Advertisement

Annals of Nuclear Medicine

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 1–13 | Cite as

Techniques for generating attenuation map using cardiac SPECT emission data only: a systematic review

  • Getu Ferenji Tadesse
  • Parham Geramifar
  • Eyachew Misganew Tegaw
  • Mohammad Reza AyEmail author
Review Article
  • 145 Downloads

Abstract

To reliably interpret and perform quantitative analysis, attenuation correction for cardiac single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is fundamental. Thus, knowledge of the patient-specific attenuation map for accurate correction is required in SPECT quantitative imaging. The aim of this systematic review is to present general principles of attenuation correction and provide a structured summary of the approaches that have been proposed for generating the attenuation map for cardiac SPECT. We identified relevant articles published in English pertaining to the attenuation map (AM) determination using SPECT emission data only by searching PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Moreover, other articles were hand searched. The protocol of this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO and the code given is CRD42017060512. Transmissionless techniques of determining attenuation map including calculated methods, statistical modeling for simultaneous estimation of attenuation and emission, consistency conditions criteria, using scattered data and other methods were reviewed. Methods for performing attenuation map for cardiac SPECT are developing and the progresses made are promising. However, much work is needed to assess the efficacy of the correction schemes in the clinical routine.

Keywords

Attenuation correction Attenuation map Cardiac SPECT Emission data 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported under grant number 38086, International campus, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Zaidi H, Hasegawa B. Determination of the attenuation map in emission tomography. J Nucl Med. 2003;44(2):291–315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van Dijk JD, et al. Value of attenuation correction in stress-only myocardial perfusion imaging using CZT-SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017;24(2):395–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dvorak RA, Brown RKJ, Corbett JR. Interpretation of SPECT/CT myocardial perfusion images: common artifacts and quality control techniques. Radiographics. 2011;31(7):2041–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zaidi H. Recent developments and future trends in nuclear medicine instrumentation. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik. 2006;16(1):5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zaidi H, Montandon ML, Slosman DO. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided attenuation and scatter corrections in three-dimensional brain positron emission tomography. Med Phys. 2003;30(5):937–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Plachcińska A, et al. Diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography with attenuation correction. Kardiologia Polska. 2016;74(1):32–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Apostolopoulos DJ, Savvopoulos C. What is the benefit of CT-based attenuation correction in myocardial perfusion SPET? Hell J Nucl Med. 2016;19(2):89–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bateman TM, Cullom SJ. Attenuation correction single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. Semin Nucl Med. 2005;35(1):37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stathaki M, et al., The benefits of prone SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in reducing both artifact defects and patient radiation exposure. Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia. 2015. 105(4):345–352.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ljungberg M, Pretorius PH. SPECT/CT: an update on technological developments and clinical applications. Br J Radiol. 2018. 91(1081):20160402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moher D, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bronnikov A. Approximate reconstruction of attenuation map in SPECT imaging. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1995;42(5):1483–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cade S, et al., Estimating an attenuation map from measured scatter for 180° cardiac SPECT. J Nucl Med, 2010. 51:1357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Censor Y, et al. A new approach to the emission computerized tomography problem: simultaneous calculation of attenuation and activity coefficients. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1979;26(2):2775–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    da Silva AMM, Robilotta CC, Ieee, Attenuation correction in cardiac spect using consistency conditions. In: 2006 3rd IEEE international symposium on biomedical imaging: macro to nano, vols 1–3. 2006. p 271.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gourion D, et al. Attenuation correction using SPECT emission data only. IEEE transactions on nuclear science. 2002;49(5):2172–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jha AK, et al. Joint reconstruction of activity and attenuation map using LM SPECT emission data. In: Nishikawa RM, Whiting BR, Hoeschen C, editors. Medical imaging 2013: physics of medical imaging, vol 8668. Bellingham, Washington: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2013.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kaplan M, et al. Generating attenuation maps using differential attenuation data. In: Nuclear science symposium, 1996. conference record, 1996 IEEE. 1996. IEEE.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krol A, et al. An EM algorithm for estimating SPECT emission and transmission parameters from emission data only. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001;20(3):218–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maeda H, et al. Attenuation correction for myocardial SPECT: segmentation with scatter and photopeak window data for attenuation correction (SSPAC) method. J Nucl Med. 2002;43(5):230P-230P.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Natterer F. Determination of tissue attenuation in emission tomography of optically dense media. Inverse Probl. 1993;9(6):731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Noumeir R, El-Daccache R. Attenuation correction in spect using active surfaces. In: Nuclear Science Symposium, 1998. Conference record. 1998 IEEE. 1998. IEEE.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nuyts J, et al. Simultaneous maximum a posteriori reconstruction of attenuation and activity distributions from emission sinograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1999;18(5):393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pan TS, et al. Estimation of attenuation maps from scatter and photopeak window single photon-emission computed tomographic images of technetium 99 m-labeled sestamibi. J Nucl Cardiol. 1997;4(1):42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Panin VY, Zeng GL, Gullberg GT. A method of attenuation map and emission activity reconstruction from emission data. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2001;48(1):131–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Salomon A, Goedicke A, Aach T. Advanced reconstruction of attenuation maps using SPECT emission data only. In: Hsieh J, editors. Medical imaging 2009: physics of medical imaging, vol 7258. Bellingham, Washington: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2009.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sitek A, Moore SC, Kijewski MF. Correction for photon attenuation without transmission measurements using Compton scatter information in SPECT. In: nuclear science symposium conference record, 2007. NSS’07. IEEE. 2007. IEEE.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Welch A, et al. Toward accurate attenuation correction in SPECT without transmission measurements. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1997;16(5):532–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yan Y, Zeng GL. Attenuation map estimation with SPECT emission data only. Int J Imaging Syst Technol. 2009;19(3):271–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bailey DL. Transmission scanning in emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25(7):774–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tung C-H, et al. Nonuniform attenuation correction using simultaneous transmission and emission converging tomography. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1992;39(4):1134–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kheruka SC, et al. A new method to correct the attenuation map in simultaneous transmission/emission tomography using 153Gd/67 Ga radioisotopes. J Med Phys Assoc Med Phys India. 2012;37(1):46.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kojima A, et al. Attenuation correction using asymmetric fanbeam transmission CT on two-head SPECT system. Ann Nucl Med. 2004;18(4):315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lang TF, et al. Description of a prototype emission transmission computed tomography imaging system. J Nucl Med. 1992;33(10):1881–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bocher M, et al. Gamma camera-mounted anatomical X-ray tomography: technology, system characteristics and first images. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000;27(6):619–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Huang B, Law MW-M, Khong P-L. Whole-body PET/CT scanning: estimation of radiation dose and cancer risk. Radiology. 2009;251(1):166–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Salvatori M, Lucignani G. Radiation exposure, protection and risk from nuclear medicine procedures. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37(6):1225–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(22):2277–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Goetze S, et al. Attenuation correction in myocardial perfusion SPECT/CT: effects of misregistration and value of reregistration. J Nucl Med. 2007;48(7):1090–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Takahashi Y, et al., Attenuation correction of myocardial SPECT images with X-ray CT: effects of registration errors between X-ray CT and SPECT. Ann Nucl Med. 2002; 16(6):431–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Patton JA, Turkington TG. SPECT/CT physical principles and attenuation correction. J Nucl Med Technol. 2008;36(1):1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kinahan PE, Hasegawa BH, Beyer T. X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners. Semin Nucl Med. 2003;33(3):166–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kinahan P, et al., Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. Med Phys. 1998; 25(10):2046–2053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Seo Y, Wong KH, Hasegawa BH. Calculation and validation of the use of effective attenuation coefficient for attenuation correction in In-111 SPECT. Med Phys. 2005;32(12):3628–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Seo Y, et al. Correction of photon attenuation and collimator response for a body-contouring SPECT/CT imaging system. J Nucl Med. 2005;46(5):868–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Berger M. XCOM: photon cross sections database. 2010. http://www.nist.gov/pml/data/xcom/index.cfm
  47. 47.
    Hansen CL, Siegel JA. Attenuation correction of thallium SPECT using differential attenuation of thallium photons. J Nucl Med. 1992;33(8):1574–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Shibutani T, et al., Characteristics of single-and dual-photopeak energy window acquisitions with thallium-201 IQ-SPECT/CT system. Ann Nucl Med. 2017. 31(7):529–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Brown JK, et al. Intrinsic dual-energy processing of myocardial perfusion images. J Nucl Med. 2000;41(7):1287–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kaplan MS, Haynor DR. Differential attenuation method for simultaneous estimation of activity and attenuation in multiemission single photon emission computed tomography. Med Phys. 1999;26(11):2333–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Licho R, et al. Attenuation compensation in (99 m Tc) SPECT brain imaging: a comparison of the use of attenuation maps derived from transmission versus emission data in normal scans. J Nucl Med. 1999;40(3):456.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Madsen MT, et al. An emission based technique for obtaining attenuation correction data for myocardial spect studies. J Nucl Med. 1993;34(5):P188–8.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Krol A, et al. Physical phantom evaluation of EM-IntraSPECT (EMIS) algorithm for non-uniform attenuation correction in cardiac imaging. In: Sonka M, Hanson KM, edtors. Medical Imaging: 2001: image processing, pts 1–3. San Diego, CA, United States; 2001. pp. 934–8.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Krol A, et al. EM-IntraSPECT algorithm with ordered subsets (OSEMIS) for non-uniform attenuation correction in cardiac imaging. In: Sonka M, Fitzpatrick JM, editors.Medical Imaging 2002: image processing, vol 1–3. San Diego, CA, United States; 2002. pp. 1022–7.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Yamauchi Y, et al. Novel attenuation correction of SPECT images using scatter photopeak window data for the detection of coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21(1):109–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Okuda K, et al. Attenuation correction of myocardial SPECT by scatter-photopeak window method in normal subjects. Ann Nucl Med. 2009;23(5):501–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Natterer F. Computerized tomography with unknown sources. SIAM J Appl Math. 1983;43(5):1201–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Salomon A, Goedicke A, Aach T. Attenuation corrected cardiac SPECT imaging using simultaneous reconstruction and a priori information. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2011;58(2):527–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical engineering, School of MedicineTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical engineering, School of MedicineTehran University of Medical Sciences, International campusTehranIran
  3. 3.Department of Physics, College of Natural SciencesAksum UniversityAxumEthiopia
  4. 4.Research Center for Nuclear Medicine, Shariati HospitalTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  5. 5.Department of Physics, College of Natural SciencesDebre Tabor UniversityDebre TaborEthiopia
  6. 6.Research Center for Molecular and Cellular ImagingTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran

Personalised recommendations