Evaluation of PSMA expression changes on PET/CT before and after initiation of novel antiandrogen drugs (enzalutamide or abiraterone) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients
To investigate the association between Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) expression changes on positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET/CT) and the response to treatment following the start of enzalutamide or abiraterone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients.
All consecutive 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans routinely performed at our institution during more than 4 years were retrospectively screened for inclusion. We included mCRPC patients with a baseline PSMA PET/CT performed less than 2 months before the start of either enzalutamide or abiraterone, and a follow-up PSMA PET/CT performed no more than a year after, while still under those novel antiandrogen drugs (NAD). The associated clinical records were reviewed. Patients were considered treatment responders if they presented decreasing PSA levels > 50% or a radiological response based on RECIST 1.1 criteria. PSMA expression changes on the follow-up PET/CT were assessed using per-patient dominant response criteria to classify patients as PSMA-responders (complete disappearance of pathologic PSMA uptake, or a decreased uptake of the majority of lesions) or PSMA-non-responders (new PSMA-expressing lesions, increased uptake of the majority of lesions, or stable PSMA expression of the disease). Descriptive statistics and measures of associations (two-sided Fisher’s exact test and Phi coefficient) were calculated.
A total of 11 and 15 patients were included in the enzalutamide and abiraterone groups. Median follow-up was 110 (IQR 76–124) and 87 (IQR 71–242) days, respectively. All treatment responders (3 enzalutamide and 4 abiraterone) were considered PSMA-responders, and all treatment non-responders (8 enzalutamide, 11 abiraterone) were considered PSMA-non-responders. PSMA PET response was thus perfectly associated with conventional response criteria (p = 0.006, Phi = 1 for enzalutamide; p = 0.001, Phi = 1 for abiraterone). In our cohort, no PSMA expression flare phenomenon was detected on follow-up PET/CT scans at a median follow-up of 3 months. However, an early and short-lived flare cannot be excluded.
This retrospective study suggests that, after a median follow-up of 3 months under enzalutamide or abiraterone, PSMA expression changes on PET/CT are strongly associated with response to treatment. Prospective studies are needed to better understand PSMA expression dynamics following the start of enzalutamide and abiraterone, along with the role of PSMA PET/CT in response assessment.
KeywordsPSMA Response Enzalutamide Abiraterone mCRPC
Dr. NP performed the data collection, the data analysis, and drafted the manuscript; Dr. CA designed the study, reviewed the data and revised the manuscript; Dr. SS, Dr. NMC, Dr. TG and Dr. AP clinically followed the patients and reviewed the manuscript; Dr. PF revised the manuscript for important intellectual content.
N. P. is a recipient of a Detweiler Travelling Fellowship provided by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest to declare for any author.
This study was performed in accordance with our institution ethical standards, as well as with the standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent revisions or equivalent ethical standards.
Due to the retrospective, descriptive and aggregate nature of the study, no specific patient consent was deemed necessary by our institutional ethics review board.
- 2.Sawicki LM, Kirchner J, Buddensieck C, Antke C, Ullrich T, Schimmöller L, et al. Prospective comparison of whole-body MRI and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for the detection of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(7):1542–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Tan N, Bavadian N, Calais J, Oyoyo U, Kim J, Turkbey IB, et al. Imaging of prostate specific membrane antigen targeted radiotracers for the detection of prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. 2019;202(2):231–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Violet JA, Jackson P, Ferdinandus J, Sandhu S, Akhurst T, Iravani A, et al. Dosimetry of Lu-177 PSMA-617 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: correlations between pre-therapeutic imaging and "whole body" tumor dosimetry with treatment outcomes. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(4):517–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Scher HI, Morris MJ, Stadler WM, Higano C, Basch E, Fizazi K, et al. Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 Trial design and objectives for castration-resistant prostate cancer: updated recommendations from the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(12):1402–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Grubmüller B, Senn D, Kramer G, Baltzer P, D'Andrea D, Grubmüller KH, et al. Response assessment using 68Ga-PSMA ligand PET in patients undergoing (177)Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(5):1063–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Gupta M, Choudhury PS, Rawal S, Goel HC, Rao SA. Evaluation of RECIST, PERCIST, EORTC, and MDA criteria for assessing treatment response with Ga68-PSMA PET-CT in metastatic prostate cancer patient with biochemical progression: a comparative study. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;52(6):420–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Emmett L, Yin C, Crumbaker M, Hruby G, Kneebone A, Epstein R, et al. Rapid modulation of PSMA expression by androgen deprivation: serial 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET in men with hormone-sensitive and castrate-resistant prostate cancer commencing androgen blockade. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(7):950–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Rahbar K, Boegemann M, Yordanova A, Eveslage M, Schäfers M, Essler M, et al. PSMA targeted radioligandtherapy in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer after chemotherapy, abiraterone and/or enzalutamide. A retrospective analysis of overall survival. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(1):12–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar