BioEnergy Research

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 551–558 | Cite as

Distribution of Structural Carbohydrates in Corn Plants Across the Southeastern USA

  • Spyridon MourtzinisEmail author
  • Keri B. Cantrell
  • Francisco J. Arriaga
  • Kipling S. Balkcom
  • Jeff M. Novak
  • James R. Frederick
  • Douglas L. Karlen


Quantifying lignin and carbohydrate composition of corn (Zea mays L.) is important to support the emerging cellulosic biofuels industry. Therefore, field studies with 0 or 100 % stover removal were established in Alabama and South Carolina as part of the Sun Grant Regional Partnership Corn Stover Project. In Alabama, cereal rye (Secale cereale L.) was also included as an additional experimental factor, serving as a winter cover crop. Plots were located on major soil types representative of their respective states: Compass and Decatur soils in Alabama and a Coxville/Rains-Goldsboro-Lynchburg soil association in South Carolina. Lignin and structural carbohydrate concentrations in the whole (above-ground) plant, cobs, vegetation excluding cobs above the primary ear (top), vegetation below the primary ear (bottom), and vegetation from above the primary ear including cobs (above-ear fraction) were determined using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). The distribution of lignin, ash, and structural carbohydrates varied among plant fractions, but neither inclusion of a rye cover crop nor the stover harvest treatments consistently affected carbohydrate concentrations within locations. Total precipitation and average air temperature during the growing season were strongly correlated with stover composition indicating that weather conditions may have multiple effects on potential biofuel production (i.e., not only yield but also stover quality). When compared to the above-ear fractions, bottom plant partitions contained greater lignin concentrations. Holocellulose concentration was consistently greater in the above-ear fractions at all three locations. Data from this study suggests that the above-ear plant portions have the most desirable characteristics for cellulosic ethanol production via fermentation in the southeastern USA.


Corn Carbohydrates Lignin Cellulose Distribution Rye Residue removal 



The authors would like to thank the many hands aiding in the corn planting, harvest collections, sample preparations, and analyses. Mention of a trade name, proprietary product, or vendors is for information only and does not guarantee or warrant the product by the USDA and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products or vendors that may also be suitable. The USDA is an equal opportunity employer.


Partial funding for this research was provided by the Alabama Wheat and Feed Grain Producers Commission of the Alabama Farmers Federation. This study is a contribution of the multilocation USDA-ARS-REAP, supported in part by supplemental funding from the North Central Regional Sun Grant Center at South Dakota State University through a grant provided by the USDOE—Office of Biomass Programs under award number DE-FC36-05GO85041.


  1. 1.
    Wilhelm WW, Johnson JMF, Lightle DT, Karlen DL, Novak JM, Barbour NW, Laird DA, Baker J, Ochsner TE, Halvorson AD, Archer DW, Arriaga F (2010) Vertical distribution of corn stover dry mass grown at several US locations. Bioenerg Resour 4:11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thomas S, Ruth M, Macfarlane B, Hames BE (2001) Estimating the effects of compositional variation on biomass conversion process economics. Biofuels Program FY01 C Milestone report #FY01–273, NRELGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lorenz A, Coors J, de Leon N, Wolfrum E, Hames B, Sluiter A, Weimer P (2009) Characterization, genetic variation, and combining ability of maize traits relevant to the production of cellulosic ethanol. Crop Sci 49:85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Philip Y, Lu L, Hayes D, Womac A, Hong K, Sokhansanj S (2008) Fast classification and compositional analysis of corn stover fractions using Fourier transform near-infrared techniques. Bioresour Technol 99:7323–7332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cone JW, Van Gelder AH, Marvin HJP (1996) Influence of drying method and ageing on chemical and physical properties and in vitro degradation characteristics of grass and maize samples. J Agr Sci 126:7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hatfield RD (1989) Structural polysaccharides in forages and their degradability. Agron J 46:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chandrakant P, Bisaria VS (1998) Simultaneous conversion of cellulose and hemicellulose to ethanol. Crit Rev Biotechnol 18:295–331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chang VS, Holtzapple MT (2000) Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic reactivity. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 84:5–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim S, Holtzapple MT (2006) Effect of structural features on enzyme digestibility of corn stover. Bioresour Technol 97:583–591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klass DL (1998) Biomass for renewable energy, fuels, and chemicals. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Waksman T (1928) The composition of natural organic materials. Soil Sci Soc Am 26:155–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim S, Dale BE (2004) Global potential bioethanol production from waste crops and crop residues. Biomass Bioenergy 26:361–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Akin DE, Morrison WH, Rigsby LL, Barton FE, Himmelsbach DS, Hicks KB (2006) Corn stover fractions and bioenergy: chemical composition, structure, and response to enzyme pretreatment. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 129–132:104–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bootsma JA, Shanks BH (2005) Hydrolysis characteristics of tissue fractions resulting from mechanical separation of corn stover. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 125:27–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Duguid KB, Montross MD, Radtke CW, Crofcheck CL, Wendt LM, Shearer SA (2009) Effect of anatomical fractionation on the enzymatic hydrolysis of acid and alkaline pretreated corn stover. Bioresour Technol 100:5189–5195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Templeton D, Sluiter AD, Hayward TK, Hames B, Thomas T (2009) Assessing corn stover composition and sources of variability via NIRS. Cellulose 16:621–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Johnson JMF, Novak JM, Varvel GE, Stott DE, Osborne SL, Karlen DL, Lamb JA, Baker J, Adler, PR (2014) Crop residue mass needed to maintain soil organic carbon levels: can it be determined? Bioenergy Res 10.  10.1007/s12155-013-9402-8
  18. 18.
    Lehman M, Ducey TF, Jin VL, Acosta-Martinez V, Ahlschwede, CM, Jeske, ES, Drijber, RA, Cantrell, KB, Frederick JR, Fink DM, Osborne SL, Novak JM, Johnson, JMF, Varvel, GE (2014) Soil microbial community response to corn stover harvesting under rain-fed, no-till conditions at multiple U.S. locations. Bioenergy Research this issueGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Osborne SL, Johnson JMF, Jin VL, Hammerbeck, AL, Varvel GE, Schumacher TE (2014) The impact of corn residue removal on soil aggregates and particulate organic matter. Bioenergy Research this issueGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wilhelm WW, Hess JR, Karlen DL, Johnson JMF, Muth DJ, Baker JM, Gollany HT, Novak JM, Scott DE, Varvel GE (2010) Review: Balancing limiting factors and economic drivers for sustainable Midwestern US agricultural residue feedstock supplies. Ind Biotechnol 6:271–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moschler WW, Shear GM, Hallock DL, Sears RD, Jones GD (1967) Winter cover crops for sod-planted corn: their selection and management. Agron J 59:547–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Crofcheck CL, Montross MD (2004) Effect of stover fraction on glucose production using enzymatic hydrolysis. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 47:841–844Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schittenhelm S (2010) Effect of drought stress on yield and quality of maize/sunflower and maize/sorghum intercrops for biogas production. J Agron Crop Sci 196:253–261Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hansey CN, de Leon N (2011) Biomass yield and cell wall composition of corn with alternative morphologies planted at variable densities. Crop Sci 51:1005–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pordesimo LO, Hames BR, Sokhansanj S, Edens WC (2005) Variation in corn stover composition and energy content with crop maturity. Biomass Bioenergy 28:366–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Van Soest PJ (1963) Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. II. A rapid method for the determination of fiber and lignin. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 46:828Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Van Soest PJ, Wine RH (1967) Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determinations of plant cell wall constituents. J Off AssocAnal Chem 50:50Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wolfrum EJ, Lorenz AJ, deLeon N (2009) Correlating detergent fiber analysis and dietary fiber analysis data for corn stover collected by NIRS. Cellulose 16:577–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bruce RR, Langdale GW, West LT, Miller WP (1995) Surface soil degradation and soil productivity restoration and maintenance. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59:654–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sainju UM, Singh BP, Whitehead WF (2002) Long-term effects of tillage, cover crops, and nitrogen fertilization on organic carbon and nitrogen concentrations in sandy loam soils in Georgia, USA. Soil Tillage Res 63:167–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hoskinson RL, Karlen DL, Birrell SJ, Radtke CW, Wilhelm WW (2007) Engineering, nutrient removal, and feedstock conversion evaluations of four corn stover harvest scenarios. Biomass Bioenergy 31:126–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Johnson JMF, Wilhelm WW, Karlen DL, Archer DW, Wienhold B, Lightle DT, Laird D, Baker J, Ochsner TE, Novak JM, Halvorson AD, Arriaga F, Barbour N (2010) Nutrient removal as a function of corn stover cutting height and cob harvest. Bioenergy Res 3:342–352Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kadam K, McMillan J (2003) Availability of corn stover as a sustainable feedstock for bioethanol production. Bioresour Technol 88:17–25PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Spyridon Mourtzinis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Keri B. Cantrell
    • 2
  • Francisco J. Arriaga
    • 3
  • Kipling S. Balkcom
    • 4
  • Jeff M. Novak
    • 2
  • James R. Frederick
    • 5
  • Douglas L. Karlen
    • 6
  1. 1.AuburnUSA
  2. 2.USDA-ARS, Coastal Plains Soil, Water, and Plant Research CenterFlorenceUSA
  3. 3.Department of Soil ScienceUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  4. 4.National Soil Dynamics Research Laboratory, USDA-Agricultural Research ServiceAuburnUSA
  5. 5.Pee Dee Research and Education CenterClemson UniversityFlorenceUSA
  6. 6.USDA-ARS, National Laboratory for Agriculture and the EnvironmentAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations