BioEnergy Research

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 311–320 | Cite as

Perennial Agroenergy Feedstocks as En Route Habitat for Spring Migratory Birds

  • Bruce A. Robertson
  • Douglas A. Landis
  • T. Scott Sillett
  • Elizabeth R. Loomis
  • Robert A. Rice
Article

Abstract

Increased production of bioenergy crops in North America is projected to exacerbate already heavy demands upon existing agricultural landscapes with potential to impact biodiversity negatively. Grassland specialist birds are an imperilled avifauna for which perennial-based, next-generation agroenergy feedstocks may provide suitable habitat. We take a multi-scaled spatial approach to evaluate the ability of two candidate second-generation agroenergy feedstocks (switchgrass, Panicum virgatum, and mixed grass–forb plantings) to act as spring migratory stopover habitat for birds. In total, we detected 35 bird species in mixed grass–forb plantings and switchgrass plantings, including grassland specialists and species of state and national conservation concern (e.g., Henslow’s Sparrow, Ammodramus henslowii). Some evidence indicated that patches with higher arthropod food availability attracted a greater diversity of migrant bird species, but species richness, total bird abundance, and the abundance of grassland specialist species were similar in fields planted with either feedstock. Species richness per unit area (species density) was relatively higher in switchgrass fields. The percent land cover of forest in landscapes surrounding study fields was negatively associated with bird species richness and species density. Habitat patch size and within-patch vegetation structure were unimportant in predicting the diversity or abundance of spring en route bird assemblages. Our results demonstrate that both switchgrass and mixed grass–forb plantings can attract diverse assemblages of migrant birds. As such, industrialized production of these feedstocks as agroenergy crops has the potential to provide a source of en route habitat for birds, particularly where fields are located in relatively unforested landscapes. Because industrialization of cellulosic biomass production will favor as yet unknown harvest and management regimes, predicting the ultimate value of perennial-based biomass plantings for spring migrants remains difficult.

Keywords

Biofuels Agriculture Grassland birds Habitat selection Agroecology Switchgrass 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Migratory Bird Center of the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, US Fish and Wildlife Service (grant # 30181AG045), the DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (DOE BER Office of Science DE-FC02-07ER64494), DOE OBP Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (DE-AC05-76RL01830), and the U.S. National Science Foundation LTER program.

References

  1. 1.
    European Union (2009) Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April, 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/ECGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    US Congress (2007) Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. Renewable fuels directive. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-6. Accessed 26 May 2009
  3. 3.
    West T, Dunphy-Guzman K, Sun A, Malczynski L, Reichmuth D, Larson R et al (2009) Feasibility, economics, and environmental impact of producing 90 billion gallons of ethanol per year by 2030. Sandia National Laboratories, LivermoreGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Green RE, Cornell SJ, Scharlemann JPW, Balmford A (2005) Farming and the fate of wild nature. Science 307:550–555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fargione JE, Cooper TR, Flaspohler DJ, Hill J, Lehman C, McCoy T et al (2009) Bioenergy and wildlife: threats and opportunities for grassland conservation. Bioscience 59:767–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meehan TD, Hurlbert AH, Gratton C (2010) Bird communities in future bioenergy landscapes of the Upper Midwest. PNAS 107:18533–18538PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fletcher RJ, Robertson BA, Evans J, Doran P, Alavalapati JRR, Schemske D (2011) Biodiversity conservation in the era of biofuels: risks and opportunities. Front Ecol Env 9:161–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tilman D, Hill J, Lehman C (2006) Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass. Science 314:1598–1600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sauer JR, Hines JE, Fallon J (2008) The North American breeding bird survey, results and analysis 1966–2007. Version 5.15.2008. USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, LaurelGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scharlemann JPW (2008) Can bird research clarify the biodiversity benefits and drawbacks of biofuels? Ibis 150:640–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Robertson BA, Doran P, Robertson R, Loomis L, Schemske D (2011) Perennial biomass feedstocks enhance avian diversity. GCB Bioenergy 3:235–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Askins RA, Chavez-Ramirez F, Dale BC, Haas CA, Herkert JA (2007) Conservation of grassland birds in North America: understanding ecological processes in different regions. Ornithol Monogr 124:1–46Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sillett TS, Holmes RT (2002) Variation in survivorship of a migratory songbird throughout its annual cycle. J Anim Ecol 71:296–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Robertson BA, Robertson JR, Loomis ER, Doran JP, Schemske DW (2011) Avian use of perennial biomass feedstocks as post-breeding and migratory stopover habitat. PLoS One 6(3):E16941PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sample DW, Mossman MJ (1997) Management of habitat for grassland birds: a guide for Wisconsin. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moore FR, Gauthreaux SAJ, Kerlinger P, Simons TR (1995) Habitat requirements during migration: important link in conservation. In: Martin TE, Finch DM (eds) Ecology and management of neotropical migratory birds. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 121–144Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rodewald PG, Brittingham MC (2004) Stopover habitats of landbirds during fall: use of edge-dominated and early-successional forests. Auk 121:1040–1055Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Martin TE (1980) Diversity and abundance of spring migratory birds using habitat islands on the Great Plains. Condor 82:430–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Buler JJ, Moore FR, Norris K (2007) A multi-scale examination of stopover habitat use by birds. Ecology 88:1789–1802PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Emlen JT (1977) Estimating breeding season bird densities from transect counts. Auk 94:455–468Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fletcher RJ, Dhundale JA, Dean TF (2000) Estimating non-breeding season bird abundance in prairies: a comparison of two survey techniques. J Field Ornith 71:321–329Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ribic CA, Koford R, Herkert JR, Johnson DH, Niemuth ND, Naugle DE et al (2009) Area sensitivity in North American grassland birds: patterns and processes. Auk 126:233–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Herkert JR (1994) The effects of habitat fragmentation on Midwestern grassland bird communities. Ecol Appl 4:461–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Harmoney KR, Moore KJ, George R, Brummer EC, Russell JR (1997) Determination of pasture biomass using four indirect methods. Agron J 89:665–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Robel RJ, Briggsa JN, Datytonan D, Hulbert DLC (1970) Relationships between visual obstruction measurements and weight of grassland vegetation. J Range Manage 23:295–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Daubenmire R (1959) A canopy-coverage method of vegetation analysis. Northwest Sci 33:43–64Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Weins JA (1974) Habitat heterogeneity and avian community structure in North American grasslands. Am Midl Nat 91:195–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    ESRI (2008) ArcGIS. ESRI, RedlandsGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    United States Department of Agriculture (2010) 2009 Cropland data layer. National Agricultural Statistics Service, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rogers LE, Hinds WT, Buschbom RL (1976) A general weight vs. length relationship for insects. Ann Ent Soc Am 69:387–389Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hódar JA (1996) The use of regression equations for estimation of arthropod biomass in ecological studies. Acta Ecol 17:421–433Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Colwell RK (1997) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 5. User’s guide and application. Available: http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates. Accessed 27 July 2010
  34. 34.
    Vickery PD, Tubaro PL, Dasilva JMC, Peterjohn BG, Herkert JR, Cavalcanti RB (1999) Conservation of grassland birds in the Western Hemisphere. In: Vickery PD, Herkert JR (eds) Ecology and conservation of grassland birds of the Western Hemisphere. Stud Avian Biol 19. Cooper Ornithological Society, Camarillo, pp 2–26Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rosenzweig ML (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    R Development Core Team (2010) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna. Version 2.12.1. ISBN 3-900051-12-7. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 9 March 2012
  38. 38.
    Legendre P, Vaudor A (1991) The R Package: Multidimensional analysis, spatial analysis. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Montréal, MontréalGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bivand R, Altman M, Anselin L et al. (2010) Package ‘spdep’, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 15 Nov 2010
  40. 40.
    Gardiner MA, Tuell JK, Isaacs R, Gibbs J, Ascher JS, Landis DA (2010) Implications of three model biofuel crops for beneficial arthropods in agricultural landscapes. Bioenergy Res 3:6–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Deppe JL, Rotenberry JT (2008) Scale-dependent habitat use by fall migratory birds: vegetation structure, floristics, and geography. Ecol Monogr 78:461–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hutto RL (1985) Seasonal changes in the habitat distribution of transient insectivorous birds in south eastern Arizona: competition mediated? Auk 102:120–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Moore FR, Kerlinger P, Simons TR (1990) Stopover on a Gulf coast barrier island by spring trans-Gulf migrants. Wilson Bull 102:487–500Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Champlin TB, Kilgo JC, Moorman CE (2009) Food abundance does not determine bird use of early-successional habitat. Ecology 90:1586–1594PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Blake JG (1984) A seasonal analysis of bird communities in southern Nevada. Southwest Nat 29:463–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Dinsmore JJ, Kent TH, Koenig D, Peterson PC, Roosa DM (1984) Iowa birds. Iowa State University Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Farley GH, Ellis LM, Stuart JN, Scorr NJ (1994) Avian species richness in different aged stands of riparian forest along the middle Rio Grande, New Mexico. Cons Biol 8:1098–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Petit DR (2000) Habitat use by landbirds along Neartic–Neotropical migration routes: implications for conservation of stopover habitats. Stud Avian Biol 20:15–33Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ribic CA, Sample DW (2001) Associations of grassland birds with landscape factors in southern Wisconsin. Am Midl Nat 146:105–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Moore FR, Yong W (1991) Evidence of food based competition among passerine migrants during stopover. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:85–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Cimprich DA, Woodrey MS, Moore FR (2005) Passerine migrants respond to variation in predation risk during stopover. Anim Behav 69:1173–1197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Bakker KK, Naugle DE, Higgins KF (2002) Incorporating landscape attributes into models for migratory grassland bird conservation. Cons Biol 16:1638–1646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Chartier AT, Ziarno J (2004) A birders guide to Michigan. American Birding Association, Colorado SpringsGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Berthold P, Terrill SB (1991) Recent advances in studies of bird migration. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 22:357–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Adler PR, Sanderson MA, Weimer PJ, Vogel KP (2009) Plant species composition and biofuel yields of conservation grasslands. Ecol Appl 19:2202–2209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Galle AM, Linz GM, Homan JH, Bleier WJ (2009) Avian use of harvested crop fields in North Dakota during spring. West N Am Nat 69:491–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Roth AM, Sample DW, Ribic CA, Paine L, Undersander DJ, Bartelt GA (2005) Grassland bird response to harvesting switchgrass as a biomass energy crop. Biomass Bioenergy 28:490–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    National Audubon Society (2007) Audubon watchlist. http://web1.audubon.org/science/species/watchlist. Accessed 7 Jan 2009

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce A. Robertson
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Douglas A. Landis
    • 3
  • T. Scott Sillett
    • 1
  • Elizabeth R. Loomis
    • 3
  • Robert A. Rice
    • 1
  1. 1.Migratory Bird CenterSmithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological ParkWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Division of Science Mathematics and ComputingBard CollegeAnnandale-on-HudsonUSA
  3. 3.DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research CenterMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations