Production of Electricity and Butanol from Microalgal Biomass in Microbial Fuel Cells
- 987 Downloads
Chlorella vulgaris (a freshwater microalga) and Dunaliella tertiolecta (a marine microalga) were grown for bulk harvest, and their biomass was tested as feedstock for electricity production in cubic two-chamber microbial fuel cells (MFCs) at 37°C. The anode inoculum was anaerobic consortium from a municipal sewage sludge digester, enriched separately for the two microalgal biomass feedstocks. After repeated subculturing of the two anaerobic enrichments, the maximum power density obtained in MFCs was higher from C. vulgaris (15.0 vs. 5.3 mW m−2) while power generation was more sustained from D. tertiolecta (13 vs. 9.8 J g-1 volatile solids). Anolytes of algal biomass-fed MFCs also contained substantial levels of butanol (8.7–16 mM with C. vulgaris and 2.5–7.0 mM with D. tertiolecta), which represents an additional form of utilizable energy. Carryover of salts from the marine D. tertiolecta biomass slurry resulted in gradual precipitation of Ca and Mg phosphates on the cathode side of the MFC. Polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis profiling and sequencing of bacterial communities demonstrated the presence of Wolinella succinogenes and Bacteroides and Synergistes spp. as well as numerous unknown bacteria in both enrichments. The D. tertiolecta enriched consortium contained also Geovibrio thiophilus and Desulfovibrio spp. Thus, the results indicate potential for combining fermentation and anaerobic respiration for bioenergy production from photosynthetic biomass.
KeywordsButanol Electricity Chlorella vulgaris Dunaliella tertiolecta Microalgal biomass Microbial fuel cell
We thank Christopher J. Hulatt and David N. Thomas, School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, for providing the algal biomass samples. This research was funded by the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation (Finland Distinguished Professor Programme, 402/06).
- 4.Fan LT, Gharpuray MM, Lee YH (1981) Evaluation and pretreatments for enzymatic conversion of agricultural residues. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp 11:29–45Google Scholar
- 21.Logan BE (2008) Microbial fuel cells. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
- 23.SFS (1988) SFS 5504: Determination of chemical oxygen demand (COD Cr) in water with the closed tube method. Oxidation with dichromate. Finnish Standards Association (SFS). Available from: (http://sales.sfs.fi/index.jsp?setLang=1).
- 25.Muyzer G, Hottenträger S, Teske A, Waver C (1996) Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified 16S rDNA—a new molecular approach to analyse the genetic diversity of mixed microbial communities. In: Akkermans ADL, van Elsas JD, de Bruijn F. (eds), Molecular microbial ecology manual. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 3.4.4/1–23.Google Scholar
- 34.Dias M, Salvado JC, Monperrus M, Caumette P, Amouroux D, Duran R et al (2008) Characterization of Desulfomicrobium salsuginis sp. nov. and Desulfomicrobium aestuarii sp. nov., two new sulfate-reducing bacteria isolated from the Adour estuary (French Atlantic coast) with specific mercury methylation potentials. Syst Appl Microbiol 31:30–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar