Advertisement

Annals of Nuclear Medicine

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 325–334 | Cite as

Japanese guideline for the oncology FDG-PET/CT data acquisition protocol: synopsis of Version 1.0

  • Hiroyoshi FukukitaEmail author
  • Michio Senda
  • Takashi Terauchi
  • Kazufumi Suzuki
  • Hiromitsu Daisaki
  • Keiichi Matsumoto
  • Yasuhiko Ikari
  • Masuo Hayashi
Technical Note

Abstract

This synopsis outlines the Japanese guideline Version 1.0 for the data acquisition protocol of oncology FDG-PET/CT scans that was created by a joint task force of the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine Technology (JSNMT) and the Japanese Council of PET Imaging, and published in Kakuigaku-Gijutsu 29(2):195–235, 2009, in Japanese. The guideline aims at standardizing the PET image quality among facilities and different PET/CT scanner models by determining and/or evaluating the data acquisition condition in experiments using an IEC body phantom, as well as by proposing the criteria for human image quality evaluation using patient noise equivalent count (NEC), NEC density, and liver signal-to-noise ratio.

Keywords

Guideline FDG-PET Oncology NEC QC 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research (21-5-2) of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.

References

  1. 1.
    Mizuta T, Senda M, Okamura T, Kitamura K, Inaoka Y, Takahashi M, et al. NEC density and liver ROI S/N ratio for image quality control of whole-body FDG-PET scans: comparison with visual assessment. Mol Imaging Biol. 2009;11:480–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    National Electrical Manufacturers Association. NEMA Standards Publication NU 2-2007: performance measurement of positron emission tomographs. Rosslyn, VA: National Electrical Manufacturers Association; 2007.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mawlawi O, Podoloff DA, Kohlmyer S, Williams JJ, Stearns CW, Culp RF, et al. Performance characteristics of a newly developed PET/CT scanner using NEMA standards in 2D and 3D modes. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1734–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Surti S, Karp JS. Imaging characteristics of a 3-dimensional GSO whole-body PET camera. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1040–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Erdi YE, Nehmeh SA, Mulnix T, Humm JL, Watson CC. PET performance measurements for an LSO-based combined PET/CT scanner using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2–2001 standard. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:813–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Teräs M, Tolvanen T, Johansson JJ, Williams JJ, Knuuti J. Performance of the new generation of whole-body PET/CT scanners: discovery STE and discovery VCT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:1683–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kemp BJ, Kim C, Williams JJ, Ganin A, Lowe VJ. NEMA NU 2–2001 performance measurements of an LYSO-based PET/CT system in 2D and 3D acquisition modes. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1960–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mejia AA, Nakamura T, Masatoshi I, Hatazawa J, Masaki M, Watanuki S. Estimation of absorbed doses in humans due to intravenous administration of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in PET studies. J Nucl Med. 1991;32:699–706.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hentschel M, Brink I. Lean body mass-based standardized uptake value, derived from a predictive equation, might be misleading in PET studies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29:1630–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    National Electrical Manufacturers Association. NEMA Standards Publication NU 2-2001: performance measurement of positron emission tomographs. Rosslyn, VA: National Electrical Manufacturers Association; 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroyoshi Fukukita
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michio Senda
    • 2
  • Takashi Terauchi
    • 3
  • Kazufumi Suzuki
    • 4
  • Hiromitsu Daisaki
    • 3
  • Keiichi Matsumoto
    • 5
  • Yasuhiko Ikari
    • 2
  • Masuo Hayashi
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyNational Center for Global Health and MedicineIchikawaJapan
  2. 2.Institute of Biomedical Research and InnovationKobeJapan
  3. 3.National Cancer CenterTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Dokkyo Medical University HospitalTochigiJapan
  5. 5.Kyoto College of Medical ScienceKyotoJapan
  6. 6.Osaka Medical College HospitalTakatsukiJapan

Personalised recommendations