, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 141–153 | Cite as

‘The Thorny and Arduous Path of Moral Progress’: Moral Psychology and Moral Enhancement

Original Paper


The moral enhancement of humans by biological or genetic means has recently been urged as a response to the pressing concerns facing human civilization. In this paper, I argue that proponents of biological moral enhancement have misrepresented the facts of human moral psychology. As a result, the likely effectiveness of traditional methods of moral enhancement has been underestimated, relative to biological or genetic means. I review arguments in favor of biological moral enhancement and argue that the complexity of moral psychology raises serious problems for such interventions. I offer a programmatic sketch of the ways in which our improved understanding of moral psychology can help facilitate more traditional methods of moral enhancement. I conclude that the best response to the dangers faced by human civilization is the continued use of traditional methods of moral enhancement and the use of our improved understanding of moral psychology to further refine and develop these methods.


Moral enhancement Moral psychology Enhancement Moral development Ecological engineering 


  1. 1.
    Haldane, J.B.S. 1924. Daedalus or science and the future. Trench: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Persson, I., and J. Savulescu. 2008. The perils of cognitive enhancement and the urgent imperative to enhance the moral character of humanity. Journal of Applied Philosophy 25: 162–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Persson, I., and J. Savulescu. 2010. Moral transhumanism. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35: 656–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Persson, I., and J. Savulescu. 2011. Getting moral enhancement right: The desireability of moral bioenhancement. Bioethics, vol. Early View.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Persson, I., and J. Savulescu. 2011. Unfit for the future? Human nature, scientific progress, and the need for moral enhancement. In Enhancing human capacities, ed. J. Savulescu, R. Meulen, and G. Kahane, 486–500. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Douglas, T. 2008. Moral enhancement. Journal of Applied Philosophy 25: 228–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Russell, B. 1924. Icarus: Or, the future of science. New York: E.P. Dutton & Company.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Appiah, K.A. 2010. The honor code: How moral revolutions happen. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cosmides, L., and J. Tooby. 1997. Evolutionary psychology: A primer. [Online]. Available: [Accessed: 04-May-2012].
  10. 10.
    Sterelny, K. 2003. Thought in a hostile world: The evolution of human cognition. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sterelny, K. 2012. The evolved apprentice: How evolution made humans unique. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schnall, S., J. Haidt, G.L. Clore, and A. Jordan. 2008. Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34: 1096–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rozin, P., L. Lowery, S. Imada, and J. Haidt. 1999. The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76: 574–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kochanska, G., N. Aksan, and M.E. Joy. 2007. Children’s fearfulness as a moderator of parenting in early socialization: Two longitudinal studies. Developmental Psychology 43: 222–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Greene, J.D. 2009. The cognitive neuroscience of moral judgment. In The cognitive neurosciences, 4th ed, ed. M.S. Gazzaniga. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Blair, R.J., D.G.V. Mitchell, and K.S. Blair. 2005. The psychopath: Emotion and the brain. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Glimcher, P.W., C. Camerer, R.A. Poldrack, and E. Fehr. 2009. Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Prinz, J.J. 2007. The emotional construction of morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Douglas, T. 2011. Moral enhancement via direct emotion modulation: A reply to John Harris. Bioethics.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harris, J. 2011. Moral enhancement and freedom. Bioethics 25: 102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Caspi, A., J. McClay, T.E. Moffitt, J. Mill, J. Martin, I.W. Craig, A. Taylor, and R. Poulton. 2002. Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science 297: 851–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tabery, J. 2009. Interactive predispositions. Philosophy of Science 76: 876–888.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tabery, J. 2009. From a genetic predisposition to an interactive predisposition: Rethinking the ethical implications of screening for gene-environment interactions. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34: 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bostrom, N., and A. Sandberg. 2010. The wisdom of nature: An evolutionary heuristic for human enhancement. In Human enhancement, 375–416. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Coors, M.E., and L. Hunter. 2005. Evaluation of genetic enhancement: Will human wisdom properly acknowledge the value of evolution? The American Journal of Bioethics 5: 21–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Henrich, J., R. Boyd, S. Bowles, C. Camerer, E. Fehr, H. Gintis, and R. McElreath. 2001. In search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. The American Economic Review 91: 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gintis, H., S. Bowles, R. Boyd, and E. Fehr. 2003. Explaining altruistic behavior in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior 24: 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wallace, B., D. Cesarini, P. Lichtenstein, and M. Johannesson. 2007. Heritability of ultimatum game responder behavior. PNAS 104: 15631–15634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Block, N. 1995. How heritability misleads about race. Cognition 56: 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Henrich, J., R. Boyd, S. Bowles, C. Camerer, E. Fehr, and H. Gintis (eds.). 2004. Foundations of human sociality: Economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Boureau, Y.-L., and P. Dayan. 2011. Opponency revisited: Competition and cooperation between dopamine and serotonin. Neuropsychopharmacology 36: 74–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dayan, P., and Q.J.M. Huys. 2009. Serotonin in affective control. Annual Review of Neuroscience 32: 95–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Haller, J., E. Mikics, J. Halász, and M. Tóth. 2005. Mechanisms differentiating normal from abnormal aggression: Glucocorticoids and serotonin. European Journal of Pharmacology 526: 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Crockett, M.J., L. Clark, M.D. Hauser, and T.W. Robbins. 2010. Serotonin selectively influences moral judgment and behavior through effects on harm aversion. PNAS 107: 17433–17438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schultz, W., P. Dayan, and P.R. Montague. 1997. A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science 275: 1593–1599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Balleine, B.W., N.D. Daw, and J.P. O’Doherty. 2009. Multiple forms of value learning and the functions of dopamine. In Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain, ed. P.W. Glimcher, C. Camerer, R.A. Poldrack, and E. Fehr, 367–387. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Frank, M.J., L.C. Seeberger, and R.C. O’Reilly. 2004. By carrot or by stick: Cognitive reinforcement learning in Parkinsonism. Science 306: 1940–1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shohamy, D., C.E. Myers, J. Kalanithi, and M.A. Gluck. 2008. Basal ganglia and dopamine contributions to probabilistic category learning. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 32: 219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Poldrack, R.A., and K. Foerde. 2008. Category learning and the memory systems debate. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 32: 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kiff, C., L. Lengua, and M. Zalewski. 2011. Nature and nurturing: Parenting in the context of child temperament. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 14: 251–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Caldwell, M.F., D.J. McCormick, D. Umstead, and G.J. Van Rybroek. 2007. Evidence of treatment progress and therapeutic outcomes among adolescents with psychopathic features. Criminal Justice and Behavior 34: 573–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Skeem, J.L., D.L.L. Polaschek, C.J. Patrick, and S.O. Lilienfeld. 2011. Psychopathic personality bridging the gap between scientific evidence and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 12: 95–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rozin, P., M. Markwith, and C. Stoess. 1997. Moralization and becoming a vegetarian: The transformation of preferences into values and the recruitment of disgust. Psychological Science 8: 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fessler, D.M.T., A.P. Arguello, J.M. Mekdara, and R. Macias. 2003. Disgust sensitivity and meat consumption: A test of an emotivist account of moral vegetarianism. Appetite 41: 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hare, T.A., C. Camerer, and A. Rangel. 2009. Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system. Science 324: 646–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Stanovich, K.E. 2009. What intelligence tests miss: The psychology of rational thought. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gigerenzer, G., and U. Hoffrage. 1995. How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review 102: 684–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bishop, M., and J.D. Trout. 2005. Epistemology and the psychology of human judgment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Casey, B.J., L.H. Somerville, I.H. Gotlib, O. Ayduk, N.T. Franklin, M.K. Askren, J. Jonides, M.G. Berman, N.L. Wilson, T. Teslovich, G. Glover, V. Zayas, W. Mischel, and Y. Shoda. 2011. Behavioral and neural correlates of delay of gratification 40 years later. PNAS 108: 14998–15003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Duckworth, A.L., H. Grant, B. Loew, G. Oettingen, and P.M. Gollwitzer. 2010. Self–regulation strategies improve self–discipline in adolescents: Benefits of mental contrasting and implementation intentions. Educational Psychology 31: 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gawrilow, C., K. Morgenroth, R. Schultz, G. Oettingen, and P. Gollwitzer. Mental contrasting with implementation intentions enhances self-regulation of goal pursuit in schoolchildren at risk for ADHD. Motivation and Emotion, pp. 1–12, in press.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gollwitzer, P.M., and G. Oettingen. 2012. Goal pursuit. In The Oxford handbook of human motivation, ed. R.M. Ryan, 208–231. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gailliot, M., R.F. Baumeister, C.N. DeWall, J.K. Maner, E.A. Plant, D.M. Tice, L.E. Brewer, and B.J. Schmeichel. 2007. Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92: 325–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Muraven, M., R.F. Baumeister, and D.M. Tice. 1999. Longitudinal improvement of self-regulation through practice: Building self-control strength through repeated exercise. Journal of Social Psychology 139: 446–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Baumeister, R.F., M. Gailliot, C.N. DeWall, and M. Oaten. 2006. Self-regulation and personality: How interventions increase regulatory success, and how depletion moderates the effects of traits on behavior. Journal of Personality 74: 1773–1801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Doris, J.M. 2002. Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Clark, A. 2008. Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Levy, N.. Ecological engineering: Reshaping our environments to achieve our goals. Philosophy & Technology, pp. 1–16, in press.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Thaler, R.H., and C.R. Sunstein. 2008. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Trout, J.D. 2009. The empathy gap: Building bridges to the good life and the good society. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Posner, R.A. 2004. Catastrophe: Risk and response. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Yepsen, R. 2007. Encouraging sustainable recycling behavior through financial incentives. BioCycle 48: 34–37.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Abrahamse, W., L. Steg, C. Vlek, and T. Rothengatter. 2005. A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology 25: 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Blais, P. 2010. Perverse cities: Hidden subsidies, wonky policy, and urban sprawl. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Zarpentine, Chris. 2011. The Fragmentation of Moral Psychology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Florida.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations