Advertisement

Neuroethics

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 55–64 | Cite as

Traumatic Brain Injury, Neuroscience, and the Legal System

  • Valerie Gray HardcastleEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

This essay addresses the question: What is the probative value of including neuroscience data in court cases where the defendant might have had a traumatic brain injury (TBI)? That is, this essay attempts to articulate how well we can connect scientific data and clinical test results to the demands of the Daubert standard in the United States’ court system, and, given the fact that neuroimaging is already being used in our courts, what, if anything, we should do about this fact. Ultimately, I am not sure that there are completely satisfactory answers to this query at this particular time in our legal history. I briefly rehearse the recent use of brain research in our legal system, summarize how neuroscience data regarding TBI and its relation to poor behavioral outcomes are currently used in the courtroom, review challenges with using these data, and highlight fundamental tensions between how the legal system views the causes of behavior and how medicine, neuroscience, and psychology do. Until these tensions are resolved, it is unclear the place neuroscience data should have in courts.

Keywords

TBI Neuroimaging PET Legal system Daubert standard Veterans 

References

  1. 1.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2013. Retrieved April 22, 2013, from www.CDC.gov/TraumaticBrainInjury/index.html.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2010. Ten leading causes of death and injury. Retrieved July 18, 2013, from http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/leadingcauses.html.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tagliaferri, F., C. Compagnone, M. Korsic, F. Servadei, and J. Kraus. 2006. A systematic review of brain injury epidemiology in Europe. Acta Neurochirugica 148: 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Decuypere, M., and P. Klimo Jr. 2012. Spectrum of traumatic brain injury from mild to severe. Surgical Clinics of North America 92: 939–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lux, W.E. 2007. The neurocognitive basis of compromised autonomy after traumatic brain injury: clinical and ethical considerations. Neurotherapeutics 4: 525–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roozenbeek, B., A.I. Maas, and D.K. Menon. 2013. Changing patterns in the epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. Nature Reviews Neurology 9: 231–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Committee of the Head Injury Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. 1993. Definition of mind traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 8: 86–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carroll, L.J., J.D. Cassidy, L. Holm, J. Kraus, and V.J. Coronado. 2004. Methodological issues and research recommendations for mild traumatic brain injury: the who collaborating centre task force on mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitative Medicine 43: 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Menon, D.K., K. Schwab, D.W. Wright, and A.I. Maas. 2010. Position statement: definition of traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 91: 1637–1640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2011. Nonfatal traumatic brain injuries related to sports and recreation activities among persons aged < 19 years – United States, 2001-1009. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 60: 1337–1342.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jordan, B.D. 2013. The clinical spectrum of sport-related traumatic brain injury. Nature Reviews Neurology 9: 222–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schneiderman, A.I., E.R. Braver, and H.K. Kang. 2008. Understanding sequelae of injury mechanisms and mild traumatic brain injury incurred during the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan: persistent postconcussive symptoms and posttraumatic stress disorder. American Journal of Epidemiology 167: 1446–1452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center. 2013. DOD worldwide numbers for TBI. DOD Office of Responsibility. http://dvbic.dcoe.mil/dod-worldwide-numbers-tbi. Accessed on 26 February 2014.
  14. 14.
    Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. 2012. Treatment for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Military and Veteran Populations: Initial Assessment. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Logan, B.W., R.T. Goldman, M. Zola, and A. Mackey. 2013. Concussive brain injury in the military: September 2001 to the present. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 31: 803–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Polusny, M.A., S.M. Kehle, N.W. Nelson, C.R. Erbes, P.A. Arbisi, and P. Thuras. 2011. Longitudinal effects of mild TBI and PTSD comorbidity on post-deployment outcomes in national guard soldiers deployed to Iraq. Archives of General Psychiatry 68: 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vanderploeg, R.D., H.G. Belanger, R.D. Horner, A.M. Spehar, G. Powell-Cope, S.L. Luther, and S.G. Scott. 2012. Health outcomes associated with military deployment: mild traumatic brain injury, blast, trauma, and combat associations in the Florida National Guard. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 93: 1887–1895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tanielian, T.E., and L.H. Jaycox (eds.). 2008. Invisible Wounds of War: Psychological and Cognitive Injuries, Their Consequences and Services to Assist Recovery. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Department of Defense. 2014. Traumatic Brain Injury: Department of Defense Special Report. http://www.defense.gov/home/features/2012/0312_tbi/. Accessed on 26 February 2014.
  20. 20.
    Okie, S. 2005. Traumatic brain injury in the war zone. New England of Journal of Medicine 352: 2043–2047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Warden, D. 2006. Military TBI during the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 21: 398–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sayer, N.A., C.E. Chiros, B. Sigford, S. Scott, B. Clothier, T. Pickett, and H.L. Lew. 2008. Characteristics and rehabilitation outcomes among patients with blast and other injuries sustained during the Global War on Terror. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 89: 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sahler, C.S., and Greenwald, B.D. 2012. Traumatic brain injury in sports: A review. Rehabilitation Research and Practice 2012: Article ID 659652. doi:10.1155/2012/659652Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dijkers, M.P., C. Harrison-Felix, and J.H. Marwitz. 2011. The traumatic brain injury model systems: history and contributions to clinical service and research. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 25: 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Office of the Surgeon General, U. A. (2013). TBI Talking Points 2013. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lamberty, G. J., Nakase-Richardson, R., Farrell-Carnahan, L. V., McGarity, S., Bidelspach, D., Harrison- Felix, C., and Cifu, D. X. 2013a. Development of a TBI Model System within the VA Polytrauma System of Care. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e31829a64d1.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lamberty, G.L., N.W. Nelson, and T. Yamada. 2013. Effects and outcomes in civilian and military traumatic brain injury: similarities, differences, and forensic implications. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 31: 814–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Silver, J.M., T.W. McAllister, and S.C. Yudofsky. 2011. Textbook of traumatic brain injury, 2nd ed. New York: American Psychiatric Publishing Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Silver, J.M., R. Kramer, S. Greenwald, and M. Weissman. 2001. The association between head injuries and psychiatric disorders: findings from the new haven NIMH epidemiologic catchment area study. Brain Injury 15: 935–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Center for Disease Control and Prevention. 2013. Traumatic brain injury in prisons and jails: An unrecognized problem. http://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/pdf/prisoner_TBI_Prof-a.pdf. Retrieved on 28 February, 2014.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Timonen, M., J. Miettunen, H. Hakko, J. Veijola, L. von Wendt, and P. Räsänen. 2002. The association of preceding traumatic brain injury with mental disorders, alcoholism, and criminality: the Northern Finland 1966 Birth cohort study. Psychiatric Research 113: 217–226. s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Luukkainen, S., K. Riala, M. Laukkanen, H. Hakko, and P. Räsänen. 2012. The association of traumatic brain injury with criminality in adolescent psychiatric inpatients in Northern Finland. Psychiatric Research 200: 767–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Slaughter, B., J.R. Fann, and D. Ehde. 2003. Traumatic brain injury in a county jail population: Prevalence, neuropsychological functioning, and psychiatric disorders. Brain Injury 17: 731–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ommaya, A.K., A.M. Salazar, A.L. Dannenberg, A.K. Ommaya, A.B.. Chervinsky, and K. Schwab. 1996. Outcome after traumatic brain injury in the U.S. military medical system. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care 41: 972–975.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Grafman, J., K. Schwab, D. Warden, et al. 1996. Frontal lobe injuries, violence, and aggression: a report of the Vietnam head injury study. Neurology 46: 1231–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Crooks, C.Y., J.M. Zumsteg, and K.R. Bell. 2007. Traumatic brain injury: a review of practice management and recent advances. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America 18: 681–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hoge, C.W., D. McGurk, J.L. Thomas, A.L. Cox, C.C. Engel, and C.A. Castro. 2008. Mild traumatic brain injury in US soldiers returning from Iraq. The New England Journal of Medicine 358: 453–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lew, H.L., J.D. Otis, C. Tun, R.D. Kerns, M.E. Clark, and D.X. Cifu. 2009. Prevalence of chronic pain, posttraumatic stress disorder, and persistent postconcussive symptoms in OIF/OEF veterans: polytrauma clinical trial. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 46: 697–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Winnans v. N.Y. & Erie Railroad Co., 62 U.S. 88 (U.S. 1859).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    People v. Hawthorne, 291 N.W. 205, 208 (Mich. 1940).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jenkins v. United States, 307 F.2d 637 (D.C. Cir. 1962).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Simmons v. State, 105 So.3d 475 (Fla. 2012).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kaufmann, P.M., and M.F. Greiffenstein. 2013. Forensic neuropsychology: training, scope of practice, and quality control. National Academy of Neuropsychology Bulletin 27: 11–15.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Larrabee, G. (ed.). 2012. Forensic Neuropsychology: A Scientific Approach, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    State v. Kuehn, 728 N.W.2d 589 (Neb. 2007).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1993. 509 U.S. 579.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Morse, S. J. 2012. Neuroimaging evidence in law: a plea for modesty and relevance. In: J. R. Simpson (Ed.), Neuroimaging in forensic psychiatry: From the clinic to the courtroom (pp. 341–358). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Moriarty, J.C. 2008. Flickering neuroadmissibility: neuroimaging evidence in U.S. Courts. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 26: 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Davis, P.C., Wippold, F.J. II, Cornelius, R.S., Aiken, A.H., Angtuaco, E.J., Berger, K.L., Broderick, D.F., Brown, D.C., Douglas, A.C., McConnell, C.T. Jr, Mechtler, L.L., Prall, J.A., Raksin, P.B., Roth, C.J., Seidenwurm, D.J., Smirniotopoulos, J.G., Waxman, A.D., and Coley, B.D. 2012. Expert panel on neurologic imaging. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® head trauma. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology (ACR). http://www.guideline.gov/content.aspx?id = 37919.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Frye v. United States, 1923 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir.)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Allen v. Bloomfield Hills School District, 760 N.W.2d 811 (Mich. App. 2008), appeal dismissed, 779 N. W.2d 793 (Mich. 2010).Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Forrest v. Steele, 2012 WL 1668358 (W.D. Mo May 11, 2012)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Blume, J. H. and Johnson, S. L. 1999. The Fourth Circuit’s “double-edged sword”: Eviscerating the right to present mitigating evidence and beheading the right to the assistance of counsel. Cornell Law Faculty Publications. Paper 235. Retrieved July 18, 2013, from http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/235.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Evans v. Secretary, DOC (2012), 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 296.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Sexton v. State, 997 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 2008).Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Nong Le v. Barnes, 2012 WL 6147895 (C.D. Cal. 2012), report and recommendation adopted, Nong Le v. Barnes, 2012 WL 6178433 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2012).Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    State v. Stanko, 741 S.E.2d 708 (S.C., 2013) rehearing denied (Apr. 3, 2013), Petition for Certiorari filed July 2, 2013.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Greiffenstein, M.F., and M.W. Baker. 2001. Comparison of premorbid and post-injury MMPI-2 profiles in late postconcussion claimants. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 15: 162–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Fann, J.R., W.J. Katon, J.M. Uomoto, and P.C. Esselman. 1995. Psychiatric disorders and functional disability in outpatients with traumatic brain injuries. The American Journal of Psychiatry 152: 1493–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Fenton, G., R. McClelland, A. Montgomery, G. MacFlynn, and W. Rutherford. 1993. The postconcussional syndrome: social antecedents and psychological sequelae. British Journal of Psychiatry 162: 493–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Evered, L., R. Ruff, J. Baldo, and A. Isomura. 2003. Emotional risk factors and postconcussional disorder. Assessment 10: 420–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Hibbard, M.R., J. Bogdany, S. Uysal, K. Kepler, J.M. Silver, W.A. Gordon, and L. Haddad. 2000. Axis II psychopathology in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 14: 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Nelson, N.W., J.B. Hoelzle, B.M. Doane, K.A. McGuire, A.G. Ferrier-Auerbach, M.J. Charlesworth, G.J. Lamberty, M.A. Polusny, P.A. Arbisi, and S.R. Sponheim. 2012. Neuropsychological outcomes of U.S. veterans with report of remote blast concussion and current psychopathology. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 18: 845–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Zhang, J., E. Mitsis, K. Chu, R. Newmark, E. Hazlett, and M. Buchsbaum. 2010. Statistical parametric mapping and cluster counting analysis of [18F] FDG-PET imaging in traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurotrauma 27: 35–49. doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    White, L., H. Petrovitch, J. Hardman, J. Nelson, D.G. Davis, W.G. Ross, L. Launer, and W.R. Markesbery. 2002. Cerebrovascular pathology and dementia in autopsied Honolulu-Asia aging study participants. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 977: 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Nugent, K.M. 2012. Practical legal concerns. In Neuroimaging in forensic psychiatry: from the clinic to the courtroom, ed. J.R. Simpson, 255–274. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Federal Rules of Evidence 403.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Langleben, D., and J. Moriarty. 2013. Using brain imaging for lie detection: where science, law, and policy collide. Psychology, Public Policy and the Law 19: 222–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Schweitzer, N.J., and M. Saks. 2011. Neuroimages and the insanity defense. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 29: 592–607. doi: 10.1002/bsl.995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Schweitzer, N.J., M. Saks, E. Murphy, A. Roskies, W. Sinnott-Armstrong, and L. Gaudet. 2011. Neuroimages as evidence in a mens rea defense: no impact. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 17: 357–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Sinnott-Armstrong, W., A. Roskies, T. Brown, and E. Murphy. 2008. Brain images as legal evidence. Episteme 5: 359–373. doi: 10.3366/E1742360008000452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Greely, H., and A. Wagner. 2011. reference guide on neuroscience. reference manual on scientific evidence, 3rd ed. Washington D.C.: National Academics Press.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    General Electric Co. v. Joiner. 1997. 522 U.S. 136.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Buller, T. 2006. Brains, lies, and psychological explanations. In Neuroethics: defining the issues in theory, practice, and policy, ed. J. Illes, 51–60. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Farah, M.J. 2005. Neuroethics: the practical and the philosophical. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Gazzaniga, M.S. 2006. Facts, fictions, and the future of neuroethics. In Neuroethics: defining the issues in theory, practice, and policy, ed. J. Illes, 141–148. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Gazzaniga, M.S., and M.S. Steven. 2005. Neuroscience and the law. Scientific American Mind 16: 42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Greene, J., and J. Cohen. 2004. For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 359: 1775–1785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Jedlička, P. 2005. Neuroethics, reductionism, and dualism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Schaffner, K.F. 2002. Neuroethics: reductionism, emergence, and decision-making capabilities. In Neuroethics: Mapping the Field, ed. S. Marcus, 27–33. New York: The Dana Foundation.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Thompson, S.K. 2007. A brave new world of interrogation jurisprudence? American Journal of Law and Medicine 33: 341–357.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Canli, T., and Z. Amin. 2002. Neuroimaging of emotion and personality: scientific evidence and ethical considerations. Brain and Cognition 50: 414–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Illes, J., M.P. Kirschen, and J.D.E. Gabrilei. 2003. From neuroimaging to neuroethics. Nature Neuroscience 6: 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Denno, D.W. 2002. Crime and consciousness: science and involuntary acts. Minnesota Law Review 87: 269–399.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    First, M., K. Botteron, C. Carter, F.X. Castellanoes, D.P. Dickstein, W. Drevets, K.L. Kim, M.F. Pescosolido, S. Rausch, K.E. Seymour, Y. Sheline, and J.-K. Zubieta. 2012. Consensus report of the APA work group on neuroimaging markers of psychiatric disorders. American Psychiatric: Association.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Meltzer, C., Sze, G., Rommelfanger, K., Kinlaw, K., Banja, J. and Wolpe, P. 2013. Guidelines for the ethical use of NeuroImages in medical testimony: Report of a multi-disciplinary consensus conference. American Journal of Neuroradiology http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3174/anjr.A3711, 1–6.
  88. 88.
    Frazzetto, G., and S. Anker. 2009. Neuroculture. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 10: 815–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Satel, S., and S.L. Lilienfeld. 2013. Brainwashed: the seductive appeal of mindless neuroscience. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Thorton, D.J. 2011. Brain culture: neuroscience and popular media. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Hardcastle, V.G. in submission. Daubert, folk psychology, and the challenge of false confessions. Journal of Philosophy, Science, and Law.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael (1999). 119 S. Ct. 1167.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Canavan (2000) 733 N.E. 2d.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Professor of Philosophy, Psychology, and Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, Scholar-in-Residence, Weaver Institute for Law and PsychiatryUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations