Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A critical analysis of Australia’s ban on the sale of electronic nicotine delivery systems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Neuroethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Australia does not allow adult smokers to buy or use electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) that contain nicotine without a prescription. This paper critically evaluates the empirical and ethical justifications provided for the policy by Federal and State governments, public health advocates and health organisations. These are: (1) that ENDS should only be approved as products for smoking cessation when there is evidence from randomised controlled trials that they are effective; (2) that as a matter of precaution we should not allow the sale of ENDS to smokers as consumer products because we do not know what their long-term effects will be; and (3) that allowing ENDS to be sold as consumer goods will enable the tobacco industry to market ENDS to young people which will also lead to an increase in youth smoking. We show that the arguments and evidence offered in support of all these claims is very weak. We also argue that even if the evidence were stronger, it would not justify denying adult smokers the right to use ENDS either to quit smoking or as a long-term alternative to smoking cigarettes. We outline ENDS policies that would more ethically address the public health concerns that motivated the current policy by allowing adult smokers to access ENDS for smoking cessation or tobacco harm reduction under tight regulations that discourage commercial promotion and adolescent use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Global Burden of Disease 2015 Tobacco Collaborators. 2017. Smoking prevalence and attributable disease burden in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2015: A systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The Lancet 389: 1885–1906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organisation. 2008. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic. Geneva. Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/tobacco/mpower/2008/en/. Accessed 7 Mar 2019.

  3. Royal College of Physicians. 2016. Nicotine without smoke: Tobacco harm reduction. Retrieved from: https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/outputs/nicotine-without-smoke-tobacco-harm-reduction-0. Accessed 7 Mar 2019.

  4. Russell, M.A.H. 1971. Cigarette smoking: Natural history of a dependence disorder. British Journal of Medical Psychology 44: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gray, N.J. 2014. Nicotine yesterday, today, and tomorrow: A global review. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 16: 128–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McNeill A., L. Brose, R. Calder, L. Bauld, and D. Robson. 2018. Evidence review of e-cigarette and heated tobacco products 2018: A report commissioned by Public Health England. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/e-cigarettes-and-heated-tobacco-products-evidence-review. Accessed 7 Mar 2019.

  7. West R., E. Beard, and J. Brown. 2016. Trends in electronic cigarette use in England. Retrieved from: http://www.smokinginengland.info/sts-documents/. Accessed 7 Mar 2019.

  8. Kavuluru, R., S. Han, and E.J. Hahn. 2019. On the popularity of the USB flash drive-shaped electronic cigarette Juul. Tobacco Control 28: 110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Aspire 2025. 2017. Research for a Smokefree Aotearoa. Achieving smokefree Aotearoa by 2025. https://aspire2025.org.nz/hot-topics/smokefree-action-plan/. Accessed 7 Mar 2019.

  10. Hall, W., and R. West. 2008. Thinking about the unthinkable: A de facto prohibition on smoked tobacco products. Addiction 103: 873–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hefler, M. 2018. The changing nicotine products landscape: Time to outlaw sales of combustible tobacco products? Tobacco Control 27 (1): 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. National Drugs and Poisons Scheduling Committee. 2017. Final decisions and reasons for decisions by delegates of the Secretary to the Department of Health: Therapeutic Goods Association, Australian Government Department of Health. Retrieved from: https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/scheduling-delegates-final-decisions-23-march-2017.pdf. Accessed 7 Mar 2019.

  13. Douglas, H., W. Hall, and C. Gartner. 2015. E-cigarettes and the law in Australia. Australian Family Physician 44: 415–418.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Irby R. 2017. Liquid nicotine 'poison' lands man in court: NewsMail. Retrieved from: https://www.news-mail.com.au/news/liquid-nicotine-an-honest-mistake/3220549/. Accessed 7 Mar 2019.

  15. Australian Government Department of Health. 2018. Principles that underpin the current policy and regulatory approach to electronic cigarettes (E-cigarettes) in Australia. Retrieved from: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/principles-underpin-current-policy-regulatory-approach-electroniccigarettes-eeCigarettes-australia. Accessed 7 Mar 2019.

  16. Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Byrne S., E. Brindal, G. Williams, K. Anastasiou, A. Tonkin et al. 2018. E-cigarettes, smoking and health: A literature review update, Australia: Commonwewalth Science and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO). Retrieved from: https://www.csiro.au/en/Research/BF/Areas/Nutrition-and-health/E-cigarettes-report. Accessed 7 Mar 2019.

  18. U.S. National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. 2018. Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24952/public-health-consequences-of-e-cigarettes.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brose, L.S., J. Brown, S.C. Hitchman, and A. McNeill. 2015. Perceived relative harm of electronic cigarettes over time and impact on subsequent use. A survey with 1-year and 2-year follow-ups. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 157: 106–111.

  20. Huerta, T.R., D.M. Walker, D. Mullen, T.J. Johnson, and E.W. Ford. 2017. Trends in e-cigarette awareness and perceived harmfulness in the U.S. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 52: 339–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. PA Department of Health. 2019, 21 January. E-cigarettes, e-cigs, e-hookahs, mods, vape pens or vapes—whatever you call them, they are NOT safer than other tobacco products. Learn how you can help protect you child's health by talking about the dangers of vaping [Twitter Post]. Retrieved from: https://twitter.com/PAHealthDept/status/1087424595211083776. Accessed 7 Mar 2019.

  22. Glantz S. 2018, 27 December. Using e-cigs increases exposure to toxic chemicals for most users; they would be better off just smoking [Twitter Post]. Retrieved from: https://twitter.com/ProfGlantz/status/1078439444644917248. Accessed 7 Mar 2019.

  23. Wolfenden, L., E. Stockings, and S.L. Yoong. 2017. Regulating e-cigarettes in Australia: Implications for tobacco use by young people. Medical Journal of Australia 208 (1): 80-89.

  24. Soneji, S., J.L. Barrington-Trimis, T.A. Wills, et al. 2017. Association between initial use of e-cigarettes and subsequent cigarette smoking among adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics 171: 788–797.

  25. Leventhal, A.M., D.R. Strong, M.G. Kirkpatrick, et al. 2015. Association of electronic cigarette use with initiation of combustible tobacco product smoking in early adolescence. JAMA 314: 700–707.

  26. Gartner C. E.,and W. Hall. 2017. Submission to the Standing Committee on Health, Aged Care and Sport: Inquiry into the use and marketing of electronic cigarettes and personal vaporisers in Australia (Submission 282).

  27. Kozlowski, L.T., and K.E. Warner. 2017. Adolescents and e-cigarettes: Objects of concern may appear larger than they are. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 174: 209–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gartner, C. 2018. How can we protect youth from putative vaping gateway effects without denying smokers a less harmful option? Addiction. 113: 1784–1785. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Banks, E., G. Joshy, M.F. Weber, B. Liu, R. Grenfell, et al. 2015. Tobacco smoking and all-cause mortality in a large Australian cohort study: Findings from a mature epidemic with current low smoking prevalence. BMC Medicine 13: 281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chapman S., M. Daube, D. Bareham, and M. Peters. 2017. Submission to the Standing Committee on Health, Aged Care and Sport on Electronic Cigarettes and Vapourisers (Submission No. 0313).

  31. Morphett K., M. Weier, R. Borland, H.-H. Yong, and C. E. Gartner. 2019. Barriers and facilitators to switching from smoking to vaping: Advice from vapers, Drug and Alcohol Review https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.12907.

  32. Russell, C., T. Dickson, and N. Mckeganey. 2017. Advice from former-smoking e-cigarette users to current smokers on how to use e-cigarettes as part of an attempt to quit smoking. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 20: 977–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hajek, P., A. Phillips-Waller, D. Przulj, F. Pesola, K. Myers Smith, et al. 2019. A randomized trial of e-cigarettes versus nicotine-replacement therapy. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1808779.

  34. Fagerström, K.O., and E.-B. Schildt. 2003. Should the European Union lift the ban on snus? Evidence from the Swedish experience. Addiction 98: 1191–1195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rodu, B., and P. Cole. 2004. The burden of mortality from smoking: Comparing Sweden with other countries in the European Union. European Journal of Epidemiology 19: 129–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rodu, B., and P. Cole. 2009. Lung cancer mortality: Comparing Sweden with other countries in the European Union. Scandanavian Journal of Public Health 37: 481–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gartner, C.E., and W.D. Hall. 2009. Smokeless tobacco use in Australia. Drug and Alcohol Review 28: 284–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sandee L. 2019. UK study shows e-cigarettes help adult smokers quit, but US experts urge caution. CNN. Retrieved from: https://edition.cnn.com/2019/01/30/health/e-cigarette-adult-smoking-cessation-study/index.html. Accessed 7 Mar 2019.

  39. Chapman, S., and R. Mackenzie. 2010. The global research neglect of unassisted smoking cessation: Causes and consequences. PLoS Medicine 7: e1000216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Brown, J., E. Beard, D. Kotz, S. Michie, and R. West. 2014. Real-world effectiveness of e-cigarettes when used to aid smoking cessation: A cross-sectional population study. Addiction 109: 1531–1540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang, C., N. Henley, and R.J. Donovan. 2004. Exploring children's conceptions of smoking addiction. Health Education Research 19: 626–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. West R., P. Hajek, A. Mcneill, J. Brown, and D. Arnott. 2015. Electronic cigarettes: What we know so far. A report to UK All Party Parliamentary Groups. Retrieved from: www.smokinginengland.info/reports/. Accessed 7 Mar 2019.

  43. Zhu, S.-H., Y.-L. Zhuang, S. Wong, S.E. Cummins, and G.J. Tedeschi. 2017. E-cigarette use and associated changes in population smoking cessation: Evidence from US current population surveys. BMJ 358: j3262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Becky, F., C. Simon, and R. Matthew. 2008. The case for the plain packaging of tobacco products. Addiction 103: 580–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Mckee, M., M. Daube, and S. Chapman. 2016. E-cigarettes should be regulated. Medical Journal of Australia 204: 331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Chapman, S. 2014. E-cigarettes: Does the new emperor of tobacco harm reduction have any clothes? European Journal of Public Health 24: 535–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. National Health and Medical Research Council. 2017. NHMRC CEO Statement: Electronic Cigarettes (E-cigarettes). Retrieved from: https://nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/ceo-statement-electronic-cigarettes. Accessed 7 Mar 2019.

  48. Public hearing into the Parliamentary Inquiry into the Use and Marketing of Electronic Cigarettes and Personal Vaporisers in Australia, 5 October 2017.: Standing Committee on Health, Aged Care and Sport; 2017.

  49. White, V.M., C.D. Warne, M.J. Spittal, S. Durkin, K. Purcell, and M.A. Wakefield. 2011. What impact have tobacco control policies, cigarette price and tobacco control programme funding had on Australian adolescents' smoking? Findings over a 15-year period. Addiction 106: 1493–1502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was funded a Wellcome Trust grant titled “E-cigarettes: history, evidence and policy.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Centre for Youth Substance Abuse Research, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia

    Wayne Hall

  2. National Addiction Centre, Kings College London, London, UK

    Wayne Hall

  3. Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia

    Kylie Morphett & Coral Gartner

  4. Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Queensland Alliance for Environmental Health Sciences, Woolloongabba, Australia

    Coral Gartner

Authors
  1. Wayne Hall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kylie Morphett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Coral Gartner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kylie Morphett.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hall, W., Morphett, K. & Gartner, C. A critical analysis of Australia’s ban on the sale of electronic nicotine delivery systems. Neuroethics 14 (Suppl 3), 323–331 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-019-09402-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-019-09402-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation