, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 173–184 | Cite as

Moral Aspects of Psychiatric Diagnosis: the Cluster B Personality Disorders

  • Marga Reimer
Original Paper


Medical professionals, including mental health professionals, largely agree that moral judgment should be kept out of clinical settings. The rationale is simple: moral judgment has the capacity to impair clinical judgment in ways that could harm the patient. However, when the patient is suffering from a "Cluster B" personality disorder, keeping moral judgment out of the clinic might appear impossible, not only in practice but also in theory. For the diagnostic criteria associated with these particular disorders (Antisocial, Borderline, Histrionic, Narcissistic) are expressed in overtly moral language. I consider three proposals for dealing with this problem. The first is to eliminate the Cluster B disorders from the DSM on the grounds that they are moral, rather than mental, disorders. The second is to replace the morally laden language of the diagnostic criteria with morally neutral language. The third is to disambiguate the notion of moral judgment so as to respect the distinction between having morally disvalued traits and having moral responsibility for those traits. Sensitivity to this distinction enables the clinician, at least in theory, to employ morally laden diagnostic criteria without adopting the sort of morally judgmental (and potentially harmful) attitude that results from the tacit presumption of moral responsibility. I argue against the first two proposals and in favor of the third. In doing so, I appeal to Grice's distinction between conventional and conversational implicature. I close with a few brief remarks on the irony of retaining overtly moral language in an ostensibly medical manual for the diagnosis of mental disorders.


Moral language Moral judgment Moral responsibility Psychiatric diagnosis Personality disorders 


  1. 1.
    Larkin, M. 2002. Women’s “non-traditional” stroke symptoms may delay emergency treatment. Lancet 360(9343): 1398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Potter, N. 2006. What is manipulative behavior anyway? Journal of Personality Disorders 20(2): 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pickard, H. 2009. Mental illness is indeed a myth. In Psychiatry as cognitive neuroscience: philosophical perspectives, ed. L. Bortolotti and M. Broome, 83–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Charland, L. 2004. Moral treatment and the personality disorders. In The philosophy of psychiatry: a companion, ed. J. Radden. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Charland, L. 2006. The moral nature of the cluster-b personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders 20(2): 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grice, H.P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics 3, ed. P. Cole and J.L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    American Psychiatric Association. 2000. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Fourth edition (text revision). American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tyrer, P., et al. 2003. Treatment rejecting and treatment seeking personality disorders: Type R and type S. Journal of Personality Disorders 17(3): 26–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kendell, R.E. 2002. The distinction between personality disorder and mental illness. The British Journal of Psychiatry 180: 110–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moran, P. 1999. The epidemiology of antisocial personality disorder. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 34(5): 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reimer, M. 2010a. Treatment adherence in the absence of insight: a puzzle and a proposed solution. Forthcoming in Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Szasz, T. 1960. The myth of mental illness. The American Psychologist 15: 113–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reimer, M. 2010b. Moral disorder in the DSM-IV: The Cluster B Personality Disorders. (unpublished typescript).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vollm, B., et al. 2004. Neurobiological substrates of antisocial and borderline personality disorder: Preliminary results of an fMRI study. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 14(1): 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pearce, S., and H. Pickard. 2009. The moral content of psychiatric treatment. The British Journal of Psychiatry 195: 281–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Robins, C., and A. Chapman. 2004. Dialectical behavior therapy: current status, recent developments, and future directions. Journal of Personality Disorders 18(1): 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Farah, M. 2002. Emerging ethical issues in neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience 5(11): 1123–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Salzman, C., et al. 1995. Effect of fluoxetine on anger in symptomatic volunteers with borderline personality disorder. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 15: 23–29.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schroeder, T. 2005. Moral responsibility and Tourette Syndrome. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61(1): 106–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations