Annals of Nuclear Medicine

, Volume 23, Issue 6, pp 569–577 | Cite as

Characterization of thymic masses using 18F-FDG PET-CT

  • Arvind Kumar
  • Subodh Kumar Regmi
  • Roman Dutta
  • Rakesh Kumar
  • Siddhartha Datta Gupta
  • Prasenjit Das
  • Dhanapathi Halanaik
  • Tarun Jindal
Original Article



The resectability and survival may be improved in thymoma and thymic carcinoma with multimodality therapy. Various diagnostic imaging modalities are required for accurate diagnosis and preoperative staging of thymic masses. The present prospective study was planned to evaluate if Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET-CT can help differentiate various thymic lesions noted on conventional imaging modalities.


A prospective study was undertaken in 23 patients who had shown either an anterior mediastinal mass consistent with thymic origin or suspicious for a thymic mass on contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan. All patients underwent whole body FDG PET-CT after intravenous injection of 370 MBq of FDG. The interpretation of PET-CT images was based on the following criteria: FDG uptake (present or absent), SUVmax, pattern of uptake, invasion to surrounding structures, presence of metastasis and necrosis. The results of PET-CT were correlated with the final histopathology following surgery. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 11.5 for Windows software. The mean SUVmax of the 3 groups of pathology was compared using the Kruskal–Wallis Test.


Thymic hyperplasia had an enlarged thymus with mean SUVmax of 1.1. Low risk thymoma had large tumors and their mean SUVmax was 3. High risk thymoma had small tumors with mean SUVmax of 2.1. As a group, thymoma had mean SUVmax value of 2.3. All thymic carcinomas were large, and their mean SUVmax was 7. The difference between the mean SUVmax for thymic hyperplasia, thymoma and thymic carcinoma was statistically significant. The difference between the SUVmax of high risk and low risk thymoma was not significant.


18F-FDG PET-CT can help characterize various thymic lesions noted on conventional imaging modalities. However, larger prospective studies are further required to substantiate these findings.


FDG PET-CT Thymic carcinoma Thymoma Thymic hyperplasia 



Positron emission tomography computed tomography




Maximum standardized uptake value


Full-width half maximum


Mega Becquerel


Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery



This project was supported by All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.


  1. 1.
    Masaoka A, Monden Y, Nakahara K, Tanioka T. Follow-up study of thymomas with special reference to their clinical stages. Cancer. 1981;48(11):2485–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Detterbeck FC, Parsons AM. Thymic tumors. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:1860–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nakahara K, Ohno K, Hashimoto J, Maeda H, Miyoshi S, Sakurai M, et al. Thymoma: results with complete resection and adjuvant postoperative irradiation in 141 consecutive patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988;95(6):1041–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Curran WJ Jr, Kornstein MJ, Brooks JJ, Turrisi AT 3rd. Invasive thymoma: the role of mediastinal irradiation following complete or incomplete surgical resection. J Clin Oncol. 1988;6:1722–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Restrepo CS, Pandit M, Rojas IC, Villamil MA, Gordillo H, Lemos D, et al. Imaging findings of expansile lesions of the thymus. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2005;34(1):22–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    de Kraker M, Kluin J, Renken N, Maat APWM, Bogers AJJC. CT and myasthenia gravis: correlation between mediastinal imaging and histopathological findings. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg. 2005;4:267–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jeong YJ, Lee KS, Kim J, Shim YM, Han J, Kwon OJ. Does CT of thymic epithelial tumors enable us to differentiate histologic subtypes and predict prognosis? Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:283–9.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Inaoka T, Takahashi K, Mineta M, Yamada T, Shuke N, Okizaki A, et al. Thymic hyperplasia and thymus gland tumors: differentiation with chemical shift MR imaging. Radiology. 2007;243:869–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McGowan KM, Long SD, Pekala PH. Glucose transporter gene expression: regulation of transcription and mRNA stability. Pharmacol Ther. 1995;66(3):465–505.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wahl RL. Targeting glucose transporters for tumor imaging: “sweet” idea, “sour” result. J Nucl Med. 1996;37(6):1031–7.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu RS, Yeh SH, Huang MH, Wang LS, Chu LS, Chang CP, et al. Use of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the detection of thymoma: a preliminary report. Eur J Nucl Med. 1995;22(12):1402–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kubota K, Yamada S, Kondo T, Yamada K, Fukuda H, Fujiwara T, et al. PET imaging of primary mediastinal tumours. Br J Cancer. 1996;73(7):882–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sasaki M, Kuwabara Y, Ichiya Y, Akashi Y, Yoshida T, Nakagawa M, et al. Differential diagnosis of thymic tumors using a combination of 11C-methionine PET and FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 1999;40(10):1595–601.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ohtsuka T, Nomori H, Watanabe K, Naruke T, Suemasu K, Kosaka N, et al. Positive imaging of thymoma by 11C-acetate positron emission tomography. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:1132–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sung YM, Lee KS, Kim BT, Choi JY, Shim YM, Yi CA. 18F-FDG PET/CT of thymic epithelial tumors: usefulness for distinguishing and staging tumor subgroups. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1628–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    El-Bawab H, Al-Sugair AA, Rafay M, Hajjar W, Mahdy M, Al-Kattan K. Role of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in thymic pathology. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;31:731–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Endo M, Nakagawa K, Ohde Y, Okumura T, Kondo H, Igawa S, et al. Utility of 18FDG-PET for differentiating the grade of malignancy in thymic epithelial tumors. Lung Cancer. 2008;61(3):350–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Detterbeck FC. Clinical value of the WHO classification system of thymoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:2328–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Meltzer CC, Leal JP, Mayberg HS, Wagner HN Jr, Frost JJ. Correction of PET data for partial volume effects in human cerebral cortex by MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1990;14(4):561–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chen CH, Muzic RF Jr, Nelson AD, Adler LP. Simultaneous recovery of size and radioactivity concentration of small spheroids with PET data. J Nucl Med. 1999;40(1):118–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rousset OG, Ma Y, Evans AC. Correction for partial volume effects in PET: principle and validation. J Nucl Med. 1998;39(5):904–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kumar R, Chauhan A, Zhuang H, Chandra P, Schnall M, Alavi A. Clinicopathologic factors associated with false negative FDG-PET in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;98(3):267–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arvind Kumar
    • 1
  • Subodh Kumar Regmi
    • 1
  • Roman Dutta
    • 1
  • Rakesh Kumar
    • 2
  • Siddhartha Datta Gupta
    • 3
  • Prasenjit Das
    • 3
  • Dhanapathi Halanaik
    • 2
  • Tarun Jindal
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgical DisciplinesAll India Institute of Medical SciencesNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Nuclear MedicineAll India Institute of Medical SciencesNew DelhiIndia
  3. 3.Department of PathologyAll India Institute of Medical SciencesNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations