Annals of Nuclear Medicine

, Volume 25, Issue 9, pp 625–633 | Cite as

18F-fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography before treatment is a predictor of radiotherapy outcome and survival prognosis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

  • Masahiro Kikuchi
  • Tomohiko Yamane
  • Shogo Shinohara
  • Keizo Fujiwara
  • Shin-ya Hori
  • Yosuke Tona
  • Hiroshi Yamazaki
  • Yasushi Naito
  • Michio Senda
Original article

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the usefulness of [18F]fluoromisonidazole ([18F]FMISO)-positron emission tomography (PET) prior to the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods

Seventeen patients with untreated HNSCC underwent pretreatment [18F]FMISO PET. Six of them underwent definitive surgery and the remaining 11 definitive (chemo-)radiotherapy. We evaluated 30 lesions from the 17 patients. SUVmax and tumor-to-muscle ratios (TMR) were measured as hypoxia indicators. Tumors equal to or above the median value were defined as tumor with high uptake of [18F]FMISO and those below as tumor with low uptake of [18F]FMISO in both indicators. Local control rates with radiotherapy, event-free survival and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates with radiotherapy or operation were compared.

Result

[18F]FMISO-PET imaging of 30 lesions resulted in a SUVmax median value of 2.3 and a TMR median value of 1.3. Local control rates with radiotherapy (20-month median follow-up duration) were significantly lower in the tumor group with high uptake of [18F]FMISO compared to the tumor group with low uptake of [18F]FMISO using either SUVmax or TMR as the hypoxic indicator (P = 0.02 and 0.04, respectively). DSS rate with radiotherapy or operation (21-month median follow-up duration) was significantly lower in the patient group with high uptake of [18F]FMISO compared to the patient group with low uptake of [18F]FMISO defined by SUVmax (P = 0.04), but was not by TMR (P = 0.57).

Conclusions

Radiotherapy outcome and survival prognosis (radiotherapy or operation) in HNSCC may be predicted by carrying out [18F]FMISO PET before treatment.

Keywords

[18F]fluoromisonidazole ([18F]FMISO) Positron emission tomography (PET) Hypoxia Head and neck cancer Prediction of prognosis 

References

  1. 1.
    Jain RK. Tumor angiogenesis and accessibility: role of vascular endothelial growth factor. Semin Oncol. 2002;29:3–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Piert M. Hypoxia Imaging. In: Wahl RL, editor. Principles and practice of PET and PET/CT. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2009. p. 464–71.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wouters A, Pauwels B, Lardon F, Vermorken JB. Review: implications of in vitro research on the effect of radiotherapy and chemotherapy under hypoxic conditions. Oncologist. 2007;12:690–712.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stadler P, Becker A, Feldmann HJ, Hänsgen G, Dunst J, Würschmidt F, et al. Influence of the hypoxic subvolume on the survival of patients with head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;44:749–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lartigau E, Lusinchi A, Weeger P, Wibault P, Luboinski B, Eschwege F, et al. Variations in tumour oxygen tension (pO2) during accelerated radiotherapy of head and neck carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 1998;34:856–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hockel M, Schlenger K, Aral B, Mitze M, Schaffer U, Vaupel P, et al. Association between tumor hypoxia and malignant progression in advanced cancer of the uterine cervix. Cancer Res. 1996;56:4509–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nordsmark M, Alsner J, Keller J, Nielsen OS, Jensen OM, Horsman MR, et al. Hypoxia in human soft tissue sarcomas: adverse impact on survival and no association with p53 mutations. Br J Cancer. 2001;84:1070–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clavo B, Pérez JL, López L, Suárez G, Lloret M, Morera J, et al. Influence of haemoglobin concentration and peripheral muscle pO2 on tumour oxygenation in advanced head and neck tumours. Radiother Oncol. 2003;66:71–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chapman JD. Hypoxic sensitizers—implications for radiation therapy. N Engl J Med. 1979;301:1429–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jerabek PA, Patrick TB, Kilbourn MR, Dischino DD, Welch MJ. Synthesis and biodistribution of 18F-labeled fluoronitroimidazoles: potential in vivo markers of hypoxic tissue. Int J Rad Appl Instrum A. 1986;37:599–605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grierson JR, Link JM, Mathis CA, Rasey JS, Krohn KA. A radiosynthesis of fluorine-18 fluoromisonidazole. J Nucl Med. 1989;30:343–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yamane T, Kikuchi M, Shinohara S, Senda M. Reduction of [(18)F]fluoromisonidazole uptake after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Imaging Biol. 2011;13:227–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kikuchi M, Shinohara S, Nakamoto Y, Usami Y, Fujiwara K, Adachi T, et al. Sequential FDG-PET/CT after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a predictor of histopathologic response in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Imaging Biol. 2011;13:368–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tang G, Wang M, Tang X, Gan M, Luo L. Fully automated one-pot synthesis of [18F]fluoromisonidazole. Nucl Med Biol. 2005;32:553–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oh SJ, Chi DY, Mosdzianowski C, Kim JY, Gil HS, Kang SH, et al. Fully automated synthesis of [18F]fluoromisonidazole using a conventional [18F]FDG module. Nucl Med Biol. 2005;32:899–905.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eschmann SM, Paulsen F, Reimold M, Dittmann H, Welz S, Reischl G, et al. Prognostic impact of hypoxia imaging with 18F-misonidazole PET in non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck cancer before radiotherapy. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:253–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gray LH, Conger AD, Ebert M, Hornsey S, Scott OC. The concentration of oxygen dissolved in tissues at the time of irradiation as a factor in radiotherapy. Br J Radiol. 1953;26:638–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brown JM. The hypoxic cell: a target for selective cancer therapy–eighteenth Bruce F Cain Memorial Award lecture. Cancer Res. 1999;59:5863–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Horan AD, Koch CJ. The Km for radiosensitization of human tumor cells by oxygen is much greater than 3 mmHg and is further increased by elevated levels of cysteine. Radiat Res. 2001;156:388–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rasey JS, Grunbaum Z, Magee S, Nelson NJ, Olive PL, Durand RE, et al. Characterization of radiolabeled fluoromisonidazole as a probe for hypoxic cells. Radiat Res. 1987;111:292–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rasey JS, Nelson NJ, Chin L, Evans ML, Grunbaum Z. Characteristics of the binding of labeled fluoromisonidazole in cells in vitro. Radiat Res. 1990;122:301–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rasey JS, Koh WJ, Evans ML, Peterson LM, Lewellen TK, Graham MM, et al. Quantifying regional hypoxia in human tumors with positron emission tomography of [18F]fluoromisonidazole: a pretherapy study of 37 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;36:417–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nordsmark M, Overgaard M, Overgaard J. Pretreatment oxygenation predicts radiation response in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Radiother Oncol. 1996;41:31–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gagel B, Piroth M, Pinkawa M, Reinartz P, Zimny M, Kaiser HJ, et al. pO polarography, contrast enhanced color duplex sonography (CDS), [18F] fluoromisonidazole and [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: validated methods for the evaluation of therapy-relevant tumor oxygenation or only bricks in the puzzle of tumor hypoxia? BMC Cancer. 2007;7:113.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gagel B, Reinartz P, Demirel C, Kaiser HJ, Zimny M, Piroth M, et al. [18F] fluoromisonidazole and [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in response evaluation after chemo-/radiotherapy of non-small-cell lung cancer: a feasibility study. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:51.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tatum JL, Kelloff GJ, Gillies RJ, Arbeit JM, Brown JM, Chao KS, et al. Hypoxia: importance in tumor biology, noninvasive measurement by imaging, and value of its measurement in the management of cancer therapy. Int J Radiat Biol. 2006;82:699–757.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kubota K, Tada M, Yamada S, Hori K, Saito S, Iwata R, et al. Comparison of the distribution of fluorine-18 fluoromisonidazole, deoxyglucose and methionine in tumour tissue. Eur J Nucl Med. 1999;26:750–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Spence AM, Muzi M, Swanson KR, O’Sullivan F, Rockhill JK, Rajendran JG, et al. Regional hypoxia in glioblastoma multiforme quantified with [18F]fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography before radiotherapy: correlation with time to progression and survival. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:2623–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rajendran JG, Schwartz DL, O’Sullivan J, Peterson LM, Ng P, Scharnhorst J, et al. Tumor hypoxia imaging with [F-18] fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography in head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:5435–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Thorwarth D, Eschmann SM, Paulsen F, Alber M. A kinetic model for dynamic [18F]-FMISO PET data to analyse tumour hypoxia. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50:2209–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masahiro Kikuchi
    • 1
  • Tomohiko Yamane
    • 2
  • Shogo Shinohara
    • 1
  • Keizo Fujiwara
    • 1
  • Shin-ya Hori
    • 3
  • Yosuke Tona
    • 3
  • Hiroshi Yamazaki
    • 1
  • Yasushi Naito
    • 1
  • Michio Senda
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryKobe City Medical Center General HospitalKobeJapan
  2. 2.Division of Molecular ImagingInstitute of Biomedical Research and InnovationKobeJapan
  3. 3.Department of OtolaryngologyShizuoka General HospitalShizuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations