The Effect of Evaluator Masculinity on Dyadic Hiring Decisions
- 15 Downloads
Research examining gender disparities in the workplace tends to focus on individual behavior rather than the behavior of teams or dyads, yet important workplace decisions such as hiring and promotion decisions are often made by more than one person. The primary aim of the current study was to determine the role of the evaluator masculinity in collaborative, dyadic hiring decisions. Participants were recruited in pairs and given measures to assess their self-agreement with masculine characteristics before evaluating the résumés of two candidates for a student government position. Path analyses revealed that the opinion of each dyad member was predictive of the group decision, but the more masculine member of the dyad had more influence on both the evaluation of the candidates and the hiring decision. Results are discussed in terms of practical considerations for ensuring gender and gender role balance for those engaging in evaluating others for hiring and promotion decisions.
KeywordsMasculinity Gender roles Workplace behavior Decision making
This research was supported with a research grant from The Citadel Foundation. Participants for this study were recruited from The Citadel and the College of Charleston in Charleston, SC. The authors would like to thank Dr. Lisa T. Ross from the College of Charleston and Mary Ann D. Koller for their assistance in gathering participants for this project. Finally, the authors dedicate this manuscript in loving memory of Achilles, a very special cat who was involved in many aspects of this project.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional committees involved (The Citadel IRB and The College of Charleston IRB) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.
- 3.Cheng, C. (1996). “We choose not to compete”: The “merit” discourse in the selection process, and Asian and Asian American men and their masculinity. In C. Cheng (Ed.), Research on men and masculinities series. Masculinities in organizations (Vol. 9, pp. 177–200). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
- 11.McKinsey & Company. (2016). Women in the workplace. Retrieved November 22, 2018, from https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/women-in-the-workplace-2016.
- 12.McKinsey & Company. (2018). Women in the workplace. Retrieved November 22, 2018, from https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/gender-equality/women-in-the-workplace-2018.
- 14.Olian, J. D., Schwab, D. P., & Haberfeld, Y. (1988). The impact of applicant gender compared to qualifications on hiring recommendations: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41(2), 180–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-59788890025-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar