Annals of Nuclear Medicine

, Volume 24, Issue 8, pp 565–569 | Cite as

Recent developments and future prospects of SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging

Review Article

Abstract

Myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging is the most commonly performed functional imaging for assessment of coronary artery disease. High diagnostic accuracy and incremental prognostic value are the major benefits while suboptimal spatial resolution and significant radiation exposure are the main limitations. Its ability to detect hemodynamic significance of lesions seen on multidetector CT angiogram (MDCTA) has paved the path for a successful marriage between anatomical and functional imaging modalities in the form of hybrid SPECT/MDCTA system. In recent years, there have been enormous efforts by industry and academia to develop new SPECT imaging systems with better sensitivity, resolution, compact design and new reconstruction algorithms with ability to improve image quality and resolution. Furthermore, expected arrival of Tc-99m-labeled deoxyglucose in next few years would further strengthen the role of SPECT in imaging hibernating myocardium. In view of these developments, it seems that SPECT would enjoy its pivotal role in spite of major threat to be replaced by fluorine-18-labeled positron emission tomography perfusion and glucose metabolism imaging agents.

Keywords

Solid-state detector CZT Iterative reconstruction Multi-pinhole collimator Tc-99m-labeled deoxyglucose 

References

  1. 1.
    Udo H, Maros F, Ricardo CC, Antonio J. Pena coronary CT angiography. J Nucl Med. 2006;47(5):797–806.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akira S, Michiaki H, Mieko T, Hirokazu O, Toshihiro N, Hiroyuki H, Atsushi T, Kazutaka A, Mitsuaki I. Quantitative measures of coronary stenosis severity by 64-slice ct angiography and relation to physiologic significance of perfusion in nonobese patients: comparison with stress myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:564–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    DiCarli MF, Hachamovitch R. New technology for noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2007;115:1464–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    George AB. Will cardiac positron emission tomography ultimately replace SPECT for myocardial perfusion imaging? J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;16:841–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Zaman MU. 99mTc-EC-deoxyglucose—a poor man’s 18F-FDG: what will be the future of PET in molecular imaging? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anger HO. Scintillation camera. Rev Sci Instrum. 1958;29(1):27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patton JA, Slomka PJ, Germano G, Berman DS. Recent technologic advances in nuclear cardiology. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14:501–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Slomka PJ, Patton JA, Berman DS, Germano G. Advances in technical aspects of myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;16:255–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jaszczak RJ, Li J, Wang H, Zalutsky MR, Coleman RE. Pinhole collimation for ultra-high-resolution, small-field-of-view SPECT. Phys Med Biol. 1994;39:425–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Funk T, Kirch DL, Koss JE, Botvinick E, Hasegawa BH. A novel approach to multipinhole SPECT for myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:595–602.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Metzler SD, Bowsher JE, Smith MF, Jaszczak RJ. Analytic determination of pinhole collimator sensitivity with penetration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001;20:730–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hudson HM, Larkin RS. Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1994;13:601–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Metz CE. The geometric transfer function component for scintillation camera collimators with straight parallel holes. Phys Med Biol. 1980;25:1059–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kenneth JN, Andrew VT, Christopher JP. Prospects for advancing nuclear cardiology by means of new detector designs. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;16:691–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Keidar Z, Kagna O, Frenkel A, Israel O. A novel ultrafast cardiac scanner for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI): comparison with a standard dual-head camera [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:125P.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gambhir SS, Berman DS, Ziffer J, Nagler M, Sandler M, Patton J, et al. A novel high-sensitivity rapid-acquisition single-photon cardiac imaging camera. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:635–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mario P, Andrea S, Giovanni S, Alberto C. Assessment of coronary flow reserve using single photon emission computed tomography with technetium 99m-labeled tracers. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008;15:456–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kennedy JA, Yosilevsky G, Przewloka K, Israel O, Frenkel A. 3D spatial resolution map and sensitivity characterization of a dedicated cardiac CZT SPECT camera [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:107P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Garcia EV, Tsukerman L, Keidar Z. A new solid state, ultra fast cardiac multi-detector SPECT system. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008;15:S3 (abstract).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maseeh Uz Zaman
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  • Ibrahim Hashmi
    • 3
  • Nosheen Fatima
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Karachi Institute of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine (KIRAN)KarachiPakistan
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyThe Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH)KarachiPakistan
  3. 3.GE Healthcare, Medical DiagnosticsLittle ChalfontUK
  4. 4.Karachi Institute of Heart Diseases (KIHD)KarachiPakistan

Personalised recommendations