Gender Differences in STEM Disciplines: From the Aspects of Informal Professional Networking and Faculty Career Development
- 1.1k Downloads
This study examines informal professional networks (IPNs) and their role in the underrepresentation of women faculty in traditionally male-dominated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. A mixed-methods design was taken in which interviews were conducted during the qualitative phase to gather information of faculty networking experiences and the importance of IPNs in their career development. An online survey was developed based on the findings from the interviews and used to gather data during the quantitative phase to further probe the patterns and functions of IPNs. Major findings are reported, including the meaningful impact of IPNs on the career development of faculty in STEM disciplines and some significant gender differences in networking patterns.
KeywordsInformal professional networks Faculty career development STEM Gender differences
This work was supported in full or in part by a grant from The University of Memphis Faculty Research Grant Fund. This support does not necessarily imply endorsement by the University of research conclusions.
- 1.American Council on Education (ACE). (1988). Educating the majority: Women challenge tradition in higher education. American Council on Education (ACE), Commission on Women in Higher Education. Google Scholar
- 5.Bentley, J. T., & Adamson, R. (2003). Gender differences in the careers of academic scientists and engineers: A literature review. National Science Foundation Special Report, (NSF 00-327). Google Scholar
- 7.Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and topology. Journal of Management, 29, 991–1013.Google Scholar
- 8.Chesler, M. A., & Chesler, N. C. (2002). Gender-informed mentoring strategies for women engineering scholars: On establishing a caring community. Journal of Engineering Education, 91, 49–55.Google Scholar
- 12.Frehill, L., Javurek-Humig, A., & Jeser-Cannavale, C. (2006). Women in engineering: A review of the 2005 literature. Magazine of the Society of Women Engineering, 52, 34–63.Google Scholar
- 13.Garvey, W. D. (1979). Communication: The essence of science. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- 15.Hess, E. (1972). Friendship. In M. W. Riley, M. Johnson, & A. Foner (Eds.), Aging and society (Vol. 3, pp. 357–393). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
- 17.Ibarra, H. (1993). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 18, 56–87.Google Scholar
- 18.Kansas State University. (2009). Summary for NSF ADVANCE site visit. Accessed April 26, 2009, from http://www.k-state.edu/advance/ReportsProgress/Summary%20for%20NSF%20Site%20Visit.doc.
- 19.Kimbrough, W., & Harper, S. R. (2006). African American men at historically Black Colleges and Universities: Different environments, similar challenges. In M. J. Cuyjet and associates (Eds.), African American men in college. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- 23.Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- 24.McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- 29.National Research Council, Committee on Women in Science, Engineering. (1991). Women in science and engineering: Increasing their numbers in the 1990s. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- 30.National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resouces Statistics. (2009). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
- 32.Nelson, D., & Rogers, D. (2005). A national analysis of diversity in science and engineering faculties at research universities. University of Oklahoma, Department of Chemistry. Accessed March 06, 2006 http://cheminfo.chem.ou.edu/~djn/diversity/briefings/Diversity%20Report%20Final.pdf.
- 37.Pell, A. N. (1996). Fixing the leaky pipeline: Women scientists in academia. Journal of Animal Science, 74, 2843–2848.Google Scholar
- 42.Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- 43.Sonnert, G., & Holton, G. (1996). Career patterns of women and men in the sciences. American Scientists, 84, 63–71.Google Scholar