Knocking Out Pain in Livestock: Can Technology Succeed Where Morality has Stalled?
- 611 Downloads
Though the vegetarian movement sparked by Peter Singer’s book Animal Liberation has achieved some success, there is more animal suffering caused today due to factory farming than there was when the book was originally written. In this paper, I argue that there may be a technological solution to the problem of animal suffering in intensive factory farming operations. In particular, I suggest that recent research indicates that we may be very close to, if not already at, the point where we can genetically engineer factory-farmed livestock with a reduced or completely eliminated capacity to suffer. In as much as animal suffering is the principal concern that motivates the animal welfare movement, this development should be of central interest to its adherents. Moreover, I will argue that all people concerned with animal welfare should agree that we ought to replace the animals currently used in factory farming with animals whose ability to suffer is diminished if we are able to do so.
KeywordsNonhuman animals Animal neuroethics Genetic engineering Pain Suffering Bioethics
- 1.Singer, P. 1975. Animal liberation. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
- 2.The Vegetarian Resource Group Poll. 2006. Conducted by Harris Interactive. http://www.vrg.org/nutshell/faq.htm#poll . Accessed 10 January 2009.
- 3.Humane Society of the United States Graph. 2006. (using data from the USDA). http://www.hsus.org/farm/resources/pubs/stats_meat_consumption.html. Accessed 10 January 2009.
- 4.USDA Agricultural Projections Report. 2007. http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/oce071. Accessed 10 January 2009.
- 5.Varner, G. 1994. The prospects for consensus and convergence in the animal rights debate. In The environmental ethics and policy book, eds. D. VanDeVeer and C. Pierce. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
- 6.Singer, P. 1979. Practical ethics. New York: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
- 7.Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- 10.Hardcastle, V. 1999. The myth of pain. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
- 24.Xu, H., L. Wu, H. Wang, X. Zhang, K. Vadakkan, S. Kim, H. Steenland, and W. Zhuo. 2008. Presynaptic and postsynaptic amplifications of neuropathic pain in the anterior cingulate cortex. Neurobiology of Disease 28(29): 7445–53.Google Scholar
- 26.Toyoda, H., L. Wu, M. Zhao, H. Xu, and M. Zhuo. 2006. Time-dependent postsynaptic AMPA GluR1 receptor recruitment in the cingulate synaptic potentiation. Developmental Neurobiology 67(4): 489–509.Google Scholar
- 28.Allen, C., P.N. Fuchs, A. Shriver, and H. Wilson. 2005. Deciphering animal pain. In Pain: new essays on the nature of pain and the methodology of its study, ed. M. Aydede, 352–366. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
- 31.Harrison, R. 1972. On factory farming. In Animals, men, and morals: an enquiry into the maltreatment of non-humans, ed. S. Godlovitch, R. Godlovitch, and J. Harris. New York: Toplinger.Google Scholar
- 33.Grandin, T. 2000. Bruise levels on fed and non-fed cattle. Proceedings Livestock Conservation Institute. http://www.grandin.com/references/LCIbruise.html. Accessed 30 June 2009.
- 34.Singer, P. and J. Mason. 2006. The way we eat: why our food choices matter. New York: Rodale Books.Google Scholar
- 35.Rollin, B. 1996. Bad ethics, good ethics and the genetic engineering of animals in agriculture. Journal of Animal Science 74: 535–41.Google Scholar