Advertisement

BioEnergy Research

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 454–464 | Cite as

Soil Health, Crop Productivity, Microbial Transport, and Mine Spoil Response to Biochars

  • J. M. NovakEmail author
  • J. A. Ippolito
  • R. D. Lentz
  • K. A. Spokas
  • C. H. Bolster
  • K. Sistani
  • K. M. Trippe
  • C. L. Phillips
  • M. G. Johnson
Article

Abstract

Biochars vary widely in pH, surface area, nutrient concentration, porosity, and metal binding capacity due to the assortment of feedstock materials and thermal conversion conditions under which it is formed. The wide variety of chemical and physical characteristics have resulted in biochar being used as an amendment to rebuild soil health, improve crop yields, increase soil water storage, and restore soils/spoils impacted by mining. Meta-analysis of the biochar literature has shown mixed results when using biochar as a soil amendment to improve crop productivity. For example, in one meta-analysis, biochar increased crop yield by approximately 10 %, while in another, approximately 50 % of the studies reported minimal to no crop yield increases. In spite of the mixed crop yield reports, biochars have properties that can improve soil health characteristics, by increasing carbon (C) sequestration and nutrient and water retention. Biochars also have the ability to bind enteric microbes and enhance metal binding in soils impacted by mining. In this review, we present examples of both effective and ineffective uses of biochar to improve soil health for agricultural functions and reclamation of degraded mine spoils. Biochars are expensive to manufacture and cannot be purged from soil after application, so for efficient use, they should be targeted for specific uses in agricultural and environmental sectors. Thus, we introduce the designer biochar concept as an alternate paradigm stating that biochars should be designed with properties that are tailored to specific soil deficiencies or problems. We then demonstrate how careful selection of biochars can increase their effectiveness as a soil amendment.

Keywords

Biochar Microbiology Mine-impacted spoils Restoration Soil health 

Abbreviations

C

Carbon

N

Nitrogen

SOC

Soil organic carbon

USDA-ARS

United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service

US EPA

United States Environmental Protection Agency

Notes

Acknowledgments

Sincere gratitude is expressed to the support staff at involved ARS and United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) locations whose hard work made this research article possible. Parts of the information in this article have been funded through an Interagency Agreement between the United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (60-6657-1-024) and the US EPA (DE-12-92342301-1). It has been subject to review by scientists of the United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) at multiple locations and by the National Health and Environment Effects Research Laboratory’s Western Ecology Division and approved for journal submission. Approval does not signify that the contents reflect the views of the USDA-ARS or the US EPA, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for their use.

References

  1. 1.
    Atkinson C, Fitzgerald J, Hipps N (2010) Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant Soil 337:1–18Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jeffery S, Verheijen FGA, van der Velde M, Bastos AC (2011) A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 144:175–187Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Biederman LA, Harpole WS (2013) Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy 5:202–214Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Crane-Droesch A, Abiven S, Jeffery S, Torn MS (2013) Heterogeneous global crop yield responses to biochar: a meta-regression analysis. Environ Res Lett 8:1–8Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sigua GC, Novak JM, Watts JM, Johnson MG, Spokas K (2015) Efficacies of designer biochars in improving biomass and nutrient uptake of winter wheat grown in a hard setting subsoil layer. Chemosphere 142:176–183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lentz RD, Ippolito JA (2012) Biochar and manure affects calcareous soil and corn silage nutrient concentrations and uptake. J Environ Qual 41:1033–1043PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Spokas KA, Cantrell KB, Novak JM, Archer DW, Ippolito JA, Collins AA, Boateng K, Lima IM, Lamb MC, McAloon AJ, Lentz RD, Nichols KA (2012) Biochar: a synthesis of its agronomic impact beyond carbon sequestration. J Environ Qual 41:973–989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Novak JM, Spokas KA, Cantrell KB, Ro KS, Watts DW, Glaz B, Busscher WJ, Hunt PG (2014) Effects of biochar and hydrochars produced from lignocellulosic and animal manure on fertility of a Mollisol and Entisol. Soil Use Manag 30:175–181Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abit SM, Bolster CH, Cai P, Walker SL (2012) Influence of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature of biochar amendments on transport of Escherichia coli in saturated and unsaturated soil. Environ Sci Technol 46:8097–8105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bolster CH, Abit SM (2012) Biochar pyrolyzed at two temperatures affects Escherichia coli transport through sandy soil. J Environ Qual 41:124–133PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beesley L, Moreno-Jiménez E, Gomez-Eyles JL, Harris E, Robinson B, Sizmur T (2011) A review of biochars potential in the remediation, revegetation and restoration of contaminated soils. Environ Pollut 159:3269–3282PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tang J, Zhu W, Kookana R, Katayama A (2013) Characteristics of biochar and its application in remediation of contaminated soil. J Biosci Bioeng 116:653–659PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Novak JM, Ro K, Ok YS, Sigua G, Spokas K, Uchimiya S, Bolan N (2016) Biochars multifunctional role as a novel technology in the agricultural, environmental, and industrial sectors. Chemosphere 142:1–3PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Antal MJ, Grønli (2003) The art, science, and technology of charcoal production. Ind Eng Chem Res 42:1619–1640Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Amonette JE, Joseph S (2009) Characteristics of biochar: macro-chemical properties. In: Lehmann JL, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management. Earthscan, London, pp 56–71Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Deenik JL, McClellan T, Uehara G, Antal M, Campbell S (2010) charcoal volatile matter content influences plant growth and soil nitrogen transformations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:1259–1269Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kleber M, Hockaday W, Nico PS (2015) Characteristics of biochar: physical and structural properties. In: Lehmann JL, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation, 2nd edn. Earthscan, London, pp 111–138Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Keiluweit M, Nico PS, Johnson M, Kleber M (2010) Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 44:1247–1253PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ippolito JA, Spokas KS, Novak JM, Lentz RD, Cantrell KB (2015) Biochar elemental composition and factors influencing nutrient retention. In: Lehmann J, Joseph (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science, technology, and implementation, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York, pp 137–161Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lehmann J, Abiven S, Kleber M, Pan G, Singh BP, Sohi SP, Zimmerman AR (2015) Persistence of biochar in soil. In: Lehmann JL, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation, 2nd edn. Earthscan, London, pp 235–282Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lehmann J, Czimczik C, Laird D, Sohi S (2009) Stability of biochar in soils. In: Lehmann JL, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation, 2nd edn. Earthscan, London, pp 183–206Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zimmerman AR (2010) Abiotic and microbial oxidation of laboratory-produced black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 44:1295–1301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cheng CH, Lehmann J, Theis JE, Burton SD, Englehard MH (2006) Oxidation of black carbon by biotic and abiotic processes. Org Geochem 37:1477–1488Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Spokas KA, Novak JM, Masiello CA, Johnson MG, Colosky EC, Ippolito JA (2015) Physical disintegration of biochar: an overlooked process. Environ Sci Technol Lett 1:326–332Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Novak JM, Cantrell KB, Watts DW (2013) Compositional and thermal evaluation of lignocellulosic and poultry litter chars via high and low temperature pyrolysis. Bioenergy Res 6:114–130Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S (2008) Using poultry liter biochars as soil amendments. Aust J Soil Res 46:437–444Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Novak JM, Lima I, Xing B, Gaskin JW, Steiner C, Das KC, Ahmedna M, Rehrah R, Watts DW, Busscher WJ, Schomberg (2009) Characterization of designer biochars produced at different temperatures and their effects on a loamy sand. Ann Environ Sci 3:195–206Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Singh B, Singh BP, Cowie AL (2010) Characterization and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment. Aust J Soil Res 48:516–525Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yuan JH, Xu RK, Wang N, Li JY (2011) Amendments of acid soils with crop residues and biochars. Pedosphere 21:320–308Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Novak JM, Busscher WJ (2012) Selection and use of designer biochars to improve characteristics of southeastern USA Coastal Plain degraded soils. In: Lee JW (ed) Advanced biofuels and bioproducts. Springer Science, New York, pp 69–97Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rehrah D, Reddy MR, Novak JM, Bansode RR, Schimmel KA, Yu J, Watts DW, Ahmedna M (2014) Production and characterization of biochars from agricultural by-products for use in soil quality enhancement. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 108:301–309Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sigua GC, Stone KC, Hunt PG, Cantrell KB, Novak JM (2015) Increasing biomass of winter wheat using sorghum biochars. Agron Sustain Dev 35:739–748Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liu X, Zhang A, Ji C, Joseph S, Bian R, Li L, Pan G, Paz-Ferreiro J (2013) Biochar’s effect on crop productivity and the dependence on experimental conditions—a meta-analysis of literature data. Plant Soil 373:583–594Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Uzoma KC, Inoue M, Andry H, Fujimaki H, Zahoor A, Nishihara E (2011) Effect of cow manure biochar on maize productivity under sandy soil conditions. Soil Use Manag 27:205–212Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Borchard N, Siemens J, Ladd B, Moeller A, Amerlung W (2014) Application of biochars to sandy and silty soil failed to increase maize yield under common agricultural practice. Soil Tillage Res 144:184–194Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gaskin JW, Speir RA, Harris K, Das KC, Lee RD, Morris LA, Fisher DS (2010) Effect of peanut hull and pine chip biochar on soil nutrients, corn nutrient status, and yield. Agron J 102:623–633Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Morris S, Chan KY, Downie A, Rust J, Joseph S, Cowie A (2010) Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant Soil 327:235–246Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Martinsen V, Mulder J, Shitumbanuma V, Sparrevik M, Borresen T, Cornelissen G (2015) Farmer-led maize biochar trials: effect on crop yield and soil nutrients under conservation farming. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 177:1–15Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jones D, Rousk J, Edward-Jones G, DeLuca T, Murphy D (2011) Biochar-mediated changes in soil quality and plant growth in a three year field trail. Soil Biol Biochem 45:113–124Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Grundale M, Deluca T (2007) Charcoal effects on soil solution chemistry and growth of Koeleria macrantha in the Ponderosa pine/Douglas-fir ecosystem. Biol Fertil Soils 43:303–311Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Taylor SA, Ashcroft GL (1972) Physical edaphology—the physics of irrigated and nonirrigated soils. WH Freeman and Company, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Alexander M (1977) Introduction to soil microbiology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Troeh FR, Thompson LM (2005) Soils and soil fertility, 6th edn. Blackwell Publisher, VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Walden J (1860) Soil culture: containing a comprehensive view of agriculture. Horticulture, pomology, domestic animals, rural economy, and agricultural literature. CM Saxton, Barker and Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tyron EH (1948) Effects of charcoal on certain physical, chemical and biological properties of forest soils. Ecol Monogr 18:81–115Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W (2002) Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal—a review. Biol Fertil Soils 35:219–230Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Laird D, Fleming P, Davis DD, Horton R, Wang B, Karlen DL (2010) Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a tropical Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158:443–449Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Novak JM, Busscher WJ, Watts DW, Amonette JE, Ippolito JA, Lima IM, Gaskin J, Das KC, Steiner C, Ahmedna M, Rehrah D, Schomberg H (2012) Biochars impact on soil-moisture storage in an Ultisol and two Aridisol. Soil Sci 177:310–320Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Basso A, Miguez FE, Laird DA, Horton R, Westgate M (2013) Assessing potential of biochar for increasing water-holding capacity of sandy soils. GCB Bioenergy 5:132–143Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mollinedo J, Schumacher TE, Chintala R (2015) Influence of feedstock and pyrolysis on biochars capacity to modify soil water retention characteristics. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 114:100–108Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Asai H, Samson BK, Stephan HM, Songyikhangsuthor K, Homma K (2009) Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos. I. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crop Res 111:81–84Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Uzoma KC, Inoue M, Andry H, Zahoor A, Nishihare E (2011) influence of biochar application on sandy soil hydraulic properties and nutrient retention. J Food Agric Environ 9:1137–1143Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ouyang L, Wang F, Tang J, Yu L, Zhang R (2013) Effects of biochar amendment on soil aggregates and hydraulic properties. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 13:991–1002Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Barnes RT, Gallagher ME, Masiello CA, Liu Z, Dugan B (2014) Biochar-induced changes in soil hydraulic conductivity and dissolved nutrient fluxes constrained by laboratory experiments. Plos One 9:1–9Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Major J, Rondon M, Molina D, Rhia SJ, Lehmann J (2012) Nutrient leaching in a Columbian savanna oxisol amended with biochar. J Environ Qual 41:1076–1086PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Lim TJ, Spokas KA, Feyereisen G, Novak JM (2016) Predicting the impact of biochar additions on soil hydraulic properties. Chemosphere 142:136–144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Novak J, Sigua G, Watts D, Cantrell K, Shumaker P, Szogi A, Johnson MG (2016) Biochars impact on water infiltration and water quality through a compacted subsoil layer. Chemosphere 142:160–167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Masiello CM, Dugan B, Brewer C, Spokas KA, Novak JM, Liu Z, Sorrenti G (2015) Biochar effects on soil hydrology. In: Lehmann J, Joseph J (eds) Biochar for environmental management, 2nd edn. Earthscan, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hillel D (1998) Environmental soil physics: fundamentals, applications and environmental considerations. Academic press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Groenevelt P, Grant CD, Semetsa S (2001) A new procedure to determine soil water availability. Aust J Soil Res 39:577–598Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Minasny B, McBrantney AB (2003) Integral energy as a measure of soil-water availability. Plant Soil 249:253–262Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    de Lima R, da Silva A, Leao T, Mosaddeghi B (2016) Soil physics: an R package for calculating soil water availability to plants by different soil physical indices. Comput Electron Agric 120:63–71Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Unc A, Goss MJ (2004) Transport of bacteria from manure and protection of water resources. Appl Soil Ecol 25:1–18Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Gerba CP, Smith JE (2005) Sources of pathogenic microorganisms and their fate during land-application of wastes. J Environ Qual 34:42–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Abit SM, Bolster CH, Cantrell KB, Flores JQ, Walker SL (2014) Transport of Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and microspheres in biochar-amended soils with different textures. J Environ Qual 43:371–378PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Mittal AK (2011) Abandoned mines: information on the number of hardrock mines, cost of clean up, and value of financial assurances (testimony before the subcommittee on energy and mineral resources, Committee on Natural Resources, House of Representatives No. GAO-11-834T). United States Accountability Office, available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d11834t.pdf
  67. 67.
    Fellet G, Marchiol L, Delle Vedove G, Peressotti A (2011) Application of biochar on mine tailings: effects and perspectives for land reclamation. Chemosphere 83:1262–1267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Anawar HM, Akter F, Solaiman ZM, Strezov V (2015) Biochar: an emerging panacea for remediation of soil contaminants from mining, industry and sewage wastes. Pedosphere 25:654–665Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Janus A, Pelfrêne A, Heymans S, Deboffe C, Douay F, Waterlot C (2015) Elaboration, characteristics and advantages of biochar for the management of contaminated soils with a specific overview on Miscanthus biochars. J Environ Manag 162:275–289Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Gwenzi W, Chaukura N, Mukome F, Machado S, Nyamasoka (2015) Biochar production and applications in Sub-Saharan Africa: opportunities, constraints, risks, and uncertainties. J Environ Manag 150:250–261Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Jain S, Baruah BP, Khare (2014) Kinetic leaching of high sulphur mine rejects amended with biochar: buffering implications. Ecol Eng 71:703–709Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Wiedner K, Rumpel C, Steiner C, Pozzi A, Maas R, Glaser B (2013) Chemical evaluation of char’s produced by thermochemical conversion (gasification, pyrolysis, and hydrothermal carbonization) of agro-industrial biomass on a commercial scale. Biomass Bioenergy 59:264–278Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Uchimya M, Lima IM, Klasson KT, Wartelle LH (2010) Contaminant immobilization and nutrient release by biochar soil amendments: role of natural organic matter. Chemosphere 80:935–940Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Uchimya M, Wartelle LH, Klasson KT, Fortier CA, Lima IM (2011) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on biochar property and function as a heavy metal sorbent in soil. J Agric Food Chem 59:2501–2510Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Ippolito JA, Novak JM, Strawn DG, Scheckel KG, Ahmedna M, Niandou MAS (2012) Macroscopic and molecular approaches of copper sorption by a steam activated biochar. J Environ Qual 41:1150–1156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Uchimiya M, Orlov A, Ramakrishnan G, Sistani K (2013) In situ and ex situ spectroscopic monitoring of biochar’s surface functional groups. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 102:53–59Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Scheckel KG, Diamond GL, Burgess MF, Klotzhbach JM, Maddaloni M, Miller BW, Partridge CR, Serda SM (2013) Amending soils with phosphate as means to mitigate soil lead hazard: a critical review of the stage of the science. J Tox Environ Health, Part B 16:337–380Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Leehmann J (2007) Bio-energy in the black. Front Ecol Environ 5:381–387Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Ippolito JA, Laird DA Busscher WJ (2012) Environmental benefits of biochar. J Environ Qual 41:967–972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Novak JM, Cantrell KB, Watts DW, Busscher WJ, Johnson MG (2014) Designing relevant biochars as soil amendments using lignocellulosic-based and manure-based feedstocks. J Soil Sediments 14:330–343Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Scott HL, Ponsonby D, Atkinson CJ (2014) Biochar: an improver of nutrient and soil water availability—what is the evidence. CAB Rev 9:1–9Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Ippolito JA, Ducey TF, Cantrell KB, Novak JM, Lentz RD (2016) Designer, acidic biochar influences calcareous soil characteristics. Chemosphere 142:184–191PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Sohi S, McDonagh, Novak JM, Wu W, Miu LM (2015) Biochar systems and system fit. In: Lehmann J, Joseph J (eds) Biochar for environmental management, 2nd edn. Earthscan, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Joseph S, Van Zwieten L, Chia C, Kimber S, Munroe P, Lin Y, Marjo C, Hook J, Thomas T, Nielsen S, Donne S, Taylor P (2013) Designing specific biochars to address soil constraints: a developing industry. In: Ladygina N, Rineau F (eds) Biochar and Soil Biota. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 165–202Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. Novak
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. A. Ippolito
    • 2
  • R. D. Lentz
    • 2
  • K. A. Spokas
    • 3
  • C. H. Bolster
    • 4
  • K. Sistani
    • 4
  • K. M. Trippe
    • 5
  • C. L. Phillips
    • 5
  • M. G. Johnson
    • 6
  1. 1.United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)-Agricultural Research Service (ARS)Coastal Plain Research CenterFlorenceUSA
  2. 2.USDA-ARSNorthwest Irrigation and Soils Research LaboratoryKimberlyUSA
  3. 3.USDA-ARSSoil and Water Management Research UnitSt. PaulUSA
  4. 4.USDA-ARSFood Animal Environmental Systems Research UnitBowling GreenUSA
  5. 5.USDA-ARSForage Seed and Cereal Research UnitCorvallisUSA
  6. 6.National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Western Ecology DivisionUnited States Environmental Protection AgencyCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations