, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 135–143 | Cite as

Neuroethics, Neuroeducation, and Classroom Teaching: Where the Brain Sciences Meet Pedagogy

  • Mariale Hardiman
  • Luke Rinne
  • Emma Gregory
  • Julia Yarmolinskaya
Original Paper


The popularization of neuroscientific ideas about learning—sometimes legitimate, sometimes merely commercial—poses a real challenge for classroom teachers who want to understand how children learn. Until teacher preparation programs are reconceived to incorporate relevant research from the neuro- and cognitive sciences, teachers need translation and guidance to effectively use information about the brain and cognition. Absent such guidance, teachers, schools, and school districts may waste time and money pursuing so called “brain-based” interventions that lack a firm basis in research. Meanwhile, the success of our schools will continue to be narrowly defined by achievement standards that ignore knowledge of the neural and cognitive processes of learning. To achieve the goals of neuroeducation, its proponents must address unique ethical issues that neuroeducation raises for five different groups of individuals: a) practicing teachers, b) neuroscience researchers whose work could inform education, c) publishers and the popular media, d) educational policy-makers, and e) university-level teacher educators. We suggest ways in which these ethical challenges can be met and provide a model for teacher preparation that will enable teachers themselves to translate findings from the neuro-and cognitive sciences and use legitimate research to inform how they design and deliver effective instruction.


Educational neuroethics Neuroeducation Pedagogy Classroom instruction 


  1. 1.
    Roskies, A. 2002. Neuroethics for the new millenium. Neuron 35(1): 21–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Racine, E. 2010. Pragmatic neuroethics: Improving treatment and understanding of the mind-brain. Cambridge: The MIT.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fischer, K.W., U. Goswami, J. Geake, and Task Force on the Future of Educational Neuroscience. 2010. The Future of Educational Neuroscience. Mind, Brain, and Education 4: 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruer, J. 1997. Education and the brain: A bridge too far. Educational Researcher 26: 4–16.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diamond, A., and D. Amso. 2008. Contributions of neuroscience to our understanding of cognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science 17(2):136–141.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Raizada, R.D.S., and M.M. Kishiyama. 2010. Effects of socioeconomic status on brain development, and how cognitive neuroscience may contribute to leveling the playing field. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 4. Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Posner, M.I., and M.K. Rothbart. 2007. Educating the human brain. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Szücs, D., and U. Goswami. 2007. Educational neuroscience: Defining a new discipline for the study of mental representations. Mind, Brain, and Education 1: 114–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Immordino-Yang, M.H., and A. Damasio. 2007. We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education 1: 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rao, H., L. Betancourt, J.M. Giannetta, N.L. Brodsky, M. Korczykowski, B.B. Avants, and M.J. Farah. 2010. Early parental care is important for hippocampal maturation: Evidence from brain morphology in humans. NeuroImage 49(1): 1144–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shaw, P., K. Eckstrand, W. Sharp, J. Blumenthal, J.P. Lerch, D. Greenstein, L. Clasen, A. Evans, J. Giedd, and J.L. Rapoport. 2007. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is characterized by a delay in cortical maturation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 19649–19654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Willingham, D.T. 2006. “Brain-based” learning: More fiction than fact. American Educator, Fall 30–37.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    De Vries, R. 2007. Who will guard the guardians of neuroscience? EMBO reports 8: S65–S69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chung, J. 2008, December 14. Scientists are discovering new physical and mental benefits to listening to music. The Wall Street Journal A5.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Toppo, G. 2008, December 7. Poverty dramatically affects children’s brains. USA Today. Retrieved from
  16. 16.
    Reynolds, G. 2007, August 19. Lobes of steel. The New York Times. Retrieved from
  17. 17.
    Pickering, S.J., and P. Howard-Jones. 2007. Educators’ views on the role of neuroscience in education: Findings from a study of UK and international perspectives. Mind, Brain, and Education 1(3): 109–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ansari, D., and D. Coch. 2006. Bridges over troubled waters: Education and cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10: 146–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fischer, K.W., D.B. Daniel, M.H. Immordino-Yang, E. Stern, A. Battro, and H. Koizumi. 2007. Why mind, brain, and education? Why now? Mind, Brain, & Education 1: 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hinton, C., and K.W. Fischer. 2008. Research schools: Grounding research in educational practice. Mind, Brain, and Education 2: 157–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kuriloff, P., M. Reichert, B. Stoudt, and S. Ravitch. 2009. Building research collaborations among schools and universities: Lessons from the field. Mind, Brain, and Education 3: 34–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ronstadt, K., and P. Yellin. 2010. Linking mind, brain, and education to clinical practice: A proposal for transdisciplinary collaboration. Mind, Brain, and Education 4: 95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Plassmann, H., J. O’Doherty, and A. Rangel. 2007. Orbitofrontal cortex encodes willingness to pay in everyday economic transactions. The Journal of Neuroscience 27(37): 9984–9988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Buckholtz, J.W., C.L. Asplund, P.E. Dux, D.H. Zald, J.C. Gore, O.D. Jones, and R. Marois. 2008. The neural correlates of third-party punishment. Neuron 60: 930–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jacobsen, T., R. Schubotz, L. Höfel, and D.Y. v. Cramon. 2006. Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty. NeuroImage 29: 276–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gardner, H. 2008. Quandaries for neuroeducators. Mind, Brain, and Education 2: 165–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Poldrack, R.A. 2006. Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10: 59–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lang, C. 2010. Science, education, and the ideology of “how”. Mind, Brain, and Education 4: 49–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shaywitz, S., R. Morris, and B. Shaywitz. 2008. The education of dyslexic children from childhood to young adulthood. Annual review of psychology 59(1): 451–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hardiman, M., S. Magsamen, G. McKhann, and J. Eilber. 2009. Neuroeducation: Learning, arts, and the brain. New York/Washington, DC: Dana.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    McCabe, D.P., and A.D. Castel. 2008. Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning. Cognition 107: 343–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Weisberg, D.S., F.C. Keil, J. Goodstein, E. Rawson, and J.R. Gray. 2008. The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20: 470–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Racine, E., S. Waldman, J. Rosenberg, and J. Illes. 2010. Contemporary neuroscience in media. Social Science & Medicine 71: 725–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Illes, J., M.A. Moser, J.B. McCormick, E. Racine, S. Blakeslee, A. Caplan, and S. Weiss. 2010. Neurotalk: Improving the communication of neuroscience research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11: 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dubinsky, J.M. 2010. Neuroscience education for prekindergarten-12 teachers. The Journal of Neuroscience 30(4): 8057–8060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Duhl, R. 2004. Adolescent brain development: A period of vulnerabilities and opportunities. Annals New York Academy of Sciences 1021: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Steinberg, L. 2008. A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review 28: 76–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stein, Z. 2010. On the difference between designing children and raising them: Ethics and the use of educationally oriented biotechnology. Mind, Brain, and Education 4: 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hardiman, M., and M. Denckla. 2010. The science of education: Informing teaching and learning through the brain sciences. In Cerebrum, ed. D. Gordon, 3–11. New York: Dana.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hardiman, M. 2003. Connecting brain research with effective teaching: The Brain-Targeted Teaching Model. Landham: Scarecrow.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mariale Hardiman
    • 1
  • Luke Rinne
    • 1
  • Emma Gregory
    • 1
  • Julia Yarmolinskaya
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EducationJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations