Neuroethics

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 167–184 | Cite as

The Mad, the Bad, and the Psychopath

Original Paper

Abstract

It is common for philosophers to argue that psychopaths are not morally responsible because they lack some of the essential capacities for morality. In legal terms, they are criminally insane. Typically, however, the insanity defense is not available to psychopaths. The primary reason is that they appear to have the knowledge and understanding required under the M’Naghten Rules. However, it has been argued that what is required for moral and legal responsibility is ‘deep’ moral understanding, something that psychopaths do not have either due to their lacking empathy or practical reason. In the first part of the paper, I argue that psychopaths do not lack the abilities required for deep moral understanding, although they have deficits in those areas. According the M’Naghten Rules, therefore, psychopaths are not insane. Under a less strict formulation of the insanity plea, like the Model Penal Code, however, there is a good case to be made for their lacking substantial capacity. I argue that because psychopathy is an essentially moral disorder, and because of the nature of psychopathic violence, psychopaths should not be excused under the insanity plea. It would be tantamount to excusing someone for committing a crime because they are bad. Arguably, this contravenes the entire system of law.

Keywords

Criminal responsibility Legal responsibility Insanity Psychopathy Moral understanding Empathy 

References

  1. 1.
    American Psychiatric Association. 2000. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th Ed. Text Revision (DSM-IV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Batson, C. D. 1991. The Altruism Question: Towards A Social-Psychological Answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benn, P. 1999. Freedom, resentment, and the psychopath. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 6: 29–39.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blackburn, R. 1998. Psychopathy and the contribution of personality to violence. In Psychopathy: antisocial, criminal and violent behavior, eds. T. Millon, and E. Simonsen, 50–68. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blair, J. 1997. A cognitive developmental approach to morality: investigating the psychopath. In The maladapted mind: classic readings in evolutionary psychopathology, ed. S. Baron-Cohen, 85–113. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blair, J., C. Sellars, I. Strickland, F. Clark, A. Williams, M. Smith, and L. Jones. 1996. Theory of mind in the psychopath. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry 7: 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blair, J., L. Jones, F. Clark, and M. Smith. 1997. The psychopathic individual: a lack of responsiveness to distress cues? Psychophysiology 34: 192–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blair, J., E. Colledge, and D. Mitchell. 2001. Somatic markers and response reversal: is there orbitofrontal cortex dysfunction in boys with psychopathic tendencies? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 29: 499–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blair, J., D. Mitchell, and K. Blair. 2005. The psychopath: emotion and the brain. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bonnie, R., J. Jeffries Jr., and P. Low. 2000. A case study in the insanity defense: the trial of John W. Hinckley, Jr, 2nd Ed. New York: Foundation.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Charland, L. 2004. Character. Moral treatment and the personality disorders. In The philosophy of psychiatry, ed. J. Radden, 64–77. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cleckley, H. 1982. The mask of sanity. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cotton, M. 2005. A foolish consistency: keeping determinism out of the criminal law. Boston University Public Interest Law Journal 15: 1–48.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Creel, A. 1977. Dharma in Hindu ethics. Calcutta: Firma KLM Private.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Damasio, A. 1994. Descartes’ Error. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Darwall, S. 1998. Empathy, sympathy, care. Philosophical Studies 89: 261–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deigh, J. 1995. Empathy and universalizability. Ethics 105: 743–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dolan, M., and R. Fulham. 2004. Theory of mind and mentalizing ability in antisocial personality diosrders with and without psychopathy. Psychological Medicine 34: 1093–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Douglas, M. 1966. Purity and danger. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Duff, R.A. 1977. Psychopathy and moral understanding. American Philosophical Quarterly 14: 189–200.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dugatkin, L.A. 1997. The evolution of the “Con Artist”. Reprinted in S. Baron-Cohen (Ed.) The maladapted mind: classical readings in evolutionary psychopathology. Hove, UK: Psychology Press, 189–205.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Elliott, C. 1996. The rules of insanity: moral responsibility and the mentally ill offender. Albany, NY: SUNY.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fields, L. 1996. Psychopathy, other-regarding moral beliefs, and responsibility. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 3: 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Foot, P. 1978. Morality as a system of hypothetical imperatives. In Virtues and Vices. Berkeley: University of California Press, 157–73.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gandhi, M. 1991. In The essential writings of Mahatma Gandhi, ed. R. Iyer. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gert, B., and C. Culver. 2004. Defining mental disorder. In The philosophy of psychiatry, ed. J. Radden, 413–425. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Glannon, W. 1997. Psychopathy and Responsibility. Journal of Applied Philosophy 14: 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Glover, J. 1970. Responsibility. New York: Humanities.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Haidt, J. 2006. The happiness hypothesis. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Haji, I. 1998. On psychopaths and culpability. Law and Philosophy 17: 117–140.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hare, R. 1993. Without conscience: the disturbing world of the psychopaths among us. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hare, R. 2004. The Hare psychopathy checklist-revised, 2nd Ed. Toronto: Mental Health Services.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hart, H. 1994. The concept of law, 2nd Ed. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hervé, H. 2007. Psychopathic subtypes: historical and contemporary perspectives. In The psychopath: theory, research, and practice, eds. H. Hervé, and J. Yuille, 431–484. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hiatt, K. and J. Newman 2006. Understanding psychopathy: the cognitive side. In Handbook of psychopathy, ed. C. Patrick, 334–352. New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hicks, B., K. Markon, C. Patrick, and R. Krueger. 2004. Identifying psychopathy subtypes on the basis of personality structure. Psychological Assessment 16: 276–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hoffman, M.L. 2000. Empathy and moral development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kant, I. 1785/1993. Grounding for the metaphysics of morals. Translated by J. Ellington. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kar, R. 2007. Hart’s response to exclusive legal positivism. The Georgetown Law Journal 95: 393–361.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kennett, J. 2002. Autism, empathy and moral agency. The Philosophical Quarterly 52: 340–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Keppel, R. 1995. The riverman: Ted Bundy and I hunt for the green river killer. New York: Pocket Books.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Krakauer, J. 2003. Under the banner of heaven: a story of violent faith. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Larbey, C. 2007. The secret lives of Kim John and Francis Philip. What do we really know about the Cathedral killers? St. Lucia Star, May 18 2007.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Levenston, G., C. Patrick, M. Bradley, and P. Lang. 2000. The psychopath as observer: emotion and attention in picture processing. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 109: 373–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lykken, D. 1957. A study of anxiety in the sociopathic personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 55: 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Maibom, H. 2005. Moral unreason: the case of psychopathy. Mind & Language 20: 237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Maibom, H. 2007. The presence of others. Philosophical Studies 132: 161–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Maudsley, H. 1898. Responsibility in mental disease. New York: D. Appleton and Company.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    McGeer, V. 2008. Varieties of moral agency: lessons from autism (and psychopathy). In Moral psychology, volume 3: the neuroscience of morality: emotion, brain disorders, and development, ed. W. Sinnott-Armstrong, 227–257. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mealey, L. 1997. The sociobiology of sociopathy: an integrated evolutionary model. Reprinted in S. Baron-Cohen (Ed.) The Maladapted Mind: Classical Readings in Evolutionary Psychopathology. Hove, UK: Psychology Press, 133–88.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mei-Tal, M. 2004. The criminal responsibility of psychopathic offenders. Israel Law Review 36: 103–121.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Murphy, J. 1972. Moral death: a Kantian essay on psychopathy. Ethics 82: 284–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Newman, J., and D. Kosson. 1986. Passive avoidance learning in psychopathic and non-psychopathic offenders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 96: 257–263.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Newman, J., C. Patterson, and D. Kosson. 1987. Response perseveration in psychopaths. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 96: 145–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Newman, J., C. Patterson, E. Howland, and S. Nichols. 1990. Passive avoidance in psychopaths: the effects of reward. Personality and Individual Differences 11: 1101–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Nichols, S. 2001. Mindreading and the cognitive architecture underlying altruistic motivation. Mind & Language 16: 425–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Nichols, S. 2004. Sentimental rules: on the nature and foundation of moral judgment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Parker, R. 1983. Miasma: pollution and purification in early Greek religion. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Patrick, C. 2007. Getting to the heart of psychopathy. In The psychopath: theory, research, and practice, eds. H. Hervé, and J. Yuille, 207–252. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Patrick, C., B. Cuthbert, and P. Lang. 1994. Emotion in the criminal psychopath: fear image processing. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 103: 523–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Patrick, C., J. Curtin, and A. Tellegen. 2002. Development and validation of a brief form of the multidimensional personality questionnaire. Psychological Assessment 14: 150–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Porter, S. and S. Porter. 2007. Psychopathy and violent crime. In The psychopath: theory, research, and practice, eds. H. Hervé, and J. Yuille, 287–300. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Poythress, N. and J. Skeem. 2006. Disaggregating psychopathy: where and how to look for subtypes. In Handbook of psychopathy, ed. C. Patrick, 172–192. New York: The Guildford.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Prinz, J. 2007. The Emotional Construction of Morals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Pritchard, J. C. 1835. Treatise on Insanity and Other Disorders Affecting the Mind. London: Sherwood Gilbert & Piper.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Raz, J. 1997. The amoralist. In Ethics and practical reason, eds. G. Cullity, and B. Gaut, 369–398. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Raz, J. 2001. Authority, law, and morality. Ethics in the Public Domain, 210 and 211.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Reznek, L. 1997. Evil or ill: justifying the insanity defence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Sober, E., and D.S. Wilson. 1998. Unto others. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Stotland, E. 1969. Exploratory investigations of empathy. In Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 4, ed. L. Berkowitz, 271–313. New York: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Thornton, D., and L. Blud 2007. The influence of psychopathic traits on response to treatment. In The Psychopath: Theory, Research, and Practice, eds. Hervé H, Yuille J, 505–39.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Waldman, I. and S. Rhee. 2006. Genetic and evnironmental influences on psychopathy and antisocial behavior. In Handbook of psychopathy, ed. C. Patrick, 205–228. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Wallace, R.J. 1996. Responsibility and the moral sentiments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Ward, T. 2002. A terrible responsibility. murder and insanity in England 1908–1939. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 25: 361–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Williams, B. 1985. Ethics and the limits of philosophy. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Wolf, S. 1987. Sanity and the metaphysics of responsibility. In Responsibility, character, and the emotions, ed. F. Schoeman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Woodworth, M., and S. Porter. 2002. In cold blood: characteristics of criminal homicides as a function of psychopathy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 111: 436–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.PhilosophyCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations