Advertisement

Gender Issues

, 28:134 | Cite as

Gender Differences in STEM Disciplines: From the Aspects of Informal Professional Networking and Faculty Career Development

  • Yonghong Jade XuEmail author
  • Cynthia L. Martin
Original Article

Abstract

This study examines informal professional networks (IPNs) and their role in the underrepresentation of women faculty in traditionally male-dominated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. A mixed-methods design was taken in which interviews were conducted during the qualitative phase to gather information of faculty networking experiences and the importance of IPNs in their career development. An online survey was developed based on the findings from the interviews and used to gather data during the quantitative phase to further probe the patterns and functions of IPNs. Major findings are reported, including the meaningful impact of IPNs on the career development of faculty in STEM disciplines and some significant gender differences in networking patterns.

Keywords

Informal professional networks Faculty career development STEM Gender differences 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in full or in part by a grant from The University of Memphis Faculty Research Grant Fund. This support does not necessarily imply endorsement by the University of research conclusions.

References

  1. 1.
    American Council on Education (ACE). (1988). Educating the majority: Women challenge tradition in higher education. American Council on Education (ACE), Commission on Women in Higher Education. Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    August, L., & Waltman, J. (2004). Culture, climate, and contribution: Career satisfaction among female faculty. Research in Higher Education, 45, 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barber, L. A. (1995). US Women in Science and Engineering, 1960–1990: Progress toward equity? Journal of Higher Education, 66, 213–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Basow, S., & Howe, K. (1985). Role-model influence: Effects of sex and sex-role attitudes in college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 4, 558–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bentley, J. T., & Adamson, R. (2003). Gender differences in the careers of academic scientists and engineers: A literature review. National Science Foundation Special Report, (NSF 00-327). Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berg, H. S., & Ferber, M. A. (1983). Men and women graduate students: Who succeeds and why? Journal of Higher Education, 54, 629–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and topology. Journal of Management, 29, 991–1013.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chesler, M. A., & Chesler, N. C. (2002). Gender-informed mentoring strategies for women engineering scholars: On establishing a caring community. Journal of Engineering Education, 91, 49–55.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clark, S. M., & Corcoran, M. (1986). Perspectives on the professional socialization of women faculty: A case of accumulative disadvantage? The Journal of Higher Education, 57, 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Downing, R. A., Crosby, F. J., & Blake-Beard, S. (2005). The importance of developmental relationships on women undergraduates’ pursuit of science. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 419–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fox, M. F., & Mohapatra, S. (2007). Social-organizational characteristics of work and publication productivity among academic scientists in doctoral-granting departments. The Journal of Higher Education, 78, 542–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Frehill, L., Javurek-Humig, A., & Jeser-Cannavale, C. (2006). Women in engineering: A review of the 2005 literature. Magazine of the Society of Women Engineering, 52, 34–63.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garvey, W. D. (1979). Communication: The essence of science. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goldstein, E. (1979). Effect of same-sex and cross-sex role models on the subsequent productivity of scholars. American Psychologist, 34, 407–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hess, E. (1972). Friendship. In M. W. Riley, M. Johnson, & A. Foner (Eds.), Aging and society (Vol. 3, pp. 357–393). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hurtado, S., Cabrera, N. L., Lin, M. H., Arellano, L., & Espinosa, L. L. (2009). Diversifying science: Underrepresented student experiences in structured research programs. Research in Higher Education, 50, 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ibarra, H. (1993). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 18, 56–87.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kansas State University. (2009). Summary for NSF ADVANCE site visit. Accessed April 26, 2009, from http://www.k-state.edu/advance/ReportsProgress/Summary%20for%20NSF%20Site%20Visit.doc.
  19. 19.
    Kimbrough, W., & Harper, S. R. (2006). African American men at historically Black Colleges and Universities: Different environments, similar challenges. In M. J. Cuyjet and associates (Eds.), African American men in college. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kulis, S., Sicotte, D., & Collins, S. (2002). More than a pipeline problem: Labor supply constraints and gender stratification across academic science disciplines. Research in Higher Education, 43, 657–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lewis, B. F. (2003). A critique of the literature on the underrepresentation of African Americans in science: Directions for future research. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 9, 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Leviton, L. C., & Whitely, S. E. (1981). Job seeking patterns of female and male Ph.D. recipients. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 690–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. (1998). At the margins: A distinctiveness approach to the social identity and social networks of underrepresented groups. Academy of Management Review, 41, 441–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Menges, R. J., & Exum, W. H. (1985). Barriers to the progress of women and minority faculty. Journal of Higher Education, 54, 123–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mitchell, R. E., & Trickett, E. J. (1980). Social networks as mediators of social support. Community Mental Health Journal, 16, 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Morris, L. K., & Daniel, L. G. (2008). Perceptions of a chilly climate: Differences in traditional and non-traditional majors for women. Research in Higher Education, 49, 256–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    National Research Council, Committee on Women in Science, Engineering. (1991). Women in science and engineering: Increasing their numbers in the 1990s. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resouces Statistics. (2009). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nebus, J. (2006). Building collegial information networks: A theory of advice network generation. Academy of Management Review, 31, 615–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nelson, D., & Rogers, D. (2005). A national analysis of diversity in science and engineering faculties at research universities. University of Oklahoma, Department of Chemistry. Accessed March 06, 2006 http://cheminfo.chem.ou.edu/~djn/diversity/briefings/Diversity%20Report%20Final.pdf.
  33. 33.
    Neumark, D., & Gardecki, R. (1998). Women helping women? Role model and mentoring effects on female Ph.D. students in economics. The Journal of Human Resources, 33, 220–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Olsen, D., Maple, S. A., & Stage, F. K. (1995). Women and minority faculty job satisfaction: Professional role interests, professional satisfactions, and institutional fit. The Journal of Higher Education, 66, 267–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Palepu, A., Friedman, R. H., Barnett, R. C., Carr, P. L., Ash, A. S., Szalacha, L., et al. (1998). Junior faculty members’ Mentoring relationships and their professional development in US medical schools. Academic Medicine, 73(318), 318–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Palmer, R., & Gasman, M. (2008). ‘It takes a village’: Social capital and academic success at Historically Black Colleges and Universities. Journal of College Student Development, 49, 52–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pell, A. N. (1996). Fixing the leaky pipeline: Women scientists in academia. Journal of Animal Science, 74, 2843–2848.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Perna, L., Lundy-Wagner, V., Drezner, N. D., Gasman, M., Yoon, S., Bose, E., et al. (2009). The contribution Of HBCUS to the preparation of African American women for STEM careers: A case study. Research in Higher Education, 50, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rose, S. M. (1985). Professional networks of junior faculty in psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 533–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rosser, S. V. (2003). Attracting and retaining women in science and engineering. Academe, 89, 24–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Settles, I. H., Cortina, L. M., Malley, J., & Stewart, A. J. (2006). The climate for women in academic science: The good, the bad, and the changeable. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sonnert, G., & Holton, G. (1996). Career patterns of women and men in the sciences. American Scientists, 84, 63–71.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Terborg, J. R. (1977). Women in management: A research review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 647–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Valian, V. (2005). Beyond gender schemas: Improving the advancement of women in academia. Hypatia, 20, 198–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Vogt, C. M., Hocevar, D., & Hagedorn, L. S. (2007). A social cognitive construct validation: Determining women’s and men’s success in engineering programs. The Journal of Higher Education, 78, 337–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wyche, K. F., & Graves, S. B. (1992). Minority women in academia: Access and barriers to professional participation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 429–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Xu, Y. J. (2008). Gender disparity in STEM disciplines: A study of faculty attrition and turnover intentions. Research in Higher Education, 49, 607–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MemphisMemphisUSA
  2. 2.University of Memphis, Office of Institutional ResearchMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations