Usefulness of both PET/CT with F18-FDG and whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging in cancer screening: a preliminary report
- 105 Downloads
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with fluorodeoxyglucose (F18-FDG) is useful for the detection of malignant lesions, including metastatic lesions, and this technique is widely used in cancer screening. However, this approach may occasionally yield false-positive and false-negative findings. At our PET center, to increase the accuracy of PET/CT, we use PET/CT and whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (WB-DWI) together. This study aimed to assess the usefulness of this combination.
We examined 29 subjects with confirmed diagnosis. All of them had undergone PET/CT and WB-DWI on the same day. Twenty-seven of them also underwent ultrasonography, blood testing, and upper gastrointestinal series on the same day and two fecal occult blood tests on another day. WB-DWI was performed on a 1.5-T MRI unit with a b value of 0 and 800 or 1000 s/mm2. For all 29 cases, PET/CT and WB-DWI were classified to be positive or negative, and the diagnostic ability was calculated for each modality.
Among the 29 subjects, 17 had malignant tumors and 12 had benign tumors or no abnormalities. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of PET/CT were 65%, 25%, 55%, 33%, and 48%, respectively; while the corresponding values for WB-DWI were 59%, 100%, 100%, 63%, and 76%, respectively. By considering the result to be negative when PET/CT findings were positive but WB-DWI findings were negative, specificity increased from 25 to 100%, and accuracy increased from 48 to 76%. On the other hand, by considering the result to be positive when the findings of either PET/CT or WB-DWI were positive, sensitivity increased from 65 to 76%, and accuracy increased from 48 to 55%.
Our results suggest that using both PET/CT and WB-DWI together can increase accuracy in cancer screening. However, this approach was not able to detect malignant lesions in some cases, indicating that there were limitations with imaging certain organs. Therefore, it is important to further understand the features of PET/CT and WB-DWI and use them appropriately for each organ. Additionally, given that the study sample was relatively small, further research is needed to validate these findings.
KeywordsPET/CT WB-DWI Cancer screening
- 3.Nishizawa S, Okada Y. PET cancer screening with multiple imaging modalities: current status and prospects. Jpn J Clin Radiol. 2017;62:645–53.Google Scholar
- 4.Takahara T, Imai Y, Yamashita T, Yasuda S, Nasu S, Cauteren M. Diffusion weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS): technical improvement using free breathing, STIR and high resolution 3D display. Radiat Med. 2004;22(4):275–82.Google Scholar
- 6.Komori T, Narabayashi I, Matsumura K, Matsuki M, Akagi H, Ogura Y, et al. 2-[Fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography versus whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI for detection of malignant lesions: initial experience. Ann Nucl Med. 2007;21(4):209–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Usuda K, Sagawa M, Maeda S, Motono N, Tanaka M, Machida Y, et al. Diagnostic performance of whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging compared to PET-CT plus brain MRI in staging clinically resectable lung cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(6):2775–80.Google Scholar
- 13.Pinker K, Moy L, Sutton EJ, Mann RM, Weber M, Thakur SB, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping for breast cancer detection as a stand-alone parameter: comparison with dynamic contrast-enhanced and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000465.Google Scholar
- 17.Chen YK, Su CT, Chi KH, Cheng RH, Wang SC, Hsu CH. Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT uptake patterns in Waldeyer’s ring for differentiating benign from malignant lesions in lateral pharyngeal recess of nasopharynx. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:8–14.Google Scholar
- 23.Giganti F, Ambrosi A, Petrone MC, Canevari C, Chiari D, Salerno A, et al. Prospective comparison of MR with diffusion-weighted imaging, endoscopic ultrasound, MDCT and positron emission tomography-CT in the pre-operative staging of oesophageal cancer: results from a pilot study. Br J Radiol 2016;89(1068):20160087. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, Andrews KS, Brooks D, Bond J, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:130–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Eugénie R, Laurence L, Guillaume B, Mael P, Astrid L, Etienne G, et al. Incidental colorectal focal 18F-FDG uptake: a novel indication for colonoscopy. Endosc Int Open. 2017;05:E92430.Google Scholar