Advertisement

Implementation of GPU accelerated SPECT reconstruction with Monte Carlo-based scatter correction

  • 196 Accesses

  • 2 Citations

Abstract

Objective

Statistical SPECT reconstruction can be very time-consuming especially when compensations for collimator and detector response, attenuation, and scatter are included in the reconstruction. This work proposes an accelerated SPECT reconstruction algorithm based on graphics processing unit (GPU) processing.

Methods

Ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm with CT-based attenuation modelling, depth-dependent Gaussian convolution-based collimator-detector response modelling, and Monte Carlo-based scatter compensation was implemented using OpenCL. The OpenCL implementation was compared against the existing multi-threaded OSEM implementation running on a central processing unit (CPU) in terms of scatter-to-primary ratios, standardized uptake values (SUVs), and processing speed using mathematical phantoms and clinical multi-bed bone SPECT/CT studies.

Results

The difference in scatter-to-primary ratios, visual appearance, and SUVs between GPU and CPU implementations was minor. On the other hand, at its best, the GPU implementation was noticed to be 24 times faster than the multi-threaded CPU version on a normal 128 × 128 matrix size 3 bed bone SPECT/CT data set when compensations for collimator and detector response, attenuation, and scatter were included.

Conclusions

GPU SPECT reconstructions show great promise as an every day clinical reconstruction tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

References

  1. 1.

    Narayanan MV, King MA, Pretorius PH, Dahlberg ST, Spencer F, Simon E, et al. Human-observer receiver-operating-characteristic evaluation of attenuation, scatter, and resolution compensation strategies for (99 m)Tc myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1725–34.

  2. 2.

    Niu X, Yang Y, Jin M, Wernick MN, King MA. Effects of motion, attenuation, and scatter corrections on gated cardiac SPECT reconstruction. Med Phys. 2011;38:6571–84.

  3. 3.

    Zaidi H, Koral KF. Scatter modelling and compensation in emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:761 – 82.

  4. 4.

    Frey EC, Gilland KL, Tsui BM. Application of task-based measures of image quality to optimization and evaluation of three-dimensional reconstruction-based compensation methods in myocardial perfusion SPECT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002;21:1040–50.

  5. 5.

    Hudson HM, Larkin RS. Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data. IEEE Trans Med Imag. 1994;13:601–9.

  6. 6.

    Di Bella EVR, Barclay AB, Eisner RL, Schafer RW. A comparison of rotation-based methods for iterative reconstruction algorithms. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1996;43:3370–6.

  7. 7.

    Sohlberg A, Watabe H, Iida H. Acceleration of Monte Carlo-based scatter compensation for cardiac SPECT. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53:N277–N285.

  8. 8.

    Jambor I, Kuisma A, Ramadan S, Huovinen R, Sandell M, Kajander S. et. al. Prospective evaluation of planar bone scintigraphy, SPECT, SPECT/CT, 18F-NaF PET/CT and whole body 1.5T MRI, including DWI, for the detection of bone metastases in high risk breast and prostate cancer patients: SKELETA clinical trial. Acta Oncol. 2016;55:59–67.

  9. 9.

    Delcroix O, Robin P, Gouillou M, Le Duc-Pennec A, Alavi Z, Le Roux PY, et al. New SPECT/CT reconstruction algorithm: reliability and accuracy in clinical routine for non-oncologic bone diseases. EJNMMI Res. 2018;8:14.

  10. 10.

    Pedemonte S, Bousse A, Erlandsson K, Modat M, Arridge S, Hutton BF, et al. GPU accelerated rotation-based emission tomography reconstruction. IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record 2010;2657–2661.

  11. 11.

    Ha S, Matej S, Ispiryan M, Mueller K. GPU-accelerated forward and back-projections with spatially varying kernels for 3D DIRECT TOF PET reconstruction. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2013;60:166–73.

  12. 12.

    Kangasmaa TS, Constable C, Hippeläinen E, Sohlberg AO. Multicenter evaluation of single-photon emission computed tomography quantification with third-party reconstruction software. Nucl Med Commun. 2016;37:983–7.

  13. 13.

    Kangasmaa TS, Kuikka JT, Vanninen EJ, Mussalo HM, Laitinen TP, Sohlberg AO. Half-time myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging with attenuation and Monte Carlo-based scatter correction. Nucl Med Commun. 2011;32:1040–5.

  14. 14.

    Hippeläinen E, Tenhunen M, Mäenpää H, Sohlberg A. Quantitative accuracy of Lu-177 SPECT reconstruction using different compensation methods: phantom and patient studies. EJNMMI Res. 2016;6:16.

  15. 15.

    Woliner-van der Weg W, Deden LN, Meeuwis AP, Koenrades M, Peeters LH, Kuipers H, Laanstra GJ, Gotthardt M, Slump CH, Visser EP. A 3D-printed anatomical pancreas and kidney phantom for optimizing SPECT/CT reconstruction settings in beta cell imaging using 111In-exendin. EJNMMI Phys. 2016;3:29.

  16. 16.

    Woodcock E, Murphy T, Hemmings P, Longworth S. Techniques used in the GEM code for Monte Carlo neutronics calculations in reactors and other systems of complex geometry. Proc Conf Appl Comput Methods Reactor Probl. 1965;557:2.

  17. 17.

    Berger M, Hubbell J. XCOM. Photon cross sections on a personal computer. Natl Bur Stand Washington, DC (USA). Cent Radiat Res. 1987.

  18. 18.

    De Jong HWAM., Slijpen ETP, Beekman FJ. Acceleration of Monte Carlo SPECT simulation using convolution-based forced detection. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2001;48:58–64.

  19. 19.

    Salmon JK, Moraes MA, Dror RO, Shaw DE. Parallel random numbers: as easy as 1, 2, 3. In: Proceedings of 2011 International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis 2011;1–12.

  20. 20.

    Doornik JA. Conversion of high-period random numbers to floating point. ACM Trans Model Comput Simul. 2007;17:3.

  21. 21.

    Satish N, Harris M, Garland M. Designing efficient sorting algorithms for manycore GPUs. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing. 2009. pp. 1–10.

  22. 22.

    Zelen M, Severo NC. Probability functions. Handb Math Funct 1964 5;925–995.

  23. 23.

    Segars WP, Sturgeon G, Mendonca S, Grimes J, Tsui BMW. 4D XCAT phantom for multimodality imaging research. Med Phys. 2010;37:4902–15.

  24. 24.

    Pratx G, Chinn G, Olcott PD, Levin CS. Fast, accurate and shift-varying line projections for iterative reconstruction using the GPU. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2009;28:435–445.

  25. 25.

    Despres P, Jia X. A review of GPU-based medical image reconstruction. Phys Med. 2017;42:76–92.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Tobias Bexelius works for HERMES Medical Solutions and Antti Sohlberg has a consulting agreement with HERMES Medical Solutions.

Author information

Correspondence to Antti Sohlberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bexelius, T., Sohlberg, A. Implementation of GPU accelerated SPECT reconstruction with Monte Carlo-based scatter correction. Ann Nucl Med 32, 337–347 (2018) doi:10.1007/s12149-018-1252-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • SPECT reconstruction
  • Scatter correction
  • Monte Carlo
  • Graphics processing unit (GPU)