Private Bleeding: Self-Induced Abortion in the Twenty-First Century United States
Although not common, self-induced abortion continues to exist in the contemporary United States, where women are being criminalized for the practice. This paper analyzes the reasons that women have for inducing their own abortions given the existence of legal alternatives. It argues that changes in medical technologies and information technologies have made self-abortions safer and more accessible, while structural and cultural barriers have limited access to legal abortions. While some feminists and reproductive rights advocates have problematized the practice of self-aborting itself as dangerous and indicative of the deterioration of the rights guaranteed under Roe v Wade, this paper suggests that feminists must turn their attentions to changing the terms under which abortion is treated under the law.
KeywordsAbortion law Medical abortion Roe v Wade Misoprostol Self-abortion
- 1.Arilha, M., & Regina M. B. (1993) Cytotec in Brazil: ‘At least it doesn’t kill’. Reproductive Health Matters, 2, 41–52.Google Scholar
- 2.Bader, G. R. (1985). Some thoughts on autonomy and equality in relation to Roe v Wade. North Carolina Law Review, 375, 382–386.Google Scholar
- 3.Ballou, B. & Raja M. (2007). Alleged bid to abort leads to baby’s death. The Boston Globe. 25 Jan 2007. http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2007/01/25/alleged_big_to_abort_leads_to_babys_death/. Accessed 20 Aug 2011.
- 4.Baulieu, E. E. (1990). The “Abortion Pill”: RU-486, a woman’s choice. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- 5.Brundrett, R. (2005). Woman’s abortion is unique South Carolina case. The State, 1 May 2005.Google Scholar
- 6.Buckley, C. (2009). For uninsured young adults, do-it-yourself health care. New York Times, 17 Feb 2009.Google Scholar
- 7.Con un pie en dos islas: The sexual and reproductive health of Dominican women in Santo Domingo and New York City. Planned Parenthood/Margaret Sanger Center International, 2008. Electronic pamphlet http://www.plannedparenthood.org/nyc/files/NYC/Dominican_Women.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2011.
- 8.Cox, L. (2008). Some worry underground abortions are still a reality. ABC News. 22 Aug 2008.Google Scholar
- 9.Fielding, S. L., et al. (2002). Having an abortion using mifepristone and home misoprostol: A qualitative analysis of women’s experiences. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34(1), 34–40.Google Scholar
- 10.Friedman, A. (2006). Mail order abortions. Mother Jones. 1 Nov 2006.Google Scholar
- 11.Goldburg, A. B., et al. (2003). Induction of labor: The misoprostol controversy. Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health, 48(4), 244–248.Google Scholar
- 12.Gordon, L. (2007). The moral property of women: A history of birth control politics in America. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
- 13.Gorney, C. (1998). Articles of faith: A frontline history of the abortion wars. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- 14.Guttmacher Institute. (2008). Facts on induced abortion in the United States. Guttmacher Institute. htttp:www.guttmacher.org.
- 15.Inquest on Gabriela Flores. October 8, 2004, case no. 0408-1313. Lexington Country Sheriff’s Department, Lexington South Carolina.Google Scholar
- 16.Jain, J., et al. (2002). A prospective, randomized double-blind trial. Human Reproduction, 17(6), 1477–1482.Google Scholar
- 17.Jensen, J. T., et al. (2010). Acceptability of suction curettage and mifepristone abortion in the United States: A prospective comparison study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 182(6), 1292–1299.Google Scholar
- 18.Lader, L. (1991). RU-486: The pill that could end the abortion wars and why American women don’t have it. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- 19.Lee, J., & Carla, B. (2009). For privacy’s sake. New York Times. 5 Jan 2009.Google Scholar
- 20.Nations, M. K., et al. (1997). Women’s Hidden transcripts about abortion in Brazil. Social Science and Medicine, 44, 1833–1844.Google Scholar
- 21.Ngai, S. W., et al. (2000). Vaginal misoprostol alone for medical abortion up to 9 weeks of gestation: efficacy and acceptability. Human Reproduction, 15, 5.Google Scholar
- 23.Ramirez, P. III. (2007). Self abortion: Woman took tylenol, motrin. Syracuse Post-Standard. 12 April 2007. http://blog.syracuse.com/news/2007/04/west_monroe_woman_charged_with.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2011.
- 24.Raymond, J. (1995). RU-486: Progress or peril? In Joan C. Callahan (Ed.), Reproduction, ethics, and the law: Feminist perspectives. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- 25.Reagan, L. (1997). When abortion was a crime: Women, medicine, and law in the United States, 1867–1973. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- 26.Rose, M. (2007). Safe, legal, and unavailable? Abortion Politics in the United States. Washington: CQ Press.Google Scholar
- 27.Rosing, M., & Archbald, C. (2000). The knowledge, acceptability, and use of misoprostol for self-induced medical abortion in an Urban US population. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, 55(3), 161–163.Google Scholar
- 28.RU-486: Demonstrating a low standard for women’s health? Hearing before the subcommittee on criminal justice, drug police, and human resources of the committee on government reform. House of Representatives, 109th Congress, Second Session, 17 May 2006. https://house.resource.org/109/org.c-span.192580-1.raw.txt. Accessed 20 Aug 2011.
- 29.Siegel, R., & Sara, B. (2006). Mommy dearest? The American Prospect. 17 Sept 2006. http://prospect.org/cs/articles?articleId=12011. Accessed 20 Aug 2011.
- 30.Statement of sentencing rationale. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v Teri Rhodes. No. 110 of 2008. Judge William R. Cunningham. http://eriecountygov.org/dept/courts/pdf/Rhodes%20Sentencing.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2011.
- 31.The Nancy Grace Show. “College athlete accused of killing her own newborn,” first broadcast 20 Sept 2007 by CNN.Google Scholar
- 32.Tillman, L. (2008). Southern border brings easy access to abortion-inducing drug. The Brownsville Herald. 25 March 2008.Google Scholar
- 33.Winikoff, B., et al. (1998). Acceptability and feasibility of early pregnancy termination by mifepristone-misoprostol: Results of a large multicenter trial in the United States. Archive of Family Medicine, 7, 360–366.Google Scholar