Neuroethics

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 115–124

Knocking Out Pain in Livestock: Can Technology Succeed Where Morality has Stalled?

Original Paper

Abstract

Though the vegetarian movement sparked by Peter Singer’s book Animal Liberation has achieved some success, there is more animal suffering caused today due to factory farming than there was when the book was originally written. In this paper, I argue that there may be a technological solution to the problem of animal suffering in intensive factory farming operations. In particular, I suggest that recent research indicates that we may be very close to, if not already at, the point where we can genetically engineer factory-farmed livestock with a reduced or completely eliminated capacity to suffer. In as much as animal suffering is the principal concern that motivates the animal welfare movement, this development should be of central interest to its adherents. Moreover, I will argue that all people concerned with animal welfare should agree that we ought to replace the animals currently used in factory farming with animals whose ability to suffer is diminished if we are able to do so.

Keywords

Nonhuman animals Animal neuroethics Genetic engineering Pain Suffering Bioethics 

References

  1. 1.
    Singer, P. 1975. Animal liberation. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    The Vegetarian Resource Group Poll. 2006. Conducted by Harris Interactive. http://www.vrg.org/nutshell/faq.htm#poll . Accessed 10 January 2009.
  3. 3.
    Humane Society of the United States Graph. 2006. (using data from the USDA). http://www.hsus.org/farm/resources/pubs/stats_meat_consumption.html. Accessed 10 January 2009.
  4. 4.
    USDA Agricultural Projections Report. 2007. http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/oce071. Accessed 10 January 2009.
  5. 5.
    Varner, G. 1994. The prospects for consensus and convergence in the animal rights debate. In The environmental ethics and policy book, eds. D. VanDeVeer and C. Pierce. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Singer, P. 1979. Practical ethics. New York: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Degrazia, D. 1999. Animal ethics around the turn of the twenty-first century. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 11: 111–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Farah, M. 2009. Neuroethics and the problem of other minds: implications of neuroscience for the moral status of brain-damaged patients and nonhuman animals. Neuroethics 1: 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hardcastle, V. 1999. The myth of pain. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Price, D.D. 2000. Psychological and neural mechanisms of the affective dimension of pain. Science 288: 1769–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rainville, P., G.H. Duncan, D.D. Price, B. Carrier, and M.C. Bushnell. 1997. Pain affect encoded in human anterior cingulate but not somatosensory cortex. Science 277: 968–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ploner, M., H.J. Freund, and A. Schnitzler. 1999. Pain affect without pain sensation in a patient with postcentral lesion. Pain 81: 211–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Foltz, E.L. and L.E. White. 1962. Pain relief by frontal cingulotomy. Journal of Neurosurgery 19: 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Romanelli, P., V. Esposito, and J. Adler. 2004. Ablative procedures for chronic pain. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 15: 335–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rose, J.D. 2002. The neurobehavioral nature of fish and the question of awareness of pain. Reviews in Fisheries Science 10(1): 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shriver, A. 2006. Minding mammals. Philosophical Psychology 19(4): 433–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jones, A.K.P., K. Friston, and R.S.J. Frackowiak. 1992. Localization of responses to pain in human cerebral cortex. Science 255: 215–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hutchison, W.D. 1999. Pain related neurons in the human cingulate cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2(5): 403–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Johansen, J.P. and H.L. Fields. 2004. Glutamatergic activation of anterior cingulate cortex produces an aversive teaching signal. Nature Neuroscience 7(4): 398–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    LaGraize, S., C. Labuda, R. Rutledge, R. Jackson, and P. Fuchs. 2004. Differential effect of anterior cingulate cortex lesion on mechanical hypersensitivity and escape/avoidance behavior in an animal model of neuropathic pain. Experimental Neurology 188: 139–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    LaGraize, S., J. Borzan, Y.B. Peng, and P. Fuchs. 2006. Selective regulation of pain affect following activation of the opiod anterior cingulate cortex system. Experimental Neurology 197: 22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wei, F. and M. Zhuo. 2006. Potentiation of sensory responses in the anterior cingulate cortex following digit amputation in the anaesthetized rat. Journal of Physiology 532: 823–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xu, H., L. Wu, H. Wang, X. Zhang, K. Vadakkan, S. Kim, H. Steenland, and W. Zhuo. 2008. Presynaptic and postsynaptic amplifications of neuropathic pain in the anterior cingulate cortex. Neurobiology of Disease 28(29): 7445–53.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wei, F. and M. Zhuo. 2008. Activation of Erk in the anterior cingulated cortex during the induction and expression of chronic pain. Molecular Pain 4: 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Toyoda, H., L. Wu, M. Zhao, H. Xu, and M. Zhuo. 2006. Time-dependent postsynaptic AMPA GluR1 receptor recruitment in the cingulate synaptic potentiation. Developmental Neurobiology 67(4): 489–509.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wei, F., C. Qiu, S. Kim, L. Muglia, J. Maas Jr., V. Pineda, H. Xu, Z. Chen, D. Storm, L.J. Muglia, and M. Zhuo. 2002. Genetic elimination of behavioral sensitization in mice lacking calmodulin-stimulated adenylyl cyclases. Neuron 36: 713–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Allen, C., P.N. Fuchs, A. Shriver, and H. Wilson. 2005. Deciphering animal pain. In Pain: new essays on the nature of pain and the methodology of its study, ed. M. Aydede, 352–366. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sun, Y., Y. Gao, Z. Zhao, B. Huang, J. Yin, G. Taylor, and Z. Chen. 2008. Involvement of P311 in the affective, but not in the sensory component of pain. Molecular Pain 4: 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fredeen, H. and A. Sather. 1978. Joint damage in pigs reared under confinement. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 58: 759–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Harrison, R. 1972. On factory farming. In Animals, men, and morals: an enquiry into the maltreatment of non-humans, ed. S. Godlovitch, R. Godlovitch, and J. Harris. New York: Toplinger.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Eisenberger, N., M.D. Lieberman, and K.D. Williams. 2003. Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science 302: 290–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Grandin, T. 2000. Bruise levels on fed and non-fed cattle. Proceedings Livestock Conservation Institute. http://www.grandin.com/references/LCIbruise.html. Accessed 30 June 2009.
  34. 34.
    Singer, P. and J. Mason. 2006. The way we eat: why our food choices matter. New York: Rodale Books.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rollin, B. 1996. Bad ethics, good ethics and the genetic engineering of animals in agriculture. Journal of Animal Science 74: 535–41.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy-Neuroscience-Psychology (PNP) ProgramWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations