Neuroethics

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 191–194 | Cite as

Brain, Behavior, and Knowledge

Original Paper

Abstract

In “Minds, Brains, and Norms,” Michael Pardo and Dennis Patterson claim that the idea that ‘you are your brain’ does not contribute to a plausible account of human behavior. I argue that they leave too little of the brain in their account of different types of behavior.

Keywords

Brain Mind Behavior Empirical explanations Conceptual explanations Wittgenstein 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Walter Sinnott-Armstrong for helpful comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this article. The writing of this article was supported in part by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, NNF 80045, States of Mind: Emerging Issues in Neuroethics.

References

  1. 1.
    Pardo, M. S., and D. Patterson. 2010. Minds, brains, and norms. Neuroethics 3: ??.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wittgenstein, L. 1958. Philosophical Investigations, 3rd ed., trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. New York: Macmillan, 208.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bunge, S.A., and J.D. Wallis (eds.). 2008. Neuroscience of rule-guided behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scoville, W.B., and B. Milner. 1957. Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 20: 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Damasio, H., T. Grabowski, R. Frank, A.M. Galabarda, and A. Damasio. 1994. The return of Phineas Gage: clues about the brain from the skull of a famous patient. Science 264: 1102–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Damasio, A. 2004. Descartes error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain, Ch. 1. New York: Grosett/Putnam.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burns, J.M., and R.H. Swerdlaw. 2003. Right orbitofrontal tumor with pedophilia symptom and constructional apraxia. Archives of Neurology 62: 437–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Roskies, A.L. 2008. Neuroimaging and inferential distance. Neuroethics 1(1): 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departments of Philosophy and Community Health SciencesUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations