Checking Privilege at the Door: Men’s Reflections on Masculinity in Women’s and Gender Studies Courses
- 765 Downloads
Certain types of masculinity undergird gender inequality, but different contexts may encourage individuals to conceptualize gender in new and unique ways. Women’s and Gender Studies (WGS) university courses support this for women, but less is known about men’s experiences. Through an analysis of interview data from 15 men who have taken WGS courses, we ask: What do men experience in the WGS classroom and how do men perceive that their experiences in WGS courses shape their conceptualizations of gender and gender relations? Men described developing their understandings of gender inequality after taking a WGS course and they applied this knowledge beyond the classroom. We address the different ways men negotiate gendered classroom dynamics, with some men articulating that their gender provided a unique position from which to participate and others reporting more discomfort. We discuss the findings’ implications regarding men disrupting or perpetuating hegemonic understandings of masculinity within educational contexts.
KeywordsWomen’s and Gender Studies College men Masculinity Gender relations
No funding was received to support this research.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Rachel M. Schmitz and Emily Kazyak have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 5.Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- 6.Berger, M. T., & Radeloff, C. L. (2014). Transforming scholarship: Why women’s and gender studies’ students are changing themselves and the world. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 7.Berila, B., Keller, J., Krone, C., Laker, J., & Mayers, O. (2005). His story/her story: A dialogue about including men and masculinities in the women’s studies curriculum. Feminist Teacher, 16, 34–52.Google Scholar
- 13.Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- 14.Charmaz, K., & Belgrave, L. L. (2002). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In J. F. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvasti, & K. D. McKinney (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (pp. 347–365). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- 15.Connell, R. W. (2014). Change among the gatekeepers: Men, masculinities and gender equality in the global arena. Signs, 40, 1801–1825.Google Scholar
- 16.Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- 19.Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- 20.DiAngelo, R., & Sensoy, Ö. (2014). Leaning in: A student’s guide to engaging constructively with social justice content. Radical Pedagogy, 11, 1–10.Google Scholar
- 33.Kaufman, M. (1999). Men, feminism, and men’s contradictory experiences of power. In J. A. Kuypers (Ed.), Men and power (pp. 59–83). Halifax: Fernwood Books.Google Scholar
- 34.Kimmel, M. S. (2004). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame, and silence in the construction of gender identity. In P. S. Rothenberg (Ed.), Race, class, and gender in the United States: An integrated study (pp. 81–93). New York: Worth.Google Scholar
- 35.Kimmel, M. S. (1998). Who’s afraid of men doing feminism? In T. Digby (Ed.), Men doing feminism (pp. 57–68). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 36.Kivel, P. (2013). The act-like-a-man box. In M. S. Kimmel & M. A. Messner (Eds.), Men’s lives (pp. 14–16). New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
- 42.Nash, R. J., Johnson, R. G., III, & Murray, M. C. (2012). Teaching college students communication strategies for effective social justice advocacy. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- 46.Padgett, D. K. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- 51.Reynolds, M. J., Shagle, S., & Venkataraman, L. (2007). A national census of women’s and gender studies programs in US institutions of higher education. University of Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.Google Scholar