Gender Issues

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 34–57 | Cite as

Gendering Abbottabad: Agency and Hegemonic Masculinity in an Age of Global Terrorism

  • Lori Poloni-StaudingerEmail author
  • Candice Ortbals


During the week after the United States’ raid on Osama bin Laden’s compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, in May 2011, the media discussed women associated with the raid. Media reported that bin Laden hid “behind a woman” during the raid, describing bin Laden’s wife as a human shield. The press also discussed a photo of the Situation Room during the raid, calling attention to Hillary Clinton, who was thought to be gasping out of emotion in the photo. The narratives surrounding Amal Ahmed al-Sadah (married to bin Laden) and Secretary Clinton elicit insights into the place of gender vis-à-vis terrorism. In this paper, we content analyze non-op-ed newswires, debating how/whether the media framed al-Sadah and Clinton as political agents, feminine representations, and/or as superfluous to terrorism. We find that the press described Clinton as emotional and largely saw al-Sadah as passive and generically as a wife. Women were portrayed differently than men, who are considered active, but unemotional. Additionally, articles critiqued President Obama’s posture and clothing in the Situation Room and disparaged Osama bin Laden for unmanliness. We therefore conclude that the mainstream, print media press prioritizes hegemonic masculinity when discussing terrorism, overlooking women’s agency and ascribing feminine identities to women and marginalized masculinities to certain men.


Gender Abbottabad Hegemonic masculinity Terrorism 


  1. 1.
    Aday, S., & Devitt, J. (2001). Style over substance: Newspaper coverage of Elizabeth Dole’s presidential bid. The Harvard International Journal of Press Politics, 6(2), 52–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, J. A., Diabah, G., & HMensa, P. A. (2013). Powerful women in powerless language: Media misrepresentation of African women in politics (the case of Liberia). Journal of Pragmatics, 43(10), 2509–2518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Auchter, J. (2012). Gendering terror: Discourses of terrorism and writing woman-as-agent. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 14(1), 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baird, J. (2005). Media tarts: How the Australian press frames female politicians. Carlton North: Scribe.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baldez, L. (2003). Women’s movements and democratic transition in Chile, Brazil, East Germany, and Poland. Comparative Politics, 35(3), 253–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barrett, F. J. (1996). The organizational construction of hegemonic masculinity: The case of the US Navy. Gender, Work, and Organization, 3(3), 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Benford, R. (1997). An insider’s critique of the social movement framing perspective. Sociological Inquiry, 67(4), 409–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bloom, M. (2007). Female suicide bombers: A global trend. Daedalus (Winter), 1–9.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brooks, D., & Collins, G. (2011). The power in a photo. International herald tribune. July 20, 2012.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bystrom, D. G. (2005). Media content and candidate viability: The case of Elizabeth Dole. In M. S. McKinney, L. L. Kaid, D. G. Bystrom, & D. Carlin (Eds.), Communicating politics: Engaging the public in democratic life (pp. 123–133). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cantrell, T. H., & Bachmann, I. (2008). Who is the lady in the window? A comparison of international and national press coverage of first female government heads. Journalism Studies, 9(3), 429–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Connell, R. W. (1989). Masculinity, violence, and war. In M. Kimmel & M. A. Messner (Eds.), Men’s lives (pp. 94–100). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cooper, F. R. (2009). Our first unisex president? Black masculinity and Obama’s feminine side. Paper 52, Suffolk University Law School Faculty Publications. Available online at
  16. 16.
    Donaldson, M. (1993). What is hegemonic masculinity? Theory and Society, 22, 643–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Driedger, M. (2007). Risk and the media: A comparison of print and televised news stories of a Canadian drinking water risk event. Risk Analysis, 27(3), 775–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Entman, R. M. (2004). Reporting environmental policy debate: The real media biases. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 1(3), 77–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fowler, L. L., & Lawless, J. L. (2009). Looking for sex in all the wrong places: Press coverage and the electoral fortunes of gubernatorial candidates. Perspectives on Politics, 7(3), 519–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gerring, J. (2012). Mere description. British Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 721–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Goldstein, J. S. (2001). War and gender: How gender shapes the war system and vice versa. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Heldman, C., Carroll, S., & Olson, P. (2000). Gender differences in print media coverage of presidential candidates: Elizabeth Dole’s bid for the Republican nomination. In Paper presented at the 197 American Political Science Association annual conference, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hirose, A., & Pih, K. K. (2009). Masculinities in mixed martial arts men who strike and men who submit: Hegemonic and marginalized. Men and Masculinities, 13, 190–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hunt, K., & Rygiel, K. (Eds.). (2006). (En)gendering the war on terror. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hutchings, K. (2008). Making sense of masculinity and war. Men and Masculinities, 10(4), 389–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jansen, S. C., & Sabo, D. (1994). The sport/war metaphor: Hegemonic masculinity, the Persian Gulf War, and the new order. Sociology of Sport Journal, 11, 1–17.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Klenke, K. (2011). Women in leadership: Contextual dynamics and boundaries. UK: Emerald.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Krosnell, A. (2005). Gendered practices in institutions of hegemonic masculinity: Reflections from feminist standpoint theory. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7(2), 280–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Levin, D. S. (2011). ‘You’re always first a girl’: Emerging adult women, gender, and sexuality in the Israeli army. Journal of Adolescent Research, 26(1), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lusher, D., & Robins, G. (2009). Hegemonic and other masculinities in local social contexts. Men and Masculinities, 11(4), 387–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Milićević, A. S. (2006). Joining the war: Masculinity, nationalism and war participation in the Balkans war of secession, 1991–1995. Nationalities Papers: The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity, 34(3), 265–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nacos, B. (2005). The portrayal of female terrorists in the media: Similar framing patterns in the 312 news coverage of women in politics and in terrorism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 28(5), 435–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nacos, B. L. (2007). Mass-mediated terrorism: The central role of the media in terrorism and counterterrorism (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Noonan, R. K. (1995). Women against the state: Political opportunities and collective action frames in Chile’s transition to democracy. Sociological Forum, 10(1), 81–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ortbals, C., Rinker, M., & Montoya, C. (2012). Politics closer to home: The impact of subnational institutions on women in politics. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 42(1), 78–107.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Poloni-Staudinger, L., & Ortbals, C. (2013). Terrorism and violent conflict: Women’s agency, leadership and responses. New York: Springer Press.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pantti, M. (2011). Portraying politics: Literary review for the project gender, politics and media: Challenging stereotypes, promoting diversity, strengthening equality. Portraying Politics. June, 15 2011.
  39. 39.
    Schippers, M. (2007). Recovering the feminine other: Masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony. Theoretical Sociology, 36, 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sjoberg, L., & Gentry, C. E. (2007). Mothers, monsters, whores: Women’s violence in global politics. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sreberny, A., & van Zoonen, L. (Eds.). (2000). Gender, politics, and communication. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Stern, M. (2006). Racism, sexism, classism and much more: Reading security-identity in marginalized sites. In B. A. Ackerly, M. Stern, & J. True (Eds.), Feminist methodologies for international relations. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sylvester, C., & Parashar, S. (2009). The contemporary ‘Mahabharata’ and the many ‘Draupadis’: Bringing gender to critical terrorism studies. In R. Jackson, J. Gunning, & M. Breen Smyth (Eds.), Critical terrorism studies: A new research agenda (pp. 178–193). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tuchman, G. (1978). The symbolic annihilation of women by the mass media. In G. Tuchman, A. C. Daniels, & J. Benét (Eds.), Hearth and home: Images of women in the media. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Van Dijck, B. (2002). Screening gender: Gender portrayal and programme making routines. Beirut, Lebanon: Expert Group Meeting of United Nations, Division for the Advancement of Women (DAW). June 20, 2011.
  46. 46.
    Wasburn, P. C. (2011). Media coverage of women in politics: The curious case of Sarah Palin. Media, Culture and Society, 33(7), 1027–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Politics and International AffairsNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA
  2. 2.Social Science Division, Seaver CollegePepperdine UniversityMalibuUSA

Personalised recommendations