiments in Ohio and Iowa, USA to examine the establishment, flowering, persistence, and shoot biomass per plot of a fertile M. × giganteus biotype (‘PowerCane’) and two Miscanthus sinensis biotypes, one feral, and one ornamental. Seeds were added to small, replicated plots in each of the 2 years under two seeding densities and two competition treatments, and plots were monitored for 2–3 years. The ‘PowerCane’ biotype established better, survived better, and produced greater amounts of biomass per plot than both M. sinensis biotypes. All three biotypes flowered by the second or third year after establishment, with inflorescences more numerous in ‘PowerCane’ and the Ornamental M. sinensis biotypes. Effects of seeding density and competition on these patterns were minor in most cases. Our research suggests that ‘PowerCane’ exhibits many traits shared by both biomass crops and invasive species: multi-year persistence, high biomass potential, and fertility. We suggest that the benefits of a seeded M. × giganteus should be carefully weighed against its increased invasive risk prior to deployment across the landscape.

Keywords

Bioenergy crops Biofuels Biomass Weed Survival 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper was supported by the USDA Biotechnology Risk Assessment Grants Program competitive grant no. 2012-33522-19961—National Institute of Food and Agriculture, by capacity grant no. IOW05466 from the USDA-National Institute of Food and Agriculture, and by the Iowa State University Department of Agronomy. We would like to thank Fernando Miguez for statistical support and Tahir Ibrahim for his help in conducting the experiment.

References

  1. 1.
    Hodkinson TR, Renvoize S, Chase MW (1997) Systematics in Miscanthus. Asp Appl Biol 49:189–198Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sacks EJ, Juvik JA, Lin Q, Stewart JR, Yamada T (2012) The gene pool of Miscanthus species and its improvement. In: Paterson AH (ed) Genomics of the Saccharinae. Springer, New York, pp. 73–101Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Głowacka K, Jørgensen U, Kjeldsen JB, Kørup K, Spitz I, Sacks EJ, Long SP (2015) Can the exceptional chilling tolerance of C4 photosynthesis found in Miscanthus × giganteus be exceeded? Screening of a novel Miscanthus Japanese germplasm collection. Ann Bot 115(6):981–990CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaiser CM, Clark LV, Juvik JA, Voigt TB, Sacks EJ (2015) Characterizing a germplasm collection for yield, yield components, and genotype × environment interactions. Crop Sci 55(5):1978–1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clifton-Brown J, Hastings A, Mos M, McCalmont JP, Ashman C, Awty-Carroll D, Cerazy J, Chiang YC, Cosentino S, Cracroft-Eley W (2016) Progress in upscaling Miscanthus biomass production for the European bio-economy with seed-based hybrids. Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12357 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Smith LL, Barney JN (2014) The relative risk of invasion: evaluation of Miscanthus × giganteus seed establishment. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 7(1):93–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hager HA, Quinn LD, Barney JN, Voigt TB, Newman JA (2015) Germination and establishment of bioenergy grasses outside cultivation: a multi-region seed addition experiment. Plant Ecol 216(10):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Quinn LD, Allen DJ, Stewart JR (2010) Invasiveness potential of Miscanthus sinensis: implications for bioenergy production in the United States. Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy 2(6):310–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    EDDMapS (2016) Early detection & distribution mapping system. The University of Georgia-Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health. http://www.eddmaps.org/. Accessed 1 March 2016
  10. 10.
    Quinn LD, Gordon DR, Glaser A, Lieurance D, Flory SL (2015) Bioenergy feedstocks at low risk for invasion in the USA: a “white list” approach. BioEnergy Research 8:471–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barney JN, DiTomaso JM (2008) Nonnative species and bioenergy: are we cultivating the next invader? Bioscience 58(1):64–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Madeja G, Umek L, Havens K (2012) Differences in seed set and fill of cultivars of Miscanthus grown in USDA cold hardiness zone 5 and their potential for invasiveness. J Environ Hortic 30(1):42–50Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Quinn LD, Matlaga DP, Stewart JR, Davis AS (2011) Empirical evidence of long-distance dispersal in Miscanthus sinensis and Miscanthus × giganteus. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 4(1):142–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sacks EJ, Jakob K, Gutterson NI (2013) High biomass Miscanthus varieties. United States Plant Patent Application Publication, 13/513, 173, 1–24Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    West NM, Matlaga DP, Davis AS (2014) Quantifying targets to manage invasion risk: light gradients dominate the early regeneration niche of naturalized and pre-commercial Miscanthus populations. Biol Invasions 16(9):1991–2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Horton JL, Fortner R, Goklany M (2010) Photosynthetic characteristics of the C4 invasive exotic grass Miscanthus sinensis Andersson growing along gradients of light intensity in the southeastern United States. Castanea 75(1):52–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Matlaga DP, Quinn LD, Davis AS, Stewart JR (2012) Light response of native and introduced Miscanthus sinensis seedlings. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 5(3):363–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Quinn LD, Stewart JR, Yamada T, Toma Y, Saito M, Shimoda K, Fernández FG (2012) Environmental tolerances of Miscanthus sinensis in invasive and native populations. BioEnergy Res 5(1):139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chang H (2015) Assessing gene flow in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) and Miscanthus spp.: implications for bioenergy crops. PhD dissertation, The Ohio State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hulme PE (1998) Post-dispersal seed predation: consequences for plant demography and evolution. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 1(1):32–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Knörzer H, Hartung K, Piepho H-P, Lewandowski I (2013) Assessment of variability in biomass yield and quality: what is an adequate size of sampling area for Miscanthus? Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy 5(5):572–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Smith LL, Allen DJ, Barney JN (2015) Yield potential and stand establishment for 20 candidate bioenergy feedstocks. Biomass and Bioenerg 73:145–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    de Melo Peixoto M, Friesen PC, Sage RF (2015) Winter cold-tolerance thresholds in field-grown Miscanthus hybrid rhizomes. J Exp Bot. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv1093 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pittman SE, Muthukrishnan R, West NM, Davis AS, Jordan NR, Forester JD (2015) Mitigating the potential for invasive spread of the exotic biofuel crop, Miscanthus × giganteus. Biol Invasions 17(11):3247–3261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jensen E, Farrar K, Thomas-Jones S, Hastings A, Donnison I, Clifton-Brown J (2011) Characterization of flowering time diversity in Miscanthus species. Glob Change Biol Bioenergy 3(5):387–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Christian EJ (2012) Seed development and germination of Miscanthus sinensis. PhD dissertation 12880. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/12880
  27. 27.
    Meyer MH, Tchida CL (1999) Miscanthus Andress. produces viable seed in four USDA hardiness zones. J Environ Hortic 17(3):137–140Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Matlaga DP, Davis AS (2013) Minimizing invasive potential of Miscanthus × giganteus grown for bioenergy: identifying demographic thresholds for population growth and spread. J Appl Ecol 50(2):479–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine L. Bonin
    • 1
  • Evans Mutegi
    • 2
  • Allison A. Snow
    • 2
  • Maria Miriti
    • 2
  • Hsiaochi Chang
    • 2
  • Emily A. Heaton
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of AgronomyIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal BiologyOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations